Skip to content

Retrospective Study of the Results of Cooled Radiofrequency for Genicular Nerves Neurotomy in 40 Consecutive Patients With Osteoarthritis of the Knee and Painful Knee Arthroplasty

Pain Treatment With Cooled Radiofrequency in Osteoarthritis and Total Knee Arthroplasty: Case Series in Hospital Universitario de Son Espases

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03343808
Enrollment
40
Registered
2017-11-17
Start date
2015-01-08
Completion date
2017-05-26
Last updated
2017-11-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Keywords

Cooled radiofrequency, chronic knee pain, knee arthroplasty, genicular nerve

Brief summary

Analyze the results of cooled radiofrequency in patients with chronic knee pain after one year of follow- up.

Detailed description

The investigators performed a retrospective case-series reviewed of 40 patients who underwent cooled RF of genicular nerves. The investigators evaluated results of the survey of quality of life (SF36), knee society score (KSS) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).

Interventions

PROCEDUREcooled radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves

Cooled RF consists of creating an injury in the nerve trough a high frequency flow. Unlike conventional RF, in cooled RF through a closed circuit where intravenous flows, we can create an injury for a longer period of time, at a lower temperature (standard RFA 90º C, cooled RFA 60º C) and within an area 8 times larger. As the lesion is spherical, and larger (about 10-12 mm in diameter), the chances of neurolysis of the nerve increase.

Sponsors

José Andrés López Riquelme
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
María del Pilar Sanchís Cortés
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Hospital Son Espases
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Chronic knee pain (older than 3 months, with no response to physiotherapy, medication or hyaluronic acid infiltration) with a pain intensity according to VAS\>7/10 * The radiological criteria were witness of OA with Kellgren-Lawrence index of 2 to 4. * Painful TKA with no apparent cause and with a radiological image where a proper placement was observed

Exclusion criteria

* Infection or lymphangitis of the member * Acute knee pain * Corticoids or hyaluronic acid infiltration with a high molecular weight prior to the surgery * Pregnancy * Severe neurological or psychiatric disorders * Patients with pacemakers

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Treatment success was defined as the number of subjects whose knee pain is reduced by ± 50% based on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).one year after the procedureThe VAS is a 11- point scale (0 points to 10 points), where 0 points equals no pain and 10 points equals the worst pain.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Short Form (36) Health Surveyone year after the procedureThe SF36 values eight parameters: physical function, social function, physical role, emotional role, mental health, vitality, pain and general health. Zero is the worst conceivable health and 100 the best.
Knee Society Score (KSS)one year after the procedureThe KSS consists of two parts. KS measures pain, range of motion, stability and alignment. FS measures the distance able to walk, the difficulty in going up or down stairs and the need for walking aids. The result is rated as excellent (80-100), good (70-79), regular (60-69) and bad (\<60).

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026