Skip to content

Prevalence and Outcome of Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure in Wales

Prevalence and Outcome of Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure in Wales

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03358043
Acronym
PANDORAWALES
Enrollment
1100
Registered
2017-11-30
Start date
2017-10-01
Completion date
2018-08-31
Last updated
2019-07-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Respiratory Insufficiency

Keywords

respiratory failure, mechanical ventilation, prevalence

Brief summary

This study is aimed to establish the epidemiological chacacteristics and clinical outcomes of mechanically ventilated patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure admitted in a network of hospitals from Wales (U.K.).

Detailed description

The present study is aimed to establish the epidemiological characteristics and clinical outcomes of adult mechanically ventilated patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure \[defined as a PaO2/FiO2 ≤300 mmHg on positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 cmH2O or more and FiO2 of 0.3 or more\] admitted in a network of hospitals from Wales (U.K.). Although there are few previous published observational studies examining the incidence and mortality of patients with acute respiratory failure and ARDS, there are no studies specifically assessing the epidemiological characteristics, patterns of ventilation and clinical outcomes in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in the current era of lung protective ventilation. This study will be done simultaneously with the PANDORA (NCT03145974) in Spain. The study is aimed to improve the knowledge on the epidemiology and outcome of ventilated patients, to identify the percentage of patients developing ARDS under the current definition, to validate a bedside scoring system for stratification of lung severity, and to examine the prognosis of hypoxemic respiratory failure, and risk factors associated with fatal outcome.

Interventions

DEVICEmechanical ventilation

Consecutive intubated pateints receiving mechanical ventilation with a PaO2/FiO2≤300 mmHg on positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 cmH2O or more and FiO2 of 0.3 or more.

Sponsors

Asociación Científica Pulmón y Ventilación Mecánica
CollaboratorOTHER
Consorcio Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red (CIBER)
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Dr. Negrin University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥18-year old. * Endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation, independent of whether the need for ventilatory support is shorter or longer than 24 hours. Only patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation can be included, although patients could have been on non-invasive ventilation before intubation. * PaO2/FiO2 ≤300 mmHg on invasive mechanical ventilation with a PEEP of 5 cmH2O or more, and with a FiO2 of 0.3 or more.

Exclusion criteria

* No patients shhould be excluded (if they meet all the inclusion criteria), regardless of the underlying disease, estimated life expectancy, or duration of invasive mechanical ventilation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Prevalence of hypoxemic acute respiratory failure4 monthsThe investigators will calculate the prevalence in relation to: (i) total number of ICU admissions; (ii) total number of mechanically ventilated patients during the study period; and (iii) per ICU bed available over the study period.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Death in the hospitalHospital stay (maximum 6 months)outcome before discharge to home (overall and in each category of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure)

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026