Skip to content

Health Gatherings - For Your Health After Cancer

Culturally Adapted Cognitive Behavioral Stress and Self-Management (C-CBSM) Intervention for Prostate Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03344757
Enrollment
188
Registered
2017-11-17
Start date
2017-10-05
Completion date
2024-08-01
Last updated
2025-09-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Genital Diseases, Male, Genital Neoplasms, Male, Neoplasm, Prostate, Prostate Neoplasm, Prostatic Diseases, Urogenital Neoplasms

Keywords

prostate cancer, localized prostate cancer, spanish, latino, hispanic, stress management

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to look at the effects of a 10-week stress management in-person group program. The program will study emotions, stress, and stress management techniques (such as relaxation and coping techniques) on quality of life, distress, depression, and physical health in Spanish- speaking, Hispanic/Latino men diagnosed with Prostate Cancer (PC).

Detailed description

This 5-year study evaluates the effects of a 10-week group-based linguistically translated and culturally adapted cognitive-behavioral stress and self-management (C-CBSM) intervention on symptom burden and health related quality of life (HRQoL) in Hispanic men treated for localized prostate cancer (PC). About 80% PC cases are diagnosed as early disease and have a 5- and 10-year survival rate of almost 100% and 99%, respectively.1 Most patients receive active treatment (\ 70%) leading to prolonged treatment-related side effects and dysfunction persisting well beyond primary treatment. Survival is offset by chronic side effects such as sexual and urinary dysfunction, pain and fatigue that can lead to poor psychosocial functioning, impaired intimacy and social functioning, and masculinity concerns. Hispanic PC survivors report lower physical and social functioning, poorer emotional well-being and greater sexual and urinary dysfunction, even after accounting for SES and disease severity. These sequelae can lead to elevated glucocorticoid release and inflammatory cytokines that have a direct effect on these symptoms and can interfere with physiological pathways necessary for recovery of sexual and urinary functioning. We have shown that CBSM reduces symptom burden and improves HRQoL in bilingual Hispanic PC survivors. In a pilot we showed that a linguistic translation of CBSM with attention to sociocultural processes improved symptom burden and HRQoL in Spanish monolingual PC survivors. We have also shown that CBSM is associated with reduced glucocorticoid resistance and inflammatory gene expression pathways in circulating leukocytes among breast cancer survivors. We propose to (a) deliver a culturally adapted C-CBSM intervention in Spanish that places greater emphasis on salient sociocultural determinants of symptom burden and HRQoL in Hispanics (e.g., fatalistic attitudes, family interdependence, perceived discrimination, machismo), (b) incorporate a neuroimmune model of symptom regulation and management, and (c) test the efficacy of C-CBSM, relative to standard non-culturally adapted CBSM, in two diverse Hispanic communities (Chicago & Miami). We will test our aims in 200 Hispanic men post-treatment for localized PC with elevated symptom burden in a 2 x 4 randomized design with condition (C-CSBM vs. CBSM) as the between groups factors, and time (baseline, post-intervention & 6- and 12-months post intervention) as the within groups factor. Our Primary Aim is to determine whether randomization to C-CBSM, relative to standard CBSM, is associated with reduced symptom burden and improved HRQoL. Our Secondary Aims evaluate whether C-CBSM leads to greater improvements in the intervention targets (e.g., stress management, psychological distress & interpersonal disruption), and physiologic adaptation (i.e., glucocorticoid receptor sensitivity & inflammatory gene expression). We will also evaluate psychosocial and physiological mechanisms as mediators of C-CBSM's effects on our primary outcomes. We also explore several moderators (e.g., SES, acculturation, treatment, Hispanic origin) of CCBSM's effect on primary outcomes and the effects of C-CBSM on cardiometabolic health (e.g., lipids, fasting glucose) via reduced inflammation. Primary Aim: Aim 1: Determine whether participation in C-CBSM is associated with significantly greater reductions in symptom burden and improvements in HRQoL relative to participation in CBSM. Secondary Aims: Aim 2: Determine whether participation in C-CBSM is associated with significantly greater improvements in intervention targets (i.e., improved stress management, and reduced psychological distress and interpersonal disruption) relative to participation in the CBSM condition. Exploratory Aims: Aim 3: Explore whether participation in C-CBSM is associated with significantly greater activation of leukocyte glucocorticoid receptor and less inflammatory gene expression profiles relative to CBSM. Aim 4: Explore whether C-CBSM related improvements in symptom burden and HRQoL are mediated by improvements in intervention targets and gene expression profiles. Aim 5: Explore moderators of C-CBSM (e.g., SES, treatment type, acculturation, Hispanic ancestry) and CCBSM's effects on cardiometabolic markers via reduced inflammation.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALCultural CBSM

The Culturally Adapted Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (C-CBSM) Intervention is a 10 weekly in-person group program. Each session will last about 90 minutes. The meetings will give facts on stress, coping with difficult events, managing anger, social support and stress reactions. Participants will also receive information on how to practice relaxation on their own. The delivery of C-CBSM places a greater emphasis on salient sociocultural determinants of symptom burden and Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in Hispanics (e.g., fatalistic attitudes, family interdependence, perceived discrimination, machismo).

BEHAVIORALStandard CBSM

The standard Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM) Intervention is a 10 weekly in-person group program. Each session will last about 90 minutes. The meetings will give facts on stress, coping with difficult events, managing anger, social support and stress reactions. Participants will also receive information on how to practice relaxation on their own.

Sponsors

Northwestern University
CollaboratorOTHER
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Miami
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. ≥ 18 years of age; 2. Hispanic/Latino self-identification; 3. Spanish speakers (including bilinguals who express interest in a Spanish-based psychosocial intervention); 4. Primary diagnosis of localized Prostate Cancer (T1-T3, N0, M0); 5. Surgical or radiation treatment (e.g., external beam, brachytherapy, proton) within minimum of 4 months and maximum of 72-months; 6. Some patients with prior inpatient psychiatric treatment for severe mental illness or overt signs of severe psychopathology (e.g., psychosis) may be enrolled, per P.I. discretion, based on a case-by-case review; 7. Willingness to be randomized and followed for approximately12 months.

Exclusion criteria

1. History of non-skin cancer within the last 2 years. 2. Prior inpatient psychiatric treatment for severe mental illness or overt signs of severe psychopathology (e.g., psychosis) within the past six months, as these conditions can interfere with adequate participation in our experimental conditions may be exclusionary, per P.I. discretion, based on a case-by-case review; 3. Active alcohol dependence within the past six months may be exclusionary, per P.I. discretion, based on a case-by-case review; 4. Active substance dependence within the past six months may be exclusionary, per P.I. discretion, based on a case-by-case review; and 5. Acute or chronic immune system medical conditions, medications or conditions that impact immune and endocrine function (e.g., Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS), Lupus, rheumatoid arthritis, Hepatitis C, or immunosuppressive treatment requiring conditions), per PI discretion based on a case by case review. 6. Individuals scoring \>3 on the SPMSQ will be excluded or per PI discretion based on a case by case review. .

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Symptom Burden as Measure by EPIC-S.Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12Symptom Burden will be measured using the 5-item sexual domain of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) - Short Form (EPIC-S). All items are transformed to a 0-100 scale and averaged to calculate the domain summary scores, where higher scores indicate better functioning and less bother.
Change in HRQoL as Measured by the FACT Questionnaire.Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12HRQoL will be measured using Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Prostate (FACT-P) including 4 domains of the FACT-General (FACT-G). The questionnaire has 39 items, with the total score ranging from 0-156. Higher scores indicate better function.
Change in Symptom Burden as Measure by EPIC-UIN.Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12Symptom Burden will be measured using the 9-item urinary domain of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) - Short Form (EPIC-UIN). All items are transformed to a 0-100 scale and averaged to calculate the domain summary scores, where higher scores indicate better functioning and less bother.
Change in HRQoL as Measured by the PROMIS Fatigue QuestionnaireBaseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12HRQoL will be measured using Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) short form for Fatigue Questionnaire. The PROMIS Fatigue measure generates t-scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Scores typically range from approximately 30 to 80. Higher scores indicate greater fatigue.
Change in HRQoL as Measured by the PROMIS Pain QuestionnaireBaseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12HRQoL will be measured using the PROMIS short form for Pain Interference Questionnaire. The items are item banks, and scoring is done via a computer adaptive test (CAT), which utilizes item response theory (IRT) to calculate a score that is then transformed into a T-score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Scores typically range from approximately 30 to 80. Items are administered in an iterative approach where subsequent items are calibrated on prior ones. Once standard error reaches 2 or less, the CAT stops administering items. Higher scores indicate greater pain interference.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Stress Management Skills as Measured by MOCS-ABaseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12Stress management skills will be measured using the Measure of Current Status Part A (MOCS-A) Questionnaire. MOCS-A is a 13-item questionnaire with a total score ranging from 0 - 52 with the higher score indicating greater stress management skills.
Change in Interpersonal Function as Measured the SIP QuestionnaireBaseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) is a 20-item questionnaire responded with a yes or no. The total number of yes responses will be scored as 1 point with the total score ranging from 0-20 with the higher score indicating poor interpersonal function.
Change in Prostate Cancer-specific Psychological Distress as Measured by MAX-PC - Section I-IIBaseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12Psychological distress will be measured using the Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer Patients (MAX-PC) Questionnaire. The MAX-PC sections I-II is a 14-item questionnaire with a total score ranging from 0-42 with the higher score indicating increased distress.
Change in Prostate Cancer-specific Psychological Distress as Measured by MAX-PC - Section IIIBaseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12Psychological distress will be measured using the Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer Patients (MAX-PC) Questionnaire. The MAX-PC section III is a 4-item questionnaire with a total score ranging from 0-12 with the lower score indicating increased distress.
Change in Psychosocial Distress as Measured by the PROMIS Depression QuestionnaireBaseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12PROMIS-Depression is a 28-item questionnaire with a total score ranging from 28-140 with the higher score indicating increased symptoms of depression.
Change in Psychosocial Distress as Measured by the PROMIS Anxiety QuestionnaireBaseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12PROMIS-Anxiety is a 29-item questionnaire with a total score ranging from 29-145 with the higher score indicating increased symptoms of anxiety.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cultural-Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CCBSM)
Participants randomized to this arm will receive 10 weekly group-based C-CBSM intervention. Cultural CBSM: The Culturally Adapted Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (C-CBSM) Intervention is a 10 weekly in-person group program. Each session will last about 90 minutes. The meetings will give facts on stress, coping with difficult events, managing anger, social support and stress reactions. Participants will also receive information on how to practice relaxation on their own. The delivery of C-CBSM places a greater emphasis on salient sociocultural determinants of symptom burden and Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in Hispanics (e.g., fatalistic attitudes, family interdependence, perceived discrimination, machismo).
100
Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM)
Participants randomized to this arm will receive 10 weekly group-based standard CBSM intervention. Standard CBSM: The standard Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM) Intervention is a 10 weekly in-person group program. Each session will last about 90 minutes. The meetings will give facts on stress, coping with difficult events, managing anger, social support and stress reactions. Participants will also receive information on how to practice relaxation on their own.
88
Total188

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up02
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1816

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM)TotalCultural-Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CCBSM)
Age, Continuous65.42 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.42
65.77 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8
66.07 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.64
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
88 Participants188 Participants100 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants6 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
10 Participants25 Participants15 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants8 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
72 Participants147 Participants75 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
88 Participants188 Participants100 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1000 / 88
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 1007 / 88
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1003 / 88

Outcome results

Primary

Change in HRQoL as Measured by the FACT Questionnaire.

HRQoL will be measured using Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Prostate (FACT-P) including 4 domains of the FACT-General (FACT-G). The questionnaire has 39 items, with the total score ranging from 0-156. Higher scores indicate better function.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12

Population: Not all participants completed every assessment/timepoint and some were lost to follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cultural-Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CCBSM)Change in HRQoL as Measured by the FACT Questionnaire.Baseline81.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.12
Cultural-Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CCBSM)Change in HRQoL as Measured by the FACT Questionnaire.Month 383.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.3
Cultural-Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CCBSM)Change in HRQoL as Measured by the FACT Questionnaire.Month 683.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.51
Cultural-Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CCBSM)Change in HRQoL as Measured by the FACT Questionnaire.Month 1282.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.41
Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM)Change in HRQoL as Measured by the FACT Questionnaire.Month 1283.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.54
Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM)Change in HRQoL as Measured by the FACT Questionnaire.Baseline81.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.7
Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM)Change in HRQoL as Measured by the FACT Questionnaire.Month 683.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.74
Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM)Change in HRQoL as Measured by the FACT Questionnaire.Month 383.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.45
Primary

Change in HRQoL as Measured by the PROMIS Fatigue Questionnaire

HRQoL will be measured using Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) short form for Fatigue Questionnaire. The PROMIS Fatigue measure generates t-scores with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Scores typically range from approximately 30 to 80. Higher scores indicate greater fatigue.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12

Population: Not all participants completed every assessment/timepoint and some were lost to follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cultural-Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CCBSM)Change in HRQoL as Measured by the PROMIS Fatigue QuestionnaireBaseline43.2 T-scoreStandard Error 0.9
Cultural-Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CCBSM)Change in HRQoL as Measured by the PROMIS Fatigue QuestionnaireMonth 343.3 T-scoreStandard Error 0.88
Cultural-Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CCBSM)Change in HRQoL as Measured by the PROMIS Fatigue QuestionnaireMonth 643.9 T-scoreStandard Error 1.09
Cultural-Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CCBSM)Change in HRQoL as Measured by the PROMIS Fatigue QuestionnaireMonth 1243.5 T-scoreStandard Error 0.96
Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM)Change in HRQoL as Measured by the PROMIS Fatigue QuestionnaireMonth 1243.0 T-scoreStandard Error 0.99
Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM)Change in HRQoL as Measured by the PROMIS Fatigue QuestionnaireBaseline43.5 T-scoreStandard Error 0.99
Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM)Change in HRQoL as Measured by the PROMIS Fatigue QuestionnaireMonth 643.1 T-scoreStandard Error 1.05
Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM)Change in HRQoL as Measured by the PROMIS Fatigue QuestionnaireMonth 342.8 T-scoreStandard Error 1.06
Primary

Change in HRQoL as Measured by the PROMIS Pain Questionnaire

HRQoL will be measured using the PROMIS short form for Pain Interference Questionnaire. The items are item banks, and scoring is done via a computer adaptive test (CAT), which utilizes item response theory (IRT) to calculate a score that is then transformed into a T-score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Scores typically range from approximately 30 to 80. Items are administered in an iterative approach where subsequent items are calibrated on prior ones. Once standard error reaches 2 or less, the CAT stops administering items. Higher scores indicate greater pain interference.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12

Population: Not all participants completed every assessment/timepoint and some were lost to follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cultural-Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CCBSM)Change in HRQoL as Measured by the PROMIS Pain QuestionnaireBaseline47.8 T-scoreStandard Error 0.93
Cultural-Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CCBSM)Change in HRQoL as Measured by the PROMIS Pain QuestionnaireMonth 346.7 T-scoreStandard Error 0.96
Cultural-Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CCBSM)Change in HRQoL as Measured by the PROMIS Pain QuestionnaireMonth 647.1 T-scoreStandard Error 1.2
Cultural-Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CCBSM)Change in HRQoL as Measured by the PROMIS Pain QuestionnaireMonth 1248.3 T-scoreStandard Error 1.07
Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM)Change in HRQoL as Measured by the PROMIS Pain QuestionnaireMonth 1246.2 T-scoreStandard Error 1.02
Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM)Change in HRQoL as Measured by the PROMIS Pain QuestionnaireBaseline47.0 T-scoreStandard Error 0.97
Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM)Change in HRQoL as Measured by the PROMIS Pain QuestionnaireMonth 646.9 T-scoreStandard Error 1.06
Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM)Change in HRQoL as Measured by the PROMIS Pain QuestionnaireMonth 346.4 T-scoreStandard Error 1.08
Primary

Change in Symptom Burden as Measure by EPIC-S.

Symptom Burden will be measured using the 5-item sexual domain of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) - Short Form (EPIC-S). All items are transformed to a 0-100 scale and averaged to calculate the domain summary scores, where higher scores indicate better functioning and less bother.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12

Population: Not all participants completed every assessment/timepoint and some were lost to follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cultural-Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CCBSM)Change in Symptom Burden as Measure by EPIC-S.Baseline30.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.53
Cultural-Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CCBSM)Change in Symptom Burden as Measure by EPIC-S.Month 334.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.01
Cultural-Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CCBSM)Change in Symptom Burden as Measure by EPIC-S.Month 635.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.39
Cultural-Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CCBSM)Change in Symptom Burden as Measure by EPIC-S.Month 1236.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.27
Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM)Change in Symptom Burden as Measure by EPIC-S.Month 1238.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.5
Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM)Change in Symptom Burden as Measure by EPIC-S.Baseline32.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.02
Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM)Change in Symptom Burden as Measure by EPIC-S.Month 638.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.67
Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM)Change in Symptom Burden as Measure by EPIC-S.Month 335.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 3.3
Primary

Change in Symptom Burden as Measure by EPIC-UIN.

Symptom Burden will be measured using the 9-item urinary domain of the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) - Short Form (EPIC-UIN). All items are transformed to a 0-100 scale and averaged to calculate the domain summary scores, where higher scores indicate better functioning and less bother.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12

Population: Not all participants completed every assessment/timepoint and some were lost to follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cultural-Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CCBSM)Change in Symptom Burden as Measure by EPIC-UIN.Month 377.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.5
Cultural-Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CCBSM)Change in Symptom Burden as Measure by EPIC-UIN.Baseline73.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.45
Cultural-Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CCBSM)Change in Symptom Burden as Measure by EPIC-UIN.Month 679.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.47
Cultural-Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CCBSM)Change in Symptom Burden as Measure by EPIC-UIN.Month 1278.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.41
Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM)Change in Symptom Burden as Measure by EPIC-UIN.Month 1283.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.31
Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM)Change in Symptom Burden as Measure by EPIC-UIN.Month 684.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.18
Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM)Change in Symptom Burden as Measure by EPIC-UIN.Baseline78.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.32
Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM)Change in Symptom Burden as Measure by EPIC-UIN.Month 382.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 2.38
Secondary

Change in Interpersonal Function as Measured the SIP Questionnaire

Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) is a 20-item questionnaire responded with a yes or no. The total number of yes responses will be scored as 1 point with the total score ranging from 0-20 with the higher score indicating poor interpersonal function.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12

Population: Not all participants completed every assessment/timepoint and some were lost to follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cultural-Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CCBSM)Change in Interpersonal Function as Measured the SIP QuestionnaireBaseline2.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.28
Cultural-Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CCBSM)Change in Interpersonal Function as Measured the SIP QuestionnaireMonth 32.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
Cultural-Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CCBSM)Change in Interpersonal Function as Measured the SIP QuestionnaireMonth 62.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Cultural-Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CCBSM)Change in Interpersonal Function as Measured the SIP QuestionnaireMonth 122.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.38
Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM)Change in Interpersonal Function as Measured the SIP QuestionnaireMonth 122.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.36
Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM)Change in Interpersonal Function as Measured the SIP QuestionnaireBaseline3.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.38
Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM)Change in Interpersonal Function as Measured the SIP QuestionnaireMonth 62.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.4
Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM)Change in Interpersonal Function as Measured the SIP QuestionnaireMonth 32.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.45
Secondary

Change in Prostate Cancer-specific Psychological Distress as Measured by MAX-PC - Section III

Psychological distress will be measured using the Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer Patients (MAX-PC) Questionnaire. The MAX-PC section III is a 4-item questionnaire with a total score ranging from 0-12 with the lower score indicating increased distress.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12

Population: Not all participants completed every assessment/timepoint and some were lost to follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cultural-Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CCBSM)Change in Prostate Cancer-specific Psychological Distress as Measured by MAX-PC - Section IIIBaseline8.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.28
Cultural-Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CCBSM)Change in Prostate Cancer-specific Psychological Distress as Measured by MAX-PC - Section IIIMonth 38.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.31
Cultural-Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CCBSM)Change in Prostate Cancer-specific Psychological Distress as Measured by MAX-PC - Section IIIMonth 68.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.29
Cultural-Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CCBSM)Change in Prostate Cancer-specific Psychological Distress as Measured by MAX-PC - Section IIIMonth 129.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.3
Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM)Change in Prostate Cancer-specific Psychological Distress as Measured by MAX-PC - Section IIIMonth 128.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.35
Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM)Change in Prostate Cancer-specific Psychological Distress as Measured by MAX-PC - Section IIIBaseline8.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.37
Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM)Change in Prostate Cancer-specific Psychological Distress as Measured by MAX-PC - Section IIIMonth 68.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.38
Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM)Change in Prostate Cancer-specific Psychological Distress as Measured by MAX-PC - Section IIIMonth 39.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.33
Secondary

Change in Prostate Cancer-specific Psychological Distress as Measured by MAX-PC - Section I-II

Psychological distress will be measured using the Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer Patients (MAX-PC) Questionnaire. The MAX-PC sections I-II is a 14-item questionnaire with a total score ranging from 0-42 with the higher score indicating increased distress.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12

Population: Not all participants completed every assessment/timepoint and some were lost to follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cultural-Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CCBSM)Change in Prostate Cancer-specific Psychological Distress as Measured by MAX-PC - Section I-IIBaseline7.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.94
Cultural-Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CCBSM)Change in Prostate Cancer-specific Psychological Distress as Measured by MAX-PC - Section I-IIMonth 35.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.98
Cultural-Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CCBSM)Change in Prostate Cancer-specific Psychological Distress as Measured by MAX-PC - Section I-IIMonth 65.01 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.93
Cultural-Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CCBSM)Change in Prostate Cancer-specific Psychological Distress as Measured by MAX-PC - Section I-IIMonth 126.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.08
Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM)Change in Prostate Cancer-specific Psychological Distress as Measured by MAX-PC - Section I-IIMonth 126.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.94
Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM)Change in Prostate Cancer-specific Psychological Distress as Measured by MAX-PC - Section I-IIBaseline10.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.2
Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM)Change in Prostate Cancer-specific Psychological Distress as Measured by MAX-PC - Section I-IIMonth 67.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.24
Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM)Change in Prostate Cancer-specific Psychological Distress as Measured by MAX-PC - Section I-IIMonth 36.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.97
Secondary

Change in Psychosocial Distress as Measured by the PROMIS Anxiety Questionnaire

PROMIS-Anxiety is a 29-item questionnaire with a total score ranging from 29-145 with the higher score indicating increased symptoms of anxiety.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12

Population: Not all participants completed every assessment/timepoint and some were lost to follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cultural-Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CCBSM)Change in Psychosocial Distress as Measured by the PROMIS Anxiety QuestionnaireBaseline49.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.98
Cultural-Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CCBSM)Change in Psychosocial Distress as Measured by the PROMIS Anxiety QuestionnaireMonth 350.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.96
Cultural-Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CCBSM)Change in Psychosocial Distress as Measured by the PROMIS Anxiety QuestionnaireMonth 651.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.16
Cultural-Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CCBSM)Change in Psychosocial Distress as Measured by the PROMIS Anxiety QuestionnaireMonth 1250.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.98
Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM)Change in Psychosocial Distress as Measured by the PROMIS Anxiety QuestionnaireMonth 1249.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.15
Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM)Change in Psychosocial Distress as Measured by the PROMIS Anxiety QuestionnaireBaseline50.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.08
Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM)Change in Psychosocial Distress as Measured by the PROMIS Anxiety QuestionnaireMonth 649.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.24
Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM)Change in Psychosocial Distress as Measured by the PROMIS Anxiety QuestionnaireMonth 349.1 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.18
Secondary

Change in Psychosocial Distress as Measured by the PROMIS Depression Questionnaire

PROMIS-Depression is a 28-item questionnaire with a total score ranging from 28-140 with the higher score indicating increased symptoms of depression.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12

Population: Not all participants completed every assessment/timepoint and some were lost to follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cultural-Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CCBSM)Change in Psychosocial Distress as Measured by the PROMIS Depression QuestionnaireBaseline44.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.91
Cultural-Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CCBSM)Change in Psychosocial Distress as Measured by the PROMIS Depression QuestionnaireMonth 343.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.94
Cultural-Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CCBSM)Change in Psychosocial Distress as Measured by the PROMIS Depression QuestionnaireMonth 644.8 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.05
Cultural-Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CCBSM)Change in Psychosocial Distress as Measured by the PROMIS Depression QuestionnaireMonth 1245.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.97
Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM)Change in Psychosocial Distress as Measured by the PROMIS Depression QuestionnaireMonth 1244.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.1
Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM)Change in Psychosocial Distress as Measured by the PROMIS Depression QuestionnaireBaseline45.9 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.96
Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM)Change in Psychosocial Distress as Measured by the PROMIS Depression QuestionnaireMonth 645.4 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.12
Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM)Change in Psychosocial Distress as Measured by the PROMIS Depression QuestionnaireMonth 344.7 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.05
Secondary

Change in Stress Management Skills as Measured by MOCS-A

Stress management skills will be measured using the Measure of Current Status Part A (MOCS-A) Questionnaire. MOCS-A is a 13-item questionnaire with a total score ranging from 0 - 52 with the higher score indicating greater stress management skills.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6, Month 12

Population: Not all participants completed every assessment/timepoint and some were lost to follow-up.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Cultural-Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CCBSM)Change in Stress Management Skills as Measured by MOCS-ABaseline38.5 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.87
Cultural-Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CCBSM)Change in Stress Management Skills as Measured by MOCS-AMonth 338.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.91
Cultural-Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CCBSM)Change in Stress Management Skills as Measured by MOCS-AMonth 639.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.93
Cultural-Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CCBSM)Change in Stress Management Skills as Measured by MOCS-AMonth 1239.2 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.9
Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM)Change in Stress Management Skills as Measured by MOCS-AMonth 1238.0 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.95
Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM)Change in Stress Management Skills as Measured by MOCS-ABaseline37.6 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.09
Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM)Change in Stress Management Skills as Measured by MOCS-AMonth 639.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.23
Cognitive Behavioral Stress Management (CBSM)Change in Stress Management Skills as Measured by MOCS-AMonth 338.3 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.09

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026