Skip to content

A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Bempedoic Acid Plus Ezetimibe Fixed-Dose Combination Compared to Bempedoic Acid, Ezetimibe, and Placebo in Patients Treated With Maximally Tolerated Statin Therapy

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Bempedoic Acid 180 Mg + Ezetimibe 10 Mg Fixed-Dose Combination Compared to Bempedoic Acid, Ezetimibe, and Placebo Alone in Patients Treated With Maximally Tolerated Statin Therapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03337308
Enrollment
382
Registered
2017-11-08
Start date
2017-10-23
Completion date
2018-07-18
Last updated
2020-04-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hyperlipidemias

Keywords

hyperlipidemia, heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, high cholesterol, ASCVD, HeFH, LDL

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if Bempedoic Acid (BA) + Ezetimibe (EZE) in a fixed-dose combination (FDC) is effective and safe versus its individual components and placebo in patients with elevated LDL cholesterol treated with maximally tolerated statin therapy.

Interventions

COMBINATION_PRODUCTBempedoic Acid + Ezetimibe Fixed-Dose Combination

bempedoic acid + ezetimibe FDC 180 mg/10 mg tablet

DRUGBempedoic Acid

bempedoic acid 180 mg tablet

DRUGEzetimibe

ezetimibe 10 mg overencapsulated tablet

DRUGPlacebos

placebo tablet or capsule to match bempedoic acid + ezetimibe fixed-dose combination (FDC) 180 mg/10 mg tablet, or bempedoic acid 180 mg tablet, or ezetimibe 10 mg capsule

Sponsors

Esperion Therapeutics, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Require lipid-modifying therapy for primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease * Fasting LDL-C ≥ 130 mg/dL for primary prevention or LDL-C ≥ 100 mg/dL for secondary prevention (history of HeFH and/or ASCVD) * Treated with maximally tolerated statin therapy at stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to screening

Exclusion criteria

* Total Fasting Triglyceride ≥ 400 mg/dL * Renal Dysfunction or nephrotic syndrome or history of nephritis * Significant cardiovascular disease or cardiovascular event within the past 3 months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)Baseline; Week 12Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast (water was allowed) at pre-specified intervals. Samples were collected and analyzed for LDL-C. Baseline was defined as the mean of the LDL-C values from Week -2 and predose Day 1/Week 0. Percent change from baseline in LDL-C was analyzed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with treatment group and randomization stratification as a factors and baseline LDL-C as a covariate. Percent change from baseline was calculated as: (\[LDL-C value at Week 12 minus Baseline value\] divided by \[Baseline Value\]) multiplied by 100. For LDL-C, if measured LDL-C value was available, measured LDL-C was used.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C)Baseline; Week 12Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast (water was allowed) at pre-specified intervals. Samples were collected and analyzed for non-HDL-C. Baseline was defined as the mean of the non-HDL-C values from Week -2 and predose Day 1/Week 0. Percent change from baseline in non-HDL-C was analyzed using ANCOVA with treatment group and randomization stratification as a factors and baseline non-HDL-C as a covariate. Percent change from baseline was calculated as: (\[non-HDL-C value at Week 12 minus Baseline value\] divided by \[Baseline Value\]) multiplied by 100.
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Total Cholesterol (TC)Baseline; Week 12Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast (water was allowed) at pre-specified intervals. Samples were collected and analyzed for TC. Baseline was defined as the mean of the TC values from Week -2 and predose Day 1/Week 0. Percent change from baseline in TC was analyzed using ANCOVA with treatment group and randomization stratification as a factors and baseline TC as a covariate. Percent change from baseline was calculated as: (\[TC value at Week 12 minus Baseline value\] divided by \[Baseline Value\]) multiplied by 100.
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)Baseline; Week 12Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast (water was allowed) at pre-specified intervals. Samples were collected and analyzed for hsCRP. Baseline was defined as the predose Day 1/Week 0 value. Percent change from baseline in hsCRP was analyzed using a non-parametric analysis. Percent change from baseline was calculated as: (\[hsCRP value at Week 12 minus Baseline value\] divided by \[Baseline Value\]) multiplied by 100.
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)Baseline; Week 12Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast (water was allowed) at pre-specified intervals. Samples were collected and analyzed for HDL-C. Baseline was defined as the mean of the HDL-C values from Week -2 and predose Day 1/Week 0. Percent change from baseline was calculated as: (\[HDL-C value at Week 12 minus Baseline value\] divided by \[Baseline Value\]) multiplied by 100.
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Triglycerides (TGs)Baseline; Week 12Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast (water was allowed) at pre-specified intervals. Samples were collected and analyzed for TGs. Baseline was defined as the mean of the TGs values from Week -2 and predose Day 1/Week 0. Percent change from baseline was calculated as: (\[TGs value at Week 12 minus Baseline value\] divided by \[Baseline Value\]) multiplied by 100.
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B)Baseline; Week 12Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast (water was allowed) at pre-specified intervals. Samples were collected and analyzed for apo B. Baseline was defined as the predose Day 1/Week 0 value. Percent change from baseline in apo B was analyzed using ANCOVA with treatment group and randomization stratification as a factors and baseline apo B as a covariate. Percent change from baseline was calculated as: (\[apo B value at Week 12 minus Baseline value\] divided by \[Baseline Value\]) multiplied by 100.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Data are presented for the Full Analysis Set, comprised of all randomized participants. One participant was randomized but was not treated.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Bempedoic Acid 180 mg + Ezetimibe 10 mg FDC
Participants received bempedoic acid + ezetimibe fixed-dose combination (FDC) 180 milligrams (mg)/10 mg tablets orally once daily for 12 weeks.
108
Bempedoic Acid 180 mg
Participants received bempedoic acid 180 mg tablets taken orally once daily for 12 weeks.
110
Ezetimibe 10 mg
Participants received ezetimibe 10 mg overencapsulated tablets orally once daily for 12 weeks.
109
Placebo
Participants received placebo to match the bempedoic acid + ezetimibe FDC 180 mg/10 mg tablet, the bempedoic acid 180 mg tablet, or the ezetimibe 10 mg capsule, taken orally, once daily for 12 weeks.
55
Total382

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event2331
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up1200
Overall StudyProtocol Violation0100
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject2121

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBempedoic Acid 180 mg + Ezetimibe 10 mg FDCBempedoic Acid 180 mgEzetimibe 10 mgPlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous63.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.97
65.2 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.54
64.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.91
65.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.74
64.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.68
Apolipoprotein B (apo B)121.1 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 30.85
113.4 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 26.43
115.5 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 31.3
115.1 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 32.52
116.4 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.98
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
32 Participants33 Participants32 Participants20 Participants117 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
76 Participants77 Participants77 Participants35 Participants265 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C)49.19 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.566
49.89 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.383
51.23 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.902
50.40 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.067
50.14 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.256
High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP)3.08 milligrams per liter (mg/L)2.91 milligrams per liter (mg/L)2.78 milligrams per liter (mg/L)3.01 milligrams per liter (mg/L)2.96 milligrams per liter (mg/L)
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)153.80 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 40.526
145.13 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 38.456
148.80 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 41.839
152.80 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 46.773
149.70 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL)
STANDARD_DEVIATION 41.162
Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C)188.22 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 46.657
175.67 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 40.474
180.18 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 47.308
180.91 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 49.72
181.26 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 45.595
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
20 Participants19 Participants16 Participants7 Participants62 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
85 Participants90 Participants91 Participants48 Participants314 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
58 Participants65 Participants57 Participants22 Participants202 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
50 Participants45 Participants52 Participants33 Participants180 Participants
Total cholesterol (TC)237.32 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 48.694
225.55 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 43.165
231.41 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 50.478
231.27 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 50.21
231.36 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 47.857
Triglycerides (TGs)177.19 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 94.904
156.65 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 71.985
161.73 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 79.924
144.59 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 55.814
162.33 mg/dL
STANDARD_DEVIATION 79.973

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 1070 / 1100 / 1090 / 55
other
Total, other adverse events
26 / 10727 / 11026 / 10912 / 55
serious
Total, serious adverse events
8 / 1077 / 11010 / 1091 / 55

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)

Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast (water was allowed) at pre-specified intervals. Samples were collected and analyzed for LDL-C. Baseline was defined as the mean of the LDL-C values from Week -2 and predose Day 1/Week 0. Percent change from baseline in LDL-C was analyzed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with treatment group and randomization stratification as a factors and baseline LDL-C as a covariate. Percent change from baseline was calculated as: (\[LDL-C value at Week 12 minus Baseline value\] divided by \[Baseline Value\]) multiplied by 100. For LDL-C, if measured LDL-C value was available, measured LDL-C was used.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 12

Population: Full Analysis Set (FAS), also known as the intention-to-treat set, was defined as all randomized participants. After a Root Cause Analysis, three sites were found not to have followed Good Clinical Practice; therefore, analysis was completed with all efficacy data from these sites removed.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Bempedoic Acid 180 mg + Ezetimibe 10 mg FDCPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)-36.2 Percent ChangeStandard Error 2.56
Bempedoic Acid 180 mgPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)-17.2 Percent ChangeStandard Error 2.52
Ezetimibe 10 mgPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)-23.2 Percent ChangeStandard Error 2.18
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)1.8 Percent ChangeStandard Error 3.49
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-46.5, -29.6]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-26.1, -11.9]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-19.7, -6.5]ANCOVA
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B)

Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast (water was allowed) at pre-specified intervals. Samples were collected and analyzed for apo B. Baseline was defined as the predose Day 1/Week 0 value. Percent change from baseline in apo B was analyzed using ANCOVA with treatment group and randomization stratification as a factors and baseline apo B as a covariate. Percent change from baseline was calculated as: (\[apo B value at Week 12 minus Baseline value\] divided by \[Baseline Value\]) multiplied by 100.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 12

Population: FAS. After a Root Cause Analysis, three sites were found not to have followed Good Clinical Practice; therefore, analysis was completed with all efficacy data from these sites removed. Only participants with available data were analyzed.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Bempedoic Acid 180 mg + Ezetimibe 10 mg FDCPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B)-24.6 Percent changeStandard Error 2.38
Bempedoic Acid 180 mgPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B)-11.8 Percent changeStandard Error 2.18
Ezetimibe 10 mgPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B)-15.3 Percent changeStandard Error 1.97
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B)5.5 Percent changeStandard Error 2.97
p-value: <0.00199% CI: [-39.9, -20.3]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00198% CI: [-20.3, -5.3]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.00398% CI: [-16.5, -2.1]ANCOVA
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)

Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast (water was allowed) at pre-specified intervals. Samples were collected and analyzed for HDL-C. Baseline was defined as the mean of the HDL-C values from Week -2 and predose Day 1/Week 0. Percent change from baseline was calculated as: (\[HDL-C value at Week 12 minus Baseline value\] divided by \[Baseline Value\]) multiplied by 100.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 12

Population: FAS. Only participants with available data were analyzed. After a Root Cause Analysis, three sites were found not to have followed Good Clinical Practice; therefore, analysis was completed with all efficacy data from these sites removed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Bempedoic Acid 180 mg + Ezetimibe 10 mg FDCPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)-5.59 Percent changeStandard Deviation 12.269
Bempedoic Acid 180 mgPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)-5.40 Percent changeStandard Deviation 14.688
Ezetimibe 10 mgPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)-2.11 Percent changeStandard Deviation 11.59
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)-0.54 Percent changeStandard Deviation 12.799
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)

Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast (water was allowed) at pre-specified intervals. Samples were collected and analyzed for hsCRP. Baseline was defined as the predose Day 1/Week 0 value. Percent change from baseline in hsCRP was analyzed using a non-parametric analysis. Percent change from baseline was calculated as: (\[hsCRP value at Week 12 minus Baseline value\] divided by \[Baseline Value\]) multiplied by 100.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 12

Population: FAS. Only participants with available data were analyzed. After a Root Cause Analysis, three sites were found not to have followed Good Clinical Practice;therefore, analysis was completed with all efficacy data from these sites removed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Bempedoic Acid 180 mg + Ezetimibe 10 mg FDCPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)-35.1 Percent Change
Bempedoic Acid 180 mgPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)-31.9 Percent Change
Ezetimibe 10 mgPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)-8.2 Percent Change
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)21.6 Percent Change
p-value: <0.00199% CI: [-78.75, -15.78]Wilcoxon rank sum test
p-value: 0.00298% CI: [-45, -7.15]Wilcoxon rank sum test
p-value: 0.73498% CI: [-21.35, 16.25]Wilcoxon rank sum test
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C)

Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast (water was allowed) at pre-specified intervals. Samples were collected and analyzed for non-HDL-C. Baseline was defined as the mean of the non-HDL-C values from Week -2 and predose Day 1/Week 0. Percent change from baseline in non-HDL-C was analyzed using ANCOVA with treatment group and randomization stratification as a factors and baseline non-HDL-C as a covariate. Percent change from baseline was calculated as: (\[non-HDL-C value at Week 12 minus Baseline value\] divided by \[Baseline Value\]) multiplied by 100.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 12

Population: FAS. After a Root Cause Analysis, three sites were found not to have followed Good Clinical Practice; therefore, analysis was completed with all efficacy data from these sites removed.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Bempedoic Acid 180 mg + Ezetimibe 10 mg FDCPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C)-31.9 Percent changeStandard Error 2.23
Bempedoic Acid 180 mgPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C)-14.1 Percent changeStandard Error 2.17
Ezetimibe 10 mgPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C)-19.9 Percent changeStandard Error 2.05
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C)1.8 Percent changeStandard Error 3.28
p-value: <0.00199% CI: [-43.9, -23.4]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00198% CI: [-25.1, -10.5]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00198% CI: [-19.1, -5]ANCOVA
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Total Cholesterol (TC)

Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast (water was allowed) at pre-specified intervals. Samples were collected and analyzed for TC. Baseline was defined as the mean of the TC values from Week -2 and predose Day 1/Week 0. Percent change from baseline in TC was analyzed using ANCOVA with treatment group and randomization stratification as a factors and baseline TC as a covariate. Percent change from baseline was calculated as: (\[TC value at Week 12 minus Baseline value\] divided by \[Baseline Value\]) multiplied by 100.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 12

Population: FAS. Only participants with available data were analyzed. After a Root Cause Analysis, three sites were found not to have followed Good Clinical Practice; therefore, analysis was completed with all efficacy data from these sites removed.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Bempedoic Acid 180 mg + Ezetimibe 10 mg FDCPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Total Cholesterol (TC)-26.4 Percent changeStandard Error 1.9
Bempedoic Acid 180 mgPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Total Cholesterol (TC)-12.1 Percent changeStandard Error 1.83
Ezetimibe 10 mgPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Total Cholesterol (TC)-16.0 Percent changeStandard Error 1.59
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Total Cholesterol (TC)0.7 Percent changeStandard Error 2.46
p-value: <0.00199% CI: [-35.1, -19.1]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00198% CI: [-20.4, -8.1]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.00198% CI: [-16.1, -4.6]ANCOVA
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Triglycerides (TGs)

Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast (water was allowed) at pre-specified intervals. Samples were collected and analyzed for TGs. Baseline was defined as the mean of the TGs values from Week -2 and predose Day 1/Week 0. Percent change from baseline was calculated as: (\[TGs value at Week 12 minus Baseline value\] divided by \[Baseline Value\]) multiplied by 100.

Time frame: Baseline; Week 12

Population: FAS. Only participants with available data were analyzed. After a Root Cause Analysis, three sites were found not to have followed Good Clinical Practice; therefore, analysis was completed with all efficacy data from these sites removed.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Bempedoic Acid 180 mg + Ezetimibe 10 mg FDCPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Triglycerides (TGs)-7.90 Percent changeStandard Deviation 25.633
Bempedoic Acid 180 mgPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Triglycerides (TGs)7.94 Percent changeStandard Deviation 42.312
Ezetimibe 10 mgPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Triglycerides (TGs)-2.46 Percent changeStandard Deviation 33.402
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Triglycerides (TGs)5.47 Percent changeStandard Deviation 31.992

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026