Analgesic Quality, Mobility
Conditions
Keywords
Zalviso, sufentanyl, PCA, Dipidolor
Brief summary
The observational study will check if there is a difference in the postoperative care of patients with urogenital intervention while using the standard PCA-syringe pump or using the Zalviso sufentanyl sublingual analgetic system. The study will exactly examine, using questionaire for the patient, the medical stuff (nurses and anesthesiologist) the difference in the analgetic quality, the difference of the patients' mobility while being treated with one of the analgetic system and if there is a difference in the cost-efficiency. We want to examine 50 Patients in each group. The studies should be finished in about one year.
Interventions
Sufentail sublingual 15ug nanopills
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Patients after urological interventions with no indication of an periduralanästesia * Patients compliant for a PCA system, and complied with the analysis of their data
Exclusion criteria
* F03 dementia * F10.2 dependence syndrome alcohol * F11.2 dependence syndrome opioids * F12.2 dependence syndrome cannabinoids * F13.2 dependence syndrome sedatives and hypnotics * F14.2 dependence syndrome cocaine * F15.2 dependence syndrome coffin * F.16.2 dependence syndrome hallucinogens * F22 schizophrenia * F41.1 generalized anxiety disorder
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| analgesic quality | 1 year | Recording of the analgesic quality measured by the request of more analgesic postoperative while being treated with the conventional PCA or the Zalviso system. |
| mobility | 1 year | Recording of the patients mobility postoperative while being treated with the conventional PCA or the Zalviso system. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| medical cost efficiency | 1 year | Comparison of the cost efficiency of both systems |
Countries
Germany