Skip to content

Pilot Study to Examine the Feasibility of the Dynamic Interferential Spinal Cord Stimulation System™ (DISCSS™)

Pilot Study to Examine the Feasibility of the DISCSS™

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03341000
Enrollment
18
Registered
2017-11-14
Start date
2017-12-01
Completion date
2020-02-03
Last updated
2024-04-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Back Pain

Brief summary

This study evaluates use of DISCSS vis SCS. Thirty (30) patients with back pain greater than leg pain who were candidates for Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) and have successfully completed a percutaneous trial with a commercially available SCS system will be trialed with a 3-4 day exposure to the investigational DISCSS™ device. The trial will be conducted at 3-5 U.S. centers. The percutaneous trial leads from the commercial system will be connected to the External Pulse Generator of the DISCSS™ Trial System and the patients will be trialed for an additional three-four days.

Detailed description

This investigation will be performed as a prospective, multicenter, open-label feasibility study. Thirty (30) patients with back pain greater than leg pain who were candidates for Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) and have successfully completed a percutaneous trial with a commercially available SCS system will be trialed with a 3-4 day exposure to the investigational DISCSS™ device. The trial will be conducted at 3-5 U.S. centers. The percutaneous trial leads from the commercial system will be connected to the External Pulse Generator of the DISCSS™ Trial System and the patients will be trialed for an additional three to four days. The investigational product for this feasibility trial will be the DISCSS™ system, not the commercially available trial SCS system. Exposure to the commercially available trial SCS system will be considered background therapy. The purpose of the background therapy phase is to establish baseline pain levels and determine patients' eligibility to continue to the investigational phase of the trial using the DISCSS™ SCS phase of the trial. Pain assessment and complications data from the commercial spinal stimulation system will be collected during the background therapy phase. The pain and complications data from the background therapy phase will not be analyzed in terms of the study endpoints.

Interventions

DEVICEDISCSS Device

This pilot feasibility study will explore and help determine optimal settings and configuration of the DISCSS™ System with patients that have completed a percutaneous trial with a commercially available SCS trial system within the first 3-5 days of the current study.

Sponsors

Meagan Medical
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

prospective, multi-center, open-label, feasibility study

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age greater than 21 years and less than 80 years 2. Has a diagnosis of chronic neuropathic pain of trunk and limbs 3. Is eligible for and participating in a spinal cord stimulation trial of a commercially available SCS trial system. Subjects will be evaluated at the end of the background Commercial SCS Device phase for complications and appropriateness to continue to the investigational phase with the DISCSS™ system. Complications from the background phase with the commercial SCS device may include, but are not limited to unusual pain or discomfort during the trial stimulation, local skin reactions or infection at the implant site. 4. Has a Back Pain Score of minimum intensity 5.0 on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) 5. Has an NRS Back Pain Score that is greater than both Leg Pain Scores 6. Is not a candidate for revision surgery 7. Has completed a minimum of 6 weeks of conservative therapy (physical therapy, anti-inflammatory medications, or similar therapies) with limited or no reduction in back pain 8. Is willing to adhere to the warnings associated with the DISCSS™ system 9. Is willing to halt and/or modify the use of all prescription and over-the-counter analgesics per the Investigator's direction during study participation 10. Is capable of providing written informed consent 11. Is able to comply with the requirements of study visits, follow-up phone visits and self-assessment questionnaires

Exclusion criteria

1. Is a poor surgical candidate by determination of the Investigator 2. Is unable to operate or understand the use of the commercial or investigational Spinal Cord Stimulator systems 3. Has an active systemic infection 4. Has exposure to shortwave, microwave or ultrasound diathermy at home or at work 5. Has occupational exposure to high levels of non-ionizing radiation such as radio or cell phone transmission stations, facilities using radiofrequency heat sealers or induction heaters, or electric power infrastructure controlled environments 6. Has an implanted cardiac system (e.g. pacemakers) 7. Is currently participating in another clinical study 8. Is currently pregnant or lactating, or not using adequate birth control 9. Has any untreated major psychiatric comorbidity 10. Has serious drug-related behavioral issues per Investigator's assessment 11. Has a bleeding complication or coagulopathy 12. Requires concurrent use of anticoagulant therapy such as heparin, warfarin, rivaroxaban, dabigatran, apixaban, edoxaban, enoxaparin, fondaparinux 13. Is immunocompromised and at risk for infection 14. Has insulin-dependent diabetes not controlled through diet and/or medication 15. Has chronic pain related to malignancy 16. Is otherwise determined, based on the opinion of the Investigator to be an unsuitable candidate for this study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Visit 5 in Back Pain.Baseline to visit 5Change from baseline (day 1) to visit 5 (day 10-11) in patient-reported pain intensity, measured on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Adverse EventsVisit 4 (Day 6-7), and Visit 5 (Day 10-11)Incidence of adverse events arising from the DISCSS treatment phase
Patient SatisfactionVisit 5 (Day 10-11)Patient-reported device efficacy and device stimulation sensation as captured on a study-specific, subject satisfaction Questionnaire.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
DISCSS Device
This pilot feasibility study will explore and help determine optimal settings and configuration of the DISCSS™ System with patients that have completed a percutaneous trial with a commercially available SCS trial system. DISCSS Device: This pilot feasibility study will explore and help determine optimal settings and configuration of the DISCSS™ System with patients that have completed a percutaneous trial with a commercially available SCS trial system.
18
Total18

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDISCSS Device
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
5 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
13 Participants
Age, Continuous56.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.6
Height67.6 Inches
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.7
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Hispanic or Latino
17 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
9 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 180 / 18
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 180 / 18
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 180 / 18

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline (Day 1) to Visit 5 in Back Pain.

Change from baseline (day 1) to visit 5 (day 10-11) in patient-reported pain intensity, measured on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain).

Time frame: Baseline to visit 5

Population: Intent to treat.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
DISCSS DeviceChange From Baseline (Day 1) to Visit 5 in Back Pain.Overall-4.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
DISCSS DeviceChange From Baseline (Day 1) to Visit 5 in Back Pain.Lower Extremity-3.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.5
DISCSS DeviceChange From Baseline (Day 1) to Visit 5 in Back Pain.Back-4.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.3
Secondary

Incidence of Adverse Events

Incidence of adverse events arising from the DISCSS treatment phase

Time frame: Visit 4 (Day 6-7), and Visit 5 (Day 10-11)

Population: All enrolled subjects.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
DISCSS DeviceIncidence of Adverse EventsSerious Adverse Event1 Adverse Events
DISCSS DeviceIncidence of Adverse EventsAdverse Event6 Adverse Events
Secondary

Patient Satisfaction

Patient-reported device efficacy and device stimulation sensation as captured on a study-specific, subject satisfaction Questionnaire.

Time frame: Visit 5 (Day 10-11)

Population: Intent to treat.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
DISCSS DevicePatient SatisfactionVery Satisfied9 Participants
DISCSS DevicePatient SatisfactionSatisfied4 Participants
DISCSS DevicePatient SatisfactionSomewhat Satisfied3 Participants
DISCSS DevicePatient SatisfactionDissatisfied1 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026