Skip to content

Norepinephrine vs Norepinephrine and Dobutamine in Cardiogenic Shock

Norepinephrine vs Norepinephrine and Dobutamine in Cardiogenic Shock : a Randomised, Opened, Cross-over Study. Heart SHOCK-NORDOB Study

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03340779
Acronym
SHOCK-NORDOB
Enrollment
40
Registered
2017-11-14
Start date
2018-01-15
Completion date
2020-05-01
Last updated
2017-11-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiogenic Shock

Keywords

Norepinephrine, Dobutamine, Shock

Brief summary

Cardiogenic shock is a frequent cause of admission and death in the intensive care unit. Mortality is about 50%. Once the etiologic treatment has been done, for instance coronary revascularization, management of the shock state is the cornerstone of the treatment. Norepinephrine is the first-line vasopressor therapy because of its minor effect on heart rhythm. Morever norepinephrine is a inotrope. In a previous study, we demonstrated that increasing the norepinephrine dose increases cardiac index, cardiac power index, SVO2 and tissue perfusion without acceleration of heart rate. Nevertheless, dobutamine remains the first-line inotropic treatment. Dobutamine has a positive chronotropic effect that might cause higher myocardial oxygen consumption. As a result, combination of vasopressor / inotrope is still controversial. The aim of this study was to compare hemodynamics and metabolics effects of 2 treatments strategies (norepinephrine dose increasing or addition of dobutamine) in patients with cardiogenic shock and optimised blood pressure level (MAP≥65 mmHg) under norepinephrine treatment. The secondary objectives were : * To evaluate the efficacy of the treatments on micro- and macrocirculation parameters * To evaluate the tolerance of the treatments * To evaluate the dose and the admistration's kinetics of the treatments

Interventions

DRUGNorepinephrine

After obtention of a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 65 mmHg with infusion of norepinephrine, patients with cardiogenic shock receive for 3 hours either increasing doses of norepinephrine (with a maximal MAP of 85 mmHg) or dobutamine. There is a wash-out phase of 30 minutes (decrease of norepinephrine dose or weaning of dobutamine). The third phase of the study is the administration of the comparator treatment during 3 hours. After the 6.5 hours of the study, the hemodynamic management is up to the physician.

Sponsors

Central Hospital, Nancy, France
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

3 first hours : strategy 1, norepinephrine alone with increased dose or norepinephrine + dobutamine 0.5 hour : wash-out (decrease of norepinephrine dose or weaning of dobutamine) 3 last hours : strategy 2, crossover, norepinephrine alone with increased dose or norepinephrine + dobutamine

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with cardiogenic shock (ischemic, rythmic, valvular) defined : by cardiac index (CI) \< 2,2 L/min/m² or CI \< 2,5 L/min/m² under vasopressor/inotropic treatment and organ hypoperfusion signs : mottles, capillary refill time , urine output \< 0,5 mL/kg/hour during at least one hour ou renal replacement therapy, consciouness impairment, pulmonary oedema, hyperlactatemia (\> 2 mmoL/L) * Mean arterial pressure \> 65 mmHg under norepinephrine treatment * Patients with social coverage

Exclusion criteria

* \< 18 years old * Pregnancy * Inclusion in other drug study * Poisonings with cardiotoxicants * Patient with intra-aortic ballon pump, extracorporeal life support * Patient under guardianship

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Obtention of a optimal cardiac outputHour 0 (H0), Hour 1, Hour 3, Hour 3.5, Hour 4,5, Hour 5.5, Hour 6.5Measure of increase of cardiac index \> 15% (L/min/m²), increase of organ perfusion assessed by : lactate clearance \> 15% (mmoL/L), decrease of mottling (decrease of 2 points of Mottling score), increase of musculaire oxygen saturation measured by NIRS \> 15% (rSo2%), increase of urine output \> 50% (mL/h), increase of SVcO2 \> 15%(%) Evaluation of occurence of side effects : Increase of heart rate \> 15% (bpm) , increase of oxygen consumption evaluated by decrease of ratio mean arterial pressure / heart rate \> 15% (Buffington ratio). The primary endpoint is defined by the presence of 2 efficacy criterias without any side effects.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in hemodynamic parametersHour 0, Hour 1, Hour 3, Hour 3.5, Hour 4,5, Hour 5.5, Hour 6.5Measure of heart rate (bpm),
Occurence of arrythmiaHour 0, Hour 1, Hour 3, Hour 3.5, Hour 4,5, Hour 5.5, Hour 6.5Notification of atrial arrythmia
All-cause mortalityDay 28Mortality
Change in metabolic parametersHour 0, Hour 1, Hour 3, Hour 3.5, Hour 4,5, Hour 5.5, Hour 6.5SVcO2 (%)

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026