Skip to content

Muscle Dysfunction in Gastrointestinal or Hepatobiliary Cancer

Prognostic Role of Muscle Dysfunction in Patients With Gastrointestinal or Hepatobiliary Cancer - An Observational Study of Two Patient Cohorts

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03347162
Enrollment
1000
Registered
2017-11-20
Start date
2017-12-01
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2023-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer, Cancer, Metastatic, Cancer of Esophagus, Cancer of Liver, Cancer of Pancreas, Cancer of Stomach

Keywords

Cancer, Muscle mass, Muscle strength, Complications, Patient reported outcomes, PRO, Physical function

Brief summary

PURPOSE: To determine the prognostic properties of a comprehensive evaluation of body composition and physical function in patients with GI-HEP cancer from point of diagnosis and throughout the treatment trajectory. GI-HEP: Patients with tumors of the upper gastrointestinal or hepatobiliary tract, specifically tumors of the esophagus, gastro-esophageal junction, stomach, primary tumors of the liver or biliary tract, as well as colorectal liver metastasis or tumors of the pancreas.

Detailed description

RATIONAL: Patients diagnosed with GI-HEP cancer are faced with poor prognosis. The treatment is demanding and associated with severe deconditioning potentially leading to worse prognostic outcomes. To what extend patients body composition at the point of diagnoses, as well as changes in body composition throughout the cancer continuum is associated with cancer outcomes is currently not well-described, specifically if this should be part of standard clinical evaluation in order to optimize therapy-efficacy. Recent findings suggest that pathophysiological alterations in skeletal muscle mass and function can have significant implications for the risk of disease progression and long-term prognosis.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients diagnosed with histologically verified GI-HEP cancer

Exclusion criteria

* Age: \<18 * Pregnancy * Physical or mental disabilities precluding physical testing * Inability to read and understand Danish

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cohort 1: Post-operative complicationsFrom baseline to 30 days post surgeryIncidens rate of post-operative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade 2 or higher).
Cohort 2: Medical treatment complicationsFrom baseline to 1 year follow-upIncidens rate of medical complications (dose-reduction, temporary or permanent discontinuation)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hospitalization durationFrom baseline to 1 year follow-upTotal number days in hospital
Disease free survivalFrom baseline to 1 year follow-upRisk of disease progression
Overall survivalFrom baseline to 1 year follow-upRisk of mortality from any-cause
Change in whole body lean massFrom baseline to 6 months follow-upDual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) scan
Change in appendicular lean massFrom baseline to 6 months follow-upDual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) scan
Change in whole body fat percentageFrom baseline to 6 months follow-upDual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) scan
Change in visceral fat massFrom baseline to 6 months follow-upDual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) scan
Change in bone mineral densityFrom baseline to 6 months follow-upDual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) scan
Change in bone mineral contentFrom baseline to 6 months follow-upDual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) scan
Change in Skeletal Muscle IndexFrom baseline to 6 months follow-upL3 muscle area determined by Computed tomography scan (performed for clinical purpose) adjusted for hight
Change in lower body physical functionFrom baseline to 6 months follow-up30 seconds Sit-To-Stand test
Change in maximum leg powerFrom baseline to 6 months follow-upLeg extensor power test (Nottingham Power rig)
Change in Walking capacityFrom baseline to 6 months follow-upMaximum 10 meter walking speed
Change in plasma total cholesterol concentrationFrom baseline to 6 months follow-upBlood sample
Change in plasma HDL cholesterolFrom baseline to 6 months follow-upBlood sample
Change in plasma LDL cholesterolFrom baseline to 6 months follow-upBlood sample
Change in plasma triglyceridesFrom baseline to 6 months follow-upBlood sample
Change in plasma HbA1CFrom baseline to 6 months follow-upBlood sample
Change in plasma glucoseFrom baseline to 6 months follow-upBlood sample
Change in plasma insulinFrom baseline to 6 months follow-upBlood sample
Change in health-related quality of lifeFrom baseline to 6 months follow-upFunctional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) questionnaire
Change in psychological distressFrom baseline to 6 months follow-upHospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) questionnaire
Change in sleep qualityFrom baseline to 6 months follow-upPittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) questionnaire
Change in physical activity levelFrom baseline to 6 months follow-upInternational Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) short form
Change in hand grip strengthFrom baseline to 6 months follow-upMaximum strength test by handgrip dynanometer
Change in stair-climbing capacityFrom baseline to 6 months follow-upTimed Stair-climbing test

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026