Skip to content

Combined Plexus Block for Hip Fracture Surgery.

Is the Combined Plexus Block a Real Alternative for Hip Fracture Surgery in the Elderly? A Comparison With General Anesthesia and Continuous Spinal Anesthesia Using a Propensity Score in a Retrospective Cohort Study.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03356704
Enrollment
593
Registered
2017-11-29
Start date
2016-08-31
Completion date
2017-10-26
Last updated
2018-07-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hip Fractures

Keywords

adults

Brief summary

Hip fracture surgery requires high risk anesthetic procedure for elderly patients (1). General anesthesia, continuous spinal anesthesia and peripheral nerve blocks are three anesthetic techniques possible. Continuous spinal anesthesia has proven its efficacity to provide an intraoperative haemodynamic stability wich guarantees good patients outcomes (2), in comparison with general anesthesia but there is poor evidence in the literature concerning the use of peripheral nerve blocks. The primary objective of this study was to compare intraoperative haemodynamic stability provides by peripheral nerve block versus general anesthesia and continuous spinal anesthesia. Secondary outcomes included : use of vasoactive drugs, opioids consumption, lengh of stay and inhospital mortality.

Detailed description

After receiving the ethic approval from the CERAR, the investigators retrospectively identified all patients who underwent hip fracture surgery from January 1 2015, to December 31, 2016 in the CHU of Montpellier. The exclusion criteria were: multiple trauma victims, two hip fractures in the same patient and single shot spinal anesthesia. In our institution the investigators used to perform three types of anesthesia: general anesthesia (GA), continuous spinal anesthesia (CSA) and combined plexus blocks (CPB). The investigators therefore made three groups GA, CSA and CPB and used a propensity score to make these groups comparable. The matching criteria were age, arterial hypertension, ASA status, Frailty score, chronic cardiac failure and type of surgery.

Interventions

OTHERno intervention

Observational study

Sponsors

University Hospital, Montpellier
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

* Adult * Hip fracture surgery

Exclusion criteria

* Multiple trauma victims * Second hip fracture in same patient * Single shot spinal anesthesia

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intraoperative hypotension1 dayDecrease of at least 30% of mean arterial pressure

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
measure the total consumption of the vasopressive molecules1 daymeasure the total consumption of the vasopressive molecules (necessary when the voltage drops by more than 30% compared to the average reference voltage) : Use of vasoactive drugs
Length of stay1 dayLength of stay
compare the use of emergency antalgics1 daycompare the use of emergency antalgics : opioids consumption
Inhospital mortality1 dayInhospital mortality

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 22, 2026