Skip to content

Efficacy of Chlorhexidine as a Final Irrigant in Single-visit Root Canal Treatment

Efficacy of Chlorhexidine as a Final Irrigant in Single-visit Root Canal Treatment: A Prospective Comparative Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03336970
Enrollment
82
Registered
2017-11-08
Start date
2011-01-01
Completion date
2014-06-01
Last updated
2017-11-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Root Canal Infection

Keywords

single visit root canal treatment, chlorhexidine

Brief summary

Ninety asymptomatic maxillary anterior teeth with periapical lesions were treated in single versus multiple visit root canal treatment. Half of the teeth were randomly assigned to the single-visit (SV) group and received an additional final rinse with 2% CHX before obturation. The other teeth were treated in multiple visits (MV) with calcium hydroxide dressing. All patients were recalled and investigated clinically and radiographically for 24 months.

Detailed description

The aim of the study was to evaluate postoperative pain and radiographic evidence of periapical healing in teeth with apical periodontitis treated in a single visit with an additional final irrigation using 2% chlorhexidine and to compare the results with conventional multiple-visit root canal treatment (RCT) with an intracanal calcium hydroxide dressing as a control group. Ninety asymptomatic maxillary anterior teeth with periapical lesions were treated by a single operator using the step-back technique with manual instrumentation with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and 5% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) as irrigants. Half of the teeth were randomly assigned to the single-visit (SV) group and received an additional final rinse with 2% chlorhexidine (CHX) before obturation. The other teeth were treated in multiple visits (MV), after completion of root canal instrumentation calcium hydroxide paste was placed into the root canal and root canal obturation was performed in second visit. All patients were recalled and investigated clinically and radiographically for 24 months. Postoperative pain at 24-48 hours and changes in apical bone density indicating radiographic healing were evaluated statistically using the Mann-Whitney U-test followed by the Friedman and the Wilcoxon tests (α=.05).

Interventions

OTHEREDTA
OTHERNaOCl
OTHERCHX
OTHERCalcium hydroxide

Sponsors

Mehmet Kemal Çalışkan
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* patients with a non-contributory medical history, * mature maxillary anterior teeth with periapical lesions (\< 5 mm), * diagnosed as asymptomatic apical periodontitis.

Exclusion criteria

* clinical symptoms, drainage, * more than 5 mm loss of periodontal attachment, * previous endodontic treatment, * non-restorable tooth.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The rate of radiographic healing of the periapical lesion6,12 and 24 monthsFollow-up visits were performed after 6, 12 and 24 months for all patients in order to evaluate radiographic status. Changes in apical bone density indicating radiographic healing was assessed by the periapical index (PAI).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The level of postoperative pain24 hours and 48 hoursPostoperative pain after 24 and 48 hours, was measured using a modified 4-grade visual analogue scale (VAS) ranging from 1 (no pain), 2 (mild pain), 3 (moderate pain/pain relieved by analgesics), to 4 (severe pain).

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026