Skip to content

MANual vs. automatIC Local Activation Time Annotation for Guiding Premature Ventricular Complex Ablation

MANual vs. automatIC Local Activation Time Annotation for Guiding Premature Ventricular Complex Ablation Procedures (MANIaC-PVC Study). A Randomized, Multicenter Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03340922
Acronym
MANIaC-PVC
Enrollment
100
Registered
2017-11-14
Start date
2018-06-26
Completion date
2020-08-31
Last updated
2020-10-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Catheter Ablation, Ventricular Premature Complexes

Keywords

premature ventricular complex, catheter ablation, activation mapping, wavefront

Brief summary

Current navigation systems incorporate algorithms for automatic identification of local activation time (LAT). However, data about their utility and accuracy in premature ventricular complex (PVC) ablation procedures are scarce. This prospective, randomized study analyzes the accuracy and effectivity of an algorithmic method based on automatic annotation of the maximal negative slope of the unipolar electrogram within the window demarcated by the bipolar electrogram, compared with conventional, manual annotation during PVC ablation procedures.

Detailed description

This is a prospective, randomized, controlled and international multicenter study. The investigators aim to analyze the accuracy of LAT annotation using a novel algorithmic method (Wavefront, CARTO, Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, California, USA) (WF), based on automatic annotation of the maximal negative slope of the unipolar electrogram (U-EGM) within the window demarcated by the B-EGM, by comparison with conventional, manual annotation in a multicenter cohort of patients referred for PVC ablation. Further on, the automatic annotation of LAT will be aided by an ECG recognition pattern algorithm (included in the last version of CARTO), which is intended to avoid wrong annotation of ventricular complexes other than the clinical PVC. The investigators hypothesize that automatic LAT annotation (using WF and the ECG recognition algorithm) could be superior to conventional, manual annotation in terms of mapping success and could reduce both procedure time and radiofrequency time.

Interventions

DEVICEAutomatic annotation of LAT (WF-method)

Automatic annotation of LAT during PVC activation mapping. Acquisition of points will be automatically performed using the Wavefront (WF) annotation tool integrated into CARTO navigation system.

DEVICEManual annotation of LAT (M-method)

Conventional, manual annotation of LAT during PVC activation mapping. Acquisition of points will be performed using the CARTO navigation system by an expert electrophysiologist.

Sponsors

Centro Medico Teknon
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Intervention model description

This is a prospective, randomized, controlled and international multicenter study. All patients who fulfill the inclusion criteria will be consecutively enrolled and randomized on a 1:1 basis to each of the LAT annotation systems (WF vs. M-method) before the ablation procedure. Ablation will be directed to the earliest activation site identified with the assigned annotation system. Any change of the assigned annotation system during the procedure won't be allowed, thus being a reason for justifying study exclusion.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age \> 18 years. * Indication for PVC ablation. * Signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

* Age \< 18 years. * Pregnancy. * PVC ablation procedures guided by pace-mapping (PASO® module); eg. low burden of PVCs during the study, mechanical impact during activation mapping. * Impossibility to perform activation mapping with the required density of points in the region of interest (see section 4.5.3). * Concomitant investigation treatments. * Medical, geographical and social factors that make study participation impractical, and inability to give written informed consent. Patient's refusal to participate in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rates of mapping success, using the assigned mapping approach (automatic vs. manual), as defined in description12 monthsMapping success will be defined as complete PVC abolition after RF applications at the earliest activation site (EAS) identified using the assigned mapping approach. A maximum of 2 RF applications with appropriate parameters (contact force, impedance drop, catheter stability) during a maximum of 45 seconds will be allowed. If the PVC is not abolished after 2 RF applications with appropriate parameters, mapping will not be considered successful.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of mapped chambers12 months
Accuracy of a proposed algorithm for selection of first chamber to map12 monthsIn the case of PVCs arising from ventricular outflow tracts, we propose an algorithm to avoid subjective criteria, and to deal with eventual wrong selection of the first mapped chamber, leading to unnecessary RF applications. This algorithm involves a step-by-step analysis of the PVC-ECG morphology: precordial R/S transition and presence of one or more of the following clinical items, which have been previously related with a left origin: male gender, hypertension, or age \> 50 years.
Number of target points12 monthsTarget point is defined as any suspected PVC-site of origin where RF is delivered according to mapping data. Therefore, for one case there can be found a single target point with multiple RF applications, or multiple target points with one single RF application. The maximum distance between 2 RF applications to be considered at the same target point will be defined as 5 mm (equivalent to a 1-cm2 area).
Mapping time12 months
Number of RF applications12 months
Acute procedure success12 monthsComplete elimination of the PVC at the end of the procedure.
Clinical success1 monthReduction of, at least, 80% in the 24-hour PVC burden 1 month after the procedure.
Radiofrequency (RF) time12 months

Countries

Spain

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026