Skip to content

Assessment of Maxillary Stability in Bimaxillary Orthognathic Patients Using the Inverted Sequence Approach

The Assessment of Maxillary Stability in Bimaxillary Orthognathic Patients Treated by Mandible-first Approach Versus Maxilla-first Approach; Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03353116
Enrollment
24
Registered
2017-11-27
Start date
2018-01-01
Completion date
2019-06-01
Last updated
2022-10-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Class III Malocclusion

Brief summary

The investigator will assess the inverted sequence approach in the treatment of class III patient undergoing bimaxillary orthognathic surgery

Detailed description

The investigator will compare the maxillary stability in class III orthognathic patients undergoing bimaxillary surgery by two surgical approaches ; the mandible-first (intervention) and the maxilla-first (control)

Interventions

PROCEDUREthe mandible first

the mandible osteotomy is going to be done and fixed first

PROCEDUREthe maxilla first

the maxilla osteotomy is going to be done and fixed first

Sponsors

Cairo University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients with skeletal class III malocclusion requiring bimaxillary orthognathic surgery 2. Patients free from any systemic disease 3. Patients who approved to be included in the trial and signed the informed consent 4. Patients with no signs or symptoms of temporomandibular disorders.

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients with cleft lip and palate can have an unfavorable effect on facial growth (LARRY M. WOLFORD, 2002) 2. Patients receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy due to the risk of low bone quality and healing (JW, 2003) 3. Patients who refused to be included in the trial

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
the change in maxilla stability6 monthsto assess the change in maxillary stability on cone beam CT obtained immediately and 6 month postoperative. the measuring unit is millimeter

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient satisfaction6 monththe quality of life questionnaire describes the patient's satisfaction during the entire treatment period which is done through a questionnaire answered by the patient through a score between 0-10 the measuring unit is numerical

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026