Skip to content

Alcohol and Health: Personalized Feedback

Alcohol and Health: Personalized Feedback

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03337438
Enrollment
320
Registered
2017-11-09
Start date
2017-10-22
Completion date
2019-10-29
Last updated
2019-10-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alcohol Consumption, Youth, Alcohol Drinking

Brief summary

Heavy episodic drinking (HED) among college students remains a concern within the U.S., as rates of HED are still high in this population. Though a variety of brief motivational interventions for alcohol use in college students have demonstrated significant effects, these effects are often small and not consistently maintained over time. Personalized feedback interventions (PFIs) are a particularly promising approach, as these are often acceptable to college students, as well as low-cost, and easy to disseminate. Though presentation of interperson discrepancy via descriptive and injunctive norms has shown consistent effects within PFIs and received much attention in the literature, intraperson, or ideal-actual self discrepancies, has largely been ignored. Drawing from cognitive dissonance theory, self-regulation theory, and motivational interviewing, the current study aims to evaluate the efficacy of an alcohol PFI with a values component to incorporate ideal-self discrepancy into a typical intervention.

Interventions

OTHERPersonalized Feedback Intervention with Values

The PFI with values will include information commonly included in personalized feedback interventions for alcohol use, such as norms information and drinking profile, as well as feedback on three of the assessed values that are highly important to the participant.

OTHERPersonalized Feedback Intervention Traditional

This PFI will include information on drinking profile, norms, behavioral strategies used while drinking, and practical costs related to drinking reframed as monetary values and caloric values.

Sponsors

Oklahoma State University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Must be at least 18 years of age * Must be able to speak and read English * Must report consuming alcohol in a typical week over the past month

Exclusion criteria

* Must not deny drinking within the past month * Non-English speaking * Under the age of 18

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Alcohol consumptionone-month post baselinemeasured by drinks per week
Alcohol consequencesone month post-baselinemeasured by the BYAACQ to determine number of consequences experienced in the past month post-baseline
Value-behavior discrepancy for values related to alcohol useone month post-baselineMeasured by the VLQ-A to measure change in behavioral consistency with values specifically related to alcohol use one month post-baseline

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Perceptions of normsone month post-baselinePerceptions of descriptive norms will be more accurate one month post-baseline
Trait mindfulnessone month post-baselineLevels of mindfulness as measured by the FFMQ will be measured at both time points

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026