Skip to content

Wound Infiltration of Liposomal Bupivacaine v Plain Bupivacaine for Post-Op Pain Control in Elective Cesarean Delivery

A Comparison of Post-Incisional Wound Infiltration of Liposomal Bupivacaine to Plain Bupivacaine for Post-Operative Pain Control in Elective Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Double Blind Placebo Controlled Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03353363
Enrollment
132
Registered
2017-11-27
Start date
2017-10-18
Completion date
2019-02-18
Last updated
2018-01-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bupivacaine, Pain, Postoperative

Keywords

cesarean delivery, liposomal bupivacaine, Exparel, bupivacaine, wound infiltration

Brief summary

Randomized double blind placebo controlled trial to compare the post-operative pain control advantages of post-incisional wound infiltration with liposomal bupivacaine to plain bupivacaine in patients presenting for elective caesarean delivery.

Detailed description

Participants will include women with uncomplicated singleton pregnancies, ≥37 weeks gestation, ≥18 years old presenting and presenting for elective caesarean delivery with a planned spinal anesthetic with a standardized amount of intrathecal morphine (ITM). Exclusion criteria include patients: not receiving a spinal anesthetic, receiving a spinal anesthetic that required supplemental intraoperative pain medications (ketamine, epidural narcotics, intravenous narcotics, etc), on chronic opioids, American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) physical status class III or higher (Note: An ASA I patient is defined as a normal healthy patient, an ASA II patient is defined as a patient with mild systemic disease and any patient that with severe systemic disease or a disease that is incapacitating would be classified as an ASA III or higher) or those that have known hypersensitivity to bupivacaine hydrochloride, amide-type local anesthetics, or any component of the formation, and any subject with hepatic or renal impairment. A three-arm study will be used: (a) control group (placebo of normal saline) (b) plain bupivacaine group and (c) liposomal bupivacaine group. After patients receive their spinal anesthetic and as the Pfannenstiel incision is being closed, an equal volume (20ml, administered via two 10ml syringes) of one of the three solutions will be infiltrated into the wound by the obstetrician team in a standardized fashion.

Interventions

DRUGBupivacaine

After patients receive their spinal anesthetic and as the Pfannenstiel incision is being closed, an equal volume (20ml, administered via two 10ml syringes) of bupivacaine 0.5% plain will be infiltrated into the wound by the obstetrician team in a standardized fashion.

DRUGLiposomal bupivacaine

After patients receive their spinal anesthetic and as the Pfannenstiel incision is being closed, an equal volume (20ml, administered via two 10ml syringes) of one liposomal bupivacaine will be infiltrated into the wound by the obstetrician team in a standardized fashion.

DRUGPlacebos

After patients receive their spinal anesthetic and as the Pfannenstiel incision is being closed, an equal volume (20ml, administered via two 10ml syringes) of normal saline will be infiltrated into the wound by the obstetrician team in a standardized fashion.

Sponsors

Brooke Army Medical Center
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator)

Masking description

Double-Blind Study

Intervention model description

Parallel Assignment

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. ASA I or II women with uncomplicated singleton pregnancies 2. ≥37 weeks gestation 3. ≥18 years old presenting 4. Presenting for elective caesarean delivery with a planned spinal anesthetic with a standardized amount of intrathecal morphine (ITM). 5. Able to provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. Subject is not a candidate for a spinal anesthetic 2. Subject receives a spinal anesthetic that required supplemental intraoperative pain medications (ketamine, epidural local anesthetic, epidural narcotics, intravenous narcotics, etc) 3. Subject is on chronic opioids. 4. Subject is an ASA class III or higher. 5. Subject has a known hypersensitivity to bupivacaine hydrochloride, amide-type local anesthetics, or any component of the formation, 6. Subject has hepatic or renal impairment that is concerning, as determined by the surgeon or anesthesiologist.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Post-operative AnalgesiaThru 24 hoursVAS pain intensity scores (at rest)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Length of Stay (LOS)Thru 72 hoursReduction in LOS
Time to first ambulationThru 72 hoursTime to ambulation
Breast feeding initiationThru 72 hoursTime to breast feeding initiation
Opioid use in the post-operative periodThru 72 hoursPost-operative opioid consumption
Increased operative timeThru 72 hoursIncreased operative time for cesarean delivery
Pain control at 2 hours post-cesarean deliveryThru 2 hoursVAS pain intensity at 2 hours
Wound Complication14days post-operativelyWound complication
Sole breastfeedingThru 72 hoursPercentage of subjects solely breastfeeding at the time of discharge

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactBrian M Fitzgerald, MD
brian.m.fitzgerald.mil@mail.mil210-916-8666

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026