Skip to content

Coached, Coordinated, Enhanced Neonatal Transition (CCENT)

Coached, Coordinated, Enhanced Neonatal Transition (CCENT): A Multi-centre Mixed-methods Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03350243
Acronym
CCENT
Enrollment
275
Registered
2017-11-22
Start date
2018-01-31
Completion date
2022-10-31
Last updated
2023-04-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prematurity

Keywords

Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, Mindfulness, Care coordination, Anticipatory guidance, Parental support, Neonatal follow-up, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

Brief summary

This study will evaluate a new neonatal follow-up model that offers additional support and coping resources for parents during their child's NICU admission as well as during their transition home. The Coached, Coordinated, Enhanced Neonatal Transition (CCENT) model involves a key worker who will be the primary support for families during the first year of their child's life. The key worker's role involves 1) parental coaching using an Acceptance and Commitment Therapy approach, 2) coordinating care across various levels of care as well as supporting families in system and resource navigation, and 3) provided proactive education targeting normal challenges in caring for a child who required intensive care support. The goal is to improve the psychosocial support and medical care coordination beyond the neonatal intensive care unit as many of the medical and social concerns do not end at the time of discharge. Primary objective is parent stress at 12 months.

Interventions

OTHERCCENT Intervention

1. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy approach: engaging families through structured individual or group sessions within the NICU and continue this support once discharged. 2. Care coordination: supporting providers in clear communication when liaising across various levels of care as well as supporting families in system and resource navigation. 3. Anticipatory guidance: proactive education targeting normal challenges in caring for a child who required intensive care support.

Sponsors

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
CollaboratorOTHER
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
CollaboratorOTHER
MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL
CollaboratorOTHER
The Ottawa Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Montreal Children's Hospital of the MUHC
CollaboratorOTHER
Provincial Health Services Authority British Columbia
CollaboratorOTHER
The Hospital for Sick Children
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
0 Months to 4 Months
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

(meets at least one of the following criteria): 1. Infant born ≤ 26+6 weeks of gestational age (GA) 2. Infant born between 27-29+6 weeks GA with ≥ 1 of the following risk factors: i)≥ Grade III intraventricular hemorrhage with post hemorrhagic hydrocephalus ii)Retinopathy of prematurity requiring intraocular bevacizumab/ anti-vascular endothelial growth factor or laser surgery therapy iii)Requires invasive (e.g., intubated) or non-invasive (e.g., CPAP or BiPAP) at ≥ 34 weeks GA and/or supplemental oxygen at ≥ 37 weeks gestational age iv)Requires surgery for management of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC)- stage 3 3. Infant with ≥ 2 major congenital anomalies as defined by EUROCAT(13) (e.g., congenital heart disease, spina bifida, cleft palate, etc. Not including minor congenital anomalies, e.g., dysmorphic facies), and length of stay in recruiting institution ≥ 14 days. 4. Infant with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) requiring therapeutic hypothermia and in the recruiting institution for ≥ 14 days.

Exclusion criteria

1. Families that do not speak English or French 2. Parent will not be involved with child's care over the entirety of the study period (2 years) (e.g., adoption). 3. Infant will be followed by an out-of-province neonatal follow-up program or lives a significant distance from the neonatal follow up program and therefore not routinely followed by the team. 4. Infant that has previously been discharged home from the NICU/hospital. 5. Decision/high likelihood of decision for act of withdrawal of care by clinical teams/families

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Parental Stress12 monthsThis outcome will be assessed using the Parenting Stress Index 4th Edition (PSI-4) Short Form questionnaire.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Parental Quality of Life (QoL)4 monthsThe Health Utilities Index (HUI) questionnaire provides a health-related quality of life (HRQL) score for overall health, which will be used to calculate quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for a cost-utility analysis.
Parental Empowerment12 monthsThis outcome will be assessed using the Family Empowerment Scale (FES), which measures empowerment across three specific domains: 1) family, 2) service system, and 3) community/political.
Child Social and Emotional Development12 monthsThis outcome will be assessed using the Brief Infant-Toddler Social Emotional Assessment (BITSEA), which is a parent self-report questionnaire that is designed as a screener to identify children (1-3 years old) at risk for or currently experiencing social-emotional and/or behavioural problems.
Parent and Child Interaction12 monthsThis outcome will be assessed using the Nursing Child Assessment Satellite Training Parent-Child Interaction (NCAST-PCI), which is used assess caregiver and infant behaviour during a structured teaching task.
Maternal Depression6 weeksThis outcome will be assessed using the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), which is a screening tool used to identify those with symptoms associated with postnatal depression in the previous 7 days. Composite score between 0 to 30 will be recorded, with a score of 10 or greater indicating possible depression.
Resource Utilization4 monthsThe Resource Use Questionnaire (RUQ) will assess family resource use relating to their child's medical needs, services and programs, as well as parent time losses and family out-of-pocket costs.
Psychology Inflexibility6 weeksThe Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ-II) a questionnaire used to measure parent psychological inflexibility or experiential avoidance. The AAQ-II consists of seven items (e.g., I'm afraid of my feelings, I worry about not being able to control my worries and feelings) measured on a 1 (never true) to 7 (always true) scale.
Parental perception of transition experience6 weeks post dischargeParental perception of transition experience will be assessed using the Pediatric Transition Experience Measure (PTEM), an 11 item parent-report questionnaire which measures a parent's perception of transition preparation and support from the hospital.
Child Development18 monthsThe Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (3rd Edition) will be used to assess neurodevelopment with separate composite scores (mean 100 ± SD 15) for cognition, language, and motor skills.
Healthcare Service Delivery12 monthsThis outcome will be assessed using the Measure of Processes of Care (MPOC20) questionnaire, which is used to measure the parent's perception of the health services they and their child receive.
Maternal Anxiety4 monthsThis outcome will be assessed using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) questionnaire, which often used in research as an indicator of caregiver distress.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Health System Outcomes12 monthsThe investigators will link the patient-reported evaluation of the CCENT model with health administrative data housed at the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES) for consenting participants. Case-costing methods will be used to determine direct health care costs related to inpatient (emergency department) and outpatient (pharmaceutical and home health care) services.
Social supportBaselineThe Social Support Questionnaire- Short Form (Sarason et al., 1987) is a 6 item measure of social support. For each of the 6 items, respondents indicate the number of people available to provide support in each of 6 areas and then rate the overall level of satisfaction with the support given in each of the areas. Scores range from 0-54 for number of people available, and satisfaction ranges from 6-36. Higher scores indicate more support.

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 15, 2026