Surgical Wound
Conditions
Keywords
negative pressure wound therapy, split thickness skin graft
Brief summary
Various management options for free flap donor sites that require split thickness skin grafting exist. None has proven superior from both a patient care and a cost standpoint. Major complications occurring at these surgical sites include wound breakdown, tendon exposure, and loss of function. We seek to investigate the use of the PICO single-use negative pressure wound therapy device in these surgical sites and determine if it can yield superior results to simpler methods.
Detailed description
Many studies have addressed the use of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in free flap donor sites with mixed results. It is well established that NPWT is safe and causes no harm, and no delay in healing. A previous study performed at UAB showed that NPWT in complex Head & Neck Surgery reconstruction is safe, including free flap donor sites. There have been studies that state the rate of tendon exposure is lower with NPWT in free flap donor sites, and studies that conclude there is no difference in complication rates. Current clinical practice is varied, often within a single institution. While no studies of NPWT in free flap donor sites have noted inferior results with its use, a primary reason cited for not using it is cost. Traditional NPWT using canister-based vacuum devices adds significant cost. The PICO single-use NPWT device (Smith & Nephew) is a relatively inexpensive, low-profile dressing that does not require attachment to an external canister. It is battery-powered and disposable. Empiric use on our patients undergoing split-thickness skin-grafting to free flap donor sites shows good results with minimal intra-operative effort compared to traditional bandaging. We would like to prospectively investigate the use of this low-cost NPWT device and compare it directly to the traditional post-op dressing method.
Interventions
DEVICEPICO Single Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System
Class II negative pressure wound therapy powered suction pump
DEVICExeroform gauze
traditional surgical dressing of xeroform gauze and padding
Sponsors
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* \> 18 years of age * participants are able to consent for themselves * undergoing reconstructive surgery requiring split-thickness skin graft coverage of a free flap donor site (i.e., radial forearm free flap or fibula free flap)
Exclusion criteria
* \< 18 years of age * participants are unable to consent for themselves * undergoing reconstructive surgery that does not require split-thickness skin graft coverage of a free flap donor site
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Progression of Wound Healing | Baseline through 30 days | Comparison of photographs of all participants' wounds taken at post-operative Day 5, post-operative Day 14-21, and post-operative Day 30. Percentage skin graft take will be evaluated on Day 30 by blinded, independent raters. A 10x10 grid was digitally overlain on each image. The de-identified images were randomized and given to two independent raters. The raters used three criteria to assess each graft. Overall graft appearance was graded on a 1-5 scale, percent of graft take was estimated, and the presence of exposed tendon was noted for each timepoint. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Negative Pressure Wound Therapy PICO Single Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System
PICO Single Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy System: Class II negative pressure wound therapy powered suction pump | 11 |
| Conventional Dressing traditional surgical wound dressing of xeroform gauze and padding
xeroform gauze: traditional surgical dressing of xeroform gauze and padding | 9 |
| Total | 20 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 2 | 2 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Negative Pressure Wound Therapy | Conventional Dressing | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 5 Participants | 4 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 6 Participants | 5 Participants | 11 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 1 Participants | 0 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 10 Participants | 9 Participants | 19 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 11 participants | 9 participants | 20 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 4 Participants | 1 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 7 Participants | 8 Participants | 15 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 11 | 0 / 9 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 11 | 0 / 9 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 11 | 0 / 9 |
Outcome results
Primary
Progression of Wound Healing
Comparison of photographs of all participants' wounds taken at post-operative Day 5, post-operative Day 14-21, and post-operative Day 30. Percentage skin graft take will be evaluated on Day 30 by blinded, independent raters. A 10x10 grid was digitally overlain on each image. The de-identified images were randomized and given to two independent raters. The raters used three criteria to assess each graft. Overall graft appearance was graded on a 1-5 scale, percent of graft take was estimated, and the presence of exposed tendon was noted for each timepoint.
Time frame: Baseline through 30 days
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Negative Pressure Wound Therapy | Progression of Wound Healing | 69.9 percentage of skin graft take |
| Conventional Dressing | Progression of Wound Healing | 75.6 percentage of skin graft take |