Skip to content

Photodynamic Therapy for the Prevention of Lung Cancer

Photodynamic Therapy for the Prevention of Lung Cancer (PEARL)

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03346304
Acronym
PEARL
Enrollment
0
Registered
2017-11-17
Start date
2018-09-30
Completion date
2024-10-31
Last updated
2019-02-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lung Cancer, Squamous Cell Lung Cancer

Keywords

Autofluorescence Broncoscopy (AFB), Photodynamic Therapy (PDT), High Grade Lesions (HGLs), lung cancer, photosensitiser, Fotolon

Brief summary

PEARL is a phase III multicentre 2:1 randomised controlled trial, with an incorporated phase II (pilot) component. All patients consented/registered onto the trial will have an autofluorescence bronchoscopy (AFB) to check for the presence of high grade lesions (HGLs) in the lung, as verified by tissue biopsy. Only patients with one or more histologically confirmed lung HGL will be randomised to receive either photodynamic therapy (PDT) treatment with surveillance (=intervention), or surveillance alone (=control). The overall aim of the phase II pilot is to demonstrate a \>20% response in the PDT group (at least 3 out of 21 PDT patients), compared to a minimum response of 5%. This will be used as an efficacy signal to determine whether the trial will continue into phase III. Response will be measured by regression of high grade lesions (HGLs) to either low grade lesions (LGLs), or to normal epithelium at 6 months post treatment (blind assessment). The overall aim of the phase III is to show that the time period over which HGLs progress to invasive lung cancer is significantly longer when treated with PDT compared to surveillance alone.

Detailed description

Background: Squamous cell carcinoma of the lung develops through a transition of progressive cytological aberration, from normal to metaplasia, mild, moderate, and severe dysplasia and then carcinoma in situ (CIS) before becoming an invasive cancer. Progression rates to invasive carcinoma can vary depending on the initial grade of lesion and it is generally accepted that high-grade lesions are more likely to progress to invasive cancer than low-grade lesions. Early detection and treatment of these lesions is critical to improving survival. There is no evidence base examining how, or whether these high-grade lesions (HGLs) should be treated, resulting in diverse treatment practices both nationally and internationally. This is the first randomised clinical trial of a bronchoscopic intervention in treating HGLs using PDT. Treatment: Treatment-arm patients will receive two courses of PDT treatment using the photosensitiser drug Fotolon®. Fotolon®, which preferentially accumulates in HGLs, is first administered via IV infusion. Patients then undergo bronchoscopy during which their HGLs are irradiated with red light (via non-heat emitting laser). Red-light activation of the photosensitiser causes chemical transformation of the cells and cell death. Follow Up: Follow up in both arms consists of AFB surveillance at 6 and 12 months, then every 6-12 months (depending on the appearance of lesions), with annual CT scanning of the thorax, and annual spirometry. Biological samples for translational analysis will be taken at baseline and each subsequent trial visit. Duration of recruitment: Anticipated recruitment for phase II is 1 year (12 months), and an additional 2 years (24 months) for the phase III.

Interventions

Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) using photosensitiser drug Fotolon

Sponsors

University College, London
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients with ≥1 histologically confirmed lung HGL (defined as severe dysplasia or carcinoma in situ) PRE-REGISTRATION: High likelihood of presence of lung HGLs as evaluated by investigator (e.g. because patient part of existing surveillance cohort or referred to trial site) and inclusion/

Exclusion criteria

below. PRE-RANDOMISATION: Following registration and AFB, only patients with ≥1 lung HGLs confirmed histologically can be continue to randomisation provided they continue to meet inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to site-specific progressionwithin a 3-year follow-up (incorporates patients from phase II)of high grade lesions in the lung to invasive lung cancer; compared between the PDT and control groups

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall and cancer specific survivalwithin a 3-year follow-up (incorporates patients from phase II)from date of randomisation; compared between the PDT and control groups
Difference in spirometry (FEV1, FVC) valuesat specific time points (6,12,24 and 36 months post randomisation);to determine whether PDT affects spirometry
Site-specific responsewithin a 3-year follow-up (incorporates patients from phase II)(regression, stable appearance, progession or recurrence) of HGLs present at baseline (index lesions); compared between the PDT and control groups
Number of new HGLswithin a 3-year follow-up (incorporates patients from phase II)HGLs identified post-baseline at new sites within the lung (i.e. not at the site of the index lesions); compared between the PDT and control groups
Number of metachronous endobronchial lung cancerswithin a 3-year follow-up (incorporates patients from phase II)that develop at remote sites within the lung in both arms
Cumulative risk of developing lung cancerwithin a 3-year follow-up (incorporates patients from phase II)as detected on bronchoscopy and CT thorax in patients harbouring HGLs from date of randomisation; compared between the PDT and control groups
Adverse eventswithin a 3-year follow-up (incorporates patients from phase II)Based on the maximum toxicity grade for each patient for each event type; compared between the PDT and control groups
EQ-5D-5Lat specific time points (6,12,24 and 36 months, and possibly 18 and 30 months, post randomisation); compared between the PDT and control groupsHealth-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)
EORTC QLQ-LC13at specific time points (6,12,24 and 36 months, and possibly 18 and 30 months, post randomisation); compared between the PDT and control groupsHealth-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)
ACE-27at specific time points (6,12,24 and 36 months, and possibly 18 and 30 months, post randomisation); compared between the PDT and control groupsHealth-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026