Skip to content

Improving Recovery After Orthopaedic Trauma: Cognitive-Behavioral Based Physical Therapy (CBPT)

Improving Recovery After Orthopaedic Trauma: Cognitive-Behavioral Based Physical Therapy (CBPT)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03335657
Acronym
CBPT
Enrollment
633
Registered
2017-11-08
Start date
2018-07-18
Completion date
2021-07-18
Last updated
2025-09-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lower Extremity Injury

Brief summary

The goal of the CBPT study is to determine the efficacy of the CBPT program for improving outcomes in service members and civilians at-risk for poor outcomes following traumatic lower-extremity injury. Primary outcome is physical function measured through a patient-reported questionnaire and physical performance tests. Secondary outcomes include pain and general health. Tertiary outcome is return to work/duty.

Detailed description

Following extremity injury, referral (and direct access) to physical therapy (PT) is considered standard of care. And, while PT strategies are commonly impairment focused, clinicians across multiple subspecialties of physical therapy recognize the importance of addressing pain and pain-related psychosocial factors as strong predictors of chronic pain as well as long-term physical and psychological disability. Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) interventions have documented positive influence on psychosocial factors in patients with chronic pain. CBT-based self-management programs have also demonstrated improvement in patient outcomes and the adoption of a physically active lifestyle, as well as improvement in fear-avoidance beliefs and self-efficacy, in various populations with chronic conditions. These evidence-based CBT and self-management strategies provide the basis for the study intervention. The proposed project will conduct a multi-center, randomized controlled trial to determine the efficacy of the CBPT program in patients at-risk for poor outcomes following traumatic lower-extremity injury. Central hypothesis is that delivery of CBPT by physical therapists over the telephone will improve outcomes, through reductions in pain catastrophizing and fear of movement and improvement in pain self-efficacy. The investigators propose a large, rigorous evaluation of the CBPT program in patients with lower extremity trauma with the goal of engaging civilians and service members in their own care and improving pain and functional outcomes. Specific Aim 1 To determine the efficacy of the CBPT program for improving outcomes in service members and civilians at-risk for poor outcomes following traumatic lower-extremity injury. Primary outcome is physical function measured through a patient-reported questionnaire. Secondary outcomes include physical performance tests, pain and general health. Tertiary outcome is return to work/duty. Specific Aim 2 To determine whether changes in the intermediary outcomes of pain catastrophizing, fear of movement, and self-efficacy at 6 months are associated with improvement in outcomes 12 months after hospital discharge. Specific Aim 3 To determine whether subgroups of patients are more likely to benefit from the CBPT program. Specific Aim 4 To examine the value of CBPT relative to Education using Markov decision-analysis.

Interventions

OTHERCBPT

The CBPT program focuses on a patient-oriented cognitive-behavioral self-management approach to improve physical function and reduce pain, through reductions in pain catastrophizing and fear of movement and increases in self-efficacy.

OTHEREducation Treatment

Participants receiving the education control arm are receiving a placebo intervention to control for the attention of the interventionist. They will receive standardized educational material addressing recovery from orthopaedic trauma.

Sponsors

Major Extremity Trauma Research Consortium
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Ages 18-60 yrs inclusive 2. Patients with at least one acute orthopaedic injury to the lower extremities or pelvis/acetabulum (determination based on information available at the time of enrollment). 3. Injury resulting from a moderate to high energy force (e.g. motor vehicle or motorcycle crash, fall \> 10 ft, gun shot, blunt trauma) 4. Patients receiving operative fixation for one or more acute orthopaedic injuries at a participating hospital. Patients should be recruited at the time of primary injury, not revision or complication surgery 5. Presence of psychosocial risk factors for poor outcomes (defined as a score greater than 30 on the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) or a score equal to or greater than 39 on the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK) or a score equal to or less than 40 on the Pain Self Efficacy Scale (PSES)). These risk factors will be identified between 2 and 8 weeks after hospital discharge.

Exclusion criteria

1. Non-English speaking 2. Patients who are unable to start the program within 12 weeks of discharge from hospital because of multiple readmission, admission to a rehabilitation facility, or other extenuating circumstances 3. Patients with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), as evidenced by intracranial hemorrhage present on admission CT. If no CT performed, patient assumed not to have moderate or severe TBI 4. Patients with major amputations of the upper or lower extremities (great toe, thumb, or proximal to the wrist or ankle) 5. Patients who require a Legally Authorized Representative (as defined by an inability to answer the Evaluation of Give Consent questions) 6. Patients non-ambulatory pre-injury or due to an associated spinal cord injury 7. History of dementia or Alzheimer's disease based on medical record or patient self-report 8. History of neurological disorder, disease or event, resulting in prior cognitive and/or physical impairment, such as prior TBI or stroke based on medical record or patient self-report 9. Presence of schizophrenia or other psychotic disorder based on medical record or patient self-report 10. Current alcohol and/or drug addiction based on medical record or patient self-report 11. Severe problems with maintaining follow-up expected (e.g. patients who are incarcerated or homeless)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Physical Function- self-reported capability to carry out activities12 monthsPhysical Function measured through Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS)/ Physical Function (short form) domain to assess one's ability to carry out activities that require a combination of skills, often within a social context. This instrument has five response options ranging in value from one to five for each question. The total raw score is the sum of values of the response for each question The highest possible raw score is 40 which represents the worse outcome. The lowest possible score is 8 and it represents the better outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain_ self reported12 monthsPain measured through Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS)/ Pain Intensity (short form) Domain at 12-months following hospital discharge. This tool has five response options ranging in value from one to five for each question. The total raw score is the sum of values of the response for each question The highest possible raw score is 15 which represents the worse outcome. The lowest possible score is 3 and it represents the better outcome.
General Health12 monthsGeneral Health measured through the Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey (VR-12)/ General Health Domain at 12-months following hospital discharge. This instrument has five response options ranging in value from one to five for each question. The total raw score is the sum of the values of the responses for each question. The highest possible raw score is 60, which represents the better outcome. The lowest possible score is 12, and it represents the worse outcome.
Physical Function- Balance and Agility12 monthsBalance and Agility measured through the Four Square Step test. Each individual will have time scores based on performance. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.
Physical Function-Leg Strength, Endurance, and Mobility12 monthsLeg Strength, Endurance, and Mobility measured through the Sit to Stand Five Times
Physical Function- Gait Speed12 monthsGait Speed measured through 10-Meter Walk test. Each individual will have time scores
Physical Function- Mobility and Power12 monthsMobility and Power measured through the Timed Stair Ascent test. Each individual will have time scores based on performance. Higher scores represent worse outcomes.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Return to work/duty6 monthsMeasured through the rate of return to work/duty 6 months post discharge

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 13, 2026