Astigmatism, Cataract
Conditions
Keywords
phacoemulsification, intraocular lens, vision, toric
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to clinically confirm the rotational stability of a modified AcrySof IQ toric intraocular lens (IOL) in a Japanese population.
Detailed description
Patients will be examined pre-operatively to up to 3 years post-operatively. One eligible eye will be selected as a target eye for efficacy analysis. If both eyes are eligible, the eye in which the IOL is implanted first will be selected as the target eye.
Interventions
Intended to provide visual acuity, including astigmatism correction, over the lifetime of the cataract patient
Removal of cataractous lens and implantation of IOL
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Diagnosis of cataracts with planned cataract removal by phacoemulsification * Calculated lens power within the available range * Able to sign informed consent and complete all study visits * Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply.
Exclusion criteria
* Eye conditions as specified in the protocol * Uncontrolled glaucoma * Pregnancy, current or planned * Other protocol-defined
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of Intraocular (IOL) Rotation (Visit 00 to Visit 4) | Visit 00 (Day 0 operative), Visit 4 (Day 120-180 postoperative) | IOL rotation was defined as the IOL axis difference between study visits. A photograph of the eye was taken, and IOL rotation was calculated as the angle between the toric mark on the IOL at Visit 4 and the reference point from Visit 00 (minimum 0 degrees, maximum 180 degrees). A lower value indicates greater IOL stability. No confirmatory hypothesis testing was conducted. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Mean Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | Visit 00 (Day 0 operative), Visit 00-A (Day 0, 1 +/- 0.5 hours postoperative), Visit 1 (Day 1-2 postoperative), Visit 2 (Day 7-14), Visit 3 (Day 30-60), Visit 4 (Day 120-180), Visit 5 (Day 330-420), Visit 6 (Day 630-780), Visit 7 (Day 990-1140) | IOL rotation was defined as the IOL axis difference between study visits. A photograph of the eye was taken, and IOL rotation was calculated as the angle on the IOL at the specified visit and the reference point from Visit 00 (minimum 0 degrees, maximum 180 degrees). A lower value indicates greater IOL stability. |
| Mean Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UCDVA) by Visit | Visit 0 (Preoperative), Visit 1 (Day 1-2 postoperative), Visit 2 (Day 7-14), Visit 3 (Day 30-60), Visit 4 (Day 120-180), Visit 5 (Day 330-420), Visit 6 (Day 630-780), Visit 7 (Day 990-1140) | Visual acuity (VA) was tested under well-lit conditions with no refractive correction in place using a decimal visual acuity chart set at 5 meters. VA was measured in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), with 0.0 logMAR corresponding to 20/20 Snellen visual acuity, or normal distance eyesight. A negative value denotes better than 20/20 visual acuity. |
| Mean Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) by Visit | Visit 0 (Preoperative), Visit 1 (Day 1-2 postoperative), Visit 2 (Day 7-14), Visit 3 (Day 30-60), Visit 4 (Day 120-180), Visit 5 (Day 330-420), Visit 6 (Day 630-780), Visit 7 (Day 990-1140) | Visual acuity (VA) was tested under well-lit conditions with refractive correction in place using a decimal visual acuity chart set at 5 meters. VA was measured in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), with 0.0 logMAR corresponding to 20/20 Snellen visual acuity, or normal distance eyesight. A negative value denotes better than 20/20 visual acuity. |
| Mean Sub-Surface Nano Glistening (SSNG) Densitometry (Peak) by Visit | Visit 1 (Day 1-2 postoperative), Visit 2 (Day 7-14), Visit 3 (Day 30-60), Visit 4 (Day 120-180), Visit 5 (Day 330-420), Visit 6 (Day 630-780), Visit 7 (Day 990-1140) | Sub-surface nano glistening (SSNG) densitometry was measured as the IOL anterior surface light scattering densitometry using Pentacam or Pentacam HR. SSNG was measured in units specific to the device, with a higher number indicating a higher presence of SSNG. Peak value is the highest value in the IOL anterior surface light scattering densitometry. |
| Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | Visit 00 (Day 0 operative), Visit 00-A (Day 0, 1 +/- 0.5 hours postoperative), Visit 1 (Day 1-2 postoperative), Visit 2 (Day 7-14), Visit 3 (Day 30-60), Visit 4 (Day 120-180), Visit 5 (Day 330-420), Visit 6 (Day 630-780), Visit 7 (Day 990-1140) | IOL rotation was defined as the IOL axis difference between study visits. A photograph of the eye was taken, and IOL rotation was calculated as the angle between the toric mark on the IOL at the specified visit and the reference point from Visit 00 (minimum 0 degrees, maximum 180 degrees). A lower value indicates greater IOL stability. |
| Number of Device Deficiencies | Visit 00 (Day 0 operative), Visit 00-A (Day 0, 1 +/- 0.5 hours postoperative), Visit 1 (Day 1-2 postoperative), Visit 2 (Day 7-14), Visit 3 (Day 30-60), Visit 4 (Day 120-180), Visit 5 (Day 330-420), Visit 6 (Day 630-780), Visit 7 (Day 990-1140) | A device deficiency was defined as an inadequacy of the medical device with respect to its identity, quality, durability, reliability, safety, or performance. |
| Percentage of Eyes With Glistening by Visit | Visit 1 (Day 1-2 postoperative), Visit 2 (Day 7-14), Visit 3 (Day 30-60), Visit 4 (Day 120-180), Visit 5 (Day 330-420), Visit 6 (Day 630-780), Visit 7 (Day 990-1140) | A slit lamp examination was conducted to determine the presence/absence of glistening particles on the implanted IOL. Glistening was reported by on a 4-point scale, where Grade 0 = no glistening; Grade 1 = mild glistening (50/mm3); Grade 2 = moderate glistening (100/mm3); and Grade 3 = severe glistening (200/mm3). |
| Number of Eyes With Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | Visit 1 (Day 1-2 postoperative), Visit 2 (Day 7-14), Visit 3 (Day 30-60), Visit 4 (Day 120-180), Visit 5 (Day 330-420), Visit 6 (Day 630-780), Visit 7 (Day 990-1140), Unscheduled Visits between Visit 1 and Visit 7 | A slit lamp examination was performed to evaluate the eye for posterior capsule opacification (that is, the thickening, opacification and clouding of the posterior lens capsule). The presence or absence of PCO was recorded. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator. |
| Number of Eyes Receiving Nd:YAG Laser Treatment for Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | Visit 1 (Day 1-2 postoperative), Visit 2 (Day 7-14), Visit 3 (Day 30-60), Visit 4 (Day 120-180), Visit 5 (Day 330-420), Visit 6 (Day 630-780), Visit 7 (Day 990-1140), Unscheduled Visits between Visit 1 and Visit 7 | A slit lamp examination was performed to evaluate the eye for posterior capsule opacification (that is, the thickening, opacification and clouding of the posterior lens capsule). A neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser was used to treat posterior capsule opacification, with treatment determined by the investigator. The presence or absence of Nd:YAG laser treament was recorded. |
| Mean SSNG Densitometry (Area Analysis) by Visit | Visit 1 (Day 1-2 postoperative), Visit 2 (Day 7-14), Visit 3 (Day 30-60), Visit 4 (Day 120-180), Visit 5 (Day 330-420), Visit 6 (Day 630-780), Visit 7 (Day 990-1140) | Sub-surface nano glistening (SSNG) densitometry was measured as the IOL anterior surface light scattering densitometry using Pentacam or Pentacam HR. SSNG was measured in units specific to the device, with a higher number indicating a higher presence of SSNG. Area analysis value is an average value of the IOL anterior surface light scattering densitometry in a certain area. |
Countries
Japan
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Subjects were enrolled at 4 investigative sites located in Japan.
Pre-assignment details
Of the 125 subjects enrolled, 4 were exited as screen failures prior to implantation with the test article. This reporting group includes all subjects/eyes with attempted implantation with the test article (successful or aborted after contact with the eye) (Safety Analysis Set).
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Acrysof IQ Toric A-code IOL AcrySof IQ Toric A-code (SN6AT3 - SN6AT5) implanted in the study eye | 121 |
| Total | 121 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 5 |
| Overall Study | Continuation impossible due to move | 4 |
| Overall Study | Physician Decision | 3 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 5 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Acrysof IQ Toric A-code IOL |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 75.5 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7 |
| Age, Customized 60 to 69 years | 14 Participants |
| Age, Customized 70 to 79 years | 69 Participants |
| Age, Customized Equal to or greater than 80 years | 36 Participants |
| Age, Customized Less than 60 years | 2 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Japanese | 121 participants |
| Region of Enrollment Japan | 121 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 67 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 54 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 4 / 121 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 7 / 121 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 15 / 121 |
Outcome results
Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of Intraocular (IOL) Rotation (Visit 00 to Visit 4)
IOL rotation was defined as the IOL axis difference between study visits. A photograph of the eye was taken, and IOL rotation was calculated as the angle between the toric mark on the IOL at Visit 4 and the reference point from Visit 00 (minimum 0 degrees, maximum 180 degrees). A lower value indicates greater IOL stability. No confirmatory hypothesis testing was conducted.
Time frame: Visit 00 (Day 0 operative), Visit 4 (Day 120-180 postoperative)
Population: All Implanted Analysis Set: All eyes with successful test article implantation and measurable data at Visit 4.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acrysof IQ Toric A-code IOL | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of Intraocular (IOL) Rotation (Visit 00 to Visit 4) | Less than 10 degrees rotation | 99.1 percentage of eyes |
| Acrysof IQ Toric A-code IOL | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of Intraocular (IOL) Rotation (Visit 00 to Visit 4) | Greater than or equal to 10 degrees rotation | 0.9 percentage of eyes |
| Acrysof IQ Toric A-code IOL | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of Intraocular (IOL) Rotation (Visit 00 to Visit 4) | Less than 20 degrees rotation | 100.0 percentage of eyes |
| Acrysof IQ Toric A-code IOL | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of Intraocular (IOL) Rotation (Visit 00 to Visit 4) | Greater than or equal to 20 degrees rotation | 0.0 percentage of eyes |
| Acrysof IQ Toric A-code IOL | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of Intraocular (IOL) Rotation (Visit 00 to Visit 4) | Less than 30 degrees rotation | 100.0 percentage of eyes |
| Acrysof IQ Toric A-code IOL | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of Intraocular (IOL) Rotation (Visit 00 to Visit 4) | Greater than or equal to 30 degrees rotation | 0.0 percentage of eyes |
Mean Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00
IOL rotation was defined as the IOL axis difference between study visits. A photograph of the eye was taken, and IOL rotation was calculated as the angle on the IOL at the specified visit and the reference point from Visit 00 (minimum 0 degrees, maximum 180 degrees). A lower value indicates greater IOL stability.
Time frame: Visit 00 (Day 0 operative), Visit 00-A (Day 0, 1 +/- 0.5 hours postoperative), Visit 1 (Day 1-2 postoperative), Visit 2 (Day 7-14), Visit 3 (Day 30-60), Visit 4 (Day 120-180), Visit 5 (Day 330-420), Visit 6 (Day 630-780), Visit 7 (Day 990-1140)
Population: All Implanted Analysis Set: All eyes with successful test article implantation and measurable data at both visits.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acrysof IQ Toric A-code IOL | Mean Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | 2.11 degree | Standard Deviation 1.8 |
| Visit 1 (Day 1-2 Postoperative) | Mean Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | 2.37 degree | Standard Deviation 1.96 |
| Visit 2 (Day 7-14 Postoperative) | Mean Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | 2.22 degree | Standard Deviation 2.08 |
| Visit 3 (Day 30-60 Postoperative) | Mean Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | 2.32 degree | Standard Deviation 2.14 |
| Visit 4 (Day 120-180 Postoperative) | Mean Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | 2.30 degree | Standard Deviation 2.23 |
| Visit 5 (Day 330-420 Postoperative) | Mean Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | 2.10 degree | Standard Deviation 2.08 |
| Visit 6 (Day 630-780 Postoperative) | Mean Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | 2.31 degree | Standard Deviation 1.99 |
| Visit 7 (Day 990-1140 Postoperative) | Mean Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | 2.10 degree | Standard Deviation 2.06 |
Mean Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) by Visit
Visual acuity (VA) was tested under well-lit conditions with refractive correction in place using a decimal visual acuity chart set at 5 meters. VA was measured in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), with 0.0 logMAR corresponding to 20/20 Snellen visual acuity, or normal distance eyesight. A negative value denotes better than 20/20 visual acuity.
Time frame: Visit 0 (Preoperative), Visit 1 (Day 1-2 postoperative), Visit 2 (Day 7-14), Visit 3 (Day 30-60), Visit 4 (Day 120-180), Visit 5 (Day 330-420), Visit 6 (Day 630-780), Visit 7 (Day 990-1140)
Population: All Implanted Analysis Set: All eyes with successful test article implantation
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acrysof IQ Toric A-code IOL | Mean Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) by Visit | 0.190 logMAR | Standard Deviation 0.163 |
| Visit 1 (Day 1-2 Postoperative) | Mean Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) by Visit | -0.030 logMAR | Standard Deviation 0.113 |
| Visit 2 (Day 7-14 Postoperative) | Mean Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) by Visit | -0.063 logMAR | Standard Deviation 0.088 |
| Visit 3 (Day 30-60 Postoperative) | Mean Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) by Visit | -0.080 logMAR | Standard Deviation 0.063 |
| Visit 4 (Day 120-180 Postoperative) | Mean Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) by Visit | -0.075 logMAR | Standard Deviation 0.099 |
| Visit 5 (Day 330-420 Postoperative) | Mean Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) by Visit | -0.085 logMAR | Standard Deviation 0.077 |
| Visit 6 (Day 630-780 Postoperative) | Mean Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) by Visit | -0.073 logMAR | Standard Deviation 0.08 |
| Visit 7 (Day 990-1140 Postoperative) | Mean Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) by Visit | -0.069 logMAR | Standard Deviation 0.101 |
Mean SSNG Densitometry (Area Analysis) by Visit
Sub-surface nano glistening (SSNG) densitometry was measured as the IOL anterior surface light scattering densitometry using Pentacam or Pentacam HR. SSNG was measured in units specific to the device, with a higher number indicating a higher presence of SSNG. Area analysis value is an average value of the IOL anterior surface light scattering densitometry in a certain area.
Time frame: Visit 1 (Day 1-2 postoperative), Visit 2 (Day 7-14), Visit 3 (Day 30-60), Visit 4 (Day 120-180), Visit 5 (Day 330-420), Visit 6 (Day 630-780), Visit 7 (Day 990-1140)
Population: All Implanted Analysis Set: All eyes with successful test article implantation
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acrysof IQ Toric A-code IOL | Mean SSNG Densitometry (Area Analysis) by Visit | 4.07 arbitrary units | Standard Deviation 0.5 |
| Visit 1 (Day 1-2 Postoperative) | Mean SSNG Densitometry (Area Analysis) by Visit | 4.12 arbitrary units | Standard Deviation 0.47 |
| Visit 2 (Day 7-14 Postoperative) | Mean SSNG Densitometry (Area Analysis) by Visit | 4.08 arbitrary units | Standard Deviation 0.46 |
| Visit 3 (Day 30-60 Postoperative) | Mean SSNG Densitometry (Area Analysis) by Visit | 4.05 arbitrary units | Standard Deviation 0.42 |
| Visit 4 (Day 120-180 Postoperative) | Mean SSNG Densitometry (Area Analysis) by Visit | 4.19 arbitrary units | Standard Deviation 0.38 |
| Visit 5 (Day 330-420 Postoperative) | Mean SSNG Densitometry (Area Analysis) by Visit | 4.30 arbitrary units | Standard Deviation 0.41 |
| Visit 6 (Day 630-780 Postoperative) | Mean SSNG Densitometry (Area Analysis) by Visit | 4.45 arbitrary units | Standard Deviation 0.48 |
Mean Sub-Surface Nano Glistening (SSNG) Densitometry (Peak) by Visit
Sub-surface nano glistening (SSNG) densitometry was measured as the IOL anterior surface light scattering densitometry using Pentacam or Pentacam HR. SSNG was measured in units specific to the device, with a higher number indicating a higher presence of SSNG. Peak value is the highest value in the IOL anterior surface light scattering densitometry.
Time frame: Visit 1 (Day 1-2 postoperative), Visit 2 (Day 7-14), Visit 3 (Day 30-60), Visit 4 (Day 120-180), Visit 5 (Day 330-420), Visit 6 (Day 630-780), Visit 7 (Day 990-1140)
Population: All Implanted Analysis Set: All eyes with successful test article implantation
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acrysof IQ Toric A-code IOL | Mean Sub-Surface Nano Glistening (SSNG) Densitometry (Peak) by Visit | 4.50 arbitrary units | Standard Deviation 0.7 |
| Visit 1 (Day 1-2 Postoperative) | Mean Sub-Surface Nano Glistening (SSNG) Densitometry (Peak) by Visit | 4.55 arbitrary units | Standard Deviation 0.57 |
| Visit 2 (Day 7-14 Postoperative) | Mean Sub-Surface Nano Glistening (SSNG) Densitometry (Peak) by Visit | 4.50 arbitrary units | Standard Deviation 0.55 |
| Visit 3 (Day 30-60 Postoperative) | Mean Sub-Surface Nano Glistening (SSNG) Densitometry (Peak) by Visit | 4.48 arbitrary units | Standard Deviation 0.64 |
| Visit 4 (Day 120-180 Postoperative) | Mean Sub-Surface Nano Glistening (SSNG) Densitometry (Peak) by Visit | 4.64 arbitrary units | Standard Deviation 0.78 |
| Visit 5 (Day 330-420 Postoperative) | Mean Sub-Surface Nano Glistening (SSNG) Densitometry (Peak) by Visit | 4.82 arbitrary units | Standard Deviation 0.63 |
| Visit 6 (Day 630-780 Postoperative) | Mean Sub-Surface Nano Glistening (SSNG) Densitometry (Peak) by Visit | 5.11 arbitrary units | Standard Deviation 0.76 |
Mean Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UCDVA) by Visit
Visual acuity (VA) was tested under well-lit conditions with no refractive correction in place using a decimal visual acuity chart set at 5 meters. VA was measured in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), with 0.0 logMAR corresponding to 20/20 Snellen visual acuity, or normal distance eyesight. A negative value denotes better than 20/20 visual acuity.
Time frame: Visit 0 (Preoperative), Visit 1 (Day 1-2 postoperative), Visit 2 (Day 7-14), Visit 3 (Day 30-60), Visit 4 (Day 120-180), Visit 5 (Day 330-420), Visit 6 (Day 630-780), Visit 7 (Day 990-1140)
Population: All Implanted Analysis Set: All eyes with successful test article implantation
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acrysof IQ Toric A-code IOL | Mean Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UCDVA) by Visit | 0.551 logMAR | Standard Deviation 0.368 |
| Visit 1 (Day 1-2 Postoperative) | Mean Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UCDVA) by Visit | 0.087 logMAR | Standard Deviation 0.17 |
| Visit 2 (Day 7-14 Postoperative) | Mean Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UCDVA) by Visit | 0.058 logMAR | Standard Deviation 0.156 |
| Visit 3 (Day 30-60 Postoperative) | Mean Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UCDVA) by Visit | 0.040 logMAR | Standard Deviation 0.127 |
| Visit 4 (Day 120-180 Postoperative) | Mean Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UCDVA) by Visit | 0.054 logMAR | Standard Deviation 0.149 |
| Visit 5 (Day 330-420 Postoperative) | Mean Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UCDVA) by Visit | 0.045 logMAR | Standard Deviation 0.163 |
| Visit 6 (Day 630-780 Postoperative) | Mean Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UCDVA) by Visit | 0.070 logMAR | Standard Deviation 0.157 |
| Visit 7 (Day 990-1140 Postoperative) | Mean Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UCDVA) by Visit | 0.086 logMAR | Standard Deviation 0.182 |
Number of Device Deficiencies
A device deficiency was defined as an inadequacy of the medical device with respect to its identity, quality, durability, reliability, safety, or performance.
Time frame: Visit 00 (Day 0 operative), Visit 00-A (Day 0, 1 +/- 0.5 hours postoperative), Visit 1 (Day 1-2 postoperative), Visit 2 (Day 7-14), Visit 3 (Day 30-60), Visit 4 (Day 120-180), Visit 5 (Day 330-420), Visit 6 (Day 630-780), Visit 7 (Day 990-1140)
Population: Safety Analysis Set
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acrysof IQ Toric A-code IOL | Number of Device Deficiencies | Broken IOL optic | 0 device deficiency |
| Acrysof IQ Toric A-code IOL | Number of Device Deficiencies | Broken IOL haptic | 0 device deficiency |
| Acrysof IQ Toric A-code IOL | Number of Device Deficiencies | IOL luxation | 0 device deficiency |
| Acrysof IQ Toric A-code IOL | Number of Device Deficiencies | IOL dislocation | 0 device deficiency |
| Acrysof IQ Toric A-code IOL | Number of Device Deficiencies | Other: IOL rotation | 2 device deficiency |
Number of Eyes Receiving Nd:YAG Laser Treatment for Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit
A slit lamp examination was performed to evaluate the eye for posterior capsule opacification (that is, the thickening, opacification and clouding of the posterior lens capsule). A neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd:YAG) laser was used to treat posterior capsule opacification, with treatment determined by the investigator. The presence or absence of Nd:YAG laser treament was recorded.
Time frame: Visit 1 (Day 1-2 postoperative), Visit 2 (Day 7-14), Visit 3 (Day 30-60), Visit 4 (Day 120-180), Visit 5 (Day 330-420), Visit 6 (Day 630-780), Visit 7 (Day 990-1140), Unscheduled Visits between Visit 1 and Visit 7
Population: Safety Analysis Set: All eyes with attempted implantation with the test article (successful or aborted after contact with the eye). Note: One subject implanted with the test article discontinued the study prior to the Visit 1 assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acrysof IQ Toric A-code IOL | Number of Eyes Receiving Nd:YAG Laser Treatment for Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | Yes | 0 eye |
| Acrysof IQ Toric A-code IOL | Number of Eyes Receiving Nd:YAG Laser Treatment for Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | No | 120 eye |
| Visit 1 (Day 1-2 Postoperative) | Number of Eyes Receiving Nd:YAG Laser Treatment for Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | No | 119 eye |
| Visit 1 (Day 1-2 Postoperative) | Number of Eyes Receiving Nd:YAG Laser Treatment for Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | Yes | 0 eye |
| Visit 2 (Day 7-14 Postoperative) | Number of Eyes Receiving Nd:YAG Laser Treatment for Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | Yes | 0 eye |
| Visit 2 (Day 7-14 Postoperative) | Number of Eyes Receiving Nd:YAG Laser Treatment for Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | No | 119 eye |
| Visit 3 (Day 30-60 Postoperative) | Number of Eyes Receiving Nd:YAG Laser Treatment for Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | No | 117 eye |
| Visit 3 (Day 30-60 Postoperative) | Number of Eyes Receiving Nd:YAG Laser Treatment for Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | Yes | 0 eye |
| Visit 4 (Day 120-180 Postoperative) | Number of Eyes Receiving Nd:YAG Laser Treatment for Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | Yes | 0 eye |
| Visit 4 (Day 120-180 Postoperative) | Number of Eyes Receiving Nd:YAG Laser Treatment for Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | No | 116 eye |
| Visit 5 (Day 330-420 Postoperative) | Number of Eyes Receiving Nd:YAG Laser Treatment for Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | No | 110 eye |
| Visit 5 (Day 330-420 Postoperative) | Number of Eyes Receiving Nd:YAG Laser Treatment for Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | Yes | 0 eye |
| Visit 6 (Day 630-780 Postoperative) | Number of Eyes Receiving Nd:YAG Laser Treatment for Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | Yes | 1 eye |
| Visit 6 (Day 630-780 Postoperative) | Number of Eyes Receiving Nd:YAG Laser Treatment for Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | No | 103 eye |
| Visit 7 (Day 990-1140 Postoperative) | Number of Eyes Receiving Nd:YAG Laser Treatment for Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | No | 29 eye |
| Visit 7 (Day 990-1140 Postoperative) | Number of Eyes Receiving Nd:YAG Laser Treatment for Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | Yes | 3 eye |
| Visit 1 Through Visit 7 Cumulative | Number of Eyes Receiving Nd:YAG Laser Treatment for Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | Yes | 4 eye |
| Visit 1 Through Visit 7 Cumulative | Number of Eyes Receiving Nd:YAG Laser Treatment for Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | No | 116 eye |
Number of Eyes With Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit
A slit lamp examination was performed to evaluate the eye for posterior capsule opacification (that is, the thickening, opacification and clouding of the posterior lens capsule). The presence or absence of PCO was recorded. Clinical significance was determined by the investigator.
Time frame: Visit 1 (Day 1-2 postoperative), Visit 2 (Day 7-14), Visit 3 (Day 30-60), Visit 4 (Day 120-180), Visit 5 (Day 330-420), Visit 6 (Day 630-780), Visit 7 (Day 990-1140), Unscheduled Visits between Visit 1 and Visit 7
Population: Safety Analysis Set: All eyes with attempted implantation with the test article (successful or aborted after contact with the eye). Note: One subject implanted with the test article discontinued the study prior to the Visit 1 assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acrysof IQ Toric A-code IOL | Number of Eyes With Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | None | 120 eye |
| Acrysof IQ Toric A-code IOL | Number of Eyes With Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | Clinically significant | 0 eye |
| Acrysof IQ Toric A-code IOL | Number of Eyes With Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | Clinically significant requiring Nd:YAG laser treatment | 0 eye |
| Acrysof IQ Toric A-code IOL | Number of Eyes With Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | Clinically nonsignificant | 0 eye |
| Visit 1 (Day 1-2 Postoperative) | Number of Eyes With Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | Clinically significant | 0 eye |
| Visit 1 (Day 1-2 Postoperative) | Number of Eyes With Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | Clinically significant requiring Nd:YAG laser treatment | 0 eye |
| Visit 1 (Day 1-2 Postoperative) | Number of Eyes With Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | Clinically nonsignificant | 1 eye |
| Visit 1 (Day 1-2 Postoperative) | Number of Eyes With Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | None | 118 eye |
| Visit 2 (Day 7-14 Postoperative) | Number of Eyes With Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | Clinically significant | 0 eye |
| Visit 2 (Day 7-14 Postoperative) | Number of Eyes With Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | None | 112 eye |
| Visit 2 (Day 7-14 Postoperative) | Number of Eyes With Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | Clinically nonsignificant | 7 eye |
| Visit 2 (Day 7-14 Postoperative) | Number of Eyes With Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | Clinically significant requiring Nd:YAG laser treatment | 0 eye |
| Visit 3 (Day 30-60 Postoperative) | Number of Eyes With Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | Clinically nonsignificant | 12 eye |
| Visit 3 (Day 30-60 Postoperative) | Number of Eyes With Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | None | 105 eye |
| Visit 3 (Day 30-60 Postoperative) | Number of Eyes With Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | Clinically significant requiring Nd:YAG laser treatment | 0 eye |
| Visit 3 (Day 30-60 Postoperative) | Number of Eyes With Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | Clinically significant | 0 eye |
| Visit 4 (Day 120-180 Postoperative) | Number of Eyes With Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | Clinically significant | 0 eye |
| Visit 4 (Day 120-180 Postoperative) | Number of Eyes With Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | Clinically nonsignificant | 16 eye |
| Visit 4 (Day 120-180 Postoperative) | Number of Eyes With Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | Clinically significant requiring Nd:YAG laser treatment | 0 eye |
| Visit 4 (Day 120-180 Postoperative) | Number of Eyes With Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | None | 100 eye |
| Visit 5 (Day 330-420 Postoperative) | Number of Eyes With Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | Clinically significant requiring Nd:YAG laser treatment | 0 eye |
| Visit 5 (Day 330-420 Postoperative) | Number of Eyes With Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | None | 79 eye |
| Visit 5 (Day 330-420 Postoperative) | Number of Eyes With Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | Clinically nonsignificant | 26 eye |
| Visit 5 (Day 330-420 Postoperative) | Number of Eyes With Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | Clinically significant | 0 eye |
| Visit 6 (Day 630-780 Postoperative) | Number of Eyes With Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | Clinically significant | 2 eye |
| Visit 6 (Day 630-780 Postoperative) | Number of Eyes With Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | Clinically nonsignificant | 34 eye |
| Visit 6 (Day 630-780 Postoperative) | Number of Eyes With Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | None | 66 eye |
| Visit 6 (Day 630-780 Postoperative) | Number of Eyes With Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | Clinically significant requiring Nd:YAG laser treatment | 2 eye |
| Visit 7 (Day 990-1140 Postoperative) | Number of Eyes With Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | None | 16 eye |
| Visit 7 (Day 990-1140 Postoperative) | Number of Eyes With Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | Clinically significant | 2 eye |
| Visit 7 (Day 990-1140 Postoperative) | Number of Eyes With Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | Clinically nonsignificant | 0 eye |
| Visit 7 (Day 990-1140 Postoperative) | Number of Eyes With Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | Clinically significant requiring Nd:YAG laser treatment | 3 eye |
| Visit 1 Through Visit 7 Cumulative | Number of Eyes With Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | Clinically significant requiring Nd:YAG laser treatment | 5 eye |
| Visit 1 Through Visit 7 Cumulative | Number of Eyes With Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | None | 74 eye |
| Visit 1 Through Visit 7 Cumulative | Number of Eyes With Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | Clinically significant | 2 eye |
| Visit 1 Through Visit 7 Cumulative | Number of Eyes With Posterior Capsule Opacification (PCO) by Visit | Clinically nonsignificant | 39 eye |
Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00
IOL rotation was defined as the IOL axis difference between study visits. A photograph of the eye was taken, and IOL rotation was calculated as the angle between the toric mark on the IOL at the specified visit and the reference point from Visit 00 (minimum 0 degrees, maximum 180 degrees). A lower value indicates greater IOL stability.
Time frame: Visit 00 (Day 0 operative), Visit 00-A (Day 0, 1 +/- 0.5 hours postoperative), Visit 1 (Day 1-2 postoperative), Visit 2 (Day 7-14), Visit 3 (Day 30-60), Visit 4 (Day 120-180), Visit 5 (Day 330-420), Visit 6 (Day 630-780), Visit 7 (Day 990-1140)
Population: All Implanted Analysis Set: All eyes with successful test article implantation and measurable data at both visits.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acrysof IQ Toric A-code IOL | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | Greater than or equal to 30 degrees rotation | 0.0 percentage of eyes |
| Acrysof IQ Toric A-code IOL | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | Less than 10 degrees rotation | 100.0 percentage of eyes |
| Acrysof IQ Toric A-code IOL | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | Greater than or equal to 10 degrees rotation | 0.0 percentage of eyes |
| Acrysof IQ Toric A-code IOL | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | Less than 20 degrees rotation | 100.0 percentage of eyes |
| Acrysof IQ Toric A-code IOL | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | Less than 30 degrees rotation | 100.0 percentage of eyes |
| Acrysof IQ Toric A-code IOL | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | Greater than or equal to 20 degrees rotation | 0.0 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 1 (Day 1-2 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | Less than 20 degrees rotation | 100.0 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 1 (Day 1-2 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | Less than 10 degrees rotation | 100.0 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 1 (Day 1-2 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | Greater than or equal to 20 degrees rotation | 0.0 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 1 (Day 1-2 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | Greater than or equal to 30 degrees rotation | 0.0 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 1 (Day 1-2 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | Greater than or equal to 10 degrees rotation | 0.0 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 1 (Day 1-2 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | Less than 30 degrees rotation | 100.0 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 2 (Day 7-14 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | Less than 30 degrees rotation | 100.0 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 2 (Day 7-14 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | Less than 20 degrees rotation | 100.0 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 2 (Day 7-14 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | Greater than or equal to 10 degrees rotation | 0.8 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 2 (Day 7-14 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | Greater than or equal to 20 degrees rotation | 0.0 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 2 (Day 7-14 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | Greater than or equal to 30 degrees rotation | 0.0 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 2 (Day 7-14 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | Less than 10 degrees rotation | 99.2 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 3 (Day 30-60 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | Less than 30 degrees rotation | 100.0 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 3 (Day 30-60 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | Less than 10 degrees rotation | 99.1 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 3 (Day 30-60 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | Greater than or equal to 10 degrees rotation | 0.9 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 3 (Day 30-60 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | Less than 20 degrees rotation | 100.0 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 3 (Day 30-60 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | Greater than or equal to 20 degrees rotation | 0.0 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 3 (Day 30-60 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | Greater than or equal to 30 degrees rotation | 0.0 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 4 (Day 120-180 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | Less than 30 degrees rotation | 100.0 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 4 (Day 120-180 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | Greater than or equal to 10 degrees rotation | 0.9 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 4 (Day 120-180 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | Greater than or equal to 30 degrees rotation | 0.0 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 4 (Day 120-180 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | Less than 10 degrees rotation | 99.1 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 4 (Day 120-180 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | Greater than or equal to 20 degrees rotation | 0.0 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 4 (Day 120-180 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | Less than 20 degrees rotation | 100.0 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 5 (Day 330-420 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | Less than 20 degrees rotation | 100.0 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 5 (Day 330-420 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | Greater than or equal to 20 degrees rotation | 0.0 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 5 (Day 330-420 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | Greater than or equal to 10 degrees rotation | 0.9 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 5 (Day 330-420 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | Less than 30 degrees rotation | 100.0 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 5 (Day 330-420 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | Less than 10 degrees rotation | 99.1 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 5 (Day 330-420 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | Greater than or equal to 30 degrees rotation | 0.0 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 6 (Day 630-780 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | Greater than or equal to 20 degrees rotation | 0.0 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 6 (Day 630-780 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | Less than 30 degrees rotation | 100.0 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 6 (Day 630-780 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | Less than 10 degrees rotation | 98.9 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 6 (Day 630-780 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | Less than 20 degrees rotation | 100.0 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 6 (Day 630-780 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | Greater than or equal to 30 degrees rotation | 0.0 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 6 (Day 630-780 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | Greater than or equal to 10 degrees rotation | 1.1 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 7 (Day 990-1140 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | Greater than or equal to 20 degrees rotation | 0.0 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 7 (Day 990-1140 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | Less than 20 degrees rotation | 100.0 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 7 (Day 990-1140 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | Greater than or equal to 30 degrees rotation | 0.0 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 7 (Day 990-1140 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | Less than 30 degrees rotation | 100.0 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 7 (Day 990-1140 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | Less than 10 degrees rotation | 100.0 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 7 (Day 990-1140 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Value of IOL Rotation From Visit 00 | Greater than or equal to 10 degrees rotation | 0.0 percentage of eyes |
Percentage of Eyes With Glistening by Visit
A slit lamp examination was conducted to determine the presence/absence of glistening particles on the implanted IOL. Glistening was reported by on a 4-point scale, where Grade 0 = no glistening; Grade 1 = mild glistening (50/mm3); Grade 2 = moderate glistening (100/mm3); and Grade 3 = severe glistening (200/mm3).
Time frame: Visit 1 (Day 1-2 postoperative), Visit 2 (Day 7-14), Visit 3 (Day 30-60), Visit 4 (Day 120-180), Visit 5 (Day 330-420), Visit 6 (Day 630-780), Visit 7 (Day 990-1140)
Population: Safety Analysis Set: All eyes with attempted implantation with the test article (successful or aborted after contact with the eye). Note: One subject implanted with the test article discontinued the study prior to the Visit 1 assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Acrysof IQ Toric A-code IOL | Percentage of Eyes With Glistening by Visit | Grade 0 | 100.0 percentage of eyes |
| Acrysof IQ Toric A-code IOL | Percentage of Eyes With Glistening by Visit | Grade 3 | 0.0 percentage of eyes |
| Acrysof IQ Toric A-code IOL | Percentage of Eyes With Glistening by Visit | Grade 2 | 0.0 percentage of eyes |
| Acrysof IQ Toric A-code IOL | Percentage of Eyes With Glistening by Visit | Grade 1 | 0.0 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 1 (Day 1-2 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Glistening by Visit | Grade 1 | 0.0 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 1 (Day 1-2 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Glistening by Visit | Grade 3 | 0.0 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 1 (Day 1-2 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Glistening by Visit | Grade 0 | 100.0 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 1 (Day 1-2 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Glistening by Visit | Grade 2 | 0.0 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 2 (Day 7-14 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Glistening by Visit | Grade 3 | 0.0 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 2 (Day 7-14 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Glistening by Visit | Grade 1 | 0.0 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 2 (Day 7-14 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Glistening by Visit | Grade 2 | 0.0 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 2 (Day 7-14 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Glistening by Visit | Grade 0 | 100.0 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 3 (Day 30-60 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Glistening by Visit | Grade 1 | 9.4 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 3 (Day 30-60 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Glistening by Visit | Grade 0 | 88.0 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 3 (Day 30-60 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Glistening by Visit | Grade 2 | 2.6 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 3 (Day 30-60 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Glistening by Visit | Grade 3 | 0.0 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 4 (Day 120-180 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Glistening by Visit | Grade 1 | 20.7 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 4 (Day 120-180 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Glistening by Visit | Grade 2 | 7.8 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 4 (Day 120-180 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Glistening by Visit | Grade 0 | 68.1 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 4 (Day 120-180 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Glistening by Visit | Grade 3 | 3.4 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 5 (Day 330-420 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Glistening by Visit | Grade 0 | 59.4 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 5 (Day 330-420 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Glistening by Visit | Grade 3 | 5.0 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 5 (Day 330-420 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Glistening by Visit | Grade 2 | 13.9 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 5 (Day 330-420 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Glistening by Visit | Grade 1 | 21.8 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 6 (Day 630-780 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Glistening by Visit | Grade 3 | 7.7 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 6 (Day 630-780 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Glistening by Visit | Grade 0 | 49.0 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 6 (Day 630-780 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Glistening by Visit | Grade 1 | 27.9 percentage of eyes |
| Visit 6 (Day 630-780 Postoperative) | Percentage of Eyes With Glistening by Visit | Grade 2 | 15.4 percentage of eyes |