Skip to content

Evaluation of a Closed Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Station Versus an Open Flow Cabinet

Comparative Study Between Two Systems of Gamete and Embryo Handling: Closed Environment Versus Open System

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03343938
Enrollment
78
Registered
2017-11-17
Start date
2017-10-31
Completion date
2019-11-30
Last updated
2020-02-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

ART

Keywords

Group embryo culture, Low oxygen tension, Closed station, Embryo handling

Brief summary

There is not yet a standardized system of human embryonic culture in vitro. In addition, technical improvements continually appear. The investigators recently carried out a study in which it shows that the grouped embryo culture at low oxygen tension (5% O2) in a benchtop incubator shows better success rates than individual culture at atmospheric oxygen tension (20% O2) in a conventional incubator. For these reasons, the investigators have decided to continue this research line to evaluate the efficacy of a new ART station with a closed environment in comparison of an open flow cabinet. This new system keeps a controled environment maintaining a carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration of 6% and a temperature of 37 degrees. A prospective randomized study will be carried out in which the manipulation of the gametes and pre-embryos of the patients will be carried out in open laminar flow cabinets or in a closed station that maintain the CO2 and temperature conditions.

Interventions

OTHEREmbryo handling in a closed station

Embryo handling is performed inside a closed station with a controlled environment: 6% CO2 and 37 degrees.

Sponsors

Vida Recoletas Sevilla
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 49 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Signing a written consent to participate in the study. * Blastocyst transfer: * Patients using their own oocytes under 40 years. * Patients using donated oocytes.

Exclusion criteria

* Preimplantation genetic screening patients. * Severe male factor (spermatozoa of testicular or epididymal origin, patients with cryptozoospermia and patients with retrograde ejaculation)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Embryo qualityThrough study completion, an average of two yearsRate of viable embryos = Transferred and Frozen embryos / Total number of embryos obtained

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Live birth rate per first embryo transferThrough study completion, an average of two yearsTotal number of live births over the total of recruited patients (taking into account only the first cycle)
Cumulative live birth rateThrough study completion, an average of two yearsTotal number of live births over the total of recruited patients (taking into account fresh and cryopreserved cycles)
Implantation rateThrough study completion, an average of two yearsTotal of implanted embryos / total of transferred embryos
Live birth rate of the first cycle per transferred embryoThrough study completion, an average of two yearsTotal number of live births over the total of transferred embryo

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026