Skip to content

Exercise Dose and Metformin for Vascular Health in Metabolic Syndrome

Exercise Dose and Metformin for Vascular Health in Adults With Metabolic Syndrome

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03355469
Enrollment
91
Registered
2017-11-28
Start date
2017-08-07
Completion date
2024-05-23
Last updated
2025-09-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Metabolic Syndrome

Brief summary

Health organizations recommend exercise in an intensity based manner to promote cardiovascular adaptation and prevent disease. Metformin is a common anti-diabetes medication that reduces future type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. However, the optimal dose of exercise to be combined with metformin for vascular health remains unknown. The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether combining high or low intensity exercise with metformin has the potential to outperform either exercise intensity alone on blood flow across the arterial tree as well as impact insulin action in individuals with metabolic syndrome. Identification of such outcomes will indicate 1) whether and how metformin should be combined with physical activity for CVD prevention, 2) provide the first indication of whether exercise intensity reduces CVD risk via multi-level vasculature function vs. metabolic insulin action, and 3) provide a rational early treatment for people with metabolic syndrome to prevent/treat type 2 diabetes and CVD.

Interventions

DRUGMetformin

Oral metformin 2000 mg/d for 16 weeks. Metformin dosage will follow 500 mg/d ramp up progression: Week 1 = 500 mg/d; Week 2 = 1,000 mg/d; Week 3 = 1500 mg/d; Week 4-16 = 2000 mg/d.

DRUGPlacebo

Oral placebo for 16 weeks. Placebo tablets will follow a four-stage progression: Week 1 = 1 tablet; Week 2 = 2 tablets; Week 3 = 3 tablets; Week 4-16 = 4 tablets.

Low intensity exercise will consist of 16 weeks of walking at \ 55% of each participant's predetermined VO2max and monitored via heart rate. Supervised exercised will occur on a treadmill 3d/wk and the duration will be determined based on individual fitness levels to expand 400 kcals. Supervised exercise training will follow a three-phase progression: Weeks 1-2 = 3 supervised sessions at 75% duration; Week 3-4 = 3 supervised sessions at 87% duration; Weeks 5-16 = 3 supervised sessions at 100% duration. Unsupervised exercised will be 2d/wk and the duration will half the time of the supervised training sessions.

BEHAVIORALHigh Intensity Exercise

High intensity exercise will consist of 16 weeks of walking at \ 85% of each participant's predetermined VO2max and monitored via heart rate. Supervised exercised will occur on a treadmill 3d/wk and the duration will be determined based on individual fitness levels to expand 400 kcals. Supervised exercise training will follow a three-phase progression: Weeks 1-2 = 3 supervised sessions at 75% duration; Week 3-4 = 3 supervised sessions at 87% duration; Weeks 5-16 = 3 supervised sessions at 100% duration. Unsupervised exercised will be 2d/wk and the duration will half the time of the supervised training sessions.

Sponsors

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
CollaboratorNIH
Rutgers University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Each subject will be randomly assigned to receive low intensity exercise training + placebo, high intensity exercise training + placebo, or these exercise programs with metformin.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female ≥40 and ≤80 years old. * Has a body mass index ≥25 and ≤47 kg/m2. * Not diagnosed with Type 2 or Type 1 diabetes * Not currently engaged in \> 150 min/wk of exercise * Weight stable (\<2kg weight change in past 3 months) * Non-smoking \>5 years At minimum, subject will have abdominal obesity (increased waist circumference as defined below) and may have any additional National Cholesterol Education Adult Treatment Panel III Metabolic Syndrome criteria: * Increased waist circumference (≥102 cm in men; ≥88 cm in women) * Elevated triglycerides (≥150 mg/dl), or on medication for treating the condition * Reduced HDL-cholesterol (\<40mg/dl in men, \<50 mg/dl in women), or on medication for treating the condition * High blood pressure (≥130 mmHg systolic or ≥85mmHg diastolic), or on medication for treating the condition * Elevated fasting glucose (≥100 mg/dl), or on medication for treating the condition * Other major risk factors to be noted based on the Framingham Risk Score * HbA1c 5.7-6.4% * LDL \> 130 mg/dL * Family history of type 2 diabetes (immediate family, i.e. parent/sibling) * History of gestational diabetes * History of Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome * Family history of pre-mature cardiovascular disease (immediate family i.e. parent/sibling) before 55 for males or 65 for females that can include heart attack, peripheral arterial disease, abdominal aortic aneurysm, symptomatic carotid artery disease or clinical coronary heart disease) * Age ( \> 45 years old for men; \> 55 years old for women) * Black/African American, Mexican, Asian, and/or Hispanic * Subjects currently taking medications that affect heart rate and rhythm (i.e. Ca++ channel blockers, nitrates, alpha- or beta-blockers)

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects prescribed metformin or have taken metformin within 1 year. * Subjects with abnormal estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). * Hypertriglyceridemic (\>400 mg/dl) and hypercholesterolemic (\>260 mg/dl) subjects * Hypertensive (\>160/100 mmHg) * Subjects with a history of significant metabolic, cardiac, congestive heart failure, cerebrovascular, hematological, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, liver, renal, or endocrine disease or cancer that in the investigator's opinion would interfere with or alter the outcome measures, or impact subject safety. * Pregnant (as evidenced by positive pregnancy test) or nursing women * Subjects with contraindications to participation in an exercise training program * Currently taking active weight suppression medication (e.g. phentermine,orlistat, lorcaserin, naltrexone-bupropion in combination, liraglutide, benzphetamine, diethylpropion, phendimetrazine) * Known hypersensitivity to perflutren (contained in Definity) * Subjects who are considered non-English speaking individuals

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Fasting Unscaled Flow Mediated Dilation (FMD) of the Brachial Artery0 and 16 weeksEndothelial function assessed as a percentage change in brachial artery diameter from baseline to deflation (5 minutes after artery occlusion by blood pressure cuff inflation). Delta = Week 16 - Week 0. Higher values and positive change scores following the intervention indicate a better outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Metabolic Insulin Sensitivity. Glucose Infusion Rate Normalized to Steady-State Insulin (GIR).0 and 16 weeksThe glucose infusion rate (mg/kg/min) divided by steady-state insulin (uU/mL) during a 120 minute euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp provides an index of metabolic insulin sensitivity. Delta = Week 16 - Week 0. Higher values and positive change scores following the intervention indicate a better outcome.
Change in Fasting Augmentation Index0 and 16 weeksMeasure of Arterial Stiffness calculated by dividing the augmentation pressure by the pulse pressure, then multiplying by 100 and normalizing to a heart rate of 75 bpm (AIx75). Delta = Week 16 - Week 0. Lower values and negative change scores following the intervention indicate a better outcome.
Change in Insulin-stimulated Microvascular Blood Flow (MBF) of the Forearm.0 and 16 weeksProduct of microvascular blood volume (VI; video intensity units) and microvascular flow velocity (sec\^-1). Insulin-stimulated microvascular blood flow is the change during a 120 minute euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp (120-0 minutes). Delta = Week 16 - Week 0. Higher values and positive change scores following the intervention indicate a better outcome.
Change in Insulin-stimulated Microvascular Flow Velocity (MFV) of the Forearm.0 and 16 weeksReplenishment curves of the forearm flexor muscle acquired during steady-state infusion of Definity microbubbles. Insulin-stimulated microvascular flow velocity is the change during a 120 minute euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp (120-0 minutes). Delta = Week 16 - Week 0. Higher values and positive change scores following the intervention indicate a better outcome.
Change in Insulin-stimulated Microvascular Blood Volume (MBV) of the Forearm.0 and 16 weeksReplenishment curves of the forearm flexor muscle acquired during steady-state infusion of Definity microbubbles. Insulin-stimulated microvascular blood volume is the change during a 120 minute euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp (120-0 minutes). Delta = Week 16 - Week 0. Higher values and positive change scores following the intervention indicate a better outcome.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
LoEx With Placebo
Low intensity exercise with placebo. Placebo: Oral placebo for 16 weeks. Placebo tablets will follow a four-stage progression: Week 1 = 1 tablet; Week 2 = 2 tablets; Week 3 = 3 tablets; Week 4-16 = 4 tablets. Low Intensity Exercise: Low intensity exercise will consist of 16 weeks of walking at \ 55% of each participant's predetermined VO2max and monitored via heart rate. Supervised exercised will occur on a treadmill 3d/wk and the duration will be determined based on individual fitness levels to expand 400 kcals. Supervised exercise training will follow a three-phase progression: Weeks 1-2 = 3 supervised sessions at 75% duration; Week 3-4 = 3 supervised sessions at 87% duration; Weeks 5-16 = 3 supervised sessions at 100% duration. Unsupervised exercised will be 2d/wk and the duration will half the time of the supervised training sessions.
22
HiEx With Placebo
High intensity exercise with placebo. Placebo: Oral placebo for 16 weeks. Placebo tablets will follow a four-stage progression: Week 1 = 1 tablet; Week 2 = 2 tablets; Week 3 = 3 tablets; Week 4-16 = 4 tablets. High Intensity Exercise: High intensity exercise will consist of 16 weeks of walking at \ 85% of each participant's predetermined VO2max and monitored via heart rate. Supervised exercised will occur on a treadmill 3d/wk and the duration will be determined based on individual fitness levels to expand 400 kcals. Supervised exercise training will follow a three-phase progression: Weeks 1-2 = 3 supervised sessions at 75% duration; Week 3-4 = 3 supervised sessions at 87% duration; Weeks 5-16 = 3 supervised sessions at 100% duration. Unsupervised exercised will be 2d/wk and the duration will half the time of the supervised training sessions.
21
LoEx With Metformin
Low intensity exercise with metformin. Metformin: Oral metformin 2000 mg/d for 16 weeks. Metformin dosage will follow 500 mg/d ramp up progression: Week 1 = 500 mg/d; Week 2 = 1,000 mg/d; Week 3 = 1500 mg/d; Week 4-16 = 2000 mg/d. Low Intensity Exercise: Low intensity exercise will consist of 16 weeks of walking at \ 55% of each participant's predetermined VO2max and monitored via heart rate. Supervised exercised will occur on a treadmill 3d/wk and the duration will be determined based on individual fitness levels to expand 400 kcals. Supervised exercise training will follow a three-phase progression: Weeks 1-2 = 3 supervised sessions at 75% duration; Week 3-4 = 3 supervised sessions at 87% duration; Weeks 5-16 = 3 supervised sessions at 100% duration. Unsupervised exercised will be 2d/wk and the duration will half the time of the supervised training sessions.
24
HiEx With Metformin
High intensity exercise with metformin. Metformin: Oral metformin 2000 mg/d for 16 weeks. Metformin dosage will follow 500 mg/d ramp up progression: Week 1 = 500 mg/d; Week 2 = 1,000 mg/d; Week 3 = 1500 mg/d; Week 4-16 = 2000 mg/d. High Intensity Exercise: High intensity exercise will consist of 16 weeks of walking at \ 85% of each participant's predetermined VO2max and monitored via heart rate. Supervised exercised will occur on a treadmill 3d/wk and the duration will be determined based on individual fitness levels to expand 400 kcals. Supervised exercise training will follow a three-phase progression: Weeks 1-2 = 3 supervised sessions at 75% duration; Week 3-4 = 3 supervised sessions at 87% duration; Weeks 5-16 = 3 supervised sessions at 100% duration. Unsupervised exercised will be 2d/wk and the duration will half the time of the supervised training sessions.
24
Total91

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyCOVID-193233
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1010
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject2103

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLoEx With PlaceboHiEx With PlaceboLoEx With MetforminHiEx With MetforminTotal
Age, Continuous56.5 years54.0 years56.0 years56.0 years56.0 years
Body Mass Index31.3 kg/m^233.8 kg/m^235.3 kg/m^236.0 kg/m^234.8 kg/m^2
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
22 Participants21 Participants24 Participants21 Participants88 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants2 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants3 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
19 Participants18 Participants23 Participants16 Participants76 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
17 Participants17 Participants19 Participants18 Participants71 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants4 Participants5 Participants6 Participants20 Participants
VO2peak22.6 ml/kg/min23.0 ml/kg/min22.9 ml/kg/min21.1 ml/kg/min22.5 ml/kg/min

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 220 / 210 / 240 / 24
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 220 / 210 / 241 / 24
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 220 / 210 / 240 / 24

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Fasting Unscaled Flow Mediated Dilation (FMD) of the Brachial Artery

Endothelial function assessed as a percentage change in brachial artery diameter from baseline to deflation (5 minutes after artery occlusion by blood pressure cuff inflation). Delta = Week 16 - Week 0. Higher values and positive change scores following the intervention indicate a better outcome.

Time frame: 0 and 16 weeks

Population: Analysis includes only individuals that had both pre and post data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
LoEx With PlaceboChange in Fasting Unscaled Flow Mediated Dilation (FMD) of the Brachial Artery-0.45 Percent change in diameters
HiEx With PlaceboChange in Fasting Unscaled Flow Mediated Dilation (FMD) of the Brachial Artery0.76 Percent change in diameters
LoEx With MetforminChange in Fasting Unscaled Flow Mediated Dilation (FMD) of the Brachial Artery3.50 Percent change in diameters
HiEx With MetforminChange in Fasting Unscaled Flow Mediated Dilation (FMD) of the Brachial Artery5.28 Percent change in diameters
Comparison: Intention to treat Full Maximum Likelihood based comparisons of baseline covariate adjusted pre- to post-intervention 0 min unscaled FMD change, where the difference is between treatment combination #2 and treatment combination #1 (i.e. treatment combination # 2 - treatment combination #1).p-value: 0.04595% CI: [0.08, 6.99]ANCOVA
Comparison: Intention to treat Full Maximum Likelihood based comparisons of baseline covariate adjusted pre- to post-intervention 0 min unscaled FMD change, where the difference is between treatment combination #2 and treatment combination #1 (i.e. treatment combination # 2 - treatment combination #1).p-value: 0.50795% CI: [-2.42, 4.73]ANCOVA
Comparison: Intention to treat Full Maximum Likelihood based comparisons of baseline covariate adjusted pre- to post-intervention 0 min unscaled FMD change, where the difference is between treatment combination #2 and treatment combination #1 (i.e. treatment combination # 2 - treatment combination #1).p-value: 0.01495% CI: [1.14, 8.83]ANCOVA
Comparison: Intention to treat Full Maximum Likelihood based comparisons of baseline covariate adjusted pre- to post-intervention 0 min unscaled FMD change, where the difference is between treatment combination #2 and treatment combination #1 (i.e. treatment combination # 2 - treatment combination #1).p-value: 0.23795% CI: [-1.66, 6.42]ANCOVA
Comparison: Intention to treat Full Maximum Likelihood based comparisons of baseline covariate adjusted pre- to post-intervention 0 min unscaled FMD change, where the difference is between treatment combination #2 and treatment combination #1 (i.e. treatment combination # 2 - treatment combination #1).p-value: 0.48695% CI: [-2.8, 5.7]ANCOVA
Comparison: Intention to treat Full Maximum Likelihood based comparisons of baseline covariate adjusted pre- to post-intervention 0 min unscaled FMD change, where the difference is between treatment combination #2 and treatment combination #1 (i.e. treatment combination # 2 - treatment combination #1).p-value: 0.08195% CI: [-0.53, 8.19]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Fasting Augmentation Index

Measure of Arterial Stiffness calculated by dividing the augmentation pressure by the pulse pressure, then multiplying by 100 and normalizing to a heart rate of 75 bpm (AIx75). Delta = Week 16 - Week 0. Lower values and negative change scores following the intervention indicate a better outcome.

Time frame: 0 and 16 weeks

Population: Analysis includes only individuals that had both pre and post data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
LoEx With PlaceboChange in Fasting Augmentation Index-1.33 Percent of pulse pressure
HiEx With PlaceboChange in Fasting Augmentation Index-4.65 Percent of pulse pressure
LoEx With MetforminChange in Fasting Augmentation Index0.00 Percent of pulse pressure
HiEx With MetforminChange in Fasting Augmentation Index-1.20 Percent of pulse pressure
Comparison: Intention to treat Full Maximum Likelihood based comparisons of baseline covariate adjusted pre- to post-intervention AIx75 change, where the difference is between treatment combination #2 and treatment combination #1 (i.e. treatment combination # 2 - treatment combination #1).p-value: 0.67195% CI: [-5.68, 8.69]ANCOVA
Comparison: Intention to treat Full Maximum Likelihood based comparisons of baseline covariate adjusted pre- to post-intervention AIx75 change, where the difference is between treatment combination #2 and treatment combination #1 (i.e. treatment combination # 2 - treatment combination #1).p-value: 0.1795% CI: [-11.84, 2.19]ANCOVA
Comparison: Intention to treat Full Maximum Likelihood based comparisons of baseline covariate adjusted pre- to post-intervention AIx75 change, where the difference is between treatment combination #2 and treatment combination #1 (i.e. treatment combination # 2 - treatment combination #1).p-value: 0.83995% CI: [-7.29, 5.97]ANCOVA
Comparison: Intention to treat Full Maximum Likelihood based comparisons of baseline covariate adjusted pre- to post-intervention AIx75 change, where the difference is between treatment combination #2 and treatment combination #1 (i.e. treatment combination # 2 - treatment combination #1).p-value: 0.02495% CI: [0.86, 11.8]ANCOVA
Comparison: Intention to treat Full Maximum Likelihood based comparisons of baseline covariate adjusted pre- to post-intervention AIx75 change, where the difference is between treatment combination #2 and treatment combination #1 (i.e. treatment combination # 2 - treatment combination #1).p-value: 0.38595% CI: [-7.16, 2.83]ANCOVA
Comparison: Intention to treat Full Maximum Likelihood based comparisons of baseline covariate adjusted pre- to post-intervention AIx75 change, where the difference is between treatment combination #2 and treatment combination #1 (i.e. treatment combination # 2 - treatment combination #1).p-value: 0.0895% CI: [-0.53, 8.86]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Insulin-stimulated Microvascular Blood Flow (MBF) of the Forearm.

Product of microvascular blood volume (VI; video intensity units) and microvascular flow velocity (sec\^-1). Insulin-stimulated microvascular blood flow is the change during a 120 minute euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp (120-0 minutes). Delta = Week 16 - Week 0. Higher values and positive change scores following the intervention indicate a better outcome.

Time frame: 0 and 16 weeks

Population: Analysis includes only individuals that had both pre and post data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
LoEx With PlaceboChange in Insulin-stimulated Microvascular Blood Flow (MBF) of the Forearm.0.027 VI * sec^-1
HiEx With PlaceboChange in Insulin-stimulated Microvascular Blood Flow (MBF) of the Forearm.0.041 VI * sec^-1
LoEx With MetforminChange in Insulin-stimulated Microvascular Blood Flow (MBF) of the Forearm.-0.026 VI * sec^-1
HiEx With MetforminChange in Insulin-stimulated Microvascular Blood Flow (MBF) of the Forearm.-0.065 VI * sec^-1
Comparison: Intention to treat Full Maximum Likelihood based comparisons of baseline covariate adjusted pre- to post-intervention MBF change, where the difference is between treatment combination #2 and treatment combination #1 (i.e. treatment combination # 2 - treatment combination #1).p-value: 0.08895% CI: [-0.069, 0.005]ANCOVA
Comparison: Intention to treat Full Maximum Likelihood based comparisons of baseline covariate adjusted pre- to post-intervention MBF change, where the difference is between treatment combination #2 and treatment combination #1 (i.e. treatment combination # 2 - treatment combination #1).p-value: 0.9695% CI: [-0.059, 0.062]ANCOVA
Comparison: Intention to treat Full Maximum Likelihood based comparisons of baseline covariate adjusted pre- to post-intervention MBF change, where the difference is between treatment combination #2 and treatment combination #1 (i.e. treatment combination # 2 - treatment combination #1).p-value: 0.07595% CI: [-0.109, 0.006]ANCOVA
Comparison: Intention to treat Full Maximum Likelihood based comparisons of baseline covariate adjusted pre- to post-intervention MBF change, where the difference is between treatment combination #2 and treatment combination #1 (i.e. treatment combination # 2 - treatment combination #1).p-value: 0.25895% CI: [-0.094, 0.028]ANCOVA
Comparison: Intention to treat Full Maximum Likelihood based comparisons of baseline covariate adjusted pre- to post-intervention MBF change, where the difference is between treatment combination #2 and treatment combination #1 (i.e. treatment combination # 2 - treatment combination #1).p-value: 0.44395% CI: [-0.075, 0.035]ANCOVA
Comparison: Intention to treat Full Maximum Likelihood based comparisons of baseline covariate adjusted pre- to post-intervention MBF change, where the difference is between treatment combination #2 and treatment combination #1 (i.e. treatment combination # 2 - treatment combination #1).p-value: 0.14495% CI: [-0.126, 0.02]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Insulin-stimulated Microvascular Blood Volume (MBV) of the Forearm.

Replenishment curves of the forearm flexor muscle acquired during steady-state infusion of Definity microbubbles. Insulin-stimulated microvascular blood volume is the change during a 120 minute euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp (120-0 minutes). Delta = Week 16 - Week 0. Higher values and positive change scores following the intervention indicate a better outcome.

Time frame: 0 and 16 weeks

Population: Analysis includes only individuals that had both pre and post data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
LoEx With PlaceboChange in Insulin-stimulated Microvascular Blood Volume (MBV) of the Forearm.0.188 Video Intensity Units (VI)
HiEx With PlaceboChange in Insulin-stimulated Microvascular Blood Volume (MBV) of the Forearm.0.433 Video Intensity Units (VI)
LoEx With MetforminChange in Insulin-stimulated Microvascular Blood Volume (MBV) of the Forearm.-0.257 Video Intensity Units (VI)
HiEx With MetforminChange in Insulin-stimulated Microvascular Blood Volume (MBV) of the Forearm.-0.510 Video Intensity Units (VI)
Comparison: Intention to treat Full Maximum Likelihood based comparisons of baseline covariate adjusted pre- to post-intervention MBV change, where the difference is between treatment combination #2 and treatment combination #1 (i.e. treatment combination # 2 - treatment combination #1).p-value: 0.08695% CI: [-0.495, 0.035]ANCOVA
Comparison: Intention to treat Full Maximum Likelihood based comparisons of baseline covariate adjusted pre- to post-intervention MBV change, where the difference is between treatment combination #2 and treatment combination #1 (i.e. treatment combination # 2 - treatment combination #1).p-value: 0.60895% CI: [-0.354, 0.574]ANCOVA
Comparison: Intention to treat Full Maximum Likelihood based comparisons of baseline covariate adjusted pre- to post-intervention MBV change, where the difference is between treatment combination #2 and treatment combination #1 (i.e. treatment combination # 2 - treatment combination #1).p-value: 0.1195% CI: [-0.779, 0.09]ANCOVA
Comparison: Intention to treat Full Maximum Likelihood based comparisons of baseline covariate adjusted pre- to post-intervention MBV change, where the difference is between treatment combination #2 and treatment combination #1 (i.e. treatment combination # 2 - treatment combination #1).p-value: 0.14595% CI: [-0.818, 0.137]ANCOVA
Comparison: Intention to treat Full Maximum Likelihood based comparisons of baseline covariate adjusted pre- to post-intervention MBV change, where the difference is between treatment combination #2 and treatment combination #1 (i.e. treatment combination # 2 - treatment combination #1).p-value: 0.56595% CI: [-0.538, 0.309]ANCOVA
Comparison: Intention to treat Full Maximum Likelihood based comparisons of baseline covariate adjusted pre- to post-intervention MBV change, where the difference is between treatment combination #2 and treatment combination #1 (i.e. treatment combination # 2 - treatment combination #1).p-value: 0.1195% CI: [-1.025, 0.116]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Insulin-stimulated Microvascular Flow Velocity (MFV) of the Forearm.

Replenishment curves of the forearm flexor muscle acquired during steady-state infusion of Definity microbubbles. Insulin-stimulated microvascular flow velocity is the change during a 120 minute euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp (120-0 minutes). Delta = Week 16 - Week 0. Higher values and positive change scores following the intervention indicate a better outcome.

Time frame: 0 and 16 weeks

Population: Analysis includes only individuals that had both pre and post data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
LoEx With PlaceboChange in Insulin-stimulated Microvascular Flow Velocity (MFV) of the Forearm.0.006 sec^-1
HiEx With PlaceboChange in Insulin-stimulated Microvascular Flow Velocity (MFV) of the Forearm.0.009 sec^-1
LoEx With MetforminChange in Insulin-stimulated Microvascular Flow Velocity (MFV) of the Forearm.-0.007 sec^-1
HiEx With MetforminChange in Insulin-stimulated Microvascular Flow Velocity (MFV) of the Forearm.-0.018 sec^-1
Comparison: Intention to treat Full Maximum Likelihood based comparisons of baseline covariate adjusted pre- to post-intervention MFV change, where the difference is between treatment combination #2 and treatment combination #1 (i.e. treatment combination # 2 - treatment combination #1).p-value: 0.14795% CI: [-0.017, 0.003]ANCOVA
Comparison: Intention to treat Full Maximum Likelihood based comparisons of baseline covariate adjusted pre- to post-intervention MFV change, where the difference is between treatment combination #2 and treatment combination #1 (i.e. treatment combination # 2 - treatment combination #1).p-value: 0.94395% CI: [-0.016, 0.017]ANCOVA
Comparison: Intention to treat Full Maximum Likelihood based comparisons of baseline covariate adjusted pre- to post-intervention MFV change, where the difference is between treatment combination #2 and treatment combination #1 (i.e. treatment combination # 2 - treatment combination #1).p-value: 0.10895% CI: [-0.027, 0.003]ANCOVA
Comparison: Intention to treat Full Maximum Likelihood based comparisons of baseline covariate adjusted pre- to post-intervention MFV change, where the difference is between treatment combination #2 and treatment combination #1 (i.e. treatment combination # 2 - treatment combination #1).p-value: 0.31995% CI: [-0.024, 0.009]ANCOVA
Comparison: Intention to treat Full Maximum Likelihood based comparisons of baseline covariate adjusted pre- to post-intervention MFV change, where the difference is between treatment combination #2 and treatment combination #1 (i.e. treatment combination # 2 - treatment combination #1).p-value: 0.49695% CI: [-0.019, 0.01]ANCOVA
Comparison: Intention to treat Full Maximum Likelihood based comparisons of baseline covariate adjusted pre- to post-intervention MFV change, where the difference is between treatment combination #2 and treatment combination #1 (i.e. treatment combination # 2 - treatment combination #1).p-value: 0.18795% CI: [-0.031, 0.007]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change in Metabolic Insulin Sensitivity. Glucose Infusion Rate Normalized to Steady-State Insulin (GIR).

The glucose infusion rate (mg/kg/min) divided by steady-state insulin (uU/mL) during a 120 minute euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp provides an index of metabolic insulin sensitivity. Delta = Week 16 - Week 0. Higher values and positive change scores following the intervention indicate a better outcome.

Time frame: 0 and 16 weeks

Population: Analysis includes only individuals that had both pre and post data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
LoEx With PlaceboChange in Metabolic Insulin Sensitivity. Glucose Infusion Rate Normalized to Steady-State Insulin (GIR).0.0012 (mg/kg/min)/(uU/mL)
HiEx With PlaceboChange in Metabolic Insulin Sensitivity. Glucose Infusion Rate Normalized to Steady-State Insulin (GIR).0.011 (mg/kg/min)/(uU/mL)
LoEx With MetforminChange in Metabolic Insulin Sensitivity. Glucose Infusion Rate Normalized to Steady-State Insulin (GIR).0.0086 (mg/kg/min)/(uU/mL)
HiEx With MetforminChange in Metabolic Insulin Sensitivity. Glucose Infusion Rate Normalized to Steady-State Insulin (GIR).0.0053 (mg/kg/min)/(uU/mL)
Comparison: Intention to treat Full Maximum Likelihood based comparisons of baseline covariate adjusted pre- to post-intervention GIR, where the difference is between treatment combination #2 and treatment combination #1 (i.e. treatment combination # 2 - treatment combination #1).p-value: 0.37395% CI: [-0.0093, 0.024]ANCOVA
Comparison: Intention to treat Full Maximum Likelihood based comparisons of baseline covariate adjusted pre- to post-intervention GIR, where the difference is between treatment combination #2 and treatment combination #1 (i.e. treatment combination # 2 - treatment combination #1).p-value: 0.19895% CI: [-0.0055, 0.025]ANCOVA
Comparison: Intention to treat Full Maximum Likelihood based comparisons of baseline covariate adjusted pre- to post-intervention GIR, where the difference is between treatment combination #2 and treatment combination #1 (i.e. treatment combination # 2 - treatment combination #1).p-value: 0.62295% CI: [-0.0129, 0.0211]ANCOVA
Comparison: Intention to treat Full Maximum Likelihood based comparisons of baseline covariate adjusted pre- to post-intervention GIR, where the difference is between treatment combination #2 and treatment combination #1 (i.e. treatment combination # 2 - treatment combination #1).p-value: 0.66695% CI: [-0.0136, 0.0088]ANCOVA
Comparison: Intention to treat Full Maximum Likelihood based comparisons of baseline covariate adjusted pre- to post-intervention GIR, where the difference is between treatment combination #2 and treatment combination #1 (i.e. treatment combination # 2 - treatment combination #1).p-value: 0.63495% CI: [-0.0169, 0.0104]ANCOVA
Comparison: Intention to treat Full Maximum Likelihood based comparisons of baseline covariate adjusted pre- to post-intervention GIR, where the difference is between treatment combination #2 and treatment combination #1 (i.e. treatment combination # 2 - treatment combination #1).p-value: 0.33695% CI: [-0.0174, 0.0062]ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026