Cardiovascular Disease
Conditions
Keywords
atrial fibrillation, surgery
Brief summary
Atrial fibrillation(AF) often occurs in patients with mitral valve disease. Both mitral replacement and mitral valve plasty are the effective methods to the mitral valve disease. How to cure atrial fibrillation is the key to full recovery. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in surgery is an effective treatment for those patients. But there are some recurrence rate after RFA, particularly in patients with enlarged left atrium. So the investigators design a new procedure(Left Atrial Geometric Volume Reduction, Pulmonary Vein Island Isolation and Left Appendage Base Closure) during mitral surgery and study the outcomes to evaluate this new operation.
Detailed description
From September 2017, 20 selective patients, and then 120 consecutive patients with valvular atrial fibrillation were treated with our new operation. If the clinical results from the first 20 patients with restrict selection criteria are unsatisfied, that is, the restoration rate of the sinus rhythm was less than 50% at 1-year follow up, the study will be stopped. Otherwise, another single arm with 120 consecutive patients with valvular AF will be recruited for next phase. Procedure details: All patients will have their left atrial geometric volume reduced, pulmonary vein island isolated and left appendage ligated or suture closed. After the superior vena cava was transected, two circular incisions were usually made in the left atrial wall between the pulmonary veins and the mitral annulus for circumferential atrial strip resection and pulmonary vein island isolation. The first circular incision was performed around the pulmonary veins. With this incision, pulmonary vein island was isolated and the left atrium was opened. The second one was performed in the interatrial groove and extended around the mitral annulus, leaving a 2 cm inferior wall margin from the annulus and the appendage in situ. With those two incisions, a circumferential strip of the left atrium was excised. Then the base of the left atrial appendage was ligated or excised and sutured. After the mitral manipulations, the center of the pulmonary vein island was longitudinally reef-imbricated with a 3-0 polypropylene continuous running suture to exclude toward the outside of the left atrial cavity. This plicated pulmonary vein island was directly anastomosed to the resected margin around the mitral annulus and the intraatrial septum instead of the interatrial groove. Finally, caval continuity was restored after aortic cross-clamp removal using a running 4-0 polypropylene suture. Telephone contact was maintained with the patients after discharge.The use of antiarrhythmic medications will be allowed during the first 3 months(blanking period). Transthoracic 2-dimensional echocardiography and Holter monitoring will be obtained at baseline and at 3, 6, and 12 months after the initial operation. Whenever the participants have symptoms such as palpitation, dizziness, or shortness of breath, they could telephone the doctors. The primary efficacy endpoint is freedom from AF at both 6 months and 12 months after surgery, assessed by 7-days continuous Holter monitoring. The primary safety are cardiopulmonary bypass time; and a composite of death, stroke, serious cardiac events (heart failure, myocardial infarction), cardiac re-hospitalizations, transient ischemic attack, pulmonary embolism, peripheral embolism, coronary artery injury, anatomical excessive bleeding, deep sternal wound infection/mediastinitis, damage to specialized conduction system requiring permanent pacemaker, and superior vena cava stenosis, within 30 days after the procedure or hospital discharge (whichever was later) The secondary efficacy endpoint are the left atrial linear dimensions and A wave reappearance measured by transthoracic echocardiography at 3 time points (before surgery, 6 and 12 months after surgery). The secondary safety endpoint are Major adverse cardiac events, which were defined as a non-weighted composite score of: death, stroke, worsening heart failure (+1 NYHA Class), hospitalization for heart failure, and mitral valve re-intervention within 12 months after surgery; and incidence of protocol-defined serious adverse events (especially thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events) within 12 months after surgery. Statistical analysis were performed with statistic package for social science( SPSS) 11.5 software. A value of P \< 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Interventions
Left Atrial Geometric Volume Reduction, Pulmonary Vein Island Isolation and Left Appendage Base Closure
Left Atrial Geometric Volume Reduction, Pulmonary Vein Island Isolation and Left Appendage Base Closure
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Phase I Inclusion Criteria 1. Able to sign Informed Consent and Release of Medical Information forms 2. Age ≥ 18 years and ≤ 60 years old 3. Clinical indications for only mitral valve surgery for the following: Organic mitral valve disease without other cardiac disorders (functional or structural). 4. Longstanding persistent AF is defined as continuous AF of greater than one year duration. Duration of AF must be documented by medical history and Presence of AF must be documented by a direct electrocardiographic assessment upon arrival in the clinic. 5. Able to use heart rhythm monitor 6. Anteroposterior diameter of left atrial between 45mm and 60mm 7. Without history of stroke.
Exclusion criteria
1\. AF without indication for mitral valve surgery; or 2. Ischemic mitral regurgitation with evidence of concomitant structural mitral valve disease; or 3. Functional tricuspid regurgitation; or 4. AF is only or paroxysmal persistent; or 5. Evidence of active infection; or 6. Mental impairment or other conditions that may not allow patient to understand the nature, significance, and scope of study; or 7. Surgical management of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy; or 8. Previous catheter ablation for AF; or 9. Life expectancy of less than one year; or 10. Absolute contraindications for anticoagulation therapy; or 11. Enrollment in concomitant drug or device trials; or 12. Uncontrolled hypo- or hyperthyroidism; or 13. FEV1 \< 30% of predicted value; or 14. Women who are pregnant as evidenced by positive pregnancy test; or 15. Women of childbearing age who do not agree to be on adequate birth control throughout the period of the trial; or 16. Diagnosed with infective endocarditis; or 17. Need emergency surgery. Phase II Inclusion Criteria 1. Able to sign Informed Consent and Release of Medical Information forms 2. Age ≥ 18 years 3. Clinical indications for mitral valve surgery for the following: Organic mitral valve disease; or Functional non-ischemic mitral regurgitation; or Ischemic mitral regurgitation with evidence of concomitant structural mitral valve disease. Note: May include need for surgical management of functional tricuspid regurgitation or patent foramen ovale. May also include concomitant CABG, aortic arch or aortic valve procedure. Surgical intervention may be performed via sternotomy or minimally invasive procedure. 4. Longstanding persistent AF is defined as continuous AF of greater than one year duration. Duration of AF must be documented by medical history and Presence of AF must be documented by a direct electrocardiographic assessment upon arrival in the clinic. 5. Able to use heart rhythm monitor
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Numbers of Participants Free From AF | 3, 6, and 12 months after the operation | Freedom from AF in patients with longstanding persistent AF undergoing MVS at 6 months and 12 months. AF will be measured by 7 days continuous Holter monitoring at 6 months and 12 months post-surgery; and freedom of AF will be defined by absence of AF lasting \> 30 seconds at 12 months |
| Intraoperative Cardiopulmonary Bypass Duration | 1 hour after operation | Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) technology is used in most cardiovascular surgeries. These surgeries utilize CPB, which has been associated with some adverse effects. This is most likely due to exposure of blood to abnormal surfaces and conditions leading to systemic inflammatory responses. Prolonged CPB duration is associated with worse clinical outcomes. |
| The Adverse Events Within 30 Days After Surgery | Within 30 days after surgery | The adverse events within 30 days after surgery, including: death, stroke, serious cardiac events (heart failure, myocardial infarction), cardiac re-hospitalizations, transient ischemic attack, pulmonary embolism, peripheral embolism, coronary artery injury, anatomical excessive bleeding, deep sternal wound infection/mediastinitis, damage to specialized conduction system requiring permanent pacemaker, and superior vena cava stenosis. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| The Number of Participants Who Will be Detected the Peak Late Trans-mitral Flow Velocity (A Wave) Reappearance | 6 months and 12 months post-surgery | The peak late trans-mitral flow velocity (A wave) reappearance means recover of efficient left atrial contraction which indicates lower rate of thrombosis. Usually these is no A wave for AF patients. The peak late trans-mitral flow velocity 6 months and 12 months post-surgery, which will be measured by transthoracic echocardiography. |
| Change in Left Atrial Anteroposterior Diameter | 6 months and 12 months post-surgery | echocardiographic change in left atrial anteroposterior diameter |
| MACEs Within 12 Months After Surgery | Within 12 months | MACEs within 12 months after surgery: defined as a non-weighted composite score of: death, stroke, worsening heart failure (+1 NYHA Class), CHF hospitalization, and mitral valve \[MV\] re-intervention. |
| Change in Left Atrial Transversal Diameter | 6 months and 12 months post-surgery | echocardiographic change in left atrial transversal diameter |
| Change in Left Atrial Superoinferior Diameter | 6 months and 12 months post-surgery | echocardiographic change in left atrial superoinferior diameter |
Countries
China
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| A New Operation (Selected Pilot Study) Two circular incisions were performed in the left atrial wall between the pulmonary veins and the mitral annulus. with those two incisions, circumferential resection of a strip for the left atrial was obtained. The middle of pulmonary vein island was longitudinal plicated and the left appendage was ligated. Finally,the plicated pulmonary island was directly anastomosed to the lest side free wall, inferior wall, roof, the posterior walls of both superior and inferior vein cavae, and intra-atrial septum.
Left atrial geometric volume reduction, pulmonary veins island isolation and left appendage ligation (Selected): Two circular incisions were performed in the left atrial wall between the pulmonary veins and the mitral annulus. with those two incisions, circumferential resection of a strip for the left atrial was obtained. The middle of pulmonary vein island was longitudinal plicated and the left appendage was ligated. Finally,the plicated pulmonary island was directly anastomosed to the lest side free wall, inferior wall, roof, the posterior walls of both superior and inferior vein cavae, and intra-atrial septum. | 20 |
| A New Operation Two circular incisions were performed in the left atrial wall between the pulmonary veins and the mitral annulus. with those two incisions, circumferential resection of a strip for the left atrial was obtained. The middle of pulmonary vein island was longitudinal plicated and the left appendage was ligated. Finally,the plicated pulmonary island was directly anastomosed to the lest side free wall, inferior wall, roof, the posterior walls of both superior and inferior vein cavae, and intra-atrial septum.
Left atrial geometric volume reduction, pulmonary veins island isolation and left appendage ligation: Two circular incisions were performed in the left atrial wall between the pulmonary veins and the mitral annulus. with those two incisions, circumferential resection of a strip for the left atrial was obtained. The middle of pulmonary vein island was longitudinal plicated and the left appendage was ligated. Finally,the plicated pulmonary island was directly anastomosed to the lest side free wall, inferior wall, roof, the posterior walls of both superior and inferior vein cavae, and intra-atrial septum. | 120 |
| Total | 140 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Death | 0 | 4 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 0 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | A New Operation | Total | A New Operation (Selected Pilot Study) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 7 Participants | 7 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 113 Participants | 133 Participants | 20 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 52.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8 | 51.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.2 | 49.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.6 |
| aortic cross-clamp duration | 52.5 minutes STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.5 | 51.4 minutes STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.9 | 44.4 minutes STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.8 |
| Aortic Lesion | 58 Participants | 58 Participants | 0 Participants |
| aortic valve replacement | 35 Participants | 35 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Atrial fibrillation duration | 23.6 months STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.7 | 23.0 months STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.4 | 19.4 months STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.5 |
| Concomitant CABG | 3 Participants | 3 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Coronary Heart Disease | 3 Participants | 3 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Diabetes | 5 Participants | 6 Participants | 1 Participants |
| EuroScore | 1.8 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4 | 1.8 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4 | 1.8 units on a scale STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6 |
| Hypertension | 13 Participants | 14 Participants | 1 Participants |
| left atrial anteroposterior diameter | 54.8 milimeters STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.3 | 54.9 milimeters STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7 | 55.0 milimeters STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.3 |
| left atrial superoinferior diameter | 72.0 milimeters STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.4 | 71.5 milimeters STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.5 | 68.9 milimeters STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.3 |
| left atrial transversal diameter | 59.6 milimeters STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1 | 59.6 milimeters STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4 | 59.4 milimeters STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.3 |
| left ventricular diastolic diameter | 49.7 milimeters STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5 | 49.6 milimeters STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.4 | 48.7 milimeters STANDARD_DEVIATION 7 |
| left ventricular ejection fraction | 60.5 % STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7 | 60.0 % STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.7 | 57.1 % STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1 |
| left ventricular systolic diameter | 33.6 milimeters STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.7 | 33.7 milimeters STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.7 | 34.0 milimeters STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.7 |
| Long-standing persistent AF | 120 Participants | 140 Participants | 20 Participants |
| Mitral Lesion | 120 Participants | 140 Participants | 20 Participants |
| mitral valve procedure mitral valve repair | 11 Participants | 11 Participants | 0 Participants |
| mitral valve procedure mitral valve replacement | 109 Participants | 129 Participants | 20 Participants |
| NYHA Class III or Class IV | 112 Participants | 132 Participants | 20 Participants |
| Preoperative amiodarone intake | 3 Participants | 4 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Preoperative beta-blocker intake | 23 Participants | 28 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Preoperative creatine level | 79.4 μmol/l STANDARD_DEVIATION 44.9 | 79.1 μmol/l STANDARD_DEVIATION 42 | 77.5 μmol/l STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.3 |
| Preoperative Digoxin intake | 69 Participants | 80 Participants | 11 Participants |
| Preoperative NT-proBNP level | 1482.3 pg/ml STANDARD_DEVIATION 1321.8 | 1493.0 pg/ml STANDARD_DEVIATION 1305 | 1555.3 pg/ml STANDARD_DEVIATION 1233.2 |
| Prior stroke | 12 Participants | 12 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 120 Participants | 140 Participants | 20 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment China | 120 participants | 140 participants | 20 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 74 Participants | 87 Participants | 13 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 46 Participants | 53 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Smoking History | 25 Participants | 27 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Total cardiopulmonary bypass time | 106.8 minutes STANDARD_DEVIATION 33.4 | 105.2 minutes STANDARD_DEVIATION 31.9 | 95.5 minutes STANDARD_DEVIATION 19 |
| Total surgery time | 230.7 minutes STANDARD_DEVIATION 48.4 | 229.4 minutes STANDARD_DEVIATION 46.6 | 221.6 minutes STANDARD_DEVIATION 33.9 |
| Tricuspid Lesion | 85 Participants | 85 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Tricuspid valve repair | 38 Participants | 38 Participants | 0 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 20 | 4 / 120 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 20 | 2 / 120 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 1 / 20 | 24 / 120 |
Outcome results
Intraoperative Cardiopulmonary Bypass Duration
Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) technology is used in most cardiovascular surgeries. These surgeries utilize CPB, which has been associated with some adverse effects. This is most likely due to exposure of blood to abnormal surfaces and conditions leading to systemic inflammatory responses. Prolonged CPB duration is associated with worse clinical outcomes.
Time frame: 1 hour after operation
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| A New Operation (Selected Pilot Study) | Intraoperative Cardiopulmonary Bypass Duration | 44.4 minutes | Standard Deviation 17.8 |
| A New Operation | Intraoperative Cardiopulmonary Bypass Duration | 52.5 minutes | Standard Deviation 23.5 |
Numbers of Participants Free From AF
Freedom from AF in patients with longstanding persistent AF undergoing MVS at 6 months and 12 months. AF will be measured by 7 days continuous Holter monitoring at 6 months and 12 months post-surgery; and freedom of AF will be defined by absence of AF lasting \> 30 seconds at 12 months
Time frame: 3, 6, and 12 months after the operation
Population: Twenty patients were enrolled in pilot study and 120 patients were enrolled in latter prospective study.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| A New Operation (Selected Pilot Study) | Numbers of Participants Free From AF | at discharge | 20 Participants |
| A New Operation (Selected Pilot Study) | Numbers of Participants Free From AF | 3 months after the operation | 20 Participants |
| A New Operation (Selected Pilot Study) | Numbers of Participants Free From AF | 6 months after the operation | 20 Participants |
| A New Operation (Selected Pilot Study) | Numbers of Participants Free From AF | 12 months after the operation | 20 Participants |
| A New Operation | Numbers of Participants Free From AF | 12 months after the operation | 98 Participants |
| A New Operation | Numbers of Participants Free From AF | at discharge | 96 Participants |
| A New Operation | Numbers of Participants Free From AF | 6 months after the operation | 97 Participants |
| A New Operation | Numbers of Participants Free From AF | 3 months after the operation | 97 Participants |
The Adverse Events Within 30 Days After Surgery
The adverse events within 30 days after surgery, including: death, stroke, serious cardiac events (heart failure, myocardial infarction), cardiac re-hospitalizations, transient ischemic attack, pulmonary embolism, peripheral embolism, coronary artery injury, anatomical excessive bleeding, deep sternal wound infection/mediastinitis, damage to specialized conduction system requiring permanent pacemaker, and superior vena cava stenosis.
Time frame: Within 30 days after surgery
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| A New Operation (Selected Pilot Study) | The Adverse Events Within 30 Days After Surgery | death | 0 Participants |
| A New Operation (Selected Pilot Study) | The Adverse Events Within 30 Days After Surgery | stroke | 0 Participants |
| A New Operation (Selected Pilot Study) | The Adverse Events Within 30 Days After Surgery | serious cardiac events (heart failure, myocardial infarction) | 0 Participants |
| A New Operation (Selected Pilot Study) | The Adverse Events Within 30 Days After Surgery | deep sternal wound infection/mediastinitis | 0 Participants |
| A New Operation (Selected Pilot Study) | The Adverse Events Within 30 Days After Surgery | transient ischemic attack, pulmonary embolism, peripheral embolism | 0 Participants |
| A New Operation (Selected Pilot Study) | The Adverse Events Within 30 Days After Surgery | coronary artery injury | 0 Participants |
| A New Operation (Selected Pilot Study) | The Adverse Events Within 30 Days After Surgery | anatomical excessive bleeding | 0 Participants |
| A New Operation (Selected Pilot Study) | The Adverse Events Within 30 Days After Surgery | damage to specialized conduction system requiring permanent pacemaker | 0 Participants |
| A New Operation | The Adverse Events Within 30 Days After Surgery | damage to specialized conduction system requiring permanent pacemaker | 0 Participants |
| A New Operation | The Adverse Events Within 30 Days After Surgery | death | 2 Participants |
| A New Operation | The Adverse Events Within 30 Days After Surgery | transient ischemic attack, pulmonary embolism, peripheral embolism | 0 Participants |
| A New Operation | The Adverse Events Within 30 Days After Surgery | stroke | 1 Participants |
| A New Operation | The Adverse Events Within 30 Days After Surgery | anatomical excessive bleeding | 0 Participants |
| A New Operation | The Adverse Events Within 30 Days After Surgery | serious cardiac events (heart failure, myocardial infarction) | 1 Participants |
| A New Operation | The Adverse Events Within 30 Days After Surgery | coronary artery injury | 0 Participants |
| A New Operation | The Adverse Events Within 30 Days After Surgery | deep sternal wound infection/mediastinitis | 1 Participants |
Change in Left Atrial Anteroposterior Diameter
echocardiographic change in left atrial anteroposterior diameter
Time frame: 6 months and 12 months post-surgery
Population: Twenty patients were enrolled in pilot study and 120 patients were enrolled in latter prospective study. Two of 120 patients died in 30d after surgery,leaving 118 patients to be included in this cohort.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A New Operation (Selected Pilot Study) | Change in Left Atrial Anteroposterior Diameter | 6 months post-surgery | 37.0 milimeters | Standard Deviation 3 |
| A New Operation (Selected Pilot Study) | Change in Left Atrial Anteroposterior Diameter | 12 months post-surgery | 36.8 milimeters | Standard Deviation 3.1 |
| A New Operation | Change in Left Atrial Anteroposterior Diameter | 6 months post-surgery | 39.6 milimeters | Standard Deviation 6.7 |
| A New Operation | Change in Left Atrial Anteroposterior Diameter | 12 months post-surgery | 39.2 milimeters | Standard Deviation 6.7 |
Change in Left Atrial Superoinferior Diameter
echocardiographic change in left atrial superoinferior diameter
Time frame: 6 months and 12 months post-surgery
Population: Twenty patients were enrolled in pilot study and 120 patients were enrolled in latter prospective study. Two of 120 patients died in 30d after surgery,leaving 118 patients to be included in this cohort.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A New Operation (Selected Pilot Study) | Change in Left Atrial Superoinferior Diameter | 6 months post-surgery | 50.3 milimeters | Standard Deviation 3.6 |
| A New Operation (Selected Pilot Study) | Change in Left Atrial Superoinferior Diameter | 12 months post-surgery | 50.3 milimeters | Standard Deviation 3.8 |
| A New Operation | Change in Left Atrial Superoinferior Diameter | 6 months post-surgery | 54.7 milimeters | Standard Deviation 8.2 |
| A New Operation | Change in Left Atrial Superoinferior Diameter | 12 months post-surgery | 55.7 milimeters | Standard Deviation 8.4 |
Change in Left Atrial Transversal Diameter
echocardiographic change in left atrial transversal diameter
Time frame: 6 months and 12 months post-surgery
Population: Twenty patients were enrolled in pilot study and 120 patients were enrolled in latter prospective study. Two of 120 patients died in 30d after surgery,leaving 118 patients to be included in this cohort.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A New Operation (Selected Pilot Study) | Change in Left Atrial Transversal Diameter | 6 months post-surgery | 40.5 milimeters | Standard Deviation 4.6 |
| A New Operation (Selected Pilot Study) | Change in Left Atrial Transversal Diameter | 12 months post-surgery | 40.3 milimeters | Standard Deviation 4.7 |
| A New Operation | Change in Left Atrial Transversal Diameter | 6 months post-surgery | 42.1 milimeters | Standard Deviation 7.6 |
| A New Operation | Change in Left Atrial Transversal Diameter | 12 months post-surgery | 42.5 milimeters | Standard Deviation 7.7 |
MACEs Within 12 Months After Surgery
MACEs within 12 months after surgery: defined as a non-weighted composite score of: death, stroke, worsening heart failure (+1 NYHA Class), CHF hospitalization, and mitral valve \[MV\] re-intervention.
Time frame: Within 12 months
Population: Twenty patients were enrolled in pilot study and 120 patients were enrolled in latter prospective study. Two of 120 patients died in 30d after surgery,leaving 118 patients to be included in this cohort.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| A New Operation (Selected Pilot Study) | MACEs Within 12 Months After Surgery | stroke | 0 Participants |
| A New Operation (Selected Pilot Study) | MACEs Within 12 Months After Surgery | mitral valve [MV] re-intervention | 0 Participants |
| A New Operation (Selected Pilot Study) | MACEs Within 12 Months After Surgery | worsening heart failure (+1 NYHA Class) | 0 Participants |
| A New Operation (Selected Pilot Study) | MACEs Within 12 Months After Surgery | Pacemaker implantation | 0 Participants |
| A New Operation (Selected Pilot Study) | MACEs Within 12 Months After Surgery | death | 0 Participants |
| A New Operation | MACEs Within 12 Months After Surgery | Pacemaker implantation | 1 Participants |
| A New Operation | MACEs Within 12 Months After Surgery | death | 2 Participants |
| A New Operation | MACEs Within 12 Months After Surgery | stroke | 3 Participants |
| A New Operation | MACEs Within 12 Months After Surgery | worsening heart failure (+1 NYHA Class) | 1 Participants |
| A New Operation | MACEs Within 12 Months After Surgery | mitral valve [MV] re-intervention | 1 Participants |
The Number of Participants Who Will be Detected the Peak Late Trans-mitral Flow Velocity (A Wave) Reappearance
The peak late trans-mitral flow velocity (A wave) reappearance means recover of efficient left atrial contraction which indicates lower rate of thrombosis. Usually these is no A wave for AF patients. The peak late trans-mitral flow velocity 6 months and 12 months post-surgery, which will be measured by transthoracic echocardiography.
Time frame: 6 months and 12 months post-surgery
Population: Twenty patients were enrolled in pilot study and 120 patients were enrolled in latter prospective study. Two of 120 patients died in 30d after surgery,leaving 118 patients to be included in this cohort.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| A New Operation (Selected Pilot Study) | The Number of Participants Who Will be Detected the Peak Late Trans-mitral Flow Velocity (A Wave) Reappearance | peak late trans-mitral flow velocity (A) reappearance rate 6 months post-surgery | 18 Participants |
| A New Operation (Selected Pilot Study) | The Number of Participants Who Will be Detected the Peak Late Trans-mitral Flow Velocity (A Wave) Reappearance | peak late trans-mitral flow velocity (A) reappearance rate 12 months post-surgery | 18 Participants |
| A New Operation | The Number of Participants Who Will be Detected the Peak Late Trans-mitral Flow Velocity (A Wave) Reappearance | peak late trans-mitral flow velocity (A) reappearance rate 6 months post-surgery | 80 Participants |
| A New Operation | The Number of Participants Who Will be Detected the Peak Late Trans-mitral Flow Velocity (A Wave) Reappearance | peak late trans-mitral flow velocity (A) reappearance rate 12 months post-surgery | 84 Participants |