Skip to content

Effect of an Observer Tool on Learning Outcomes During High Fidelity Simulation

Impact of the Use of an Observer Tool Based on Technical Skills on Learning Outcomes in Anesthesia Residents Undergoing High Fidelity Simulation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03356717
Enrollment
89
Registered
2017-11-29
Start date
2017-06-23
Completion date
2017-06-30
Last updated
2017-11-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Simulation

Keywords

simulation, high-fidelity, observer tool; learning outcomes

Brief summary

The increasing use of high-fidelity simulation is limited by the imbalance between the growing number of students and the human resources available in such a way that all residents cannot play a role during scenarios. The learning outcomes of observers need to be studied in more depth. Previous studies have provided controversial results but overall no significant differences in learning outcomes can be demonstrated between observers and participants engaged as players in scenarios. Moreover, preliminary data suggest that learning outcomes of observers might be improved by using an observer tool during the scenario. However, no high-quality study has yet shown if this assumption is verified. In the present study, 3rd-4th year residents in anesthesia will be randomized before high fidelity scenarios to act as observers only or active participants in some scenarios and observers in others. The main outcome parameter will be the learning outcomes by comparing data obtained before and after the sessions by using questionnaires specifically dedicated to the knowledge of technical skills in the management of crisis scenarios.

Detailed description

The increasing use of high-fidelity simulation in France during the anesthesia curriculum is limited by the imbalance between the growing number of students and the human resources available in such a way that all residents cannot play a role during scenarios. This leads to a new situation in which not all residents can be an active participant in scenarios with some remaining observers all along the simulation sessions. Based on Kolb experiential theory, this situation should lead to a decreased knowledge acquisition. Previous studies have however provided controversial results but overall no significant differences in learning outcomes can be demonstrated between observers and participants engaged as players in scenarios. Moreover, preliminary data suggest that learning outcomes of observers might be improved by using an observer tool during the scenario. However, no high-quality study has yet shown if this assumption is verified. In the present study, after informed consent will be obtained, 3rd-4th year residents in anesthesia will be randomized before high fidelity scenarios to act as observers only or active participants in some scenarios and observers in others. The main outcome parameter will be the learning outcomes by comparing data obtained before and after the sessions by using questionnaires specifically dedicated to the knowledge of technical skills in the management of crisis scenarios. In addition, self-efficacy of the simulation sessions will be explored through the responses to additional questionnaires evaluating the change in non-technical skills after the sessions.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALeducational intervention with observer tool

To assess if the use of an observer tool by observers during high fidelity simulation improves learning outcomes

BEHAVIORALeducational intervention

without observer tool

Sponsors

Université Paris-Sud
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

randomized study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 40 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

residents in anesthesia

Exclusion criteria

none

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Learning outcomes assessing knowledge of technical skillsmeasured before and immediately after the sessionThe main outcome parameter will be the learning outcomes by comparing data obtained before and after the sessions by using questionnaires specifically dedicated to the knowledge of technical skills in the management of crisis scenarios: change will be assessed

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
self assessment of the effect of the simulation session on non-technical skillsmeasured immediately after the sessionSelf-efficacy of the simulation sessions will be explored through the responses to additional questionnaires evaluating the change in non-technical skills after the sessions

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026