Skip to content

Two-Piece Zirconia Dental Implant vs Two-Piece Titanium Dental Implant- Randomized Clinical Control Trial

Inflammation and Microbiology Pattern on Two-piece Zirconia Dental Implant Compared to Titanium Dental Implants. Randomized Clinical Control Trial

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03336723
Enrollment
60
Registered
2017-11-08
Start date
2018-01-01
Completion date
2019-01-01
Last updated
2017-11-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osseointegration Failure of Dental Implant Due to Infection, Osseointegration Failure of Dental Implant Prior to Intentional Prosthetic Loading

Brief summary

2 Arms (60 subjects - 30 each arm). Experimental group with two-pice zirconia dental implant and Control group with two-piece titanium dental implant Evaluate Changes in inflammatory and microbiology levels from T0 (baseline) T2 (8 weeks) and T3 (after crown placement) Also evaluate secondary outcomes: marginal bone loss (MBL), gingival height (GH) levels, osseointegration, gender, age, time of surgery, anatomical position and implant stability. p values\<0.05 were considered statistically significant

Interventions

DEVICEDental Implant

Place a two piece zirconia dental implant on a healed ridge. At baseline, two month and crown placement take fluid samples with adsorbent paper in the per- implant crevicular fluid. At t2 and t3 repeat sample taken

Sponsors

Implantology Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Single implants in any area (maxillary and mandibular), extracted teeth for at least 3 months before implant placement, with bone volumes sufficient (at least 2 mm mesial, distal, buccal and palatal) to accommodate dental implant without the need for regeneration. Controlled oral hygiene, absence of any lesions in the oral cavity, at least 2 mm keratinized tissue. In addition, patients must agree to participate in a postoperative control program and signed the informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1 - allergic to local anaesthetics, or any of the other components. 2 - Patients with hepatic or renal dysfunction 3 - Patients with epilepsy, shock, cardiac conduction disorders or myasthenia gravis 4 - Patients with myocardial injury 5 - Hyperthyroidism 6 - Severe Hypertension 7 - Insufficient bone volume 8 - Smoking more than five cigarettes / day 9 - Excessive alcohol consumption 10 - localized anti-tumour radiation therapy of the oral cavity 11 - Chemotherapy 12 - Liver Diseases 13 - immunosuppressed patients 14 - Patients taking corticosteroids 15 - Pregnancy 16 - inflammatory and autoimmune diseases of the oral cavity \-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Osseointegrationfrom T0 to T2 - 2 monthmeasure if the healing process of bone was successful
Marginal bone loss4 month after T0measure bone level from T0 baseline to T3
IL1b concentration4 monthMeasure IL fluid at T0 and T2 for IL1b characterization
IL6 concentration4 monthMeasure IL fluid at T0 and T2 for IL1b characterization
Microbiologic samples4 monthMeasure crevicular fluid at T0 and T2 for bacteria characterization

Contacts

Primary ContactElena cervino, DMD
elecer@gmail.com00351919774343

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026