Skip to content

Timing of Weight Bearing After Hallux Valgus Surgery

Randomised Controlled Trial of the Timing of Full Weight Bearing Walking After Soft Tissue Hallux Valgus Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03340415
Enrollment
53
Registered
2017-11-13
Start date
2018-07-13
Completion date
2020-04-30
Last updated
2021-03-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hallux Valgus and Bunion

Keywords

Hallux Valgus, Bunion, Post-operative, Rehabilitation, Weight Bearing Status

Brief summary

Investigate the optimal timing for weight bearing after Hallux Valgus surgery. Hypothesis: Early weight bearing does not affect outcome after the Endoscopic Distal Soft Tissue Procedure for Hallux Valgus Correction.

Detailed description

Introduction: * Rehabilitation plans after hallux valgus/bunion surgery is varied * From a patient's perspective, full weight bearing is paramount for quality of life and return to work/study * No high-level study showing the optimal time to resume full weight bearing available Hypothesis: Early weight bearing (at 2 weeks post-op) does not affect outcome after the Endoscopic Distal Soft Tissue Procedure for Hallux Valgus correction Trial Design: * Parallel group * Random allocation * Operating Surgeon blind to randomisation Study Setting: * General Regional Hospital * Single Centre

Interventions

OTHERAccelerated Rehabilitation plan

early weight bearing after surgery

Sponsors

Chinese University of Hong Kong
CollaboratorOTHER
North District Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Masking description

Surgeon blinded

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All patients undergoing the EDSTP recruited

Exclusion criteria

* Cases requiring additional procedures (eg 2nd toe correction) * Mental incapacitation * Physical disability hindering rehabilitation (eg CVA, neurological disorder)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hallux Valgus Angle as a Measure of the Radiological Changes0, 12, 26 weeks post-surgeryWeight bearing feet X-Ray to measure radiological parameters of hallux valgus. A larger angle represents the more severe condition. This is the angle between the 1st metatarsal and the proximal phalanx.
Inter-metatarsal Angle as a Measure of the Radiological Changes0, 12, 26 weeks post-surgeryWeight bearing feet X-Ray to measure radiological parameters of hallux valgus. A larger angle represents the more severe condition. This is measure using the bisecting line between the 1st metatarsal and the 2nd metatarsal.
Radiological Changes (Tibial Sesamoid Position)0, 12, 26 weeks post-surgeryWeight bearing feet X-Ray to measure radiological parameters of hallux valgus. 4 represents the most neutral position. bigger difference from 4 means more severe condition. This a score from 0-7.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Foot Function (FAOS Sport)0, 12, 26 week post-surgeryCalculation of foot function using the self-reported Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS): FAOS consists of 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport and Recreation), and foot and ankle-related Quality of Life (QOL). The last week is taken into consideration when answering the questionnaire. Standardized answer options are given (% Likert boxes) and each question gets a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.
Foot Function (FAOS Symptoms)0, 12, 26 week post-surgeryCalculation of foot function using the self-reported Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS): FAOS consists of 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport and Recreation), and foot and ankle-related Quality of Life (QOL). The last week is taken into consideration when answering the questionnaire. Standardized answer options are given (% Likert boxes) and each question gets a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.
Foot Function (FAOS QoL)0, 12, 26 week post-surgeryCalculation of foot function using the self-reported Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS): FAOS consists of 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport and Recreation), and foot and ankle-related Quality of Life (QOL). The last week is taken into consideration when answering the questionnaire. Standardized answer options are given (% Likert boxes) and each question gets a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.
Foot Function (FAOS Pain)0, 12, 26 week post-surgeryCalculation of foot function using the self-reported Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS): FAOS consists of 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport and Recreation), and foot and ankle-related Quality of Life (QOL). The last week is taken into consideration when answering the questionnaire. Standardized answer options are given (% Likert boxes) and each question gets a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.
Foot Function (FAOS ADL)0, 12, 26 week post-surgeryCalculation of foot function using the self-reported Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS): FAOS consists of 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport and Recreation), and foot and ankle-related Quality of Life (QOL). The last week is taken into consideration when answering the questionnaire. Standardized answer options are given (% Likert boxes) and each question gets a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.

Countries

Hong Kong

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

2 lost to follow-up. power analysis only required 40 participants.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Control Rehab
Follow existing rehabilitation protocol of Non-weight bearing walking for 6 weeks followed by heel walking for 6 weeks; then the resumption of normal full weight-bearing walking in normal shoes at 12 weeks post-operation
29
Accelerated Rehab
Accelerated rehabilitation protocol of non-weight bearing walking for 2 weeks followed by heel walking for 10 weeks; then the resumption of normal full weight-bearing walking in normal shoes at 12 weeks post-operation Accelerated Rehabilitation plan: early weight bearing after surgery
21
Total50

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAccelerated RehabTotalControl Rehab
Age, Continuous60 years60 years60 years
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Hong Kong
21 participants50 participants29 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
19 Participants45 Participants26 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants5 Participants3 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 290 / 24
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 290 / 24
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 290 / 24

Outcome results

Primary

Hallux Valgus Angle as a Measure of the Radiological Changes

Weight bearing feet X-Ray to measure radiological parameters of hallux valgus. A larger angle represents the more severe condition. This is the angle between the 1st metatarsal and the proximal phalanx.

Time frame: 0, 12, 26 weeks post-surgery

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control RehabHallux Valgus Angle as a Measure of the Radiological Changes0 week35.6 degreesStandard Deviation 7.1
Control RehabHallux Valgus Angle as a Measure of the Radiological Changes12 week8.8 degreesStandard Deviation 5.2
Control RehabHallux Valgus Angle as a Measure of the Radiological Changes26 week11.6 degreesStandard Deviation 7.6
Accelerated RehabHallux Valgus Angle as a Measure of the Radiological Changes0 week37.4 degreesStandard Deviation 8
Accelerated RehabHallux Valgus Angle as a Measure of the Radiological Changes12 week7.2 degreesStandard Deviation 4.8
Accelerated RehabHallux Valgus Angle as a Measure of the Radiological Changes26 week10.5 degreesStandard Deviation 6.2
Primary

Inter-metatarsal Angle as a Measure of the Radiological Changes

Weight bearing feet X-Ray to measure radiological parameters of hallux valgus. A larger angle represents the more severe condition. This is measure using the bisecting line between the 1st metatarsal and the 2nd metatarsal.

Time frame: 0, 12, 26 weeks post-surgery

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control RehabInter-metatarsal Angle as a Measure of the Radiological Changes0 week14.0 degreesStandard Deviation 3
Control RehabInter-metatarsal Angle as a Measure of the Radiological Changes12 week6.2 degreesStandard Deviation 1.9
Control RehabInter-metatarsal Angle as a Measure of the Radiological Changes26 week7.7 degreesStandard Deviation 2.7
Accelerated RehabInter-metatarsal Angle as a Measure of the Radiological Changes0 week16.4 degreesStandard Deviation 3.7
Accelerated RehabInter-metatarsal Angle as a Measure of the Radiological Changes12 week7.2 degreesStandard Deviation 2.2
Accelerated RehabInter-metatarsal Angle as a Measure of the Radiological Changes26 week7.3 degreesStandard Deviation 2.4
Primary

Radiological Changes (Tibial Sesamoid Position)

Weight bearing feet X-Ray to measure radiological parameters of hallux valgus. 4 represents the most neutral position. bigger difference from 4 means more severe condition. This a score from 0-7.

Time frame: 0, 12, 26 weeks post-surgery

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control RehabRadiological Changes (Tibial Sesamoid Position)0 week5.55 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Control RehabRadiological Changes (Tibial Sesamoid Position)12 week2.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.2
Control RehabRadiological Changes (Tibial Sesamoid Position)26 week2.9 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.3
Accelerated RehabRadiological Changes (Tibial Sesamoid Position)0 week5.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.1
Accelerated RehabRadiological Changes (Tibial Sesamoid Position)12 week3.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Accelerated RehabRadiological Changes (Tibial Sesamoid Position)26 week3.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1
Secondary

Foot Function (FAOS ADL)

Calculation of foot function using the self-reported Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS): FAOS consists of 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport and Recreation), and foot and ankle-related Quality of Life (QOL). The last week is taken into consideration when answering the questionnaire. Standardized answer options are given (% Likert boxes) and each question gets a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.

Time frame: 0, 12, 26 week post-surgery

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control RehabFoot Function (FAOS ADL)0 week59.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.4
Control RehabFoot Function (FAOS ADL)12 week61.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.3
Control RehabFoot Function (FAOS ADL)26 week84.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.6
Accelerated RehabFoot Function (FAOS ADL)0 week53.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 25.6
Accelerated RehabFoot Function (FAOS ADL)12 week81.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.6
Accelerated RehabFoot Function (FAOS ADL)26 week86.0 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.2
Secondary

Foot Function (FAOS Pain)

Calculation of foot function using the self-reported Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS): FAOS consists of 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport and Recreation), and foot and ankle-related Quality of Life (QOL). The last week is taken into consideration when answering the questionnaire. Standardized answer options are given (% Likert boxes) and each question gets a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.

Time frame: 0, 12, 26 week post-surgery

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control RehabFoot Function (FAOS Pain)12 week66.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.3
Control RehabFoot Function (FAOS Pain)0 week44 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.8
Control RehabFoot Function (FAOS Pain)26 week82.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.6
Accelerated RehabFoot Function (FAOS Pain)0 week47.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 28.8
Accelerated RehabFoot Function (FAOS Pain)12 week78.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.4
Accelerated RehabFoot Function (FAOS Pain)26 week85.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.9
Secondary

Foot Function (FAOS QoL)

Calculation of foot function using the self-reported Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS): FAOS consists of 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport and Recreation), and foot and ankle-related Quality of Life (QOL). The last week is taken into consideration when answering the questionnaire. Standardized answer options are given (% Likert boxes) and each question gets a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.

Time frame: 0, 12, 26 week post-surgery

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control RehabFoot Function (FAOS QoL)0 week41.2 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 30.2
Control RehabFoot Function (FAOS QoL)12 week49.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.4
Control RehabFoot Function (FAOS QoL)26 week82.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.2
Accelerated RehabFoot Function (FAOS QoL)0 week31.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.6
Accelerated RehabFoot Function (FAOS QoL)12 week72.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.7
Accelerated RehabFoot Function (FAOS QoL)26 week81.4 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.9
Secondary

Foot Function (FAOS Sport)

Calculation of foot function using the self-reported Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS): FAOS consists of 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport and Recreation), and foot and ankle-related Quality of Life (QOL). The last week is taken into consideration when answering the questionnaire. Standardized answer options are given (% Likert boxes) and each question gets a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.

Time frame: 0, 12, 26 week post-surgery

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control RehabFoot Function (FAOS Sport)0 week52.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 29.7
Control RehabFoot Function (FAOS Sport)12 weekNA score on a scale
Control RehabFoot Function (FAOS Sport)26 week76.7 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.7
Accelerated RehabFoot Function (FAOS Sport)0 week39.8 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.7
Accelerated RehabFoot Function (FAOS Sport)12 weekNA score on a scale
Accelerated RehabFoot Function (FAOS Sport)26 week77.6 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.7
Secondary

Foot Function (FAOS Symptoms)

Calculation of foot function using the self-reported Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS): FAOS consists of 5 subscales; Pain, other Symptoms, Function in daily living (ADL), Function in sport and recreation (Sport and Recreation), and foot and ankle-related Quality of Life (QOL). The last week is taken into consideration when answering the questionnaire. Standardized answer options are given (% Likert boxes) and each question gets a score from 0 to 4. A normalized score (100 indicating no symptoms and 0 indicating extreme symptoms) is calculated for each subscale.

Time frame: 0, 12, 26 week post-surgery

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control RehabFoot Function (FAOS Symptoms)0 week58.3 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 26.1
Control RehabFoot Function (FAOS Symptoms)12 week62.1 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.1
Control RehabFoot Function (FAOS Symptoms)26 week81.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.8
Accelerated RehabFoot Function (FAOS Symptoms)0 week47.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 23.9
Accelerated RehabFoot Function (FAOS Symptoms)12 week76.9 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.6
Accelerated RehabFoot Function (FAOS Symptoms)26 week80.5 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.6

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026