Skip to content

Comparison Between Supervised Group Exercise and Home Exercise Program for Knee Osteoarthritis

Comparison Between Supervised Group Exercise and Home Exercise Program for Knee Osteoarthritis

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03356431
Enrollment
46
Registered
2017-11-29
Start date
2017-04-18
Completion date
2019-12-31
Last updated
2022-02-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Keywords

Exercise therapy, Physical Therapy

Brief summary

Physical exercise is a widely recommended treatment modality for osteoarthritis, which can be performed through a supervised group exercise or a home exercise program. However, up to now only little research has been conducted on the home exercise program in Brazil. The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy between supervised group exercise and home exercise program in people with knee osteoarthritis. Methods: The study population consists of 46 men and woman with knee osteoarthritis aged between 40 and 65. The patients should be clinically diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis and classified in Kelgreen-Laurence grades I, II and III. Primary outcomes are the Westerm Ontário and McMaster Universities (WOMAC), Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, 40-meter walk test, isometric strength of hip (abduction and adduction) and knee (flexion and extension) and postural control. The patients are randomized into 2 groups, with one group receiving 12 sessions of supervised group exercise and the other group following an exercise program at home. The program lasts 6 weeks with both groups receiving the same exercise protocol consisting of stretching, isometric and isotonic exercises for major muscle groups in both lower extremities. The Mann-Whitney U test is used to examine the Anthropometric variables. The ANOVA is used to compare outcomes before and after treatment. A value of p\< 0.05 is considered to be statistically signifcant.

Interventions

* Quadriceps muscle isometric contraction in sitting position 1 set of 3-3 reps × 1 min hold. * Isotonic quadriceps contraction with resistance band 3 sets of 10 reps x 1min hold. * Isotonic hamstring contraction with resistance band 3 sets of 10 reps x 1min hold. * Sit to stand exercise during 1 min. * Dynamic stepping exercise (walking up and down one step/stair during 1 min). * Standing calf stretch 3 x 20 sec. * Standing quadriceps stretching 3 x 20 sec. * Supine hamstring stretching 3 x 20 sec.

OTHERHome-based exercise

* Quadriceps muscle isometric contraction in sitting position 1 set of 3-3 reps × 1 min hold. * Isotonic quadriceps contraction with resistance band 3 sets of 10 reps x 1min hold. * Isotonic hamstring contraction with resistance band 3 sets of 10 reps x 1min hold. * Sit to stand exercise during 1 min. * Dynamic stepping exercise (walking up and down one step/stair during 1 min). * Standing calf stretch 3 x 20 sec. * Standing quadriceps stretching 3 x 20 sec. * Supine hamstring stretching 3 x 20 sec.

Sponsors

Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* age between 45 and 65 years; * Kellgren-Lawrence Grade I, II and III with knee osteoarthritis determined clinically and radiographically.

Exclusion criteria

* history of surgery in the lower limb; * patients who performed physiotherapy in the last six months; * disease or disability which contraindicate the performance of the exercise training (vestibular problems, cardiorespiratory, rheumatic and neurological diseases).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Westerm Ontário and McMaster Universities15 minThe Westerm Ontário and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) questionnaire is a multidimensional measure of pain, stiffness, and physical functional disability in patients with osteoarthritis. In this study we will use the Visual Analogue Scale format with 24 items and five response levels for each item (none- 0 points, mild-25, moderate-50, severe-75 or extreme-100 points). The range of the scores is function (0-1700), pain (0-500) and stiffness (0-200) and the final score of each item is obtained by dividing the final result by the number of questions of each item. The total score is obtained by adding all the items and dividing by 24. Scores range from 0 to 100 for the total WOMAC, where 0 represents the best health status and 100 the worst possible status. The higher the score, the poorer the function.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)10 minThis is a 13-item scale for use in assessing catastrophizing in clinical and nonclinical populations. Each PCS item is rated on a 5-point scale: 0 (not at all) to 4 (all the time). People are asked to indicate the degree to which they have the above thoughts and feelings when they are experiencing pain. The PCS total score is computed by summing responses to all 13 items. PCS total scores range from 0 - 52. The PCS subscales are computed by summing the responses to the following items: Rumination: Sum of items 8, 9, 10, 11 Magnification: Sum of items 6, 7, 13 Helplessness: Sum of items 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 12. Higher values representing greater catastrophizing.
Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia10 minThe Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK) is a 17 item questionnaire used to assess the subjective rating of kinesiophobia or fear of movement. Items are scored on a 4-point Likert scale with scoring possibilities ranging from 'strongly disagree' (score=1) to 'strongly agree' (score=4). This is a self-completed questionnaire and the range of scores are from 17 to 68. A total score is calculated after inversion of the individual scores of items 4, 8, 12 and 16 and then summing responses to all 17 items. Higher scores indicate an increasing degree of kinesiophobia.
Body Mass Index5 min.Body mass index (BMI) is a measure of body fat based on height and weight. BMI is defined as the body mass divided by the square of the body height, and is universally expressed in units of kg/m2, resulting from mass in kilograms and height in metres.
Lower Extremity Functional Scale10 minThe Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) is a questionnaire containing 20 questions about a person's ability to perform everyday tasks. It is intended for use on adults with lower extremity conditions. The questionnaire containing five levels for each item, representing different degrees of difficulty to perform the listed activities (1- Extreme Difficulty or Unable to Perform Activity, 2- Quite a Bit of Difficulty, 3- Moderate Difficulty, 4- A Little Bit of Difficulty, 5- No Difficulty). The columns on the scale are summed to get a total score and the scores range between 0 to 80. The higher score means less functional impairment.
Isometric strength of hip and knee35 min.Maximal voluntary isometric contraction is measure with a hand-held dynamometer (Microfet 2m Hoogan Health Industries, West Jordan, UT, USA). Knee extension and flexion strength will be tested isometrically at 90° of knee flexion and hip abduction and aduction strength will be in tested in side-lying. Participants are instructed to perform 3 maximal voluntary isometric contractions for 5 seconds on each leg, with 10 seconds of rest between trials. The average muscle force of three repetitions will be calculated for each muscle group. The values are measured in kilogram-force and normalized to body weight (in kilograms).
Postural control30 min.Postural control is evaluated using two force platform (AMTI, model OR6-6-2000) and patients are asked to stand barefoot with one foot on each platform, arms along the sides, remaining as stable as possible looking to a point located 3 meters in front. All participants will be tested under four different postural conditions (eyes open, eyes closed and firm support, foam support) during three 30-s trials with one minute of rest provided between trials . The center of pressure (COP) velocity (m/s) and amplitude for medial/lateral (m/cm2) and anterior/posterior (m/cm2) directions will be analised.
40-meter walk test2 minThe 40-meter walk test assesses the time it takes to walk short distances. Participants are asked to walk as quickly but as safely as possible to a mark 10 m away, return, and repeat for a total distance of 40 m. Subjects are timed for this test and data are expressed as speed. The time it takes to cover a specified distance is recorded in seconds and id measured with a stopwatch. This time is converted to a walking speed by dividing the distance covered by the time taken and is expressed as meters/second. Higher values represent better performance.

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026