Skip to content

The Sensorimotor Locus of Balance Control in Elderly Gait

The Sensorimotor Locus of Balance Control in Elderly Gait

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03341728
Enrollment
14
Registered
2017-11-14
Start date
2017-10-30
Completion date
2018-07-25
Last updated
2019-07-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ambulation Difficulty, Gait, Unsteady, Fall, Position Sense Disorders

Brief summary

The aging population is at an exceptionally high risk of debilitating falls, contributing significantly to reduced independence and quality of life. It remains extremely challenging to screen for falls risk, and programs designed to mitigate falls risk have only modestly influenced the sizeable portion of the aging population experiencing one or more falls annually. Balance control in standing and walking depends on integrating reliable sensory feedback and on planning and executing appropriate motor responses. Walking balance control is especially dynamic, requiring active and coordinated adjustments in posture (i.e., trunk stabilization) and foot placement from step to step. Accordingly, using a custom, immersive virtual environment, the investigators have shown that sensory (i.e., optical flow) perturbations, especially when applied during walking, elicit strong and persistent motor responses to preserve balance. Exciting pilot data suggest that these motor responses are remarkably more prevalent in old age, presumably governed by an increased reliance on vision for balance control. Additional pilot data suggest that prolonged exposure to these perturbations may effectively condition successful balance control strategies. Founded on these recent discoveries, and leveraging the increase reliance on vision for balance control in old age, the investigators stand at the forefront of a potentially transformative new approach for more effectively identifying and mitigating age-related falls risk. The investigator's overarching hypothesis is that optical flow perturbations, particularly when applied during walking, can effectively identify balance deficits due to aging and falls history and can subsequently condition the neuromechanics of successful balance control via training.

Detailed description

Specific Aim 1. Investigate sensory, motor, and cognitive-motor mechanisms governing susceptibility to optical flow perturbations. Aging increases the reliance on vision for balance control. However, central and peripheral mechanisms underlying aging and falls history effects on the susceptibility to optical flow perturbations are unclear. Hypothesis 1: Entrainment to optical flow perturbations will correlate most strongly with visual dependence and decreased somatosensory function, alluding to an age-associated process of multi-sensory reweighting. Methods: Multivariate models will quantify the extent to which strategically-selected sensory (i.e., visual dependence via rod/frame test, somatosensory function), motor (i.e., rate of torque development, timed sit-to-stand) and cognitive-motor (i.e., interference) mechanisms underlie inter-individual differences in susceptibility to perturbations. Specific Aim 2. Estimate the efficacy of prolonged optical flow perturbations to condition the neuromechanics of walking balance control in older adult fallers. Pilot data from young adults suggests that prolonged exposure to optical flow perturbations may condition reactive strategies used to successfully control walking balance. The investigator's premise is that dynamic perturbation training can improve resilience to unexpected balance disturbances. Here, the investigators conduct a preliminary test of the effects of training with optical flow perturbations on walking balance in older adult fallers. Hypothesis 2: (a) Older adults with a history of falls will adapt to prolonged exposure to perturbations, conditioning their step to step adjustments in walking balance control, and (b) improving their response to unexpected balance challenges following training. Methods: In two 20 min sessions, on different days in a randomized cross-over design, older adults with a history of falls will walk with (treatment session) and without (control session) prolonged exposure to optical flow perturbations. The investigators will assess time-dependent changes in the neuromechanics of walking balance during training and after-effects via gait variability, dynamic stability, and performance on a series of real-world like targeting and obstacle avoidance tasks.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALOptical flow perturbations

Continuous mediolateral (i.e., side-to-side) 20-minute perturbations of optical flow that elicit the visual perception of lateral imbalance via virtual reality during treadmill walking.

BEHAVIORALNormal walking

Usual treadmill walking without optical flow perturbations

Sponsors

National Institute on Aging (NIA)
CollaboratorNIH
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

No Masking

Intervention model description

In two 20 min sessions, on different days in a randomized cross-over design, older adults will walk with (treatment session) and without (control session) prolonged exposure to optical flow perturbations.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Be able to walk without an assistive aid (i.e., walker, cane) * Have the full capacity to provide informed consent OLDER NON-FALLERS * Age 65+ years * No history of falls\* in the prior 12 months OLDER ADULTS WITH A HISTORY OF FALLS * Age 65+ years * History of one or more falls\* in the prior 12 months * For the purposes of this study, falls counted towards the self-reported total will be defined as per the Kellogg International Work Group - a fall is unintentionally coming to the ground or some lower level and other than as a consequence of sustaining a violent blow, loss of consciousness, sudden onset of paralysis as in stroke or an epileptic seizure

Exclusion criteria

* Current lower extremity injury or fracture * Taking medication that causes dizziness * Have a leg prosthesis * Prisoners * Individuals clearly lacking the capacity to provide informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Postural Sway After 10 Min of WalkingBaseline, 10 minutesMagnitude of side-to-side postural sway
Change in Kinematic Variability After 10 Min of WalkingBaseline, 10 minutesMagnitude of step-to-step corrections in step width measured in cm
Change in Foot Placement Targeting Accuracy After 10 Min of WalkingBaseline, 10 minutesAccuracy of performing foot placement targeting task. i.e., distance between heel marker at initial contact and target line (measured using three-dimensional motion capture during walking).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in Cognitive-motor Interference Accuracy After 10 Min of WalkingBaseline, 10 minutesAccuracy performing an auditory stroop test (cognitive dual-task)
Change in Cognitive-motor Interference Response Time After 10 Min of WalkingBaseline, 10 minutesResponse time in performing an auditory stroop test (cognitive dual-task)
Change in Margin of Stability Variability After 10 Min of WalkingBaseline, 10 minutesChange in step-to-step fluctuations in margin of stability (the distance between the lateral boundary of the foot and the body's center of mass, measured in cm)

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Participants
Older adults will walk during exposure to optical flow perturbations Optical flow perturbations: Continuous mediolateral (i.e., side-to-side) 20-minute perturbations of optical flow that elicit the visual perception of lateral imbalance via virtual reality. Normal walking
14
Total14

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Participants
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
14 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
14 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
History of Falls4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
13 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
14 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 140 / 14
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 140 / 14
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 140 / 14

Outcome results

Primary

Change in Foot Placement Targeting Accuracy After 10 Min of Walking

Accuracy of performing foot placement targeting task. i.e., distance between heel marker at initial contact and target line (measured using three-dimensional motion capture during walking).

Time frame: Baseline, 10 minutes

Population: Data could not be collected because motion capture markers tracking the location of the targeting device were too often obstructed to be able to reliably estimate foot placement targeting accuracy.

Primary

Change in Kinematic Variability After 10 Min of Walking

Magnitude of step-to-step corrections in step width measured in cm

Time frame: Baseline, 10 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionChange in Kinematic Variability After 10 Min of Walking0.55 cmStandard Deviation 0.35
Normal Walking (Control)Change in Kinematic Variability After 10 Min of Walking0.00 cmStandard Deviation 0.01
Primary

Change in Postural Sway After 10 Min of Walking

Magnitude of side-to-side postural sway

Time frame: Baseline, 10 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionChange in Postural Sway After 10 Min of Walking-2.39 cmStandard Deviation 1.1
Normal Walking (Control)Change in Postural Sway After 10 Min of Walking-0.01 cmStandard Deviation 0.59
Secondary

Change in Cognitive-motor Interference Accuracy After 10 Min of Walking

Accuracy performing an auditory stroop test (cognitive dual-task)

Time frame: Baseline, 10 minutes

Population: Data could not be collected because noise from the treadmill motor interfered with the collection of auditory stroop test responses.

Secondary

Change in Cognitive-motor Interference Response Time After 10 Min of Walking

Response time in performing an auditory stroop test (cognitive dual-task)

Time frame: Baseline, 10 minutes

Population: Data could not be collected because noise from the treadmill motor interfered with the collection of auditory stroop test responses.

Secondary

Change in Margin of Stability Variability After 10 Min of Walking

Change in step-to-step fluctuations in margin of stability (the distance between the lateral boundary of the foot and the body's center of mass, measured in cm)

Time frame: Baseline, 10 minutes

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
InterventionChange in Margin of Stability Variability After 10 Min of Walking-1.02 cmStandard Deviation 0.99
Normal Walking (Control)Change in Margin of Stability Variability After 10 Min of Walking0.16 cmStandard Deviation 0.26

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 2, 2026