Skip to content

Sulopenem Followed by Sulopenem-etzadroxil/Probenecid vs Ertapenem Followed by Cipro for Complicated UTI in Adults

Prospective, Phase 3, Randomized, Multi-center, Double-blind, Double-dummy Study of Efficacy, Tolerability & Safety of Sulopenem Followed by Sulopenem-etzadroxil/Probenecid vs Ertapenem Followed by Cipro for Treatment of cUTI in Adults

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03357614
Enrollment
1395
Registered
2017-11-30
Start date
2018-09-18
Completion date
2019-12-14
Last updated
2020-12-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Complicated Urinary Tract Infections

Brief summary

This is a prospective, phase 3, randomized, multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy study to compare the efficacy and safety of sulopenem followed by sulopenem-etzadroxil/probenecid versus ertapenem followed by ciprofloxacin for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) in adults.

Interventions

Antibiotic therapy for complicated UTI

Antibiotic therapy for complicated UTI

DRUGErtapenem

Antibiotic therapy for complicated UTI

DRUGCiprofloxacin

Antibiotic therapy for complicated UTI

Antibiotic therapy for complicated UTI

Sponsors

Iterum Therapeutics, International Limited
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Adults ≥18 years of age with more than 24 hours of urinary symptoms attributable to a UTI 2. Able to provide informed consent 3. Clinically documented pyelonephritis or complicated urinary tract infection: 1. Pyelonephritis with normal anatomy 2. Complicated UTI as defined by one or more of the following factors: i. The presence of an indwelling catheter ii. \>100 mL of residual urine after voiding iii. Neurogenic bladder iv. Obstructive uropathy due to nephrolithiasis, tumor or fibrosis v. Azotemia due to intrinsic renal disease vi. Urinary retention in men possibly due to benign prostatic hypertrophy vii. Surgically modified or abnormal urinary tract anatomy 4. At least two of the following signs or symptoms: 1. Rigors, chills or fever/hypothermia 2. Flank pain or pelvic pain 3. Nausea or vomiting 4. Dysuria, urinary frequency or urinary urgency 5. Costovertebral angle tenderness on physical examination 5. A mid-stream urine specimen with: 1. a dipstick analysis positive for nitrite AND 2. evidence of pyuria as defined by either: i. a dipstick analysis positive for leukocyte esterase AND/OR ii. at least 10 white blood cells per cubic millimeter on microscopic analysis of unspun urine AND/OR iii. White blood cell count ≥10 cells/high-powered field in urine sediment

Exclusion criteria

1. Receipt of effective antibacterial drug therapy for complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI) for a continuous duration of more than 24 hours during the previous 72 hours. Patients who have objective documentation of clinical progression of cUTI while on antibacterial drug therapy, or patients who received antibacterial drugs for surgical prophylaxis and then develop cUTI, may be appropriate for enrollment. 2. Subjects with an organism isolated from the urine within the last year known to be resistant to ertapenem 3. Severe structural or functional urinary tract abnormality responsible for an intractable infection which in the opinion of the investigator would require \> 10 days of therapy or post-treatment prophylaxis (eg. patients with chronic vesiculo-ureteral reflux). 4. Uncomplicated UTI 5. Patients with paraplegia/quadriplegia 6. Hypotension with systolic blood pressure \< 90 mm Hg 7. Complicated UTI associated with complete obstruction, emphysematous pyelonephritis, known or suspected renal or perinephric abscess or expected to require surgical intervention (not placement of catheters) to achieve cure 8. Patients with a known history of myasthenia gravis 9. Patients who require concomitant administration of tizanidine or valproic acid 10. Patients with a history of allergy to carbapenems or quinolones or amoxicillin-clavulanate or other beta-lactams, or hypersensitivity to probenecid 11. Renal transplantation 12. Patients requiring dialysis 13. Acute or chronic prostatitis 14. High risk for cUTI caused by Pseudomonas sp. (eg,. history of prior UTI due to Pseudomonas species, recent steroid use, others) 15. Chronic indwelling catheters or stents 16. Ileal loops or vesico-urethral reflux 17. Recent trauma to the pelvis or urinary tract within the prior 30 days 18. History of seizures 19. Patients with a history of blood dyscrasias 20. Patients with a history of uric acid kidney stones 21. Patients with acute gouty attack 22. Patients on chronic methotrexate therapy 23. Females of child-bearing potential who are unable to take adequate contraceptive precautions, have a positive pregnancy test result within 24 hours of study entry, are otherwise known to be pregnant, or are currently breastfeeding an infant. 24. Male subjects must agree to use of an effective barrier method of contraception during the study and for 14 days post treatment 25. Patients known to have a history of liver or kidney disease or neutropenia as defined by the following baseline laboratory criteria: * Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) \> 3 X Upper Limit of Normal * Total bilirubin \> 2 X Upper Limit of Normal * Neutropenia (\<1000 cells/mm3) 26. Patients participating in any other clinical study that involved the administration of an investigational medication 27. Patient immunocompromised 28. Patients unlikely to comply with the protocol 29. Patients considered unlikely to survive the 4-week study period or has a rapidly progressive or terminal illness

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Overall SuccessDay 21 +/- 1 dayClinical success is defined as complete resolution of cUTI symptoms present at study entry and no new cUTI symptoms; microbiologic success is defined as eradication of the bacterial pathogen found at study entry (reduced to \<1000 CFU/mL)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic SuccessDay 21 +/- 1 dayMicrobiologic success is defined as demonstrating \<1000 CFU/mL of the baseline urpathogen by quantitative urine culture

Countries

Estonia, Georgia, Hungary, Latvia, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Sulopenem
Sulopenem 1000 mg IV once daily for a minimum of 5 days, followed by sulopenem-etzadroxil/probenecid 500 mg PO twice daily to complete 7-10 total days of treatment Sulopenem: Antibiotic therapy for complicated UTI Sulopenem-Etzadroxil/Probenecid: Antibiotic therapy for complicated UTI
697
Ertapenem
Ertapenem 1000 mg IV once daily for a minimum of 5 days, followed by ciprofloxacin 500 mg PO twice daily or amoxicillin-clavulanate 500 mg PO twice daily to complete 7-10 total days of treatment Ertapenem: Antibiotic therapy for complicated UTI Ciprofloxacin: Antibiotic therapy for complicated UTI Amoxicillin-clavulanate: Antibiotic therapy for complicated UTI
698
Total1,395

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicSulopenemErtapenemTotal
Age, Continuous57.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.2
59.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.2
58.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 18.2
Diabetes114 Participants114 Participants228 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
22 Participants20 Participants42 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
672 Participants675 Participants1347 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Bulgaria
150 participants145 participants295 participants
Region of Enrollment
Croatia
8 participants6 participants14 participants
Region of Enrollment
Czechia
8 participants10 participants18 participants
Region of Enrollment
Estonia
16 participants18 participants34 participants
Region of Enrollment
Georgia
81 participants92 participants173 participants
Region of Enrollment
Hungary
70 participants47 participants117 participants
Region of Enrollment
Latvia
31 participants42 participants73 participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
3 participants3 participants6 participants
Region of Enrollment
Russia
180 participants194 participants374 participants
Region of Enrollment
Serbia
1 participants4 participants5 participants
Region of Enrollment
Slovakia
10 participants8 participants18 participants
Region of Enrollment
Ukraine
109 participants98 participants207 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
30 participants31 participants61 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
389 Participants380 Participants769 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
308 Participants318 Participants626 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 6970 / 698
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 6970 / 698
serious
Total, serious adverse events
14 / 6976 / 698

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With Overall Success

Clinical success is defined as complete resolution of cUTI symptoms present at study entry and no new cUTI symptoms; microbiologic success is defined as eradication of the bacterial pathogen found at study entry (reduced to \<1000 CFU/mL)

Time frame: Day 21 +/- 1 day

Population: Analysis population is the microbiologic modified intent-to-treat population (all modified intent-to-treat patients with a positive study entry urine culture within 48 hours prior to first dose, defined as \>100,000 CFU/mL of a uropathogen and no more than 2 species of a uropathogen \>100,000 CFU/mL; if 1 of the uropathogens was also isolated from baseline blood culture, however, the patient was included in this population regardless of the baseline urine culture result).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SulopenemPercentage of Participants With Overall Success301 Participants
ErtapenemPercentage of Participants With Overall Success325 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Microbiologic Success

Microbiologic success is defined as demonstrating \<1000 CFU/mL of the baseline urpathogen by quantitative urine culture

Time frame: Day 21 +/- 1 day

Population: Analysis population is the microbiologic modified intent-to-treat population (all modified intent-to-treat patients with a positive study entry urine culture within 48 hours prior to first dose, defined as \>100,000 CFU/mL of a uropathogen and no more than 2 species of a uropathogen \>100,000 CFU/mL; if 1 of the uropathogens was also isolated from baseline blood culture, however, the patient was included in this population regardless of the baseline urine culture result).

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
SulopenemPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Success316 Participants
ErtapenemPercentage of Participants With Microbiologic Success343 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 11, 2026