Skip to content

Use of the Venous Coupler in Breast Reconstruction by Means of a Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator: Reduction of Surgery Length and Venous Thromboses ?

Use of the Venous Coupler in Breast Reconstruction by Means of a Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator: Reduction of Surgery Length and Venous Thromboses ?

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03340623
Enrollment
40
Registered
2017-11-13
Start date
2017-11-01
Completion date
2018-05-28
Last updated
2018-05-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Mammary Reconstruction

Keywords

DIEP, Venous coupler

Brief summary

This is a retrospective study performed on medical records, in order to compare the number of venous thromboses, the surgery duration, the complications rate and the duration of anastomosis in breast reconstructive surgeries by the DIEP (Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap) technique, with or without the use of a venous coupler.

Detailed description

Breast cancer is the most common and deadliest cancer among women in Belgium. Women with invasive cancer may be offered a total mastectomy with or without adjuvant/neoadjuvant therapy, and with or without breast reconstruction. It is obvious that the loss of a breast can impact the self-image, hence the importance of informing the patient about the possibilities of breast reconstruction. Between 14 and 20% of women choose to resort to reconstruction. Different types of breast reconstruction exist: prosthetic reconstruction, lipolifting and flap reconstruction (of large dorsal, gluteus maximus, rectus abdominis muscle and DIEP). DIEP (Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator Flap) presents numerous advantages. It consists in the use of a free cutaneo-greasy flap taken from the abdomen, without muscle removed. The abdominal skin has a similar appearance to the breast skin and, thanks to the presence of fat, the missing volume is replaced by a living tissue. Weakness of the abdominal wall is also avoided. However, it remains a surgical procedure with possible complications. There are several steps in this surgery. The first is to dissect the abdominal flap by talking the skin and subcutaneous fat and isolating one or two branches of the lower epigastric artery and one or two veins. The donor area is then closed. The second step is to prepare the recipient area, ie dissect the artery that will be anastomosed with the lower deep epigastric artery.This artery can be the intern mammary artery, the thoraco-dorsal artery or more rarely the axillary artery. The third step consists of performing arterial and venous anastomoses and checking the quality of these. Two microanastomoses must thus be performed: arterial and venous. The classic technique, the most used, is to suture the 2 veins. Alternatively, a coupler device can be used to perform the venous anastomosis. It is therefore interesting to compare the classical method and the venous coupler method in terms of surgery duration, venous thrombosis and complications. If the coupler is proved effective, it could replace the manual suture. Venous thrombosis is the main cause of flap failure. But surgery duration has also an impact on the complication rate, and the anastomosis duration corresponds to the time during which the flap is not perfused. It is thus necessary to keep it to a minimum in order to reduce the risk of flap loss.

Interventions

DEVICEVenous coupler

A coupler can be used to perform a venous anastomosis. It is a double ring with pins on only one of its 2 faces. The technique consists in clamping the two veins, estimating the intima-to-intimal diameter of the vessels, choosing the coupler of the appropriate size, sliding the vein in the ring and evers the edges of the vessel to fix them on the pins, redo the same thing for the other vein and finally bring the two vessels together in order to clip them together.

Sponsors

Brugmann University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
25 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Total mastectomy with mammary reconstruction by the DIEP technique * Patients treated within the CHU Brugmann Hospital * Patients treated between 01/01/2017 and 01/09/2017

Exclusion criteria

/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of venous thrombosisUp to 1 week after mammary reconstruction surgeryRate of venous thrombosis
Surgery durationAt the date of mammary reconstruction surgery.Duration of the mammary reconstruction surgery with the DIEP technique
Anastomosis durationAt the date of mammary reconstruction surgery.Duration of the anastomosis during the mammary reconstruction surgery

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Co-morbidity : diabetesAt the date of mammary reconstruction surgery.Medical history of diabetes
Co-morbidity : cardio-vascular diseaseAt the date of mammary reconstruction surgery.Medical history of cardio-vascular disease
Co-morbidity : medical history of venous thrombosisAt the date of mammary reconstruction surgery.Medical history of venous thrombosis
AgeAt the date of mammary reconstruction surgery.Patient age
Unilateral or Bilateral DIEPAt the date of mammary reconstruction surgery.Unilateral or Bilateral DIEP
Medical complications (yes/no)Up to one week after mammary reconstruction surgeryMedical complications within the grafted flap
Type of cancer treatmentAt the date of mammary reconstruction surgery.(neo)adjuvant chemiotherapy or (neo)adjuvant radiotherapy
Immediate of differed reconstructionAt the date of mammary reconstruction surgery.Reconstruction performed immediately after mastectomy or not
Body mass indexAt the date of mammary reconstruction surgery.Body mass index
TabagismAt the date of mammary reconstruction surgery.Tabagism status (smoker/non smoker)

Countries

Belgium

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026