Skip to content

Linked Color Imaging Versus High-definition White Light Endoscopy for the Detection of Polyps in Patients With Lynch Syndrome (LCI-LYNCH)

Linked Color Imaging Versus High-definition White Light Endoscopy for the Detection of Polyps in Patients With Lynch Syndrome. An International, Multicenter, Parallel Randomized Controlled Trial.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03344289
Enrollment
357
Registered
2017-11-17
Start date
2018-01-21
Completion date
2020-06-09
Last updated
2020-07-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Colonoscopy, Lynch Syndrome

Keywords

Linked-color-imaging, Advanced Imaging Techniques

Brief summary

The aim of the present study is to compare polyp detection rates of LCI with high-definition white light endoscopy (HD-WLE) in patients with Lynch syndrome in a parallel, international, multicenter, randomized controlled colonoscopy trial

Detailed description

Rationale: Linked Color Imaging is a push-button endoscopic imaging technique developed to enhance the visibility of the vasculature and architecture of the mucosal surface by narrowing the spectrum of absorbed light. Compared to High-Definition White Light Endoscopy, mucosal surface patterns are better visualized and this could potentially increase the detection of polyps by improving the visibility of colorectal polyps. Patients with Lynch syndrome have accelerated carcinogenesis and even the smallest polyps have malignant potential. Increasing polyp detection rates with new imaging techniques is therefore of importance. Objective: To compare polyp detection rates of Linked Color Imaging with High-Definition White Light Endoscopy during surveillance colonoscopy in Lynch patients Study design: international, multicentre, parallel, randomized controlled trial Inclusion criteria: Patients diagnosed with Lynch syndrome (proven germline mutation in one of the following MMR genes: MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 or PMS2) aged ≥ 18 years old undergoing surveillance colonoscopy Exclusion criteria: Patients who underwent recent surveillance colonoscopy within 1 year from current exam (e.g. after piecemeal EMR) or patients referred for endoscopic evaluation of known colorectal neoplasia. Patients in whom the colonoscopy is planned for the evaluation of symptoms like rectal blood loss, recent change in bowel habits, weight loss or anemia. Patients with a concurrent diagnosis of (serrated) polyposis syndrome or inflammatory bowel disease. Patients who are unwilling or unable to give informed consent. Intervention: Included patients will undergo surveillance colonoscopy with either Linked Color Imaging colonoscopy or High-Definition White Light Endoscopy after 1:1 randomization. Main study parameters/endpoints: Polyp detection rate of Linked Color Imaging versus High-Definition White Light Endoscopy Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Each colonoscopy is associated with a small, but not negligible risk of bleeding (\ 1.5%) or perforation (\ 0.1%). The use of LCI does not increase the risk of endoscopy.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTColonoscopy

Participants will be randomized towards colonoscopy withdrawal with either LCI or HD-WLE

Sponsors

FUJIFILM Europe GmbH
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

An international, multicenter, parallel randomized controlled trial.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of Lynch-syndrome, with a germline mutation in one of the MMR genes (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2) * Age \>18 years * Surveillance colonoscopy for Lynch syndrome.

Exclusion criteria

* Recent surveillance colonoscopy within 1 year from current exam (e.g. after piecemeal EMR) or patients referred for endoscopic evaluation of known colorectal neoplasia. * Colonoscopy planned for the evaluation of symptoms like rectal blood loss, recent change in bowel habits, weight loss or anemia. * Patients with a concurrent diagnosis of (serrated) polyposis syndrome or inflammatory bowel disease. * Patients who are unwilling or unable to give informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
polyp detection rates2 yearsThe aim of the present study is to compare polyp detection rates of LCI with high-definition white light endoscopy (HD-WLE) in patients with Lynch syndrome in a parallel, international, multicenter, randomized controlled colonoscopy trial.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
adenoma detection rate2 years
mean number of adenomas2 years
mean number of detected polyps2 years
mean duration of procedures2 years
sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of optical diagnosis on a per polyp basis2 years
mean number of serrated polyps2 years

Countries

Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 15, 2026