Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy of Post-operative Denosumab Strategy for Giant Cell Tumor of Bone Treatment in China

Safety and Efficacy of Post-operative Denosumab Strategy for Giant Cell Tumor of Bone Treatment in China:Correlation Between Recurrence and Drug Withdrawl

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03358212
Enrollment
100
Registered
2017-11-30
Start date
2018-03-01
Completion date
2021-06-01
Last updated
2017-11-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Giant Cell Tumor of Bone

Keywords

giant cell tumor of bone, Denosumab, post-operative

Brief summary

This prospective observational study is going to figure out the safety and efficacy of denosumab as an post-operative strategy.All the patients enrolled will take denosumab according to the protocols.We focus on the recurrence rate after the drug withdrawl and possibility of malignant transformation.

Detailed description

This prospective observational study is going to figure out the safety and efficacy of denosumab as an post-operative strategy. This study only included patients who meet all the following criteria: (1) With treatment-naïve sacral giant-cell tumor (GCT) firstly treated in our center (for referral patients, only those with definite diagnosis were included); (2) Being diagnosed with classic giant-cell tumor of bone (GCTB) by puncture pathology prior to treatment (for referral patients, definite diagnosis shall be made by the Pathology Department in our center through pathology consultation on tissue sections); (3) previously denosumab-naïve. Data collection:The following data of patients included in this study were collected: (1) basic information: age, gender; (2) pathological data: puncture pathological diagnosis, and postoperative pathological findings; (3) the imaging findings (including X-ray, CT, Magnetic resonance(MR), Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography(PET-CT)) and functional assessment of patients in the neoadjuvant denosumab group before and after the use of denosumab; (4) intraoperative blood loss, and duration of operation; (5) imaging findings in postoperative follow-up re-examination and outcome. functional assessment: For sacral giant cell tumor:The Motor Urination defecation(MUD) scoring system published on Spine by our center in 2016 , which include three domains (motor function and sensation of lower limbs \[M\], urination and uriesthesia \[U\], and Defecation and rectal sensation \[D\]) with three items in each domain (each item can be scored by 0, 1, 2 or 3, and the maximum score is 27), was applied in the functional assessment of sacral nerves. For GCT occurs in Limbs ,we use Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) 93 to record the function. All the patients enrolled will take denosumab according to the protocols:denosumab 120mg was administrated to patients by subcutaneous injection every four weeks, with loading doses on Day 8 and Day 15 of the first cycle,them take it monthly till 1 year after the surgery.We focus on the recurrence rate after the drug withdrawl and possibility of malignant transformation.

Interventions

DRUGDenosumab

Denosumab 120mg was administrated to patients by subcutaneous injection every four weeks, with loading doses on Day 8 and Day 15 of the first cycle.Patients were instructed to take calcium supplements orally every day and avoid any oral operation during treatment

Sponsors

Peking University People's Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

(1) With treatment-naïve sacral GCT firstly treated in our center (for referral patients, only those with definite diagnosis were included); (2)single center lesion (3) Being diagnosed with classic GCTB by puncture pathology prior to treatment (for referral patients, definite diagnosis shall be made by the Pathology Department in our center through pathology consultation on tissue sections); (4) previously denosumab-naïve.

Exclusion criteria

(1)primary malignant giant cell tumor of bone(2)radiation therapy in history(3)lung metastasis at first diagnosis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
recurrence without metastasisup to 2 yearsCT or MR proof that the tumor relapse in the primary site by at least two radiologist

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
metastasis without recurrenceup to 2 yearsconfirmed via lung CT scan by at least two radiologist
death from other diseaseup to 2 yearspatient die from another disease but must not from giant cell tumor
death from giant cell tumorup to 2 yearspatient die from the tumor itself

Contacts

Primary ContactChen Zhongyan, MD
harrypotterchen@126.com+8615201285835
Backup ContactYang Yi, MD,PHD
bonetumor@163.com+86-13701312827

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026