Skip to content

Hypertension, Intracranial Pulsatility and Brain Amyloid-beta Accumulation in Older Adults (HIPAC Trial)

Hypertension, Intracranial Pulsatility and Brain Amyloid-beta Accumulation in Older Adults (HIPAC Trial)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03354143
Acronym
HIPAC
Enrollment
85
Registered
2017-11-27
Start date
2018-04-10
Completion date
2024-03-30
Last updated
2025-07-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypertension

Keywords

Dementia, Alzheimer's Disease, Blood Pressure, Cognitive Function, Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to determine if lowering blood pressure using FDA approved medication (antihypertensive drugs) alters brain pulsatility and reduces brain amyloid beta protein accumulation in older adults. Amyloid beta protein is high in the brain of older adults with Alzheimer's disease. Hypertension may increase brain amyloid beta protein accumulation and affect memory and thinking ability in older adults. However, whether lowering blood pressure reduces brain amyloid beta protein and improves brain function is inconclusive. The investigators hypothesize that treating high blood pressure alters brain pulsatility, which in turn reduces brain amyloid beta protein accumulation and improves brain structure and function.

Interventions

OTHERStandard Care

Calcium channel blocker (CCB, amlodipine), angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB, losartan), and other antihypertensive drugs will be used to reduce 24-hour SBP ≤ 130 mmHg.

Calcium channel blocker (CCB, amlodipine), angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB, losartan), and other antihypertensive drugs will be used to reduce 24-hour SBP ≤ 120 mmHg.

Sponsors

Texas Health Resources
CollaboratorOTHER
Michigan State University
CollaboratorOTHER
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
55 Years to 79 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Age 55-79, all races/ethnicities, and both women and men are eligible; 2. Mini-mental state exam (MMSE) \> 26 to exclude cognitive impairment or dementia; 3. Healthy normotensive subjects (24-hour ambulatory BP\<125/75 mmHg without use of antihypertensive medication); 4. Patients with hypertension defined as 24-hour SBP ≥130 mmHg , patients on BP medications are eligible; 5. Patients with hypertension are willing to be randomized into either treatment group and ability to return to clinic or laboratory for follow-up visits over 12 months; 6. Fluency in English, adequate visual and auditory acuity to allow neuropsychological testing; 7. Screening laboratory tests and ECG without significant abnormalities that might interfere with the study

Exclusion criteria

1. History of stroke, transient ischemic attack, traumatic brain injury or severe cerebrovascular disease by clinical diagnosis or past MRI/CT; 2. Diagnosis of AD or other type of dementia and neurodegenerative diseases; 3. Evidence of severe depression or other DSM-V Axis I psychopathology 4. Unstable heart disease based on clinical judgment (heart attack/cardiac arrest, cardiac bypass procedures within previous 6 months and congestive heart failure), evidence of atrial fibrillation on ECG, or other severe medical conditions; 5. Chronic kidney diseases with GFR \< 40 ml/min; 6. Orthostatic hypotension, defined as standing SBP\<100 mmHg; 7. History of significant autoimmune disorders such as systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis and polymyalgia rheumatica; 8. History of drug or alcohol abuse within the last 2 years; 9. Diagnosis of uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (fasting blood sugar ≥126 mg/dL or A1C \>7.5%) 10. Obstructive sleep apnea; 11. Regularly smoking cigarette within the past year; 12. Severe obesity with BMI ≥ 45; 13. Participants enrolled in another investigational drug or device study within the past 2 months; 14. Carotid stent or sever stenosis (\> 50%); 15. Pacemaker or other medical device of metal that precludes performing MRI; 16. History of B12 deficiency or hypothyroidism (stable treatment for at least 3 months is allowable); 17. Any conditions judged by the study investigators to be either medically inappropriate, or risky for participant or likely to have poor study adherence; 18. Claustrophobia; 19. Pregnancy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Gray Matter Intracranial PulsatilityBaseline and 12-monthsChanges (12 month timepoint minus baseline) in intracranial pulsatility will be measured with CINE phase-contrast MRI. We will use the velocity-encoded CINE PC MRI to measure intracranial pulsatility. Pulsatility measured in mm per cardiac cycle

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in Overall Average 24hr Diastolic Blood PressureBaseline and 12-monthschanges in overall average 24 hr ambulatory diastolic blood pressure will be assessed SpaceLabs monitor
Regional Cortical Thickness Via Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Baseline and 12-months
Brain White Matter Hyperintensity (WMH) Via Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Baseline and 12-monthsWhite matter hyperintensities (WMH) on brain T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) magnetic resonance images (MRI) are commonly observed in older adults over 65 years old, and more extensive in those with vascular or Alzheimer's disease type of dementia. Qualitative and quantitative WMH characterization has been used as a biomarker to assist cerebral small vessel disease diagnosis and to assess treatment effects. In this report, the size of the WMH has been assessed with the PGS software, the top performer of the deep-learning algorithms from the 2017 MICCAI WMH segmentation challenge. The unit of the WMH total size presented in this report is in mL.
Changes in Overall Average 24 Hour Systolic Blood PressureBaseline and 12-monthschanges in overall average 24 hr ambulatory systolic blood pressure will be assessed SpaceLabs monitor
Brain Neural Network Functional Connectivity Via Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Baseline and 12-monthsThe brain's functional connectivity, particularly within the Default Mode Network (DMN), can be assessed using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) through the correlations between the activity of the brain regions within a network. In this report, the DMN regions were identified with a seed-based approach from another clinical trial with 420 subjects of a similar population. By identifying regions of interest (ROIs) within the DMN, researchers can analyze how these regions connect and interact with each other, revealing information about brain activity and potentially aiding in the diagnosis and understanding of various neurological and psychiatric conditions. Here, the functional connectivity of the DMN brain regions is reported in the unit of Pearson correlation R, with a range of 0 to 1 in this application. A high R value indicates a high level of connectivity.
NIH PROMIS Patient-reported Outcome Measures of Physical HealthBaseline and 12-monthsPROMIS® (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) is a set of person-centered measures that evaluates and monitors physical, mental, and social health in adults and children. Four items are used to assess global physical health. Three of these are administered using five-category response scales, and one item (rating of pain on average) uses a response scale of 0-10 that is recoded to five categories (0 = 1; 1-3 = 2; 4-6 = 3; 7-9 = 4; 10 = 5). T-score Metric: PROMIS measures use a T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population. On the T-score metric: A score of 40 is one SD lower than the mean of the reference population. A score of 60 is one SD higher than the mean of the reference population. For PROMIS measures, higher scores equals more of the concept being measured (e.g., more Fatigue, more Physical Function).A score of 60 is one standard deviation above the average population
NIH PROMIS Patient-reported Outcome Measures of Mental HealthBaseline and 12-monthsPROMIS® (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) is a set of person-centered measures that evaluates and monitors physical, mental, and social health in adults and children. Four items are used to assess global physical health. Three of these are administered using five-category response scales, and one item (rating of pain on average) uses a response scale of 0-10 that is recoded to five categories (0 = 1; 1-3 = 2; 4-6 = 3; 7-9 = 4; 10 = 5). T-score Metric: PROMIS measures use a T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population. On the T-score metric: A score of 40 is one SD lower than the mean of the reference population. A score of 60 is one SD higher than the mean of the reference population. For PROMIS measures, higher scores equals more of the concept being measured (e.g., more Fatigue, more Physical Function). A score of 60 is one standard deviation above the average population
Brain White Matter Microstructural Integrity Via Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Baseline and 12-monthsFractional Anisotropy (FA) values are a measure of how directed diffusion is in a tissue, typically ranging from 0 to 1. A value of 0 indicates isotropic diffusion (diffusion is the same in all directions), while a value of 1 indicates highly anisotropic diffusion (diffusion is restricted to a single direction). FA is often used in diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and is thought to reflect fiber density, axonal diameter, and myelination in white matter.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

85 participants enrolled include 40 (Control group subjects-no intervention) and 45 participants (undergo intervention). These 45 subjects are randomized to either Standard care or Intensive care interventions that is summarized in the table below. Control group was not randomized and they did not receive an experimental intervention but received SOC.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Standard Care
Subjects in the standard care arm will receive calcium channel blocker (CCB, amlodipine), angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB, losartan), and other antihypertensive drugs to reduce 24-hour SBP ≤ 130 mmHg. Drug doses will be titrated to reach the BP target. Standard Care: Calcium channel blocker (CCB, amlodipine), angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB, losartan), and other antihypertensive drugs will be used to reduce 24-hour SBP ≤ 130 mmHg.
19
Intensive Treatment
Subjects in the intensive treatment arm will receive calcium channel blocker (CCB, amlodipine), angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB, losartan), and other antihypertensive drugs to reduce 24-hour SBP ≤ 120 mmHg. Intensive Treatment: Calcium channel blocker (CCB, amlodipine), angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB, losartan), and other antihypertensive drugs will be used to reduce 24-hour SBP ≤ 120 mmHg.
26
Control Group
Control group subjects-no intervention- not randomized. This includes Healthy normotensive subjects (24-hour ambulatory BP\<125/75 mmHg without use of antihypertensive medication) who undergo MRI as part of standard of care (SOC).
40
Total85

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalStandard CareIntensive TreatmentControl Group
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
43 Participants14 Participants8 Participants21 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
42 Participants5 Participants18 Participants19 Participants
Age, Continuous65.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7
68.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.8
62.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.4
60.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
6 Participants1 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
11 Participants6 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
68 Participants12 Participants21 Participants35 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
45 participants19 participants26 participants40 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
47 Participants9 Participants16 Participants22 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
38 Participants10 Participants10 Participants18 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 190 / 26
other
Total, other adverse events
8 / 197 / 26
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 190 / 26

Outcome results

Primary

Changes in Gray Matter Intracranial Pulsatility

Changes (12 month timepoint minus baseline) in intracranial pulsatility will be measured with CINE phase-contrast MRI. We will use the velocity-encoded CINE PC MRI to measure intracranial pulsatility. Pulsatility measured in mm per cardiac cycle

Time frame: Baseline and 12-months

Population: Data was not collected for the Control group subjects since the investigator never planned to assess this outcome measure using Control group subject data as part of the pre-specified outcomes in the protocol.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard CareChanges in Gray Matter Intracranial Pulsatility-0.09 mm/cardiac cycleStandard Deviation 0.04
Intensive TreatmentChanges in Gray Matter Intracranial Pulsatility0.02 mm/cardiac cycleStandard Deviation 0.03
Secondary

Brain Neural Network Functional Connectivity Via Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

The brain's functional connectivity, particularly within the Default Mode Network (DMN), can be assessed using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) through the correlations between the activity of the brain regions within a network. In this report, the DMN regions were identified with a seed-based approach from another clinical trial with 420 subjects of a similar population. By identifying regions of interest (ROIs) within the DMN, researchers can analyze how these regions connect and interact with each other, revealing information about brain activity and potentially aiding in the diagnosis and understanding of various neurological and psychiatric conditions. Here, the functional connectivity of the DMN brain regions is reported in the unit of Pearson correlation R, with a range of 0 to 1 in this application. A high R value indicates a high level of connectivity.

Time frame: Baseline and 12-months

Population: Data was not collected for the Control group subjects since the investigator never planned to assess this outcome measure using Control group subject data as part of the pre-specified outcomes in the protocol.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard CareBrain Neural Network Functional Connectivity Via Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Baseline0.39 Pearson correlation R (r value)Standard Deviation 0.083
Standard CareBrain Neural Network Functional Connectivity Via Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)12 Month0.39 Pearson correlation R (r value)Standard Deviation 0.079
Intensive TreatmentBrain Neural Network Functional Connectivity Via Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Baseline0.42 Pearson correlation R (r value)Standard Deviation 0.14
Intensive TreatmentBrain Neural Network Functional Connectivity Via Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)12 Month0.4 Pearson correlation R (r value)Standard Deviation 0.08
Secondary

Brain White Matter Hyperintensity (WMH) Via Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

White matter hyperintensities (WMH) on brain T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) magnetic resonance images (MRI) are commonly observed in older adults over 65 years old, and more extensive in those with vascular or Alzheimer's disease type of dementia. Qualitative and quantitative WMH characterization has been used as a biomarker to assist cerebral small vessel disease diagnosis and to assess treatment effects. In this report, the size of the WMH has been assessed with the PGS software, the top performer of the deep-learning algorithms from the 2017 MICCAI WMH segmentation challenge. The unit of the WMH total size presented in this report is in mL.

Time frame: Baseline and 12-months

Population: Data was not collected for the Control group subjects since the investigator never planned to assess this outcome measure using Control group subject data as part of the pre-specified outcomes in the protocol.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard CareBrain White Matter Hyperintensity (WMH) Via Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Baseline7.9 mlStandard Deviation 12.9
Standard CareBrain White Matter Hyperintensity (WMH) Via Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)12 Month7.5 mlStandard Deviation 13
Intensive TreatmentBrain White Matter Hyperintensity (WMH) Via Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Baseline2.8 mlStandard Deviation 3.2
Intensive TreatmentBrain White Matter Hyperintensity (WMH) Via Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)12 Month2.6 mlStandard Deviation 2.9
Secondary

Brain White Matter Microstructural Integrity Via Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

Fractional Anisotropy (FA) values are a measure of how directed diffusion is in a tissue, typically ranging from 0 to 1. A value of 0 indicates isotropic diffusion (diffusion is the same in all directions), while a value of 1 indicates highly anisotropic diffusion (diffusion is restricted to a single direction). FA is often used in diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and is thought to reflect fiber density, axonal diameter, and myelination in white matter.

Time frame: Baseline and 12-months

Population: Data was not collected for the Control group subjects since the investigator never planned to assess this outcome measure using Control group subject data as part of the pre-specified outcomes in the protocol.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard CareBrain White Matter Microstructural Integrity Via Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Baseline0.4 Mean fractional anisotropy from DTIStandard Deviation 0.02
Standard CareBrain White Matter Microstructural Integrity Via Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)12 Month0.4 Mean fractional anisotropy from DTIStandard Deviation 0.01
Intensive TreatmentBrain White Matter Microstructural Integrity Via Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Baseline0.4 Mean fractional anisotropy from DTIStandard Deviation 0.02
Intensive TreatmentBrain White Matter Microstructural Integrity Via Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)12 Month0.4 Mean fractional anisotropy from DTIStandard Deviation 0.01
Secondary

Changes in Overall Average 24 Hour Systolic Blood Pressure

changes in overall average 24 hr ambulatory systolic blood pressure will be assessed SpaceLabs monitor

Time frame: Baseline and 12-months

Population: Data was not collected for the Control group subjects since the investigator never planned to assess this outcome measure using Control group subject data as part of the pre-specified outcomes in the protocol.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard CareChanges in Overall Average 24 Hour Systolic Blood Pressure17.9 mmHgStandard Deviation 3.3
Intensive TreatmentChanges in Overall Average 24 Hour Systolic Blood Pressure23.6 mmHgStandard Deviation 2.8
Secondary

Changes in Overall Average 24hr Diastolic Blood Pressure

changes in overall average 24 hr ambulatory diastolic blood pressure will be assessed SpaceLabs monitor

Time frame: Baseline and 12-months

Population: Data was not collected for the Control group subjects since the investigator never planned to assess this outcome measure using Control group subject data as part of the pre-specified outcomes in the protocol.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard CareChanges in Overall Average 24hr Diastolic Blood Pressure10.9 mmHgStandard Deviation 1.5
Intensive TreatmentChanges in Overall Average 24hr Diastolic Blood Pressure12 mmHgStandard Deviation 1.2
Secondary

NIH PROMIS Patient-reported Outcome Measures of Mental Health

PROMIS® (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) is a set of person-centered measures that evaluates and monitors physical, mental, and social health in adults and children. Four items are used to assess global physical health. Three of these are administered using five-category response scales, and one item (rating of pain on average) uses a response scale of 0-10 that is recoded to five categories (0 = 1; 1-3 = 2; 4-6 = 3; 7-9 = 4; 10 = 5). T-score Metric: PROMIS measures use a T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population. On the T-score metric: A score of 40 is one SD lower than the mean of the reference population. A score of 60 is one SD higher than the mean of the reference population. For PROMIS measures, higher scores equals more of the concept being measured (e.g., more Fatigue, more Physical Function). A score of 60 is one standard deviation above the average population

Time frame: Baseline and 12-months

Population: Data was not collected for the Control group subjects since the investigator never planned to assess this outcome measure using Control group subject data as part of the pre-specified outcomes in the protocol.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard CareNIH PROMIS Patient-reported Outcome Measures of Mental HealthBaseline56.0 T soreStandard Deviation 7.5
Standard CareNIH PROMIS Patient-reported Outcome Measures of Mental Health12 Month54.9 T soreStandard Deviation 8.4
Intensive TreatmentNIH PROMIS Patient-reported Outcome Measures of Mental HealthBaseline52.1 T soreStandard Deviation 7.4
Intensive TreatmentNIH PROMIS Patient-reported Outcome Measures of Mental Health12 Month54.0 T soreStandard Deviation 6.3
Secondary

NIH PROMIS Patient-reported Outcome Measures of Physical Health

PROMIS® (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) is a set of person-centered measures that evaluates and monitors physical, mental, and social health in adults and children. Four items are used to assess global physical health. Three of these are administered using five-category response scales, and one item (rating of pain on average) uses a response scale of 0-10 that is recoded to five categories (0 = 1; 1-3 = 2; 4-6 = 3; 7-9 = 4; 10 = 5). T-score Metric: PROMIS measures use a T-score metric in which 50 is the mean of a relevant reference population and 10 is the standard deviation (SD) of that population. On the T-score metric: A score of 40 is one SD lower than the mean of the reference population. A score of 60 is one SD higher than the mean of the reference population. For PROMIS measures, higher scores equals more of the concept being measured (e.g., more Fatigue, more Physical Function).A score of 60 is one standard deviation above the average population

Time frame: Baseline and 12-months

Population: Data was not collected for the Control group subjects since the investigator never planned to assess this outcome measure using Control group subject data as part of the pre-specified outcomes in the protocol.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard CareNIH PROMIS Patient-reported Outcome Measures of Physical Health12 Month50.9 T scoreStandard Deviation 7.5
Standard CareNIH PROMIS Patient-reported Outcome Measures of Physical HealthBaseline52.1 T scoreStandard Deviation 6.4
Intensive TreatmentNIH PROMIS Patient-reported Outcome Measures of Physical HealthBaseline51.0 T scoreStandard Deviation 6.3
Intensive TreatmentNIH PROMIS Patient-reported Outcome Measures of Physical Health12 Month51.8 T scoreStandard Deviation 7.4
Secondary

Regional Cortical Thickness Via Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

Time frame: Baseline and 12-months

Population: Data was not collected for the Control group subjects since the investigator never planned to assess this outcome measure using Control group subject data as part of the pre-specified outcomes in the protocol.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard CareRegional Cortical Thickness Via Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Baseline2.3 mmStandard Deviation 0.09
Standard CareRegional Cortical Thickness Via Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)12 month2.3 mmStandard Deviation 0.09
Intensive TreatmentRegional Cortical Thickness Via Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)Baseline2.4 mmStandard Deviation 0.08
Intensive TreatmentRegional Cortical Thickness Via Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)12 month2.3 mmStandard Deviation 0.09

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026