Skip to content

Study of Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of AIN457 in Patients With Active Overuse Tendinopathy

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group, Phase II, 24-week Study Investigating the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of AIN457 in Patients With Active Overuse Tendinopathy Refractory to Oral NSAIDs/Acetaminophen, Physiotherapy or Corticosteroid Injections

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03344640
Enrollment
96
Registered
2017-11-17
Start date
2017-12-15
Completion date
2019-10-17
Last updated
2021-10-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tendinopathy

Keywords

Overuse tendinopathy, shoulder, rotator cuff, IL-17A-Ab, AIN457X

Brief summary

This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center, Phase II study of s.c. secukinumab 300 mg in 98 randomized patients with overuse rotator-cuff tendinopathy without systemic inflammatory disease.

Detailed description

This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center, Phase II study of s.c. secukinumab 300 mg in 98 randomized patients with overuse rotator-cuff tendinopathy without systemic inflammatory disease and refractory to NSAIDs/acetaminophen, physiotherapy or corticosteroids. The study consisted of a 4-week screening period, a 2-week run-in period, a 12-week treatment period and a 12-week follow-up period after last treatment. The population consisted of patients with unilateral overuse (non-systemic inflammatory) shoulder tendinopathy, 18 - 65 years of age. Safety assessments included physical examinations, ECGs, vital signs, standard clinical laboratory evaluations (hematology, blood chemistry, and urinalysis), adverse event and serious adverse event monitoring.

Interventions

DRUGsecukinumab

AIN457 300 mg subcutaneously for 12 weeks

OTHERPlacebo

Placebo to match AIN457 subcutaneously for 12 weeks

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Patients and investigators were blinded until EOS. Sponsor was blinded until after the analysis of the primary endpoint at week 14.

Intervention model description

Parallel Assignment

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Male or non-pregnant, non-lactating female patients 18 to 65 years of age at randomization 2. Presence of unilateral rotator cuff tendinopathy with: 1. Symptoms present ≥6 weeks, but \<12 months prior to randomization 2. Tendinopathy with no more than a 50% tear as established by ultrasound at screening (historic data acceptable if not older than 3 months) and MRI at baseline: Sein MRI tendinopathy scoring system grade I-III; with no tear or partial tear \[maximum 50% tendon thickness (Bauer tendon thickness score maximum 2); AP length maximum 10 mm (Bauer tendon length score max 2)\]. Maximum 50% of patients with partial tear 3. Pain in the affected shoulder (at rest or on movement) on at least 3 days out of 7 days in the past week prior to baseline and a score of ≥4 out of 10 on a VAS pain scale 4. Positive Painful Arc Test on examination and/or nightly pain in the affected shoulder on at least 4 out of 7 days in the past week prior to baseline 3. The rotator-cuff tendinopathy must have been refractory to standard treatment, including NSAIDs and physiotherapy

Exclusion criteria

1\. Rheumatologic, inflammatory diseases, including but not limited to: PsA, AS and RA 2. Previous shoulder surgery in affected shoulder 3. History of adhesive capsulitis/frozen shoulder or calcification in the tendon (in affected or contralateral shoulder) confirmed by X-Ray, historic X-Rays can be used if performed within 3 months of baseline 4. Symptomatic osteoarthritis of the shoulder (gleno-humeral, acromioclavicular) (in affected or contralateral shoulder confirmed by X-Ray, historic X-Rays can be used if performed within 3 months of baseline 5. Neck conditions, including but not limited to cervical spine syndrome, which in the opinion of the investigator, may explain the patient's symptoms 6. Previous platelet rich plasma injections within the last 12 months prior to randomization 7. Previous treatment with any cell-depleting therapies including but not limited to anti- CD20, investigational agents (e.g. Campath, anti-CD4, anti-CD5, anti-CD3, anti-CD19) 8. Previous exposure to any biologic immunomodulating agents, including but not limited to TNFalpha inhibitors (including, but not limited to adalimumab, infliximab), or biologics targeting IL-17 (including, but not limited to secukinumab, ixekizumab or brodalumab) or the IL-17 receptor within the last 12 months prior to baseline 9. Any intraarticular/subacromial corticosteroid treatment within 8 weeks prior to randomization and more than 3 injections for the current tendinopathy. Oral, intramuscular or i.v. corticosteroid treatment within the last 12 months prior to randomization \-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Score at Week 14 in All Patients - Statistical Analysis Results of Total WORC Scores at Week 14Week 14 (Day 99)WORC PRO score at week 14. The WORC Index consists of 21 items divided into 5 Domains: Physical Symptoms (6 items), Sport/Recreation (4 items), Work Function (4 items), Lifestyle Function (4 items) and Emotional Function (3 items). The total scores and sub scores used were the percentages of the normal scores with 0 being worst and 100 being best. All Patients - Statistical analysis results of WORC scores at Week 14

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Scores Over Time in All PatientsDays 15, 29, 57, 85, 127, and End of StudyWORC score at Days 15, 29, 57, 85, 127, and End of Study (day 169). The scale range for WORC total score is 0-100, 0 being the worst possible outcome (highly symptomatic patient) and 100 being the best possible outcome (asymptomatic patient)
Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire Score (QuickDASH) Over TimeDays 15, 29, 57, 85, 99, 127, and End of StudyPatient Reported Outcome: Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) This questionnaire asks about symptoms as well participant's ability to do certain activities - ranging from 1 (No difficulty) to 5 (Unable). The scale range for QuickDASH total score is 0-100, 0 being the best possible outcome and 100 being the worst possible outcome
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score Over TimeDays 15, 29, 57, 85, 99, 127, and End of StudyPatient Reported Outcome: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Evaluation Form (ASES) score is self-administered and has 17 questions in the areas of shoulder symptoms and functions. The ASES total score ranges from 0 to 100 (best).
EQ-5D-5L Index Score Over TimeDays 15, 29, 57, 85, 99, 127 and End of StudyPatient Reported Outcome: Statistical analysis results of EQ-5D-5L Index score, which contains 5 items to assess Health Status (mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). Overall scores range from 0 to 1 with lower scores representing a higher level of dysfunction.
Pain Score Over Time Using a VAS ScaleDays 15, 29, 57, 85, 99, 127 and End of StudyPain intensity is assessed by a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) which is measured on a 100mm line that represents a continuum between no pain and worst pain. The scale range for pain score is 0-100, 0 being the best possible outcome (no pain) and 100 being the worst possible outcome (worst pain).
Your Health Today Score Over TimeDays 15, 29, 57, 85, 99, 127, and End of StudyPatient Reported Outcome: Statistical analysis results of EQ-5D-5L for Your health Today questionnaire, which reflects how good or bad the subjets Health is on a scale from 0 (worst health) to 100 (best health).
Physician Global Assessment (PhGA) Score Using a VAS Scale Over TimeDays 15, 29, 57, 85, 99, 127 and End of StudyPhysician global assessment (PhGA) score using a VAS scale (considering the last 24 hours). The scale range for PhGA score is 0-100, 0 being the best possible outcome (no disease activity) and 100 being the worst possible outcome (maximal disease activity).
Pharmacokinetics - CminDays 1, 29, 85 and EoS (End of Study)Mean trough concentrations Cmin is a pharmacokinetics term for the minimum blood plasma concentration reached by a drug prior to administration of a second dose (mass/volume) Serum trough concentrations of secukinumab 300 mg group was measured at Days 1, 29, 85 and EoS
Immunogenicity Assessment - Treatment Emergent ADAsDay 1 and EoSNumber of Participants with Treatment emergent Anti-secukinumab antibodies
Number of Participants With Tendinosis Grade Score 1, 2 or 3 Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Sein ScoresBaseline and Day 99Assessment of structural changes in the rotator cuff tendinopathy over time The MRI Sein score was used to grade supraspinatus tendinosis using a modified 4-point scale from 0 to 3 and changes in grading over time were captured in the shift table. Grade 0 is normal, grade 1 is mild, Grade 2 is moderate and grade 3 is marked tendinosis. In this Sein score assessment, only data from Day 99 and baseline could be compared, as only those two time points were double read and adjudicated in case the 2 readers had different results. At any other time-points (Day 57 and EOS), images were assessed only by one reader and thus could not be compared to baseline.
Patient Global Assessment (PGA) Score Over Time Using a VAS ScaleDays 15, 29, 57, 85, 99, 127 and End of StudyThe patient's global assessment of disease activity is performed using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from no activity to most active in the last 24 hours. The scale range for PGA score is 0-100, 0 being the best possible outcome (no disease activity) and 100 being the worst possible outcome (maximal disease activity).

Countries

Czechia, Germany, Netherlands, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Of all patients randomized (N= 98; 100%) in the study, a total of 96 patients (98%) were dosed (49 patients in the secukinumab 300 mg group and 47 patients in the placebo group)

Pre-assignment details

2 patients were not dosed, one patient decided to discontinue on Day 1 due to a common cold and one patient was a run-in failure

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Secukinumab
AIN457 300 mg subcutaneously (s.c.)
49
Placebo
Placebo s.c.
47
Total96

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Follow-up EpochWithdrawal by Subject02
Overall StudyAdverse Event10
Overall StudyPhysician Decision11
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject12

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboTotalSecukinumab
Age, Continuous49.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.56
46.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.2
44.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.51
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black or African American
1 Participants4 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
45 Participants88 Participants43 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
23 Participants40 Participants17 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
24 Participants56 Participants32 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 490 / 47
other
Total, other adverse events
36 / 4934 / 47
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 490 / 47

Outcome results

Primary

The Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Score at Week 14 in All Patients - Statistical Analysis Results of Total WORC Scores at Week 14

WORC PRO score at week 14. The WORC Index consists of 21 items divided into 5 Domains: Physical Symptoms (6 items), Sport/Recreation (4 items), Work Function (4 items), Lifestyle Function (4 items) and Emotional Function (3 items). The total scores and sub scores used were the percentages of the normal scores with 0 being worst and 100 being best. All Patients - Statistical analysis results of WORC scores at Week 14

Time frame: Week 14 (Day 99)

Population: Pharmacodynamic (PD) Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
SecukinumabThe Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Score at Week 14 in All Patients - Statistical Analysis Results of Total WORC Scores at Week 1437.00 Scores on a scale
PlaceboThe Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Score at Week 14 in All Patients - Statistical Analysis Results of Total WORC Scores at Week 1437.77 Scores on a scale
Comparison: All Patients at day 99p-value: 0.87590% CI: [-8.84, 7.3]LS mean
Secondary

American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score Over Time

Patient Reported Outcome: American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder Evaluation Form (ASES) score is self-administered and has 17 questions in the areas of shoulder symptoms and functions. The ASES total score ranges from 0 to 100 (best).

Time frame: Days 15, 29, 57, 85, 99, 127, and End of Study

Population: PD Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
SecukinumabAmerican Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score Over TimeDay 5724.15 Scores on a scale
SecukinumabAmerican Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score Over TimeDay 9931.29 Scores on a scale
SecukinumabAmerican Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score Over TimeDay 2917.53 Scores on a scale
SecukinumabAmerican Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score Over TimeDay 12734.92 Scores on a scale
SecukinumabAmerican Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score Over TimeDay 8530.50 Scores on a scale
SecukinumabAmerican Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score Over TimeEnd of Study37.29 Scores on a scale
SecukinumabAmerican Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score Over TimeDay 158.66 Scores on a scale
PlaceboAmerican Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score Over TimeEnd of Study36.15 Scores on a scale
PlaceboAmerican Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score Over TimeDay 155.26 Scores on a scale
PlaceboAmerican Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score Over TimeDay 2914.37 Scores on a scale
PlaceboAmerican Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score Over TimeDay 5722.56 Scores on a scale
PlaceboAmerican Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score Over TimeDay 8526.97 Scores on a scale
PlaceboAmerican Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score Over TimeDay 9927.79 Scores on a scale
PlaceboAmerican Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Score Over TimeDay 12732.94 Scores on a scale
Comparison: Statistical analysis results of ASES total score (PD analysis) at day 99p-value: 0.41190% CI: [-3.54, 10.54]LS Mean
Comparison: Statistical analysis results of ASES total score (PD analysis) at End of Study set)p-value: 0.80490% CI: [-6.5, 8.78]LS Mean
Secondary

Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire Score (QuickDASH) Over Time

Patient Reported Outcome: Disability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) This questionnaire asks about symptoms as well participant's ability to do certain activities - ranging from 1 (No difficulty) to 5 (Unable). The scale range for QuickDASH total score is 0-100, 0 being the best possible outcome and 100 being the worst possible outcome

Time frame: Days 15, 29, 57, 85, 99, 127, and End of Study

Population: PD Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
SecukinumabDisability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire Score (QuickDASH) Over TimeDay 57-22.43 Scores on a scale
SecukinumabDisability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire Score (QuickDASH) Over TimeDay 99-29.45 Scores on a scale
SecukinumabDisability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire Score (QuickDASH) Over TimeDay 29-18.31 Scores on a scale
SecukinumabDisability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire Score (QuickDASH) Over TimeDay 127-32.86 Scores on a scale
SecukinumabDisability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire Score (QuickDASH) Over TimeDay 85-28.14 Scores on a scale
SecukinumabDisability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire Score (QuickDASH) Over TimeEnd of Study-33.89 Scores on a scale
SecukinumabDisability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire Score (QuickDASH) Over TimeDay 15-11.64 Scores on a scale
PlaceboDisability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire Score (QuickDASH) Over TimeEnd of Study-35.40 Scores on a scale
PlaceboDisability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire Score (QuickDASH) Over TimeDay 15-8.23 Scores on a scale
PlaceboDisability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire Score (QuickDASH) Over TimeDay 29-16.95 Scores on a scale
PlaceboDisability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire Score (QuickDASH) Over TimeDay 57-24.01 Scores on a scale
PlaceboDisability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire Score (QuickDASH) Over TimeDay 85-27.22 Scores on a scale
PlaceboDisability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire Score (QuickDASH) Over TimeDay 99-30.69 Scores on a scale
PlaceboDisability of Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire Score (QuickDASH) Over TimeDay 127-31.99 Scores on a scale
Comparison: Statistical analysis results of QuickDASH total score (PD Analysis Set) at day 99p-value: 0.73590% CI: [-4.81, 7.28]LS Mean
Comparison: Statistical analysis results of QuickDASH total score (PD analysis set) at End of Studyp-value: 0.68990% CI: [-4.76, 7.79]LS Mean
Secondary

EQ-5D-5L Index Score Over Time

Patient Reported Outcome: Statistical analysis results of EQ-5D-5L Index score, which contains 5 items to assess Health Status (mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). Overall scores range from 0 to 1 with lower scores representing a higher level of dysfunction.

Time frame: Days 15, 29, 57, 85, 99, 127 and End of Study

Population: PD Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
SecukinumabEQ-5D-5L Index Score Over TimeDay 570.12 Scores on a scale
SecukinumabEQ-5D-5L Index Score Over TimeDay 990.16 Scores on a scale
SecukinumabEQ-5D-5L Index Score Over TimeDay 290.10 Scores on a scale
SecukinumabEQ-5D-5L Index Score Over TimeDay 1270.19 Scores on a scale
SecukinumabEQ-5D-5L Index Score Over TimeDay 850.16 Scores on a scale
SecukinumabEQ-5D-5L Index Score Over TimeEnd of Study0.19 Scores on a scale
SecukinumabEQ-5D-5L Index Score Over TimeDay 150.07 Scores on a scale
PlaceboEQ-5D-5L Index Score Over TimeEnd of Study0.18 Scores on a scale
PlaceboEQ-5D-5L Index Score Over TimeDay 150.04 Scores on a scale
PlaceboEQ-5D-5L Index Score Over TimeDay 290.09 Scores on a scale
PlaceboEQ-5D-5L Index Score Over TimeDay 570.11 Scores on a scale
PlaceboEQ-5D-5L Index Score Over TimeDay 850.14 Scores on a scale
PlaceboEQ-5D-5L Index Score Over TimeDay 990.15 Scores on a scale
PlaceboEQ-5D-5L Index Score Over TimeDay 1270.17 Scores on a scale
Comparison: Statistical analysis results of of EQ-5D-5L Index score at day 99 (PD Analysis Set)p-value: 0.61390% CI: [-0.03, 0.06]LS Mean
Comparison: Statistical analysis results of of EQ-5D-5L Index score at End of Study (PD Analysis Set)p-value: 0.7490% CI: [-0.04, 0.06]LS Mean
Secondary

Immunogenicity Assessment - Treatment Emergent ADAs

Number of Participants with Treatment emergent Anti-secukinumab antibodies

Time frame: Day 1 and EoS

Population: PD Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
SecukinumabImmunogenicity Assessment - Treatment Emergent ADAsDay 10 Participants
SecukinumabImmunogenicity Assessment - Treatment Emergent ADAsEnd of Study0 Participants
PlaceboImmunogenicity Assessment - Treatment Emergent ADAsDay 11 Participants
PlaceboImmunogenicity Assessment - Treatment Emergent ADAsEnd of Study0 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Tendinosis Grade Score 1, 2 or 3 Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Sein Scores

Assessment of structural changes in the rotator cuff tendinopathy over time The MRI Sein score was used to grade supraspinatus tendinosis using a modified 4-point scale from 0 to 3 and changes in grading over time were captured in the shift table. Grade 0 is normal, grade 1 is mild, Grade 2 is moderate and grade 3 is marked tendinosis. In this Sein score assessment, only data from Day 99 and baseline could be compared, as only those two time points were double read and adjudicated in case the 2 readers had different results. At any other time-points (Day 57 and EOS), images were assessed only by one reader and thus could not be compared to baseline.

Time frame: Baseline and Day 99

Population: PD Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
SecukinumabNumber of Participants With Tendinosis Grade Score 1, 2 or 3 Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Sein ScoresBaseline grade 131 participants
SecukinumabNumber of Participants With Tendinosis Grade Score 1, 2 or 3 Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Sein ScoresBaseline grade 211 participants
SecukinumabNumber of Participants With Tendinosis Grade Score 1, 2 or 3 Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Sein ScoresBaseline grade 33 participants
SecukinumabNumber of Participants With Tendinosis Grade Score 1, 2 or 3 Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Sein ScoresDay 99 grade 131 participants
SecukinumabNumber of Participants With Tendinosis Grade Score 1, 2 or 3 Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Sein ScoresDay 99 grade 211 participants
SecukinumabNumber of Participants With Tendinosis Grade Score 1, 2 or 3 Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Sein ScoresDay 99 grade 33 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Tendinosis Grade Score 1, 2 or 3 Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Sein ScoresDay 99 grade 29 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Tendinosis Grade Score 1, 2 or 3 Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Sein ScoresBaseline grade 125 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Tendinosis Grade Score 1, 2 or 3 Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Sein ScoresDay 99 grade 126 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Tendinosis Grade Score 1, 2 or 3 Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Sein ScoresBaseline grade 210 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Tendinosis Grade Score 1, 2 or 3 Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Sein ScoresDay 99 grade 33 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Tendinosis Grade Score 1, 2 or 3 Measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Sein ScoresBaseline grade 33 participants
Secondary

Pain Score Over Time Using a VAS Scale

Pain intensity is assessed by a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) which is measured on a 100mm line that represents a continuum between no pain and worst pain. The scale range for pain score is 0-100, 0 being the best possible outcome (no pain) and 100 being the worst possible outcome (worst pain).

Time frame: Days 15, 29, 57, 85, 99, 127 and End of Study

Population: PD Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
SecukinumabPain Score Over Time Using a VAS ScaleDay 99-46.11 Scores on a scale
SecukinumabPain Score Over Time Using a VAS ScaleDay 15-12.11 Scores on a scale
SecukinumabPain Score Over Time Using a VAS ScaleDay 29-26.04 Scores on a scale
SecukinumabPain Score Over Time Using a VAS ScaleDay 57-35.52 Scores on a scale
SecukinumabPain Score Over Time Using a VAS ScaleDay 85-42.63 Scores on a scale
SecukinumabPain Score Over Time Using a VAS ScaleDay 127-49.44 Scores on a scale
SecukinumabPain Score Over Time Using a VAS ScaleEnd of Study-52.23 Scores on a scale
PlaceboPain Score Over Time Using a VAS ScaleDay 127-45.27 Scores on a scale
PlaceboPain Score Over Time Using a VAS ScaleDay 85-37.97 Scores on a scale
PlaceboPain Score Over Time Using a VAS ScaleDay 15-9.50 Scores on a scale
PlaceboPain Score Over Time Using a VAS ScaleDay 99-40.56 Scores on a scale
PlaceboPain Score Over Time Using a VAS ScaleDay 29-23.13 Scores on a scale
PlaceboPain Score Over Time Using a VAS ScaleEnd of Study-50.74 Scores on a scale
PlaceboPain Score Over Time Using a VAS ScaleDay 57-32.83 Scores on a scale
Comparison: Statistical analysis results of pain score using VAS scale (PD Analysis Set) at day 99p-value: 0.28190% CI: [-14.07, 2.97]LS Mean
Comparison: Statistical analysis results of pain score using VAS scale (PD Analysis Set) at End of Studyp-value: 0.7890% CI: [-10.33, 7.35]LS Mean
Secondary

Patient Global Assessment (PGA) Score Over Time Using a VAS Scale

The patient's global assessment of disease activity is performed using a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from no activity to most active in the last 24 hours. The scale range for PGA score is 0-100, 0 being the best possible outcome (no disease activity) and 100 being the worst possible outcome (maximal disease activity).

Time frame: Days 15, 29, 57, 85, 99, 127 and End of Study

Population: PD Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
SecukinumabPatient Global Assessment (PGA) Score Over Time Using a VAS ScaleDay 57-29.40 Scores on a scale
SecukinumabPatient Global Assessment (PGA) Score Over Time Using a VAS ScaleDay 99-38.43 Scores on a scale
SecukinumabPatient Global Assessment (PGA) Score Over Time Using a VAS ScaleDay 29-22.25 Scores on a scale
SecukinumabPatient Global Assessment (PGA) Score Over Time Using a VAS ScaleDay 127-43.78 Scores on a scale
SecukinumabPatient Global Assessment (PGA) Score Over Time Using a VAS ScaleDay 85-37.57 Scores on a scale
SecukinumabPatient Global Assessment (PGA) Score Over Time Using a VAS ScaleEnd of Study-47.72 Scores on a scale
SecukinumabPatient Global Assessment (PGA) Score Over Time Using a VAS ScaleDay 15-6.33 Scores on a scale
PlaceboPatient Global Assessment (PGA) Score Over Time Using a VAS ScaleEnd of Study-39.43 Scores on a scale
PlaceboPatient Global Assessment (PGA) Score Over Time Using a VAS ScaleDay 15-8.09 Scores on a scale
PlaceboPatient Global Assessment (PGA) Score Over Time Using a VAS ScaleDay 29-16.38 Scores on a scale
PlaceboPatient Global Assessment (PGA) Score Over Time Using a VAS ScaleDay 57-25.69 Scores on a scale
PlaceboPatient Global Assessment (PGA) Score Over Time Using a VAS ScaleDay 85-31.75 Scores on a scale
PlaceboPatient Global Assessment (PGA) Score Over Time Using a VAS ScaleDay 99-35.10 Scores on a scale
PlaceboPatient Global Assessment (PGA) Score Over Time Using a VAS ScaleDay 127-38.32 Scores on a scale
Comparison: Statistical analysis results of pain score using VAS scale (PD Analysis Set) at day 99p-value: 0.48990% CI: [-11.28, 4.64]LS Mean
Comparison: Statistical analysis results of pain score using VAS scale at End of Studyp-value: 0.08790% CI: [-16.26, -0.32]LS Mean
Secondary

Pharmacokinetics - Cmin

Mean trough concentrations Cmin is a pharmacokinetics term for the minimum blood plasma concentration reached by a drug prior to administration of a second dose (mass/volume) Serum trough concentrations of secukinumab 300 mg group was measured at Days 1, 29, 85 and EoS

Time frame: Days 1, 29, 85 and EoS (End of Study)

Population: PD Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
SecukinumabPharmacokinetics - CminMean trough concentration after first 4 wkly doses90.4 ug/mLStandard Deviation 30.7
SecukinumabPharmacokinetics - CminWeek 1213.2 ug/mLStandard Deviation 6.67
Secondary

Physician Global Assessment (PhGA) Score Using a VAS Scale Over Time

Physician global assessment (PhGA) score using a VAS scale (considering the last 24 hours). The scale range for PhGA score is 0-100, 0 being the best possible outcome (no disease activity) and 100 being the worst possible outcome (maximal disease activity).

Time frame: Days 15, 29, 57, 85, 99, 127 and End of Study

Population: PD Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
SecukinumabPhysician Global Assessment (PhGA) Score Using a VAS Scale Over TimeDay 57-30.78 Score on a scale
SecukinumabPhysician Global Assessment (PhGA) Score Using a VAS Scale Over TimeDay 99-35.72 Score on a scale
SecukinumabPhysician Global Assessment (PhGA) Score Using a VAS Scale Over TimeDay 29-25.01 Score on a scale
SecukinumabPhysician Global Assessment (PhGA) Score Using a VAS Scale Over TimeDay 127-41.72 Score on a scale
SecukinumabPhysician Global Assessment (PhGA) Score Using a VAS Scale Over TimeDay 85-33.42 Score on a scale
SecukinumabPhysician Global Assessment (PhGA) Score Using a VAS Scale Over TimeEnd of Study-44.64 Score on a scale
SecukinumabPhysician Global Assessment (PhGA) Score Using a VAS Scale Over TimeDay 15-13.99 Score on a scale
PlaceboPhysician Global Assessment (PhGA) Score Using a VAS Scale Over TimeEnd of Study-44.26 Score on a scale
PlaceboPhysician Global Assessment (PhGA) Score Using a VAS Scale Over TimeDay 15-9.11 Score on a scale
PlaceboPhysician Global Assessment (PhGA) Score Using a VAS Scale Over TimeDay 29-19.42 Score on a scale
PlaceboPhysician Global Assessment (PhGA) Score Using a VAS Scale Over TimeDay 57-27.83 Score on a scale
PlaceboPhysician Global Assessment (PhGA) Score Using a VAS Scale Over TimeDay 85-37.88 Score on a scale
PlaceboPhysician Global Assessment (PhGA) Score Using a VAS Scale Over TimeDay 99-41.73 Score on a scale
PlaceboPhysician Global Assessment (PhGA) Score Using a VAS Scale Over TimeDay 127-44.18 Score on a scale
Comparison: Statistical analysis results of PhGA score using VAS scale at day 99p-value: 0.2190% CI: [-1.9, 13.91]LS Mean
Comparison: Statistical analysis results of PhGA score using VAS scale at End of Studyp-value: 0.94290% CI: [-8.86, 8.11]LS Mean
Secondary

The Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Scores Over Time in All Patients

WORC score at Days 15, 29, 57, 85, 127, and End of Study (day 169). The scale range for WORC total score is 0-100, 0 being the worst possible outcome (highly symptomatic patient) and 100 being the best possible outcome (asymptomatic patient)

Time frame: Days 15, 29, 57, 85, 127, and End of Study

Population: PD Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
SecukinumabThe Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Scores Over Time in All PatientsDay 1512.39 Scores on a scale
SecukinumabThe Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Scores Over Time in All PatientsDay 2922.35 Scores on a scale
SecukinumabThe Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Scores Over Time in All PatientsDay 5728.74 Scores on a scale
SecukinumabThe Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Scores Over Time in All PatientsDay 8534.86 Scores on a scale
SecukinumabThe Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Scores Over Time in All PatientsDay 12741.86 Scores on a scale
SecukinumabThe Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Scores Over Time in All PatientsEnd of Study43.41 Scores on a scale
PlaceboThe Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Scores Over Time in All PatientsDay 12738.50 Scores on a scale
PlaceboThe Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Scores Over Time in All PatientsDay 158.42 Scores on a scale
PlaceboThe Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Scores Over Time in All PatientsDay 8533.48 Scores on a scale
PlaceboThe Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Scores Over Time in All PatientsDay 2919.49 Scores on a scale
PlaceboThe Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Scores Over Time in All PatientsEnd of Study40.97 Scores on a scale
PlaceboThe Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Scores Over Time in All PatientsDay 5730.11 Scores on a scale
Comparison: All patients at day 2990% CI: [-3.39, 9.11]LS Mean
Comparison: All patientts at day 15p-value: 0.1990% CI: [-1.03, 8.97]LS mean
Comparison: All patients at day 57p-value: 0.76190% CI: [-8.81, 6.08]LS Mean
Comparison: All patients at day 85p-value: 0.76590% CI: [-6.27, 9.03]LS Mean
Comparison: All patients at day 127p-value: 0.49190% CI: [-4.73, 11.45]LS Mean
Comparison: All patients at end of studyp-value: 0.63990% CI: [-6.19, 11.07]LS Mean
Secondary

Your Health Today Score Over Time

Patient Reported Outcome: Statistical analysis results of EQ-5D-5L for Your health Today questionnaire, which reflects how good or bad the subjets Health is on a scale from 0 (worst health) to 100 (best health).

Time frame: Days 15, 29, 57, 85, 99, 127, and End of Study

Population: PD Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
SecukinumabYour Health Today Score Over TimeDay 573.19 Scores on a scale
SecukinumabYour Health Today Score Over TimeDay 998.75 Scores on a scale
SecukinumabYour Health Today Score Over TimeDay 293.27 Scores on a scale
SecukinumabYour Health Today Score Over TimeDay 1279.55 Scores on a scale
SecukinumabYour Health Today Score Over TimeDay 857.36 Scores on a scale
SecukinumabYour Health Today Score Over TimeEnd of Study10.22 Scores on a scale
SecukinumabYour Health Today Score Over TimeDay 15-0.22 Scores on a scale
PlaceboYour Health Today Score Over TimeEnd of Study12.13 Scores on a scale
PlaceboYour Health Today Score Over TimeDay 150.02 Scores on a scale
PlaceboYour Health Today Score Over TimeDay 293.56 Scores on a scale
PlaceboYour Health Today Score Over TimeDay 579.02 Scores on a scale
PlaceboYour Health Today Score Over TimeDay 857.79 Scores on a scale
PlaceboYour Health Today Score Over TimeDay 9910.01 Scores on a scale
PlaceboYour Health Today Score Over TimeDay 12713.59 Scores on a scale
Comparison: Statistical analysis results of Your Health Today EQ-5D-5L Index score at day 99 (PD Analysis Set)p-value: 0.70690% CI: [-6.81, 4.29]LS Mean
Comparison: Statistical analysis results of Your Health Today EQ-5D-5L Index score at End of Studyp-value: 0.64790% CI: [-8.79, 4.99]LS Mean

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026