Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Elagolix in Participants With Endometriosis With Associated Moderate to Severe Pain

A Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Elagolix Alone or Elagolix With Hormonal Add-Back in Subjects With Endometriosis With Associated Moderate to Severe Pain

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03343067
Enrollment
11
Registered
2017-11-17
Start date
2017-12-27
Completion date
2018-10-23
Last updated
2019-11-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Endometriosis

Keywords

Endometriosis associated pain, Elagolix, Non-menstrual pelvic pain (NMPP), Dysmenorrhea (DYS)

Brief summary

This is a Phase 3, dose-escalation study designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of both elagolix alone and elagolix plus estradiol/norethindrone acetate (E2/NETA) over 24 months in the management of endometriosis with associated moderate to severe pain in premenopausal women.

Interventions

DRUGelagolix

Tablets

Sponsors

AbbVie
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 49 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participant is a premenopausal female 18 to 49 years of age (inclusive) at the time of Screening. * Participant has a documented surgical diagnosis (e.g., laparoscopy or laparotomy) of endometriosis established by visualization or histology within 10 years prior to entry into Washout or Screening, * Participant must agree to use only those rescue analgesics permitted by the protocol during the Screening and Treatment Periods for her endometriosis-associated pain. * Participant must have the following documented in the e-Diary during the last 35 days prior to Study Day 1: 1. At least 2 days of moderate or severe DYS, AND either, 2. At least 2 days of moderate or severe NMPP and an average NMPP score of at least 1.0, OR 3. At least 4 days of moderate or severe NMPP and an average NMPP score of at least 0.5.

Exclusion criteria

* Participant has chronic pelvic pain that is not caused by endometriosis that requires chronic analgesic therapy, which would interfere with the assessment of endometriosis-associated pain. * Participant is using any systemic corticosteroids for over 14 days within 3 months prior to Screening or is likely to require treatment with systemic corticosteroids during the course of the study. Over-the-counter and prescription topical, inhaled or intranasal corticosteroids are allowed. * Participant has a history of major depression or post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) within 2 years prior to screening or other major psychiatric disorder at any time * Participant has a history of suicide attempts or answered yes to questions 4 or 5 on the suicidal ideation portion of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) at Screening or prior to study drug dosing on Day 1. * Participant has any condition that would interfere with obtaining adequate dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements * Screening DXA results of the lumbar spine (L1 - L4), femoral neck or total hip bone mineral density (BMD) corresponding to less than 2 or more standard deviations below normal (Z-score \< -2.0 for participants \< 40 years of age, T-score for participants \>= 40 years of age). * Participant has either 1. a newly diagnosed, clinically significant medical condition that requires therapeutic intervention (e.g., new onset hypertension) that has not been stabilized 30 days prior to enrollment on Day 1 OR 2. a clinically significant medical condition that is anticipated to required intervention during the course of study participation (e.g., anticipated major elective surgery) OR 3. an unstable medical condition that makes the participant an unsuitable candidate for the study in the opinion of the Investigator * Participant has any conditions contraindicated with use of E2/NETA

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Responders at Month 6 Based on DYS Pain ScaleMonth 6Proportion of responders at Month 6 based upon the scale for DYS pain scale (ranging from 0 \[none\] to 3 \[severe\]) using the daily e-Diary, as well as no increased analgesic rescue use for endometriosis-associated pain.
Proportion of Responders at Month 6 Based on NMPP Pain ScaleMonth 6Proportion of responders at Month 6 based upon the scale for NMPP pain scale (ranging from 0 \[none\] to 3 \[severe\]) using the daily e-Diary, as well as no increased analgesic rescue use for endometriosis-associated pain.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Dyspareunia at Month 6Month 0 (baseline), Month 6The dyspareunia pain scale score ranged from 0 to 3 (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe), recorded in a daily eDiary and averaged monthly based on a 35-day window. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Daily Diary Endometriosis-Associated Pain Score Via Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Month 6Month 0 (baseline), Month 6The NRS for overall endometriosis-associated pain ranges from 0 (none) to 10 (worst pain ever), recorded in a daily eDiary and averaged monthly based on a 35-day window. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline in Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue Analgesics (NSAIDs/Opioids) at Month 6Month 0 (baseline), Month 6Based on average pill counts and assessed using the daily e-Diary. Permitted non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) included naproxen, ibuprofen, diclofenac, and celecoxib. Permitted opioids included hydrocodone + acetaminophen and codeine phosphate + acetaminophen.
Percentage of Participants With 30% or More Reduction From Baseline Based on the 35 Day Mean of the Daily Diary Endometriosis-Associated Pain Score Via NRS at Month 6Month 6The NRS for overall endometriosis-associated pain ranges from 0 (none) to 10 (worst pain ever), recorded in a daily eDiary and averaged monthly based on a 35-day window.
Proportion of Responders Over TimeMonth 0 (baseline), Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6As assessed by change and percent change from baseline in average pain score and rescue analgesic use monthly for DYS, NMPP, dyspareunia, and Daily Diary endometriosis-associated pain score via NRS, respectively.
Proportion of Responders Over Time (Not Taking Into Consideration of Analgesic Use)Month 0 (baseline), Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6As assessed by change and percent change from Baseline in average pain score and rescue analgesic use monthly for DYS, NMPP, dyspareunia, and Daily Diary endometriosis-associated pain score via NRS, respectively.
Change From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average DYS Pain ScoreMonth 0 (baseline), Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6The DYS pain scale score ranged from 0 to 3 (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe), recorded in a daily eDiary and averaged monthly based on a 35-day window. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. The analysis was based on a 28-day window. If a participant prematurely discontinued during the open-label period, based on the analysis window, some data might fall into Month 4 analysis.
Change From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average NMPP Pain ScoreMonth 0 (baseline), Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6The NMPP pain scale score ranged from 0 to 3 (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe), recorded in a daily eDiary and averaged monthly based on a 35-day window. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average Dyspareunia Pain ScoreMonth 0 (baseline), Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6The dyspareunia pain scale score ranged from 0 to 3 (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe), recorded in a daily eDiary and averaged monthly based on a 35-day window. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average Daily Diary Endometriosis-Associated Pain Score Via NRSMonth 0 (baseline), Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6The NRS for overall endometriosis-associated pain ranges from 0 (none) to 10 (worst pain ever), recorded in a daily eDiary and averaged monthly based on a 35-day window. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Percent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for DYSMonth 0 (baseline), Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6The DYS pain scale score ranged from 0 to 3 (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe), recorded in a daily eDiary and averaged monthly based on a 35-day window. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Percent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for NMPPMonth 0 (baseline), Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6The NMPP pain scale score ranged from 0 to 3 (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe), recorded in a daily eDiary and averaged monthly based on a 35-day window. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Percent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for DyspareuniaMonth 0 (baseline), Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6The dyspareunia pain scale score ranged from 0 to 3 (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe), recorded in a daily eDiary and averaged monthly based on a 35-day window. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Percent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for Daily Diary Endometriosis-Associated Pain Score Via NRSMonth 0 (baseline), Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6The NRS for overall endometriosis-associated pain ranges from 0 (none) to 10 (worst pain ever), recorded in a daily eDiary and averaged monthly based on a 35-day window. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Change From Baseline Over Time in Daily Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue AnalgesicsMonth 0 (baseline), Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Based on average pill counts and assessed using a daily e-Diary. Permitted non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) included naproxen, ibuprofen, diclofenac, and celecoxib. Permitted opioids included hydrocodone + acetaminophen and codeine phosphate + acetaminophen.
Number of Analgesic Use Responders and Non-Responders Over TimeMonths 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6Based only on reduction of rescue analgesics used. Responders were defined as: * participants with no analgesic use at screening and no analgesic use added * participants with NSAID only use at screening and NSAID dose stopped, decreased, or stable (\<15% increase) and no opioid use added * participants with opioid only use at screening and opioid dose stopped, decreased, or stable (\<15% increase), opioid dose stopped and NSAID substituted (any dose), opioid dose decreased and NSAID added (any dose) * participants with NSAID + opioid use at screening and any of the following: NSAID dose stopped + opioid analgesic use stopped, decreased, or stable (\<15% increase); NSAID dose decreased + opioid analgesic use stopped, decreased, or stable (\<15% increase); NSAID dose stable (\< 15% increase) + opioid analgesic use stopped, decreased, or stable (\<15% increase); NSAID dose increased by \>15% + opioid analgesic use stopped; NSAID dose increased by \>15% + opioid analgesic dose decreases.
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scores Over TimeMonths 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6The PGIC is a 7-point response scale where participants rate their endometriosis related pain as: very much improved (1), much improved (2), minimally improved (3), not changed (4), minimally worse (5), much worse (6), very much worse (7).
Overall Endometriosis-Associated Pain Via NRS (7-Day Recall) Scores Over TimeMonth 0 (baseline), Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6The endometriosis-associated pain questionnaire is an 11-point NRS assessing overall endometriosis-associated pain over a 7-day recall period. Participants assessed their endometriosis-associated pain on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain ever.
Change From Baseline in DYS at Month 6Month 0 (baseline), Month 6The DYS pain scale score ranged from 0 to 3 (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe), recorded in a daily eDiary and averaged monthly based on a 35-day window. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
EHP-30 Scores Over Time: Control and PowerlessnessMonth 0 (baseline), Months 3, 6The EHP-30 is a disease-specific self-administered questionnaire used to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. Domains used in the study included Pain, Control and Powerlessness, Well-Being, Social Support, Self-Image, and Sexual Intercourse. Each domain is calculated on a scale from 0 = best possible health status to 100 = worst possible health status.
EHP-30 Scores Over Time: Emotional Well-BeingMonth 0 (baseline), Months 3, 6The EHP-30 is a disease-specific self-administered questionnaire used to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. Domains used in the study included Pain, Control and Powerlessness, Well-Being, Social Support, Self-Image, and Sexual Intercourse. Each domain is calculated on a scale from 0 = best possible health status to 100 = worst possible health status.
EHP-30 Scores Over Time: Self-ImageMonth 0 (baseline), Months 3, 6The EHP-30 is a disease-specific self-administered questionnaire used to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. Domains used in the study included Pain, Control and Powerlessness, Well-Being, Social Support, Self-Image, and Sexual Intercourse. Each domain is calculated on a scale from 0 = best possible health status to 100 = worst possible health status.
EHP-30 Scores Over Time: Social SupportMonth 0 (baseline), Months 3, 6The EHP-30 is a disease-specific self-administered questionnaire used to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. Domains used in the study included Pain, Control and Powerlessness, Well-Being, Social Support, Self-Image, and Sexual Intercourse. Each domain is calculated on a scale from 0 = best possible health status to 100 = worst possible health status.
EHP-30 Scores Over Time: Sexual IntercourseMonth 0 (baseline), Months 3, 6The EHP-30 is a disease-specific self-administered questionnaire used to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. Domains used in the study included Pain, Control and Powerlessness, Well-Being, Social Support, Self-Image, and Sexual Intercourse. Each domain is calculated on a scale from 0 = best possible health status to 100 = worst possible health status.
EuroQol-5D 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Scores Over Time: MobilityMonth 0 (baseline), Months 3, 6The EQ-5D-5L is a health state utility instrument with 5 items that comprise 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression), each of which is rated on 5 levels of severity (1=no problem, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems, 5=extreme problems) and a separate visual analog scale (VAS) indicating a participant's rating of their current health status (health today) on a scale of from 0 (worst health imaginable) to 100 (best health imaginable).
EQ-5D-5L Scores Over Time: Self-CareMonth 0 (baseline), Months 3, 6The EQ-5D-5L is a health state utility instrument with 5 items that comprise 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression), each of which is rated on 5 levels of severity (1=no problem, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems, 5=extreme problems) and a separate visual analog scale (VAS) indicating a participant's rating of their current health status (health today) on a scale of from 0 (worst health imaginable) to 100 (best health imaginable).
EQ-5D-5L Scores Over Time: Usual ActivitiesMonth 0 (baseline), Months 3, 6The EQ-5D-5L is a health state utility instrument with 5 items that comprise 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression), each of which is rated on 5 levels of severity (1=no problem, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems, 5=extreme problems) and a separate visual analog scale (VAS) indicating a participant's rating of their current health status (health today) on a scale of from 0 (worst health imaginable) to 100 (best health imaginable).
EQ-5D-5L Scores Over Time: Pain/DiscomfortMonth 0 (baseline), Months 3, 6The EQ-5D-5L is a health state utility instrument with 5 items that comprise 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression), each of which is rated on 5 levels of severity (1=no problem, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems, 5=extreme problems) and a separate visual analog scale (VAS) indicating a participant's rating of their current health status (health today) on a scale of from 0 (worst health imaginable) to 100 (best health imaginable).
EQ-5D-5L Scores Over Time: Anxiety/DepressionMonth 0 (baseline), Months 3, 6The EQ-5D-5L is a health state utility instrument with 5 items that comprise 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression), each of which is rated on 5 levels of severity (1=no problem, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems, 5=extreme problems) and a separate visual analog scale (VAS) indicating a participant's rating of their current health status (health today) on a scale of from 0 (worst health imaginable) to 100 (best health imaginable).
EQ-5D-5L VAS Scores Over Time: Health TodayMonth 0 (baseline), Months 3, 6The EQ-5D-5L is a health state utility instrument with 5 items that comprise 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression), each of which is rated on 5 levels of severity (1=no problem, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems, 5=extreme problems) and a separate VAS indicating a participant's rating of their current health status (health today) on a scale of from 0 (worst health imaginable) to 100 (best health imaginable).
Health Endometriosis Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (ETSQ) Scores Over TimeMonth 0 (baseline), Months 3, 6The 6-item ETSQ was developed to assess patient-reported satisfaction with effects on endometriosis pain, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, amount of bleeding tolerability and overall treatment satisfaction. The ETSQ has a 7 point response scale. The range for this scale is 0 to 36, with lower ETSQ scores reflecting lower levels of satisfaction with endometriosis treatment.
Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) Scores Over Time: Percent Work Missed Due to ProblemMonth 0 (baseline), Month 6Absenteeism is presented as the mean percentage of work time missed due to health problem (as reported on the WPAI:SHP), and is calculated as: 100\*number of hours of work missed due to health problem / (number of hours of work missed due to health problem + number of hours worked). WPAI is a questionnaire used to evaluate lost productivity; scores are presented as percentages (multiplying the scores by 100), with 0% representing no impact on productivity and 100% representing complete impact on productivity.
WPAI:SHP Scores Over Time: Percent Impairment While Working Due to ProblemMonth 0 (baseline), Month 6Presenteeism (the extent to which health problem decreased productivity) is presented as the mean percentage of impairment while working due to health problem, and is calculated as: 100\*scale value of question 5 on the WPAI (between 0 and 10) / 10. WPAI:SHP is a questionnaire used to evaluate lost productivity; scores are presented as percentages (multiplying the scores by 100), with 0% representing no impact on productivity and 100% representing complete impact on productivity.
PROMIS Fatigue Short Form 6a Scores Over TimeMonth 0 (baseline), Month 6The PROMIS Fatigue Short Form 6a is self-administered and composed of 6 questions to evaluate fatigue. Possible scores range from 6 to 30, 6 = not at all (no fatigue), and 30 = very much (most fatigue).
WPAI:SHP Scores Over Time: Percent Overall Work Impairment Due to ProblemMonth 0 (baseline), Month 6The mean percentage of overall work impairment due to health problem (based on the WPAI questionnaire) is presented, and is calculated as: Absenteeism (%) + extent to which health problem decreased productivity (%)\* \[number of hours worked / (number of hours of work missed due to health problem + number of hours worked)\]. WPAI is a questionnaire used to evaluate lost productivity; scores are presented as percentages (multiplying the scores by 100), with 0% representing no impact on productivity and 100% representing complete impact on productivity.
WPAI:SHP Scores Over Time: Percent Activity Impairment Due to ProblemMonth 0 (baseline), Month 6Activity impairment due to health problem (the extent to which health problem affected the ability to perform usual daily activities) is presented as the mean percentage of activity impairment, and is calculated as 100\*scale value of WPAI question 6 (between 0 and 10) / 10. WPAI is a questionnaire used to evaluate lost productivity; scores are presented as percentages (multiplying the scores by 100), with 0% representing no impact on productivity and 100% representing complete impact on productivity.
Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) Scores Over Time: PainMonth 0 (baseline), Months 3, 6The EHP-30 is a disease-specific self-administered questionnaire used to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. Domains used in the study included Pain, Control and Powerlessness, Well-Being, Social Support, Self-Image, and Sexual Intercourse. Each domain is calculated on a scale from 0 = best possible health status to 100 = worst possible health status.
Change From Baseline in NMPP at Month 6Month 0 (baseline), Month 6The NMPP pain scale score ranged from 0 to 3 (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe), recorded in a daily eDiary and averaged monthly based on a 35-day window. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

The study was terminated early for business reasons, not for safety concerns. There are no subject data past Treatment Month 6.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group A
Day 1 through Month 3 (open-label): elagolix 150 mg QD Participants discontinued prematurely during the open-label period.
7
Group B
Day 1 Through Month 3 (Open-Label): Open-Label elagolix 150 mg QD Month 4 Through Month 6 (Double-Blind): Efficacy responders to elagolix 150 mg QD Month 3 continued on elagolix 150 mg QD The efficacy responder status of each participant was determined based on the responses to the Daily Diary endometriosis-associated pain score via a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) in the electronic diary. Efficacy responder: ≥ 30% decrease (improvement) from Baseline based on the average of the Daily Diary for endometriosis-associated pain score via NRS over a 35 day window.
3
Group C
Day 1 Through Month 3 (Open-Label): Open-Label elagolix 150 mg QD Month 4 Through Month 6 (Double-Blind): Incomplete efficacy responders to elagolix 150 mg QD at Month 3 and randomized to elagolix 200 mg BID plus E2/NETA 1/0.5 mg QD treatment group The efficacy responder status of each participant was determined based on the responses to the Daily Diary endometriosis-associated pain score via NRS in the electronic diary. Incomplete efficacy responder: \< 30% decrease (improvement) from Baseline based on the average of the Daily Diary for endometriosis-associated pain score via NRS over a 35 day window.
1
Total11

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Double Blind Period: Month 3 to Month 6Study Terminated by Sponsor031

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGroup AGroup BGroup CTotal
Age, Customized
20 to < 25 years
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Age, Customized
25 to < 30 years
0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Age, Customized
30 to < 35 years
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Age, Customized
35 to < 40 years
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Age, Customized
40 to < 45 years
3 Participants1 Participants0 Participants4 Participants
Age, Customized
45 to < 50 years
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Daily Diary Endometriosis-Associated Pain Score Via Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)5.176 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9302
3.638 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5692
7.371 score on a scale4.956 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.9663
Dysmenorrhea (DYS) Pain Scale0.641 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.1689
0.429 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.103
0.600 score on a scale0.579 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.1696
Dyspareunia Pain Scale0.539 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9064
0.043 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.0202
3.000 score on a scale0.686 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.1187
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants2 Participants0 Participants8 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Non-Menstrual Pelvic Pain (NMPP) Pain Scale1.053 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4534
0.914 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4721
2.400 score on a scale1.138 score on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.5893
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants1 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
5 Participants1 Participants0 Participants6 Participants
Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue Analgesics (NSAIDs/Opioids)
NSAID
2.388 pills/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.7765
0.581 pills/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.933
0.743 pills/day1.745 pills/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3655
Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue Analgesics (NSAIDs/Opioids)
NSAID + Opioid
2.629 pills/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.6903
0.638 pills/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8918
1.314 pills/day1.966 pills/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.3196
Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue Analgesics (NSAIDs/Opioids)
Opioid
0.241 pills/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.375
0.057 pills/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.099
0.571 pills/day0.221 pills/day
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.327
Sex: Female, Male
Female
7 Participants3 Participants1 Participants11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 70 / 30 / 1
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 73 / 31 / 1
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 70 / 30 / 1

Outcome results

Primary

Proportion of Responders at Month 6 Based on DYS Pain Scale

Proportion of responders at Month 6 based upon the scale for DYS pain scale (ranging from 0 \[none\] to 3 \[severe\]) using the daily e-Diary, as well as no increased analgesic rescue use for endometriosis-associated pain.

Time frame: Month 6

Population: Analysis was intended to be based on a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) threshold, which could not be calculated, since only 1 participant had a Month 6 assessment for this endpoint at the time of study termination.

Primary

Proportion of Responders at Month 6 Based on NMPP Pain Scale

Proportion of responders at Month 6 based upon the scale for NMPP pain scale (ranging from 0 \[none\] to 3 \[severe\]) using the daily e-Diary, as well as no increased analgesic rescue use for endometriosis-associated pain.

Time frame: Month 6

Population: Analysis was intended to be based on ROC threshold, which could not be calculated, since only 1 participant had a Month 6 assessment for this endpoint at the time of study termination.

Secondary

Change From Baseline in Daily Diary Endometriosis-Associated Pain Score Via Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Month 6

The NRS for overall endometriosis-associated pain ranges from 0 (none) to 10 (worst pain ever), recorded in a daily eDiary and averaged monthly based on a 35-day window. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Month 0 (baseline), Month 6

Population: Participants with an assessment at baseline and given time point.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group BChange From Baseline in Daily Diary Endometriosis-Associated Pain Score Via Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Month 6-1.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.02
Secondary

Change From Baseline in DYS at Month 6

The DYS pain scale score ranged from 0 to 3 (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe), recorded in a daily eDiary and averaged monthly based on a 35-day window. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Month 0 (baseline), Month 6

Population: Participants with an assessment at baseline and given time point.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Group BChange From Baseline in DYS at Month 6-0.23 score on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Dyspareunia at Month 6

The dyspareunia pain scale score ranged from 0 to 3 (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe), recorded in a daily eDiary and averaged monthly based on a 35-day window. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Month 0 (baseline), Month 6

Population: Participants with an assessment at baseline and given time point.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Group BChange From Baseline in Dyspareunia at Month 60.29 score on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline in NMPP at Month 6

The NMPP pain scale score ranged from 0 to 3 (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe), recorded in a daily eDiary and averaged monthly based on a 35-day window. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Month 0 (baseline), Month 6

Population: Participants with an assessment at baseline and given time point.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group BChange From Baseline in NMPP at Month 6-0.13 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.061
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue Analgesics (NSAIDs/Opioids) at Month 6

Based on average pill counts and assessed using the daily e-Diary. Permitted non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) included naproxen, ibuprofen, diclofenac, and celecoxib. Permitted opioids included hydrocodone + acetaminophen and codeine phosphate + acetaminophen.

Time frame: Month 0 (baseline), Month 6

Population: Participants with an assessment at baseline and given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group BChange From Baseline in Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue Analgesics (NSAIDs/Opioids) at Month 6Opioid: Change at Month 60.09 pills/dayStandard Deviation 0.121
Group BChange From Baseline in Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue Analgesics (NSAIDs/Opioids) at Month 6NSAID: Change at Month 60.63 pills/dayStandard Deviation 0.606
Group BChange From Baseline in Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue Analgesics (NSAIDs/Opioids) at Month 6NSAID + Opioid: Change at Month 60.71 pills/dayStandard Deviation 0.485
Secondary

Change From Baseline Over Time in Daily Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue Analgesics

Based on average pill counts and assessed using a daily e-Diary. Permitted non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) included naproxen, ibuprofen, diclofenac, and celecoxib. Permitted opioids included hydrocodone + acetaminophen and codeine phosphate + acetaminophen.

Time frame: Month 0 (baseline), Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Population: Participants with an assessment at baseline and given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group AChange From Baseline Over Time in Daily Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue AnalgesicsOpioid: Change at Month 4-0.34 pills/day
Group AChange From Baseline Over Time in Daily Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue AnalgesicsNSAID: Change at Month 3-0.96 pills/dayStandard Deviation 1.03
Group AChange From Baseline Over Time in Daily Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue AnalgesicsNSAID + Opioid: Change at Month 3-1.13 pills/dayStandard Deviation 1.273
Group AChange From Baseline Over Time in Daily Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue AnalgesicsOpioid: Change at Month 3-0.17 pills/dayStandard Deviation 0.242
Group AChange From Baseline Over Time in Daily Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue AnalgesicsNSAID: Change at Month 4-1.69 pills/day
Group AChange From Baseline Over Time in Daily Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue AnalgesicsNSAID: Change at Month 1-0.84 pills/dayStandard Deviation 0.796
Group AChange From Baseline Over Time in Daily Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue AnalgesicsOpioid: Change at Month 2-0.17 pills/dayStandard Deviation 0.263
Group AChange From Baseline Over Time in Daily Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue AnalgesicsNSAID + Opioid: Change at Month 2-1.33 pills/dayStandard Deviation 0.767
Group AChange From Baseline Over Time in Daily Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue AnalgesicsNSAID + Opioid: Change at Month 1-0.72 pills/dayStandard Deviation 1.178
Group AChange From Baseline Over Time in Daily Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue AnalgesicsOpioid: Change at Month 10.12 pills/dayStandard Deviation 0.552
Group AChange From Baseline Over Time in Daily Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue AnalgesicsNSAID: Change at Month 2-1.15 pills/dayStandard Deviation 0.785
Group AChange From Baseline Over Time in Daily Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue AnalgesicsNSAID + Opioid: Change at Month 4-2.03 pills/day
Group BChange From Baseline Over Time in Daily Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue AnalgesicsNSAID + Opioid: Change at Month 10.03 pills/dayStandard Deviation 0.436
Group BChange From Baseline Over Time in Daily Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue AnalgesicsNSAID + Opioid: Change at Month 4-0.00 pills/dayStandard Deviation 0.863
Group BChange From Baseline Over Time in Daily Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue AnalgesicsNSAID + Opioid: Change at Month 50.18 pills/dayStandard Deviation 1.217
Group BChange From Baseline Over Time in Daily Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue AnalgesicsNSAID + Opioid: Change at Month 60.71 pills/dayStandard Deviation 0.485
Group BChange From Baseline Over Time in Daily Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue AnalgesicsNSAID: Change at Month 10.09 pills/dayStandard Deviation 0.388
Group BChange From Baseline Over Time in Daily Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue AnalgesicsNSAID: Change at Month 2-0.17 pills/dayStandard Deviation 0.834
Group BChange From Baseline Over Time in Daily Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue AnalgesicsNSAID: Change at Month 3-0.43 pills/dayStandard Deviation 1.091
Group BChange From Baseline Over Time in Daily Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue AnalgesicsNSAID: Change at Month 40.01 pills/dayStandard Deviation 0.845
Group BChange From Baseline Over Time in Daily Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue AnalgesicsNSAID: Change at Month 50.23 pills/dayStandard Deviation 1.197
Group BChange From Baseline Over Time in Daily Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue AnalgesicsNSAID: Change at Month 60.63 pills/dayStandard Deviation 0.606
Group BChange From Baseline Over Time in Daily Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue AnalgesicsOpioid: Change at Month 1-0.06 pills/dayStandard Deviation 0.099
Group BChange From Baseline Over Time in Daily Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue AnalgesicsOpioid: Change at Month 2-0.03 pills/dayStandard Deviation 0.049
Group BChange From Baseline Over Time in Daily Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue AnalgesicsOpioid: Change at Month 30.02 pills/dayStandard Deviation 0.016
Group BChange From Baseline Over Time in Daily Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue AnalgesicsOpioid: Change at Month 4-0.01 pills/dayStandard Deviation 0.044
Group BChange From Baseline Over Time in Daily Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue AnalgesicsOpioid: Change at Month 5-0.05 pills/dayStandard Deviation 0.082
Group BChange From Baseline Over Time in Daily Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue AnalgesicsOpioid: Change at Month 60.09 pills/dayStandard Deviation 0.121
Group BChange From Baseline Over Time in Daily Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue AnalgesicsNSAID + Opioid: Change at Month 3-0.41 pills/dayStandard Deviation 1.107
Group BChange From Baseline Over Time in Daily Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue AnalgesicsNSAID + Opioid: Change at Month 2-0.20 pills/dayStandard Deviation 0.83
Group CChange From Baseline Over Time in Daily Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue AnalgesicsNSAID: Change at Month 20.63 pills/day
Group CChange From Baseline Over Time in Daily Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue AnalgesicsNSAID + Opioid: Change at Month 1-1.10 pills/day
Group CChange From Baseline Over Time in Daily Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue AnalgesicsOpioid: Change at Month 4-0.40 pills/day
Group CChange From Baseline Over Time in Daily Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue AnalgesicsNSAID + Opioid: Change at Month 4-1.03 pills/day
Group CChange From Baseline Over Time in Daily Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue AnalgesicsNSAID + Opioid: Change at Month 3-1.20 pills/day
Group CChange From Baseline Over Time in Daily Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue AnalgesicsOpioid: Change at Month 1-0.43 pills/day
Group CChange From Baseline Over Time in Daily Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue AnalgesicsNSAID: Change at Month 4-0.63 pills/day
Group CChange From Baseline Over Time in Daily Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue AnalgesicsNSAID: Change at Month 1-0.67 pills/day
Group CChange From Baseline Over Time in Daily Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue AnalgesicsOpioid: Change at Month 2-0.51 pills/day
Group CChange From Baseline Over Time in Daily Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue AnalgesicsNSAID: Change at Month 3-0.71 pills/day
Group CChange From Baseline Over Time in Daily Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue AnalgesicsNSAID + Opioid: Change at Month 2-1.14 pills/day
Group CChange From Baseline Over Time in Daily Rescue Analgesic Use Across Both Classes of Rescue AnalgesicsOpioid: Change at Month 3-0.49 pills/day
Secondary

Change From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average Daily Diary Endometriosis-Associated Pain Score Via NRS

The NRS for overall endometriosis-associated pain ranges from 0 (none) to 10 (worst pain ever), recorded in a daily eDiary and averaged monthly based on a 35-day window. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Month 0 (baseline), Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Population: Participants with an assessment at baseline and given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group AChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average Daily Diary Endometriosis-Associated Pain Score Via NRSChange at Month 1-0.86 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.975
Group AChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average Daily Diary Endometriosis-Associated Pain Score Via NRSChange at Month 4-6.43 score on a scale
Group AChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average Daily Diary Endometriosis-Associated Pain Score Via NRSChange at Month 3-3.70 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.616
Group AChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average Daily Diary Endometriosis-Associated Pain Score Via NRSChange at Month 2-2.40 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.106
Group BChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average Daily Diary Endometriosis-Associated Pain Score Via NRSChange at Month 6-1.36 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.02
Group BChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average Daily Diary Endometriosis-Associated Pain Score Via NRSChange at Month 1-0.89 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.159
Group BChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average Daily Diary Endometriosis-Associated Pain Score Via NRSChange at Month 2-2.02 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.758
Group BChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average Daily Diary Endometriosis-Associated Pain Score Via NRSChange at Month 3-1.81 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.43
Group BChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average Daily Diary Endometriosis-Associated Pain Score Via NRSChange at Month 4-1.43 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.078
Group BChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average Daily Diary Endometriosis-Associated Pain Score Via NRSChange at Month 5-1.40 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.961
Group CChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average Daily Diary Endometriosis-Associated Pain Score Via NRSChange at Month 1-0.84 score on a scale
Group CChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average Daily Diary Endometriosis-Associated Pain Score Via NRSChange at Month 4-1.06 score on a scale
Group CChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average Daily Diary Endometriosis-Associated Pain Score Via NRSChange at Month 3-1.34 score on a scale
Group CChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average Daily Diary Endometriosis-Associated Pain Score Via NRSChange at Month 2-1.40 score on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average DYS Pain Score

The DYS pain scale score ranged from 0 to 3 (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe), recorded in a daily eDiary and averaged monthly based on a 35-day window. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. The analysis was based on a 28-day window. If a participant prematurely discontinued during the open-label period, based on the analysis window, some data might fall into Month 4 analysis.

Time frame: Month 0 (baseline), Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Population: Participants with an assessment at baseline and given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group AChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average DYS Pain ScoreChange at Month 4-0.69 score on a scale
Group AChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average DYS Pain ScoreChange at Month 3-0.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.263
Group AChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average DYS Pain ScoreChange at Month 2-0.18 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.124
Group AChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average DYS Pain ScoreChange at Month 10.05 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.655
Group BChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average DYS Pain ScoreChange at Month 4-0.06 score on a scale
Group BChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average DYS Pain ScoreChange at Month 5-0.16 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.141
Group BChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average DYS Pain ScoreChange at Month 6-0.23 score on a scale
Group BChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average DYS Pain ScoreChange at Month 1-0.04 score on a scale
Group BChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average DYS Pain ScoreChange at Month 2-0.26 score on a scale
Group BChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average DYS Pain ScoreChange at Month 3-0.34 score on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average Dyspareunia Pain Score

The dyspareunia pain scale score ranged from 0 to 3 (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe), recorded in a daily eDiary and averaged monthly based on a 35-day window. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Month 0 (baseline), Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Population: Participants with an assessment at baseline and given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group AChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average Dyspareunia Pain ScoreChange at Month 1-0.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.741
Group AChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average Dyspareunia Pain ScoreChange at Month 4-2.23 score on a scale
Group AChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average Dyspareunia Pain ScoreChange at Month 3-2.20 score on a scale
Group AChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average Dyspareunia Pain ScoreChange at Month 2-1.44 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.071
Group BChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average Dyspareunia Pain ScoreChange at Month 60.29 score on a scale
Group BChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average Dyspareunia Pain ScoreChange at Month 10.30 score on a scale
Group BChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average Dyspareunia Pain ScoreChange at Month 20.06 score on a scale
Group BChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average Dyspareunia Pain ScoreChange at Month 30.07 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.101
Group BChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average Dyspareunia Pain ScoreChange at Month 40.09 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.04
Group BChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average Dyspareunia Pain ScoreChange at Month 50.09 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.081
Group CChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average Dyspareunia Pain ScoreChange at Month 1-0.29 score on a scale
Group CChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average Dyspareunia Pain ScoreChange at Month 4-0.03 score on a scale
Group CChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average Dyspareunia Pain ScoreChange at Month 3-0.03 score on a scale
Group CChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average Dyspareunia Pain ScoreChange at Month 2-0.37 score on a scale
Secondary

Change From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average NMPP Pain Score

The NMPP pain scale score ranged from 0 to 3 (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe), recorded in a daily eDiary and averaged monthly based on a 35-day window. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Month 0 (baseline), Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Population: Participants with an assessment at baseline and given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group AChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average NMPP Pain ScoreChange at Month 1-0.13 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.252
Group AChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average NMPP Pain ScoreChange at Month 4-1.34 score on a scale
Group AChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average NMPP Pain ScoreChange at Month 3-0.70 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.828
Group AChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average NMPP Pain ScoreChange at Month 2-0.48 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.394
Group BChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average NMPP Pain ScoreChange at Month 6-0.13 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.061
Group BChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average NMPP Pain ScoreChange at Month 1-0.07 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.508
Group BChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average NMPP Pain ScoreChange at Month 2-0.30 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.167
Group BChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average NMPP Pain ScoreChange at Month 3-0.30 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.092
Group BChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average NMPP Pain ScoreChange at Month 4-0.34 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.029
Group BChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average NMPP Pain ScoreChange at Month 5-0.27 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.256
Group CChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average NMPP Pain ScoreChange at Month 10.39 score on a scale
Group CChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average NMPP Pain ScoreChange at Month 40.46 score on a scale
Group CChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average NMPP Pain ScoreChange at Month 30.54 score on a scale
Group CChange From Baseline Over Time in Monthly Average NMPP Pain ScoreChange at Month 20.29 score on a scale
Secondary

EHP-30 Scores Over Time: Control and Powerlessness

The EHP-30 is a disease-specific self-administered questionnaire used to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. Domains used in the study included Pain, Control and Powerlessness, Well-Being, Social Support, Self-Image, and Sexual Intercourse. Each domain is calculated on a scale from 0 = best possible health status to 100 = worst possible health status.

Time frame: Month 0 (baseline), Months 3, 6

Population: Participants with an assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group AEHP-30 Scores Over Time: Control and PowerlessnessMonth 336.46 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 32.874
Group AEHP-30 Scores Over Time: Control and PowerlessnessBaseline71.43 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.159
Group BEHP-30 Scores Over Time: Control and PowerlessnessMonth 68.33 score on a scale
Group BEHP-30 Scores Over Time: Control and PowerlessnessMonth 326.39 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.382
Group BEHP-30 Scores Over Time: Control and PowerlessnessBaseline56.94 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.691
Group CEHP-30 Scores Over Time: Control and PowerlessnessBaseline41.67 score on a scale
Group CEHP-30 Scores Over Time: Control and PowerlessnessMonth 325.00 score on a scale
Secondary

EHP-30 Scores Over Time: Emotional Well-Being

The EHP-30 is a disease-specific self-administered questionnaire used to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. Domains used in the study included Pain, Control and Powerlessness, Well-Being, Social Support, Self-Image, and Sexual Intercourse. Each domain is calculated on a scale from 0 = best possible health status to 100 = worst possible health status.

Time frame: Month 0 (baseline), Months 3, 6

Population: Participants with an assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group AEHP-30 Scores Over Time: Emotional Well-BeingMonth 318.75 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.5
Group AEHP-30 Scores Over Time: Emotional Well-BeingBaseline29.76 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.815
Group BEHP-30 Scores Over Time: Emotional Well-BeingMonth 625.00 score on a scale
Group BEHP-30 Scores Over Time: Emotional Well-BeingMonth 323.61 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.347
Group BEHP-30 Scores Over Time: Emotional Well-BeingBaseline50.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.333
Group CEHP-30 Scores Over Time: Emotional Well-BeingBaseline45.83 score on a scale
Group CEHP-30 Scores Over Time: Emotional Well-BeingMonth 337.50 score on a scale
Secondary

EHP-30 Scores Over Time: Self-Image

The EHP-30 is a disease-specific self-administered questionnaire used to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. Domains used in the study included Pain, Control and Powerlessness, Well-Being, Social Support, Self-Image, and Sexual Intercourse. Each domain is calculated on a scale from 0 = best possible health status to 100 = worst possible health status.

Time frame: Month 0 (baseline), Months 3, 6

Population: Participants with an assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group AEHP-30 Scores Over Time: Self-ImageMonth 343.75 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 41.597
Group AEHP-30 Scores Over Time: Self-ImageBaseline50.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.048
Group BEHP-30 Scores Over Time: Self-ImageMonth 616.67 score on a scale
Group BEHP-30 Scores Over Time: Self-ImageMonth 38.33 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.434
Group BEHP-30 Scores Over Time: Self-ImageBaseline36.11 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.549
Group CEHP-30 Scores Over Time: Self-ImageBaseline75.00 score on a scale
Group CEHP-30 Scores Over Time: Self-ImageMonth 38.33 score on a scale
Secondary

EHP-30 Scores Over Time: Sexual Intercourse

The EHP-30 is a disease-specific self-administered questionnaire used to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. Domains used in the study included Pain, Control and Powerlessness, Well-Being, Social Support, Self-Image, and Sexual Intercourse. Each domain is calculated on a scale from 0 = best possible health status to 100 = worst possible health status.

Time frame: Month 0 (baseline), Months 3, 6

Population: Participants with an assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group AEHP-30 Scores Over Time: Sexual IntercourseMonth 345.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.452
Group AEHP-30 Scores Over Time: Sexual IntercourseBaseline70.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.361
Group BEHP-30 Scores Over Time: Sexual IntercourseMonth 630.00 score on a scale
Group BEHP-30 Scores Over Time: Sexual IntercourseMonth 345.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 42.426
Group BEHP-30 Scores Over Time: Sexual IntercourseBaseline62.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.82
Group CEHP-30 Scores Over Time: Sexual IntercourseBaseline60.00 score on a scale
Group CEHP-30 Scores Over Time: Sexual IntercourseMonth 360.00 score on a scale
Secondary

EHP-30 Scores Over Time: Social Support

The EHP-30 is a disease-specific self-administered questionnaire used to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. Domains used in the study included Pain, Control and Powerlessness, Well-Being, Social Support, Self-Image, and Sexual Intercourse. Each domain is calculated on a scale from 0 = best possible health status to 100 = worst possible health status.

Time frame: Month 0 (baseline), Months 3, 6

Population: Participants with an assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group AEHP-30 Scores Over Time: Social SupportMonth 317.19 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.831
Group AEHP-30 Scores Over Time: Social SupportBaseline48.21 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.565
Group BEHP-30 Scores Over Time: Social SupportMonth 625.00 score on a scale
Group BEHP-30 Scores Over Time: Social SupportMonth 316.67 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.868
Group BEHP-30 Scores Over Time: Social SupportBaseline45.83 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.094
Group CEHP-30 Scores Over Time: Social SupportBaseline50.00 score on a scale
Group CEHP-30 Scores Over Time: Social SupportMonth 318.75 score on a scale
Secondary

Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) Scores Over Time: Pain

The EHP-30 is a disease-specific self-administered questionnaire used to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. Domains used in the study included Pain, Control and Powerlessness, Well-Being, Social Support, Self-Image, and Sexual Intercourse. Each domain is calculated on a scale from 0 = best possible health status to 100 = worst possible health status.

Time frame: Month 0 (baseline), Months 3, 6

Population: Participants with an assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group AEndometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) Scores Over Time: PainMonth 338.07 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.529
Group AEndometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) Scores Over Time: PainBaseline59.42 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.694
Group BEndometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) Scores Over Time: PainMonth 627.27 score on a scale
Group BEndometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) Scores Over Time: PainMonth 317.42 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.422
Group BEndometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) Scores Over Time: PainBaseline47.73 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.193
Group CEndometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) Scores Over Time: PainBaseline59.09 score on a scale
Group CEndometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30) Scores Over Time: PainMonth 338.64 score on a scale
Secondary

EQ-5D-5L Scores Over Time: Anxiety/Depression

The EQ-5D-5L is a health state utility instrument with 5 items that comprise 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression), each of which is rated on 5 levels of severity (1=no problem, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems, 5=extreme problems) and a separate visual analog scale (VAS) indicating a participant's rating of their current health status (health today) on a scale of from 0 (worst health imaginable) to 100 (best health imaginable).

Time frame: Month 0 (baseline), Months 3, 6

Population: Participants with an assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group AEQ-5D-5L Scores Over Time: Anxiety/DepressionMonth 31.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Group AEQ-5D-5L Scores Over Time: Anxiety/DepressionBaseline1.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Group BEQ-5D-5L Scores Over Time: Anxiety/DepressionMonth 61.0 score on a scale
Group BEQ-5D-5L Scores Over Time: Anxiety/DepressionMonth 31.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Group BEQ-5D-5L Scores Over Time: Anxiety/DepressionBaseline1.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
Group CEQ-5D-5L Scores Over Time: Anxiety/DepressionBaseline1.0 score on a scale
Group CEQ-5D-5L Scores Over Time: Anxiety/DepressionMonth 31.0 score on a scale
Secondary

EQ-5D-5L Scores Over Time: Pain/Discomfort

The EQ-5D-5L is a health state utility instrument with 5 items that comprise 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression), each of which is rated on 5 levels of severity (1=no problem, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems, 5=extreme problems) and a separate visual analog scale (VAS) indicating a participant's rating of their current health status (health today) on a scale of from 0 (worst health imaginable) to 100 (best health imaginable).

Time frame: Month 0 (baseline), Months 3, 6

Population: Participants with an assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group AEQ-5D-5L Scores Over Time: Pain/DiscomfortMonth 32.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.15
Group AEQ-5D-5L Scores Over Time: Pain/DiscomfortBaseline2.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.76
Group BEQ-5D-5L Scores Over Time: Pain/DiscomfortMonth 61.0 score on a scale
Group BEQ-5D-5L Scores Over Time: Pain/DiscomfortMonth 31.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
Group BEQ-5D-5L Scores Over Time: Pain/DiscomfortBaseline2.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
Group CEQ-5D-5L Scores Over Time: Pain/DiscomfortBaseline4.0 score on a scale
Group CEQ-5D-5L Scores Over Time: Pain/DiscomfortMonth 33.0 score on a scale
Secondary

EQ-5D-5L Scores Over Time: Self-Care

The EQ-5D-5L is a health state utility instrument with 5 items that comprise 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression), each of which is rated on 5 levels of severity (1=no problem, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems, 5=extreme problems) and a separate visual analog scale (VAS) indicating a participant's rating of their current health status (health today) on a scale of from 0 (worst health imaginable) to 100 (best health imaginable).

Time frame: Month 0 (baseline), Months 3, 6

Population: Participants with an assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group AEQ-5D-5L Scores Over Time: Self-CareMonth 31.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Group AEQ-5D-5L Scores Over Time: Self-CareBaseline1.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Group BEQ-5D-5L Scores Over Time: Self-CareMonth 61.0 score on a scale
Group BEQ-5D-5L Scores Over Time: Self-CareMonth 31.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Group BEQ-5D-5L Scores Over Time: Self-CareBaseline1.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Group CEQ-5D-5L Scores Over Time: Self-CareBaseline1.0 score on a scale
Group CEQ-5D-5L Scores Over Time: Self-CareMonth 31.0 score on a scale
Secondary

EQ-5D-5L Scores Over Time: Usual Activities

The EQ-5D-5L is a health state utility instrument with 5 items that comprise 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression), each of which is rated on 5 levels of severity (1=no problem, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems, 5=extreme problems) and a separate visual analog scale (VAS) indicating a participant's rating of their current health status (health today) on a scale of from 0 (worst health imaginable) to 100 (best health imaginable).

Time frame: Month 0 (baseline), Months 3, 6

Population: Participants with an assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group AEQ-5D-5L Scores Over Time: Usual ActivitiesMonth 31.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
Group AEQ-5D-5L Scores Over Time: Usual ActivitiesBaseline2.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.82
Group BEQ-5D-5L Scores Over Time: Usual ActivitiesMonth 61.0 score on a scale
Group BEQ-5D-5L Scores Over Time: Usual ActivitiesMonth 31.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.15
Group BEQ-5D-5L Scores Over Time: Usual ActivitiesBaseline1.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
Group CEQ-5D-5L Scores Over Time: Usual ActivitiesBaseline1.0 score on a scale
Group CEQ-5D-5L Scores Over Time: Usual ActivitiesMonth 32.0 score on a scale
Secondary

EQ-5D-5L VAS Scores Over Time: Health Today

The EQ-5D-5L is a health state utility instrument with 5 items that comprise 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression), each of which is rated on 5 levels of severity (1=no problem, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems, 5=extreme problems) and a separate VAS indicating a participant's rating of their current health status (health today) on a scale of from 0 (worst health imaginable) to 100 (best health imaginable).

Time frame: Month 0 (baseline), Months 3, 6

Population: Participants with an assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group AEQ-5D-5L VAS Scores Over Time: Health TodayMonth 372.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.63
Group AEQ-5D-5L VAS Scores Over Time: Health TodayBaseline79.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.16
Group BEQ-5D-5L VAS Scores Over Time: Health TodayMonth 694.0 score on a scale
Group BEQ-5D-5L VAS Scores Over Time: Health TodayMonth 385.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15
Group BEQ-5D-5L VAS Scores Over Time: Health TodayBaseline53.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.12
Group CEQ-5D-5L VAS Scores Over Time: Health TodayBaseline72.0 score on a scale
Group CEQ-5D-5L VAS Scores Over Time: Health TodayMonth 370.0 score on a scale
Secondary

EuroQol-5D 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Scores Over Time: Mobility

The EQ-5D-5L is a health state utility instrument with 5 items that comprise 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression), each of which is rated on 5 levels of severity (1=no problem, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems, 5=extreme problems) and a separate visual analog scale (VAS) indicating a participant's rating of their current health status (health today) on a scale of from 0 (worst health imaginable) to 100 (best health imaginable).

Time frame: Month 0 (baseline), Months 3, 6

Population: Participants with an assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group AEuroQol-5D 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Scores Over Time: MobilityMonth 31.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Group AEuroQol-5D 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Scores Over Time: MobilityBaseline1.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.53
Group BEuroQol-5D 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Scores Over Time: MobilityMonth 61.0 score on a scale
Group BEuroQol-5D 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Scores Over Time: MobilityMonth 31.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Group BEuroQol-5D 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Scores Over Time: MobilityBaseline1.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Group CEuroQol-5D 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Scores Over Time: MobilityBaseline1.0 score on a scale
Group CEuroQol-5D 5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Scores Over Time: MobilityMonth 32.0 score on a scale
Secondary

Health Endometriosis Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (ETSQ) Scores Over Time

The 6-item ETSQ was developed to assess patient-reported satisfaction with effects on endometriosis pain, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, amount of bleeding tolerability and overall treatment satisfaction. The ETSQ has a 7 point response scale. The range for this scale is 0 to 36, with lower ETSQ scores reflecting lower levels of satisfaction with endometriosis treatment.

Time frame: Month 0 (baseline), Months 3, 6

Population: Participants with an assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group AHealth Endometriosis Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (ETSQ) Scores Over TimeMonth 322.25 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.43
Group AHealth Endometriosis Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (ETSQ) Scores Over TimeBaseline19.71 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.536
Group BHealth Endometriosis Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (ETSQ) Scores Over TimeMonth 631.00 score on a scale
Group BHealth Endometriosis Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (ETSQ) Scores Over TimeMonth 325.47 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.652
Group BHealth Endometriosis Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (ETSQ) Scores Over TimeBaseline18.00 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Group CHealth Endometriosis Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (ETSQ) Scores Over TimeBaseline18.00 score on a scale
Group CHealth Endometriosis Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (ETSQ) Scores Over TimeMonth 325.00 score on a scale
Secondary

Number of Analgesic Use Responders and Non-Responders Over Time

Based only on reduction of rescue analgesics used. Responders were defined as: * participants with no analgesic use at screening and no analgesic use added * participants with NSAID only use at screening and NSAID dose stopped, decreased, or stable (\<15% increase) and no opioid use added * participants with opioid only use at screening and opioid dose stopped, decreased, or stable (\<15% increase), opioid dose stopped and NSAID substituted (any dose), opioid dose decreased and NSAID added (any dose) * participants with NSAID + opioid use at screening and any of the following: NSAID dose stopped + opioid analgesic use stopped, decreased, or stable (\<15% increase); NSAID dose decreased + opioid analgesic use stopped, decreased, or stable (\<15% increase); NSAID dose stable (\< 15% increase) + opioid analgesic use stopped, decreased, or stable (\<15% increase); NSAID dose increased by \>15% + opioid analgesic use stopped; NSAID dose increased by \>15% + opioid analgesic dose decreases.

Time frame: Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Group ANumber of Analgesic Use Responders and Non-Responders Over TimeMonth 1: Responder5 Participants
Group ANumber of Analgesic Use Responders and Non-Responders Over TimeMonth 1: Non-Responder2 Participants
Group ANumber of Analgesic Use Responders and Non-Responders Over TimeMonth 2: Responder4 Participants
Group ANumber of Analgesic Use Responders and Non-Responders Over TimeMonth 2: Non-Responder1 Participants
Group ANumber of Analgesic Use Responders and Non-Responders Over TimeMonth 3: Responder2 Participants
Group ANumber of Analgesic Use Responders and Non-Responders Over TimeMonth 3: Non-Responder0 Participants
Group ANumber of Analgesic Use Responders and Non-Responders Over TimeMonth 4: Responder1 Participants
Group ANumber of Analgesic Use Responders and Non-Responders Over TimeMonth 4: Non-Responder0 Participants
Group ANumber of Analgesic Use Responders and Non-Responders Over TimeMonth 5: Responder0 Participants
Group ANumber of Analgesic Use Responders and Non-Responders Over TimeMonth 5: Non-Responder0 Participants
Group ANumber of Analgesic Use Responders and Non-Responders Over TimeMonth 6: Responder0 Participants
Group ANumber of Analgesic Use Responders and Non-Responders Over TimeMonth 6: Non-Responder0 Participants
Group BNumber of Analgesic Use Responders and Non-Responders Over TimeMonth 6: Non-Responder2 Participants
Group BNumber of Analgesic Use Responders and Non-Responders Over TimeMonth 1: Responder2 Participants
Group BNumber of Analgesic Use Responders and Non-Responders Over TimeMonth 4: Responder2 Participants
Group BNumber of Analgesic Use Responders and Non-Responders Over TimeMonth 5: Responder2 Participants
Group BNumber of Analgesic Use Responders and Non-Responders Over TimeMonth 1: Non-Responder1 Participants
Group BNumber of Analgesic Use Responders and Non-Responders Over TimeMonth 3: Non-Responder2 Participants
Group BNumber of Analgesic Use Responders and Non-Responders Over TimeMonth 6: Responder0 Participants
Group BNumber of Analgesic Use Responders and Non-Responders Over TimeMonth 2: Responder2 Participants
Group BNumber of Analgesic Use Responders and Non-Responders Over TimeMonth 4: Non-Responder1 Participants
Group BNumber of Analgesic Use Responders and Non-Responders Over TimeMonth 3: Responder1 Participants
Group BNumber of Analgesic Use Responders and Non-Responders Over TimeMonth 2: Non-Responder1 Participants
Group BNumber of Analgesic Use Responders and Non-Responders Over TimeMonth 5: Non-Responder1 Participants
Group CNumber of Analgesic Use Responders and Non-Responders Over TimeMonth 2: Non-Responder0 Participants
Group CNumber of Analgesic Use Responders and Non-Responders Over TimeMonth 3: Responder1 Participants
Group CNumber of Analgesic Use Responders and Non-Responders Over TimeMonth 5: Non-Responder0 Participants
Group CNumber of Analgesic Use Responders and Non-Responders Over TimeMonth 3: Non-Responder0 Participants
Group CNumber of Analgesic Use Responders and Non-Responders Over TimeMonth 4: Responder1 Participants
Group CNumber of Analgesic Use Responders and Non-Responders Over TimeMonth 4: Non-Responder0 Participants
Group CNumber of Analgesic Use Responders and Non-Responders Over TimeMonth 6: Responder0 Participants
Group CNumber of Analgesic Use Responders and Non-Responders Over TimeMonth 1: Responder1 Participants
Group CNumber of Analgesic Use Responders and Non-Responders Over TimeMonth 1: Non-Responder0 Participants
Group CNumber of Analgesic Use Responders and Non-Responders Over TimeMonth 5: Responder0 Participants
Group CNumber of Analgesic Use Responders and Non-Responders Over TimeMonth 2: Responder1 Participants
Group CNumber of Analgesic Use Responders and Non-Responders Over TimeMonth 6: Non-Responder0 Participants
Secondary

Overall Endometriosis-Associated Pain Via NRS (7-Day Recall) Scores Over Time

The endometriosis-associated pain questionnaire is an 11-point NRS assessing overall endometriosis-associated pain over a 7-day recall period. Participants assessed their endometriosis-associated pain on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 = no pain and 10 = worst pain ever.

Time frame: Month 0 (baseline), Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Population: Participants with an assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group AOverall Endometriosis-Associated Pain Via NRS (7-Day Recall) Scores Over TimeBaseline8.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.79
Group AOverall Endometriosis-Associated Pain Via NRS (7-Day Recall) Scores Over TimeMonth 39.0 score on a scale
Group AOverall Endometriosis-Associated Pain Via NRS (7-Day Recall) Scores Over TimeMonth 24.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
Group AOverall Endometriosis-Associated Pain Via NRS (7-Day Recall) Scores Over TimeMonth 15.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.04
Group BOverall Endometriosis-Associated Pain Via NRS (7-Day Recall) Scores Over TimeMonth 64.0 score on a scale
Group BOverall Endometriosis-Associated Pain Via NRS (7-Day Recall) Scores Over TimeBaseline9.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Group BOverall Endometriosis-Associated Pain Via NRS (7-Day Recall) Scores Over TimeMonth 17.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.15
Group BOverall Endometriosis-Associated Pain Via NRS (7-Day Recall) Scores Over TimeMonth 22.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.15
Group BOverall Endometriosis-Associated Pain Via NRS (7-Day Recall) Scores Over TimeMonth 35.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.31
Group BOverall Endometriosis-Associated Pain Via NRS (7-Day Recall) Scores Over TimeMonth 43.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
Group BOverall Endometriosis-Associated Pain Via NRS (7-Day Recall) Scores Over TimeMonth 58.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Group COverall Endometriosis-Associated Pain Via NRS (7-Day Recall) Scores Over TimeMonth 38.0 score on a scale
Group COverall Endometriosis-Associated Pain Via NRS (7-Day Recall) Scores Over TimeBaseline7.0 score on a scale
Group COverall Endometriosis-Associated Pain Via NRS (7-Day Recall) Scores Over TimeMonth 25.0 score on a scale
Group COverall Endometriosis-Associated Pain Via NRS (7-Day Recall) Scores Over TimeMonth 18.0 score on a scale
Group COverall Endometriosis-Associated Pain Via NRS (7-Day Recall) Scores Over TimeMonth 47.0 score on a scale
Secondary

Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scores Over Time

The PGIC is a 7-point response scale where participants rate their endometriosis related pain as: very much improved (1), much improved (2), minimally improved (3), not changed (4), minimally worse (5), much worse (6), very much worse (7).

Time frame: Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Population: Participants with an assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group APatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scores Over TimeMonth 12.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.35
Group APatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scores Over TimeMonth 22.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0
Group APatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scores Over TimeMonth 32.0 score on a scale
Group BPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scores Over TimeMonth 42.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Group BPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scores Over TimeMonth 61.0 score on a scale
Group BPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scores Over TimeMonth 12.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
Group BPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scores Over TimeMonth 52.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.71
Group BPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scores Over TimeMonth 32.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Group BPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scores Over TimeMonth 21.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.58
Group CPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scores Over TimeMonth 12.0 score on a scale
Group CPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scores Over TimeMonth 22.0 score on a scale
Group CPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scores Over TimeMonth 35.0 score on a scale
Group CPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Scores Over TimeMonth 42.0 score on a scale
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With 30% or More Reduction From Baseline Based on the 35 Day Mean of the Daily Diary Endometriosis-Associated Pain Score Via NRS at Month 6

The NRS for overall endometriosis-associated pain ranges from 0 (none) to 10 (worst pain ever), recorded in a daily eDiary and averaged monthly based on a 35-day window.

Time frame: Month 6

Population: Participants with both baseline and post-baseline values for Daily Diary Endometriosis-Associated Pain Score via NRS.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Group BPercentage of Participants With 30% or More Reduction From Baseline Based on the 35 Day Mean of the Daily Diary Endometriosis-Associated Pain Score Via NRS at Month 650.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for Daily Diary Endometriosis-Associated Pain Score Via NRS

The NRS for overall endometriosis-associated pain ranges from 0 (none) to 10 (worst pain ever), recorded in a daily eDiary and averaged monthly based on a 35-day window. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Month 0 (baseline), Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Population: Participants with an assessment at baseline and given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group APercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for Daily Diary Endometriosis-Associated Pain Score Via NRSPercent Change at Month 1-14.10 percentage change of score on a scaleStandard Deviation 37.146
Group APercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for Daily Diary Endometriosis-Associated Pain Score Via NRSPercent Change at Month 4-70.98 percentage change of score on a scale
Group APercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for Daily Diary Endometriosis-Associated Pain Score Via NRSPercent Change at Month 3-43.98 percentage change of score on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.509
Group APercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for Daily Diary Endometriosis-Associated Pain Score Via NRSPercent Change at Month 2-37.82 percentage change of score on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.066
Group BPercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for Daily Diary Endometriosis-Associated Pain Score Via NRSPercent Change at Month 6-33.56 percentage change of score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.357
Group BPercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for Daily Diary Endometriosis-Associated Pain Score Via NRSPercent Change at Month 1-19.61 percentage change of score on a scaleStandard Deviation 35.468
Group BPercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for Daily Diary Endometriosis-Associated Pain Score Via NRSPercent Change at Month 2-56.25 percentage change of score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.507
Group BPercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for Daily Diary Endometriosis-Associated Pain Score Via NRSPercent Change at Month 3-53.05 percentage change of score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.803
Group BPercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for Daily Diary Endometriosis-Associated Pain Score Via NRSPercent Change at Month 4-38.00 percentage change of score on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.275
Group BPercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for Daily Diary Endometriosis-Associated Pain Score Via NRSPercent Change at Month 5-35.81 percentage change of score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.326
Group CPercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for Daily Diary Endometriosis-Associated Pain Score Via NRSPercent Change at Month 1-11.34 percentage change of score on a scale
Group CPercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for Daily Diary Endometriosis-Associated Pain Score Via NRSPercent Change at Month 4-14.34 percentage change of score on a scale
Group CPercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for Daily Diary Endometriosis-Associated Pain Score Via NRSPercent Change at Month 3-18.22 percentage change of score on a scale
Group CPercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for Daily Diary Endometriosis-Associated Pain Score Via NRSPercent Change at Month 2-18.99 percentage change of score on a scale
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for DYS

The DYS pain scale score ranged from 0 to 3 (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe), recorded in a daily eDiary and averaged monthly based on a 35-day window. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Month 0 (baseline), Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Population: Participants with an assessment at baseline and given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group APercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for DYSPercent Change at Month 4-80.00 percent change of units on a scale
Group APercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for DYSPercent Change at Month 3-62.92 percent change of units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.159
Group APercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for DYSPercent Change at Month 2-27.45 percent change of units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.119
Group APercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for DYSPercent Change at Month 11.67 percent change of units on a scaleStandard Deviation 109.961
Group BPercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for DYSPercent Change at Month 4-16.67 percent change of units on a scale
Group BPercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for DYSPercent Change at Month 5-40.48 percent change of units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.672
Group BPercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for DYSPercent Change at Month 6-57.14 percent change of units on a scale
Group BPercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for DYSPercent Change at Month 1-7.89 percent change of units on a scale
Group BPercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for DYSPercent Change at Month 2-75.00 percent change of units on a scale
Group BPercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for DYSPercent Change at Month 3-85.71 percent change of units on a scale
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for Dyspareunia

The dyspareunia pain scale score ranged from 0 to 3 (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe), recorded in a daily eDiary and averaged monthly based on a 35-day window. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Month 0 (baseline), Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Population: Participants with an assessment at baseline and given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group APercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for DyspareuniaPercent Change at Month 10.14 percentage change of units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.18
Group APercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for DyspareuniaPercent Change at Month 4106.25 percentage change of units on a scale
Group APercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for DyspareuniaPercent Change at Month 360.88 percentage change of units on a scaleStandard Deviation 65.632
Group APercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for DyspareuniaPercent Change at Month 26.60 percentage change of units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.719
Group BPercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for DyspareuniaPercent Change at Month 6-18.08 percentage change of units on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.571
Group BPercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for DyspareuniaPercent Change at Month 1-15.27 percentage change of units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.791
Group BPercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for DyspareuniaPercent Change at Month 2-15.26 percentage change of units on a scaleStandard Deviation 21.84
Group BPercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for DyspareuniaPercent Change at Month 3-21.63 percentage change of units on a scaleStandard Deviation 24.719
Group BPercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for DyspareuniaPercent Change at Month 4-12.67 percentage change of units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.433
Group BPercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for DyspareuniaPercent Change at Month 5-14.86 percentage change of units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.002
Group CPercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for DyspareuniaPercent Change at Month 1-9.52 percentage change of units on a scale
Group CPercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for DyspareuniaPercent Change at Month 4-0.95 percentage change of units on a scale
Group CPercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for DyspareuniaPercent Change at Month 3-0.95 percentage change of units on a scale
Group CPercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for DyspareuniaPercent Change at Month 2-12.38 percentage change of units on a scale
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for NMPP

The NMPP pain scale score ranged from 0 to 3 (0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe), recorded in a daily eDiary and averaged monthly based on a 35-day window. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Month 0 (baseline), Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Population: Participants with an assessment at baseline and given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group APercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for NMPPPercent Change at Month 1-11.81 percentage change of units on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.677
Group APercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for NMPPPercent Change at Month 4-71.21 percentage change of units on a scale
Group APercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for NMPPPercent Change at Month 3-38.26 percentage change of units on a scaleStandard Deviation 42.319
Group APercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for NMPPPercent Change at Month 2-37.53 percentage change of units on a scaleStandard Deviation 31.15
Group BPercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for NMPPPercent Change at Month 6-17.23 percentage change of units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.044
Group BPercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for NMPPPercent Change at Month 14.22 percentage change of units on a scaleStandard Deviation 53.238
Group BPercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for NMPPPercent Change at Month 2-34.21 percentage change of units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.044
Group BPercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for NMPPPercent Change at Month 3-38.03 percentage change of units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.343
Group BPercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for NMPPPercent Change at Month 4-44.49 percentage change of units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.725
Group BPercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for NMPPPercent Change at Month 5-28.40 percentage change of units on a scaleStandard Deviation 33.641
Group CPercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for NMPPPercent Change at Month 116.07 percentage change of units on a scale
Group CPercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for NMPPPercent Change at Month 419.05 percentage change of units on a scale
Group CPercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for NMPPPercent Change at Month 322.62 percentage change of units on a scale
Group CPercent Change From Baseline to Each Month During the Treatment Period for NMPPPercent Change at Month 211.90 percentage change of units on a scale
Secondary

PROMIS Fatigue Short Form 6a Scores Over Time

The PROMIS Fatigue Short Form 6a is self-administered and composed of 6 questions to evaluate fatigue. Possible scores range from 6 to 30, 6 = not at all (no fatigue), and 30 = very much (most fatigue).

Time frame: Month 0 (baseline), Month 6

Population: Participants with an assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group APROMIS Fatigue Short Form 6a Scores Over TimeBaseline22.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.1
Group APROMIS Fatigue Short Form 6a Scores Over TimeMonth 615.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.77
Group BPROMIS Fatigue Short Form 6a Scores Over TimeBaseline19.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.11
Group BPROMIS Fatigue Short Form 6a Scores Over TimeMonth 611.0 score on a scale
Group CPROMIS Fatigue Short Form 6a Scores Over TimeBaseline27.0 score on a scale
Group CPROMIS Fatigue Short Form 6a Scores Over TimeMonth 621.0 score on a scale
Secondary

Proportion of Responders Over Time

As assessed by change and percent change from baseline in average pain score and rescue analgesic use monthly for DYS, NMPP, dyspareunia, and Daily Diary endometriosis-associated pain score via NRS, respectively.

Time frame: Month 0 (baseline), Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Population: Analysis was intended to be based on ROC threshold, which could not be calculated for this endpoint due to low enrollment at the time of study termination.

Secondary

Proportion of Responders Over Time (Not Taking Into Consideration of Analgesic Use)

As assessed by change and percent change from Baseline in average pain score and rescue analgesic use monthly for DYS, NMPP, dyspareunia, and Daily Diary endometriosis-associated pain score via NRS, respectively.

Time frame: Month 0 (baseline), Months 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Population: Analysis was intended to be based on ROC threshold, which could not be calculated for this endpoint due to low enrollment at the time of study termination.

Secondary

Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) Scores Over Time: Percent Work Missed Due to Problem

Absenteeism is presented as the mean percentage of work time missed due to health problem (as reported on the WPAI:SHP), and is calculated as: 100\*number of hours of work missed due to health problem / (number of hours of work missed due to health problem + number of hours worked). WPAI is a questionnaire used to evaluate lost productivity; scores are presented as percentages (multiplying the scores by 100), with 0% representing no impact on productivity and 100% representing complete impact on productivity.

Time frame: Month 0 (baseline), Month 6

Population: Participants with an assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group AWork Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) Scores Over Time: Percent Work Missed Due to ProblemBaseline0.16 percent of work time missedStandard Deviation 0.205
Group AWork Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) Scores Over Time: Percent Work Missed Due to ProblemMonth 60.00 percent of work time missedStandard Deviation 0
Group BWork Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) Scores Over Time: Percent Work Missed Due to ProblemBaseline0.08 percent of work time missedStandard Deviation 0.144
Group BWork Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) Scores Over Time: Percent Work Missed Due to ProblemMonth 60.00 percent of work time missed
Secondary

WPAI:SHP Scores Over Time: Percent Activity Impairment Due to Problem

Activity impairment due to health problem (the extent to which health problem affected the ability to perform usual daily activities) is presented as the mean percentage of activity impairment, and is calculated as 100\*scale value of WPAI question 6 (between 0 and 10) / 10. WPAI is a questionnaire used to evaluate lost productivity; scores are presented as percentages (multiplying the scores by 100), with 0% representing no impact on productivity and 100% representing complete impact on productivity.

Time frame: Month 0 (baseline), Month 6

Population: Participants with an assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group AWPAI:SHP Scores Over Time: Percent Activity Impairment Due to ProblemBaseline0.66 percentage impairment of activityStandard Deviation 0.237
Group AWPAI:SHP Scores Over Time: Percent Activity Impairment Due to ProblemMonth 60.40 percentage impairment of activityStandard Deviation 0.346
Group BWPAI:SHP Scores Over Time: Percent Activity Impairment Due to ProblemBaseline0.67 percentage impairment of activityStandard Deviation 0.058
Group BWPAI:SHP Scores Over Time: Percent Activity Impairment Due to ProblemMonth 60.30 percentage impairment of activity
Group CWPAI:SHP Scores Over Time: Percent Activity Impairment Due to ProblemBaseline0.70 percentage impairment of activity
Group CWPAI:SHP Scores Over Time: Percent Activity Impairment Due to ProblemMonth 60.70 percentage impairment of activity
Secondary

WPAI:SHP Scores Over Time: Percent Impairment While Working Due to Problem

Presenteeism (the extent to which health problem decreased productivity) is presented as the mean percentage of impairment while working due to health problem, and is calculated as: 100\*scale value of question 5 on the WPAI (between 0 and 10) / 10. WPAI:SHP is a questionnaire used to evaluate lost productivity; scores are presented as percentages (multiplying the scores by 100), with 0% representing no impact on productivity and 100% representing complete impact on productivity.

Time frame: Month 0 (baseline), Month 6

Population: Participants with an assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group AWPAI:SHP Scores Over Time: Percent Impairment While Working Due to ProblemBaseline0.57 percent impairment while workingStandard Deviation 0.273
Group AWPAI:SHP Scores Over Time: Percent Impairment While Working Due to ProblemMonth 60.30 percent impairment while workingStandard Deviation 0.265
Group BWPAI:SHP Scores Over Time: Percent Impairment While Working Due to ProblemBaseline0.53 percent impairment while workingStandard Deviation 0.153
Group BWPAI:SHP Scores Over Time: Percent Impairment While Working Due to ProblemMonth 60.30 percent impairment while working
Secondary

WPAI:SHP Scores Over Time: Percent Overall Work Impairment Due to Problem

The mean percentage of overall work impairment due to health problem (based on the WPAI questionnaire) is presented, and is calculated as: Absenteeism (%) + extent to which health problem decreased productivity (%)\* \[number of hours worked / (number of hours of work missed due to health problem + number of hours worked)\]. WPAI is a questionnaire used to evaluate lost productivity; scores are presented as percentages (multiplying the scores by 100), with 0% representing no impact on productivity and 100% representing complete impact on productivity.

Time frame: Month 0 (baseline), Month 6

Population: Participants with an assessment at given time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group AWPAI:SHP Scores Over Time: Percent Overall Work Impairment Due to ProblemBaseline0.61 percent overall work impairmentStandard Deviation 0.307
Group AWPAI:SHP Scores Over Time: Percent Overall Work Impairment Due to ProblemMonth 60.30 percent overall work impairmentStandard Deviation 0.265
Group BWPAI:SHP Scores Over Time: Percent Overall Work Impairment Due to ProblemBaseline0.56 percent overall work impairmentStandard Deviation 0.194
Group BWPAI:SHP Scores Over Time: Percent Overall Work Impairment Due to ProblemMonth 60.30 percent overall work impairment

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026