Adolescent Development, Intellectual Disability, Young Adult
Conditions
Keywords
Intellectual disability, Parenthood, Reproduction, Intervention, Adolescents
Brief summary
This study aims to evaluate an intervention using the Toolkit Children - what does it involve? and the Real-Care-Baby (RCB) simulator among students with intellectual disability (ID), using a cluster randomized trial design with waiting-list control group.
Detailed description
Background: There is limited knowledge about how young people with ID can be facilitated in their process of deciding about parenthood. A feasibility study showed that it is possible to evaluate an intervention using the chosen instruments among students with ID in order to provide them with further insights about parenthood. Methods: Randomization of eleven clusters/schools to intervention and eleven clusters to waiting-list control. Intervention includes thirteen educational lessons and a three-day and night caring-session with the RCB simulator. Intervention will be given 1-2 lessons/week during 8-14 weeks. Data will be collected with questionnaires and interviews before and after intervention. In control group: Before and after waiting-list time and after intervention.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALChildren - what does it involve?
Thirteen educational lessons based on the conversational material Toolkit will be delivered in the classroom at school, two lessons per theme. The themes consists of: 1) a card game: What i wish 2) Time 3) Money 4) Skills 5) Relations 6) Housing. The material is prepared and same for all schools. This intervention will be given 1-2 lessons per week over a period of 8-14 weeks. During this period the students also care for the RCB simulator during three days and nights, but with a break for day care for the simulator which was between 7 am and 5 pm when the students were in school. All students will practice handling the simulator to be familiar with all types of needs: to rock, change diaper, feed and burp and were taught the skills of head support, techniques to avoid rough handling.
Sponsors
Uppsala-Örebro Regional Research Council
Uppsala University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Masking description
The researchers are outcome assessors, independent from the intervention.
Intervention model description
Cluster randomized intervention study with waiting list control group.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
16 Years to 21 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* Students with mild or moderate ID with informed consent can be included * Understand and respond to a questionnaire
Exclusion criteria
\- Students with severe ID
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Infant Simulator Attitude Scale (ISA) | Change from baseline after 13 weeks | The original ISA consists of 38 items of which most are statements with four response alternatives ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree. It was translated to Swedish and to the cognitive level of students with intellectual disability. Statements were changed into questions and one response alternative I do not know was added. The items related to sexual activity and to contraception were omitted since it was not the focus of the intervention and also to ease the all over burden of lengthy questionnaires for the students. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| General Self-Efficacy Scale (S-GSE) | Change from baseline after 13 weeks | The S-GSE contains 10 items and it has already been used in Sweden. The investigators adapted two of the items and added the response alternative I do not know. The layout of the response alternatives was adapted to individuals with cognitive disability and the students were given the opportunity to use pictures or sign language for ease of understanding. |
| Data extracted from Real Care Baby simulator | Change from baseline after three days and nights | Proper care, mishandle and performance - mean and range in percent |
Countries
Sweden
Outcome results
None listed