Skip to content

Neoadjuvant Short-term Intensive Chemoresection Versus Standard Adjuvant Intravesical Instillations in NMIBC

Neoadjuvant Short-term Intensive Chemoresection Versus Standard Adjuvant Intravesical Instillations in NMIBC

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03348969
Acronym
NICSA
Enrollment
120
Registered
2017-11-21
Start date
2017-11-01
Completion date
2025-12-31
Last updated
2026-03-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bladder Cancer

Keywords

Mitomycin C, Neoadjuvant

Brief summary

A randomized controlled trial aiming to investigate neoadjuvant, short-term intensive chemoresection with Mitomycin C compared to standard treatment with TURB and adjuvant intravesical instillation therapy in patients with recurrent non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).

Detailed description

Background: Bladder cancer is the 11th most common cancer in the world and one of the most costly cancers on a per patient basis, due to the cost of operative procedures, follow-up cystoscopies and instillation therapy. Furthermore there is a risk of progression to invasive and hence deadly cancer why efficient and immediate treatment is crucial. Treatment today consists of surgical removal of tumours (TURB) and adjuvant intravesical treatment. There is a chance; neoadjuvant intravesical treatment with chemotherapy can supersede surgical removal in chemo-sensitive tumours while however some tumours will not respond to intravesical chemotherapy. Currently it is not possible to predict which tumours are chemo-sensitive and which are not. Objectives: To assess the efficacy of neoadjuvant, short-term intensive chemoresection with Mitomycin C compared to standard treatment with TURB and adjuvant intravesical instillation therapy in patients with recurrent non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). To investigate the ability to predict chemo-response in patients with recurrent non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Methods: A randomised clinical controlled trial will include 120 patients with recurrent NMIBC. The control group of 60 patients will receive standard care with TURB and adjuvant intravesical treatment. The intervention group of 60 patients will be submitted to neoadjuvant short-term intensive chemoresection with three instillations with Mitomycin C per week for two weeks. Remnant tumour tissue will be evaluated by flexible cystoscopy after four weeks. To investigate the ability to predict chemo-response in patients with recurrent NMIBC, a connection between biomarkers of the initial tumour tissue and tumour response will be assessed. Samples of the latest resected tumour prior to inclusion will be collected from all participants treated with neoadjuvant chemoresection and assessed against the tumour response seen in the trial. Perspectives: Validation of biomarkers to predict chemo-response will be an important step to integrate biomarkers in daily clinical practice and to individualize the treatment of NMIBC. In some cases surgery could be avoided while ineffective chemotherapy could be avoided in others.

Interventions

DRUGMitomycin c

Neoadjuvant Mitomycin C

Sponsors

Jørgen Bjerggaard Jensen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Randomized Clinical Trial

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Known history of urothelial non-invasive Ta-tumour low-grade or high-grade. * ≥18 years old * Mentally healthy individual * The ability to understand Danish orally and in writing

Exclusion criteria

* Known history of invasive tumour of the bladder (T1+) * Known history of CIS of the bladder * Previous BCG-treatment within the last 24 months * Previous Mitomycin C-treatment (except single-shot postoperative instillation) * Known allergy or intolerance to Mitomycin C * Solid tumour with suspicions of invasion * Single tumour of more than 2 cm in diameter * Suspicion of CIS (positive cytology with high-grade neoplastic cells combined with suspicious cystoscopy for flat lesions). * Small bladder volume (less than 100 ml) or incontinence * Acute cystitis * Pregnancy or breast-feeding * Not willing to use secure contraception with regard to men with partners and premenopausal women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
2-year recurrence ratewithin 2 yearsThe primary outcome is the number of patients in need for a TURB or tumour fulguration in the first 2 years following randomization. TURBs included as primary endpoint are the initial TURB in the control group, the prospective TURB in the intervention group for patients without complete chemoresection as well as TURB due to recurrence in both study groups. In case a TURB is recommended, but a subject refuses to undergo surgery, the recommended TURB is also registered.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tumour response rate6 months after complete enrollmentNumber of patients with complete, partial and incomplete tumour response on neoadjuvant, short-term intensive chemoresection with Mitomycin C.
5-year recurrence ratewithin 5 yearsThe number of patients in need of a TURB or tumour fulguration in the outpatient clinic in the first 5 years following randomization. TURBs included are the initial TURB in the control group, the prospective TURB in the intervention group for patients without complete chemoresection as well as TURB due to recurrence in both study groups. In case a TURB is recommended, but a subject refuses to undergo surgery, the recommended TURB is also registered.
Adverse events6 months after complete enrollmentProportion of patients with adverse events related to neoadjuvant, short-term intensive chemoresection
Biomarkerswithin 2 yearsComposition of 650 cancer-associated genes expressed on the last resected tumour

Countries

Denmark

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJørgen Bjerggaard Jensen, MD

Aarhus University Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 4, 2026