Skip to content

Difference of Information Gain Between Video-base and Doctor Interview After Preanesthetic Visit

Difference of Information Gain Between Video-base and Doctor Interview After Preanesthetic Visit

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03344445
Enrollment
250
Registered
2017-11-17
Start date
2017-01-01
Completion date
2018-12-31
Last updated
2018-03-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anesthesia

Brief summary

To investigate the differenec of patients' satisfaction and information gain betweem face-to-face interview and video introduction

Detailed description

We made up a video which showed the type, the method, the risk, and the benefit of all anesthesia with words, pictures, and image. A study nurse will ask the will of patients. The patients enrolled in the study will be randomly divided into traditional group(control group) and study group(study group). The study group will watch the video at first, then our anesthesiologist visit the patient. The control group will receive traditional anesthesiologist visit. After doctors' visit, the patients have to complete a test and a questionnaire. The patients who don't participate in the study will have traditional visit and no test.

Interventions

OTHERvideo-assisted pre anesthesia explain

Anesthesiologist will visit all study patients, and only the experimental group will read the video.

Sponsors

IRB of NTUH Hsin-Chu Branch
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

simple compare of information gain between traditional visit and video-assisted visit

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* All adult patients were included who were scheduled to undergo elective surgery

Exclusion criteria

* Postoperative stay in the intensive care unit was expected or unexpected.,Repeated general anesthesia had been performed in the previous 6 months,ASA classification was more than or equal to III,There were pronounced cognitive and or speech barriers

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
inform gain analysisafter every 100 effective data or 1 year, analyzed the dataThe score of test would represent the inform gain of patient
satification anaylsisafter every 100 effective data or 1 year, analyzed the dataThe score of questionnaire represent the ratification of patient

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026