Skip to content

Stepped Palliative Care Versus Early Integrated Palliative Care in Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer

Randomized Trial of Stepped Palliative Care Versus Early Integrated Palliative Care in Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03337399
Acronym
STEP PC
Enrollment
507
Registered
2017-11-09
Start date
2018-02-01
Completion date
2023-12-31
Last updated
2026-08-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lung Cancer

Keywords

Lung Cancer

Brief summary

This research study is evaluating ways to provide palliative care to patients who have recently been diagnosed with lung cancer

Detailed description

Patients with serious cancers, like advanced lung cancer, often experience physical symptoms, such as pain or shortness of breath. In addition, both patients and their loved ones (family and friends) often feel worried or sad about their cancer diagnosis. Research has shown that early involvement of a team of clinicians that specialize in lessening (or "palliating") many of these distressing physical and emotional symptoms and in helping patients and their family cope with a serious illness improves patients' and their loved ones' experience with their cancer. This team is called "palliative care," and consists of physicians and advanced practice nurses (or "nurse practitioners") who work closely and collaboratively with your oncology team to care for the participant and the participant's loved ones. Research shows that when the palliative care team works closely with the oncology team to care for patients with advanced cancer, they may have better symptom control, quality of life, and mood and their loved ones feel less distressed. This study will compare two different strategies for scheduling participant's visits with the palliative care clinician. The first strategy is to schedule the participant to meet with the palliative care clinician regularly each month. The investigators call this strategy "early integrated palliative care". The second strategy is to schedule the participant to meet with the palliative care clinician after the participant is admitted to the hospital or if the participant's oncology team needs to change the participant cancer treatment, as these are times when the participant is likely to have health issues that the palliative care clinician can help with. The investigators will also monitor the participant's quality of life regularly. If the study team determines that the participant quality of life worsens, the investigators will increase the frequency of the participant's visits with the palliative care clinician to monthly appointments. The investigators call this strategy "stepped palliative care" because the investigators step up the frequency of the participant palliative care visits if the participant's quality of life worsens during the participant cancer treatment. No matter which strategy the participant is taking part in, the participant will still be able to request additional palliative care visits outside of the study schedule if the participant feel they need them.

Interventions

OTHERStepped PC

Palliative Care is involvement of a team of clinicians that specialize in lessening (or "palliating") many of these distressing physical and emotional symptoms and in helping patients and their family cope with a serious illness improves patients' and their loved ones' experience with their cancer

OTHEREarly Integrated PC

Palliative Care is involvement of a team of clinicians that specialize in lessening (or "palliating") many of these distressing physical and emotional symptoms and in helping patients and their family cope with a serious illness improves patients' and their loved ones' experience with their cancer

Sponsors

Massachusetts General Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosed with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, small cell lung cancer, or mesothelioma, being treated with non-curative intent, and informed of advanced disease within the prior twelve weeks * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status from 0 (asymptomatic) to 2 (symptomatic and in bed \<50% of the day) * The ability to read and respond to questions in English or Spanish * Primary cancer care at one of the three participating sites * Age \> 18 years

Exclusion criteria

* Already receiving outpatient PC or hospice services * Cognitive or psychiatric conditions as determined by the treating oncologist to prohibit study consent or participation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient-reported Quality of Life24 WeeksQuality of life as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung Range 0-136 with higher scores indicating better quality of life

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Proportion of Patients Who Self-report Discussing Their End of Life Care Preferences With Their Clinicians48 weeks (or last assessment prior to death if before 48 weeks)Compare the proportion of patients who report that they discussed their end-of-life care preferences with their clinicians based on a single item from the perceptions of prognosis and treatment questionnaire (PTPQ). The PTPQ includes an item that measures patient report of communication about their wishes if they were dying (yes vs. no).
Length of Stay in HospiceFrom hospice enrollment until death during study period (i.e. 12-month follow up)Length of stay in hospice as collected per medical record review
Palliative Care Resource Utilizationweek 24Mean number of palliative care visits

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJennifer Temel, MD

Massachusetts General Hospital

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Stepped PC
* Patients will receive Stepped PC * During step 1, patients will be scheduled to meet with the outpatient PC clinician within four weeks of study enrollment and after they are admitted to the hospital or have a change in their cancer treatment * Patients will complete the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung (FACT-L) to monitor their quality of life every six weeks and if their quality of life deteriorates substantially, they will step up to step 2 of the protocol * Patients who transition to step 2 will then meet with the PC clinician at least every four weeks for the remainder of their illness Stepped PC: Palliative Care is involvement of a team of clinicians that specialize in lessening (or palliating) many of these distressing physical and emotional symptoms and in helping patients and their family cope with a serious illness improves patients' and their loved ones' experience with their cancer
250
Early Integrated PC
* Patients will receive Early Integrated PC * Patients will meet with the PC clinician within four weeks of enrollment and at least every four weeks throughout their course of illness Early Integrated PC: Palliative Care is involvement of a team of clinicians that specialize in lessening (or palliating) many of these distressing physical and emotional symptoms and in helping patients and their family cope with a serious illness improves patients' and their loved ones' experience with their cancer
257
Total507

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicStepped PCEarly Integrated PCTotal
Age, Continuous66.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2
66.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1
66.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.2
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Lung93.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.4
95.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.7
94.63 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.6
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants5 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
29 Participants28 Participants57 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants5 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants5 Participants6 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
215 Participants212 Participants427 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
250 participants257 participants507 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Man
120 participants126 participants246 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Missing
0 participants1 participants1 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Other
0 participants0 participants0 participants
Sex/Gender, Customized
Woman
130 participants130 participants260 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
161 / 250164 / 257
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 00 / 0
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 00 / 0

Outcome results

Primary

Patient-reported Quality of Life

Quality of life as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung Range 0-136 with higher scores indicating better quality of life

Time frame: 24 Weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Stepped PCPatient-reported Quality of Life100.62 score on a scale
Early Integrated PCPatient-reported Quality of Life97.75 score on a scale
Comparison: The difference in week 24 means between groups was estimated using a linear regression model adjusted for baseline FACT-L score.p-value: <0.05Regression, Linear
Secondary

Length of Stay in Hospice

Length of stay in hospice as collected per medical record review

Time frame: From hospice enrollment until death during study period (i.e. 12-month follow up)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Stepped PCLength of Stay in Hospice19.5 daysStandard Deviation 4.3
Early Integrated PCLength of Stay in Hospice34.6 daysStandard Deviation 4.2
Comparison: Among patients who died, non-inferiority of stepped PC in the mean length of stay in hospice was assessed using linear regression and a one-sided test against the pre-specified margin of -7 days, based upon published quality metrics.p-value: 0.15Regression, Linear
Secondary

Palliative Care Resource Utilization

Mean number of palliative care visits

Time frame: week 24

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Stepped PCPalliative Care Resource Utilization2.4 daysStandard Deviation 0.2
Early Integrated PCPalliative Care Resource Utilization4.7 daysStandard Deviation 0.1
Comparison: The difference between groups in the mean number of outpatient PC visits per patient by week 24 was assessed using linear regression and a two-sided superiority test.p-value: 0.1595% CI: [-2.7, -1.8]Regression, Linear
Secondary

Proportion of Patients Who Self-report Discussing Their End of Life Care Preferences With Their Clinicians

Compare the proportion of patients who report that they discussed their end-of-life care preferences with their clinicians based on a single item from the perceptions of prognosis and treatment questionnaire (PTPQ). The PTPQ includes an item that measures patient report of communication about their wishes if they were dying (yes vs. no).

Time frame: 48 weeks (or last assessment prior to death if before 48 weeks)

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Stepped PCProportion of Patients Who Self-report Discussing Their End of Life Care Preferences With Their Clinicians58 Participants
Early Integrated PCProportion of Patients Who Self-report Discussing Their End of Life Care Preferences With Their Clinicians62 Participants
Comparison: Non-inferiority of stepped PC in the proportion reporting patient-clinician communication about end-of-life care at each patient's final follow-up assessment was evaluated using a binomial generalized linear model with identity link and a one-sided test against the pre-specified margin of -10%.p-value: <0.15Regression, Linear
Other Pre-specified

Cost-effectiveness

Cost effectiveness as assessed by data collection from the medical record, hospital cost accounting systems, and patient report as per the EuroQOL

Time frame: up to 5 years

Other Pre-specified

Health Care Utilization

Healthcare utilization as measured the means and proportion of patients who experience emergency department visits, hospital admission, and chemotherapy administration at the end of life between the two groups.

Time frame: prior to death or end of study period

Other Pre-specified

Patients' Prognostic Understanding

Perception of Treatment and Prognosis Questionnaire (PTPQ)

Time frame: last assessment collected during study or prior to death

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 4, 2026