Skip to content

Examining Techniques on Adenoma Miss Rate in Proximal Colon

Efficacy of Segmental Re-examination and Retroflexion of Proximal Colon for Adenoma Miss Rate During Colonoscopy

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03355443
Acronym
SINOCOLO2017
Enrollment
600
Registered
2017-11-28
Start date
2017-12-31
Completion date
2019-12-31
Last updated
2017-11-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colorectal Adenoma, Colorectal Polyp

Keywords

Colonoscopy, Lower Gastrointestinal Tract, Re-examination, Retroflexion

Brief summary

The primary aim of this study is \- to explore the usefulness of re-examination and retroflexion on adenoma miss rate (AMR) in the proximal colon. Other aims include to explore the data below when re-examination or retroflexion is used. * Adenoma detection rate, ADR * Polyp miss rate, PMR * Polyp detection rate, PDR * Withdrawal time, WT

Detailed description

AMR = number of adenomas missing during the first examination/ total number of adenomas in both examinations = number of adenomas detected only in the second examination/(number of adenomas detected during the first examination + number of adenomas detected only in the second examination)

Interventions

PROCEDURERetroflexion

Retroflexion technique in colonoscopy means turning the colonoscope tip 180 degree in order to look backward in the colon and rectum.

Re-examination in colonoscopy means examining the cecum and ascending colon twice in the routine fashion.

Sponsors

Changhai Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
45 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients between 45 and 80 years who undergo colonoscopy examination for screening, and who receive primary screening and get positive result

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant female patients * Patients received colonoscopy in the past 5 years * Patients who have history of colorectal cancer, colorectal polyposis, inflammatory bowel disease or heredity colorectal neoplasm syndrome such as familiar adenomatous polyposis, Lynch Syndrome and so on * Patients who had previous abdominal surgery * Patients who are known to have colonic stricture or obstructing tumor from the results of radiography (X ray, CT scan or barium enema) * Patients who are presenting acute surgical conditions such as severe colitis, megacolon and active gastrointestinal bleeding * Patients who have inadequate bowel preparation * Patients who reject to participate in this study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adenoma miss rate in the proximal colon (AMR)At the end of the procedure, up to 1 hourAMR refers to the rate of adenoma missing, calculated as the proportion of adenomas which are missing in the first examination. AMR in the proximal colon is calculated with only the proximal colon concerned.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adenoma Detection Rate in the proximal colon (ADR)At the end of the procedure, up to 1 hourADR refers to the rate of adenoma detection, calculated as the proportion of subjects with at least one adenoma. ADR in the proximal colon is calculated with only the proximal colon concerned.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactEn-Da YU, MBBS
endayu@yeah.net08618699629177
Backup ContactZi-Ye ZHAO, MD
yemenzhao@126.com

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 8, 2026