Skip to content

An Exploratory Study to Evaluate the Prophylactic Efficacy of a Single Immunization of Ad26.RSV.preF Against Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection in a Virus Challenge Model in Healthy 18 to 50 Year-old Adults

An Exploratory, Phase 2a, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Prophylactic Efficacy of a Single Immunization of Ad26.RSV.preF Against Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection in a Virus Challenge Model in Healthy 18 to 50 Year-Old Adults

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03334695
Enrollment
64
Registered
2017-11-07
Start date
2017-10-16
Completion date
2018-11-27
Last updated
2025-02-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess a trend for the prophylactic efficacy of a single dose of 1\*10\^11 virus particles (vp) of adenovirus serotype 26 respiratory syncytial virus pre-fusion F protein (Ad26.RSV.preF) administered intramuscularly to adults aged 18-50 years in the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) challenge model in terms of reduction of nasal wash viral load compared to placebo.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALAd26.RSV.preF

Ad26.RSV.preF will be administered as intramuscular injection at a dose of 1\*10\^11 vp in single-use vials.

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo will be administered as sterile 0.9% saline for injection.

Sponsors

Janssen Vaccines & Prevention B.V.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Each participant must sign an Informed Consent Form (ICF) indicating that he or she understands the purpose of and procedures required for the study, is willing to participate in the study and attend all scheduled visits, is willing to be isolated and stay in the clinic for the quarantine phase, and is willing and able to comply with all study procedures and adhere to the prohibitions and restrictions specified in this protocol * Participants must be in good health, without significant medical illness, on the basis of a medical evaluation that reveals the absence of any clinically relevant abnormality and includes a physical examination (including height and weight), skin examination, medical history, vital signs (systolic and diastolic blood pressure and heart rate, respiratory rate, and body temperature), and the results of clinical laboratory tests performed within 56 days of vaccination. If there are abnormalities, the participant may be included only if the investigator judges the abnormalities or deviations from normal to be not clinically significant. This determination must be recorded in the participant's source documents and initialed by the investigator * Participants must have a non-clinically significant 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) within 56 days of vaccination including: normal sinus rhythm (heart rate between 50 and 100 beats per minute \[bpm\], extremes included); QT interval corrected for heart rate according to Fridericia (QTcF) interval less than or equal to (\<=) 450 millisecond (ms); QT interval corrected for heart rate according to Bazett (QTcB) interval \<= 450 ms; QRS interval less than (\<) 120 ms; PR interval \<= 210 ms * Participants must be sero-suitable for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) within 90 days of vaccination (low immunity to the RSV-A Memphis 37b virus using a virus neutralization assay * Participant must be healthy on the basis of clinical laboratory tests performed within 56 days of vaccination. If the results of the laboratory screening tests are outside the local laboratory normal reference ranges and additionally within the limits of toxicity Grade 1 according to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) toxicity tables (that is, for tests in the FDA table), the participant may be included only if the investigator judges the abnormalities or deviations from normal to be not clinically significant and appropriate and reasonable for the population under study. This determination must be recorded in the participant's source documents and initialed by the investigator

Exclusion criteria

* Participant has acute illness (this does not include minor illnesses such as diarrhea) or temperature greater than or equal to (\>=) 37.8 degree Centigrade within 24 hours prior to study vaccination * Participant has history of malignancy (exceptions are basal cell carcinomas of the skin treated over 5 years prior to vaccination considered cured with minimal risk of recurrence) * Participant has chronic active hepatitis B or hepatitis C infection, documented by hepatitis B surface antigen and hepatitis C antibody, respectively Viral Challenge

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Area Under the Viral Load-Time Curve (VL-AUC) of Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) by Quantitative Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR)From Day 2 to Day 12VL-AUC for RSV was determined by qRT-PCR assay of nasal wash samples. Here, values below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) were imputed with zero.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Viral Load by Quantitative RT-PCR Assay on Day 6 and 7Day 6 (0 hour and 12 hours) and Day 7 (0 hour and 12 hours)Viral load determined by quantitative RT-PCR assay of nasal wash samples on Day 6 and Day 7 were reported. Here, values below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) were imputed with zero.
VL-AUC of RSV by Quantitative Culture of RSV (Plaque Assay) on Day 6 and 7Day 6 (0 hour and 12 hours) and Day 7 (0 hour and 12 hours)VL-AUC of RSV by the quantitative culture of nasal wash samples on Day 6 and Day 7 were determined. pfu\*h/mL stands for plaque-forming units hour per millilitre.
Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic RSV InfectionsFrom Day 2 to Day 12Symptomatic RSV infection is defined in two ways (Conservative and Liberal). Conservative: participant had 2 or more quantifiable RT-PCR measurements on different samples, with one of following: symptoms of 2 different categories of subject symptom card (SSC) (Upper Respiratory \[runny/stuffy nose, sneezing, sore throat, earache\], Lower Respiratory \[cough, shortness of breath, chest tightness, wheeze\], Systemic \[malaise, headache, muscle and/or joint ache\]) regardless of grade and assessment timepoint or Grade 2 symptom from any category; Liberal (RT-PCR): had 2/more quantifiable RT-PCR measurements, with clinical symptom of any severity.
Total Clinical Symptoms Score at Day 6 and 7Day 6 and 7: morning, afternoon and eveningThe total clinical symptom score was determined as the sum of the scores (grades) ranges from 0 (no symptom) to 52 (severe symptoms) of the 13 self-reportable symptoms on the SSC. Clinical symptoms includes runny nose, stuffy nose, sneezing, sore throat, ear ache, malaise, headache, muscle and/or joint ache, chilliness/ feverishness, cough, chest tightness, shortness of breath and wheeze. For every separate symptom, the score ranges from 0 (I have no symptom) to 4 (its quite bothersome most of the times and stop from participating in activities).
Weight of Mucus Secretions Over TimeDay 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12The weight mucous over time was determined in grams using eCRF forms. Participants were given pre-weighed packets of paper tissues. After each tissue was used for nose blowing or sneezing, the participants should store them in an airtight plastic bag to calculate the weight of mucus from Day 0 to Day 12. All paper tissues used by each participant were collected for each 24-hour period up to Day 12, to determine daily mucus weight.
Number of Tissues Used Over TimeDay 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12Number of tissues used by participant per time point were reported using eCRF forms. Participants were given pre-weighed packets of paper tissues. After each tissue was used for nose blowing or sneezing, the participants should store them in an airtight plastic bag to calculate the number of tissues used from Day 0 to Day 12. All paper tissues used by each participant were collected for each 24-hour period up to Day 12, to determine daily number of tissues used.
Peak Viral Load of RSV-A Memphis 37bFrom Day 2 to Day 12Peak viral load of RSV-A Memphis 37b was defined as the maximum viral load as determined by quantitative RT-PCR assay of nasal wash samples. Here, values below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) were imputed with zero.
Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Up to 6 months post-vaccination and up to 6 months post-challengeA SAE is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.
Percentage of Participants With Solicited Local and Systemic AEs7 days post-vaccination (Day -21)Solicited local AEs: erythema, swelling/induration, and pain/tenderness. Solicited systemic AEs: fatigue, headache, myalgia, arthralgia, chills, nausea and fever.
Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesUp to Day 28 post-challengePercentage of participants with vital signs abnormalities were reported. Vital signs measurements included body temperature (measured in degree celsius from less than \[\<\] 37.5 to \<39.5), respiratory rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and pulse rate, which were graded by FDA Toxicity Grading Scale Grade 0 (=no grade), Grade 1 (=mild), Grade 2 (=moderate), Grade 3 (=severe) and Grade 4 (=potentially life-threatening).
Percentage of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesUp to Day 12 post challengeECG parameters included heart rate, PR, QRS, QTcB, QTcF, and the uncorrected QT interval which were graded by FDA Toxicity Grading Scale Grade 0 (=no grade), Grade 1 (=mild), Grade 2 (=moderate), Grade 3 (=severe) and Grade 4 (=potentially life-threatening).
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Up to Day 28 post-challengePercentage of participants with clinical laboratory abnormalities were reported. The biochemical and hematological parameters analyzed were- Alanine aminotransferase (AA), Alkaline phosphatase (AP), Aspartate aminotransferase (AsP), Hyperkalemia, Hypernatremia, Hypoglycemia, Hypophosphatemia, Hemoglobin, Neutrophils, White blood cell (WBC) - increase and Urine protein, which were graded by FDA Toxicity Grading Scale Grade 0 (=no grade), Grade 1 (=mild), Grade 2 (=moderate), Grade 3 (=severe) and Grade 4 (=potentially life-threatening).
Percentage of Participants With Unsolicited Adverse Events (AEs)Up to 28 days post-vaccination and up to 28 days post-challengeUnsolicited AEs are all AEs for which participants were specifically not questioned in the participant diary. An AE is any untoward medical event that occurs in a participant administered an investigational product, and it does not necessarily indicate only events with a clear causal relationship with the relevant investigational product.

Countries

United Kingdom

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

In total, 64 participants were screened. Of these, 63 participants were randomized and received the study vaccine. One participant was randomized in error and did not receive the study vaccine hence not included in the analyses.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)
Participants received a single intramuscular injection of 1\*10\^11 vp (viral particles) of adenovirus serotype 26 respiratory syncytial virus pre-fusion conformation-stabilized F protein (Ad26.RSV.preF) on Day -28 followed by intranasal challenge with a respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)-A Memphis 37b virus on Day 0 (24 to 90 days after vaccination).
31
Placebo
Participants received a single intramuscular injection of matching placebo on Day -28 followed by intranasal challenge with RSV-A Memphis 37b virus on Day 0 (24 to 90 days after vaccination).
32
Total63

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up33
Overall StudyPhysician Decision12
Overall StudyProtocol Violation01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAd26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)TotalPlacebo
Age, Continuous25.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.19
25.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.33
25.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.56
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
30 Participants62 Participants32 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
3 Participants4 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants5 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
24 Participants52 Participants28 Participants
Region of Enrollment
UNITED KINGDOM
31 Participants63 Participants32 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
12 Participants18 Participants6 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
19 Participants45 Participants26 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 310 / 320 / 270 / 26
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 319 / 3216 / 2716 / 26
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 310 / 321 / 270 / 26

Outcome results

Primary

Area Under the Viral Load-Time Curve (VL-AUC) of Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) by Quantitative Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR)

VL-AUC for RSV was determined by qRT-PCR assay of nasal wash samples. Here, values below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) were imputed with zero.

Time frame: From Day 2 to Day 12

Population: The Intent-to-treat-Challenge (ITTc) population is a subset of the Full Analysis Set (FAS) (all participants who were randomized and received study vaccine, regardless of the occurrence of protocol deviations) included all randomized, vaccinated and challenged participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Area Under the Viral Load-Time Curve (VL-AUC) of Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) by Quantitative Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR)0 log10 copies*hour per millilitre (h/mL)
PlaceboArea Under the Viral Load-Time Curve (VL-AUC) of Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) by Quantitative Reverse Transcriptase-Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR)236 log10 copies*hour per millilitre (h/mL)
p-value: 0.012Wilcoxon Rank Sum test
Secondary

Number of Tissues Used Over Time

Number of tissues used by participant per time point were reported using eCRF forms. Participants were given pre-weighed packets of paper tissues. After each tissue was used for nose blowing or sneezing, the participants should store them in an airtight plastic bag to calculate the number of tissues used from Day 0 to Day 12. All paper tissues used by each participant were collected for each 24-hour period up to Day 12, to determine daily number of tissues used.

Time frame: Day 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12

Population: The Intent-to-treat-Challenge (ITTc) population is a subset of the Full Analysis Set (FAS) (all participants who were randomized and received study vaccine, regardless of the occurrence of protocol deviations) included all randomized, vaccinated and challenged participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Number of Tissues Used Over TimeDay 22.9 TissuesStandard Error 0.65
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Number of Tissues Used Over TimeDay 72.8 TissuesStandard Error 0.92
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Number of Tissues Used Over TimeDay 42.3 TissuesStandard Error 0.49
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Number of Tissues Used Over TimeDay 82.0 TissuesStandard Error 0.71
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Number of Tissues Used Over TimeDay 11.7 TissuesStandard Error 0.41
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Number of Tissues Used Over TimeDay 92.3 TissuesStandard Error 0.72
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Number of Tissues Used Over TimeDay 52.1 TissuesStandard Error 0.81
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Number of Tissues Used Over TimeDay 101.8 TissuesStandard Error 0.61
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Number of Tissues Used Over TimeDay 31.9 TissuesStandard Error 0.45
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Number of Tissues Used Over TimeDay 111.6 TissuesStandard Error 0.47
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Number of Tissues Used Over TimeDay 62.4 TissuesStandard Error 0.77
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Number of Tissues Used Over TimeDay 121.4 TissuesStandard Error 0.4
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Number of Tissues Used Over TimeDay 01.8 TissuesStandard Error 0.53
PlaceboNumber of Tissues Used Over TimeDay 121.7 TissuesStandard Error 0.45
PlaceboNumber of Tissues Used Over TimeDay 00.7 TissuesStandard Error 0.33
PlaceboNumber of Tissues Used Over TimeDay 10.7 TissuesStandard Error 0.27
PlaceboNumber of Tissues Used Over TimeDay 21.2 TissuesStandard Error 0.32
PlaceboNumber of Tissues Used Over TimeDay 31.3 TissuesStandard Error 0.28
PlaceboNumber of Tissues Used Over TimeDay 41.5 TissuesStandard Error 0.31
PlaceboNumber of Tissues Used Over TimeDay 52.3 TissuesStandard Error 0.68
PlaceboNumber of Tissues Used Over TimeDay 65.1 TissuesStandard Error 1.59
PlaceboNumber of Tissues Used Over TimeDay 78.1 TissuesStandard Error 1.94
PlaceboNumber of Tissues Used Over TimeDay 85.2 TissuesStandard Error 1.38
PlaceboNumber of Tissues Used Over TimeDay 92.8 TissuesStandard Error 0.53
PlaceboNumber of Tissues Used Over TimeDay 102.7 TissuesStandard Error 0.61
PlaceboNumber of Tissues Used Over TimeDay 112.0 TissuesStandard Error 0.5
Secondary

Peak Viral Load of RSV-A Memphis 37b

Peak viral load of RSV-A Memphis 37b was defined as the maximum viral load as determined by quantitative RT-PCR assay of nasal wash samples. Here, values below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) were imputed with zero.

Time frame: From Day 2 to Day 12

Population: The Intent-to-treat-Challenge (ITTc) population is a subset of the Full Analysis Set (FAS) (all participants who were randomized and received study vaccine, regardless of the occurrence of protocol deviations) included all randomized, vaccinated and challenged participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Peak Viral Load of RSV-A Memphis 37b0.000 log10 copies per mL
PlaceboPeak Viral Load of RSV-A Memphis 37b5.365 log10 copies per mL
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)

Percentage of participants with clinical laboratory abnormalities were reported. The biochemical and hematological parameters analyzed were- Alanine aminotransferase (AA), Alkaline phosphatase (AP), Aspartate aminotransferase (AsP), Hyperkalemia, Hypernatremia, Hypoglycemia, Hypophosphatemia, Hemoglobin, Neutrophils, White blood cell (WBC) - increase and Urine protein, which were graded by FDA Toxicity Grading Scale Grade 0 (=no grade), Grade 1 (=mild), Grade 2 (=moderate), Grade 3 (=severe) and Grade 4 (=potentially life-threatening).

Time frame: Up to Day 28 post-challenge

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study vaccine, regardless of the occurrence of protocol deviations. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants analyzed for this OM at specified categories.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Challenge: AsA: Grade 114.8 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Challenge: AsA: Grade 23.7 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Challenge: AsA: Grade 40 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Challenge: Bilirubin: Grade 23.7 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Challenge: Hyperglycemia: Grade 10 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Challenge: Hyperkalemia: Grade 13.7 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Challenge: Hypernatremia: Grade 23.7 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Challenge: Hypophosphatemia:Grade 13.7 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Challenge: Hypoproteinemia:Grade 111.1 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Challenge: Eosinophils: Grade 10 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Challenge: Hemoglobin: Grade 17.4 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Challenge: Neutrophils: Grade 17.4 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Challenge: Platelets: Grade 13.7 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Challenge: Platelets: Grade 200 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Challenge: WBC increase: Grade 13.7 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Dose: Neutrophils: Grade 112.9 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Dose: Urine Protein: Grade 13.2 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Dose: AA: Grade 19.7 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Dose: AP: Grade 10 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Dose: AsA: Grade 16.5 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Dose: AsA: Grade 20 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Dose: Hyperkalemia: Grade 23.2 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Dose: Hypernatremia: Grade 23.2 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Dose: Hypoglycemia: Grade 20 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Dose: Hypophosphatemia:Grade 13.2 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Dose: Hypophosphatemia:Grade 29.7 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Dose: Hemoglobin: Grade 13.2 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Dose: Hemoglobin: Grade 23.2 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Dose: WBC increase: Grade 10 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Challenge: AA: Grade 125.9 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Challenge: AA: Grade 27.4 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Challenge: AP: Grade 10 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Dose: Hypophosphatemia:Grade 20 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Dose: AA: Grade 10 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Challenge: AsA: Grade 23.8 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Challenge: AA: Grade 115.4 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Challenge: AsA: Grade 43.8 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Dose: AP: Grade 13.1 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Challenge: Bilirubin: Grade 20 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Dose: Hemoglobin: Grade 13.1 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Challenge: Hyperglycemia: Grade 13.8 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Dose: AsA: Grade 10 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Challenge: Hyperkalemia: Grade 13.8 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Challenge: AP: Grade 13.8 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Challenge: Hypernatremia: Grade 20 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Dose: AsA: Grade 23.1 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Challenge: Hypophosphatemia:Grade 10 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Dose: Hemoglobin: Grade 20 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Challenge: Hypoproteinemia:Grade 10 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Dose: Hyperkalemia: Grade 20 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Challenge: Eosinophils: Grade 17.7 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Dose: Neutrophils: Grade 16.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Challenge: Hemoglobin: Grade 10 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Dose: Hypernatremia: Grade 20 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Challenge: Neutrophils: Grade 10 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Challenge: AA: Grade 23.8 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Challenge: Platelets: Grade 13.8 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Dose: Hypoglycemia: Grade 23.1 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Challenge: Platelets: Grade 203.8 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Dose: WBC increase: Grade 13.1 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Challenge: WBC increase: Grade 10 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Dose: Hypophosphatemia:Grade 10 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Challenge: AsA: Grade 115.4 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities (Graded)Post Dose: Urine Protein: Grade 13.1 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities

ECG parameters included heart rate, PR, QRS, QTcB, QTcF, and the uncorrected QT interval which were graded by FDA Toxicity Grading Scale Grade 0 (=no grade), Grade 1 (=mild), Grade 2 (=moderate), Grade 3 (=severe) and Grade 4 (=potentially life-threatening).

Time frame: Up to Day 12 post challenge

Population: The Intent-to-treat-Challenge (ITTc) population is a subset of the Full Analysis Set (FAS) (all participants who were randomized and received study vaccine, regardless of the occurrence of protocol deviations) included all randomized, vaccinated and challenged participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQTc Fridericia: (increase from baseline [30; 60] ms)3.7 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesHeart rate: Abnormally low: Grade 10 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesHeart rate: Abnormally low: Grade 20 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQTc Bazett (450 millisecond [ms], 480 ms)0 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQTc Bazett (increase from baseline [30; 60] ms)7.4 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQTc Bazett (increase from baseline [30; 60] ms)11.5 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQTc Bazett (450 millisecond [ms], 480 ms)3.8 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesHeart rate: Abnormally low: Grade 13.8 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesQTc Fridericia: (increase from baseline [30; 60] ms)0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) AbnormalitiesHeart rate: Abnormally low: Grade 23.8 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

A SAE is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.

Time frame: Up to 6 months post-vaccination and up to 6 months post-challenge

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study vaccine, regardless of the occurrence of protocol deviations. Here 'n' (number analyzed) included all evaluable participants who were analyzed at specified categories.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Post-vaccination0 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Post-challenge3.2 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Post-vaccination0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Post-challenge0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Solicited Local and Systemic AEs

Solicited local AEs: erythema, swelling/induration, and pain/tenderness. Solicited systemic AEs: fatigue, headache, myalgia, arthralgia, chills, nausea and fever.

Time frame: 7 days post-vaccination (Day -21)

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study vaccine, regardless of the occurrence of protocol deviations.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Solicited Local and Systemic AEsSolicited local AEs100.0 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Solicited Local and Systemic AEsSolicited systemic AEs100.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local and Systemic AEsSolicited local AEs18.8 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Solicited Local and Systemic AEsSolicited systemic AEs50.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic RSV Infections

Symptomatic RSV infection is defined in two ways (Conservative and Liberal). Conservative: participant had 2 or more quantifiable RT-PCR measurements on different samples, with one of following: symptoms of 2 different categories of subject symptom card (SSC) (Upper Respiratory \[runny/stuffy nose, sneezing, sore throat, earache\], Lower Respiratory \[cough, shortness of breath, chest tightness, wheeze\], Systemic \[malaise, headache, muscle and/or joint ache\]) regardless of grade and assessment timepoint or Grade 2 symptom from any category; Liberal (RT-PCR): had 2/more quantifiable RT-PCR measurements, with clinical symptom of any severity.

Time frame: From Day 2 to Day 12

Population: The Intent-to-treat-Challenge (ITTc) population is a subset of the Full Analysis Set (FAS) (all participants who were randomized and received study vaccine, regardless of the occurrence of protocol deviations) included all randomized, vaccinated and challenged participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic RSV InfectionsConservative22.2 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic RSV InfectionsLiberal33.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Symptomatic RSV InfectionsConservative46.2 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Symptomatic RSV InfectionsLiberal61.5 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Unsolicited Adverse Events (AEs)

Unsolicited AEs are all AEs for which participants were specifically not questioned in the participant diary. An AE is any untoward medical event that occurs in a participant administered an investigational product, and it does not necessarily indicate only events with a clear causal relationship with the relevant investigational product.

Time frame: Up to 28 days post-vaccination and up to 28 days post-challenge

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study vaccine, regardless of the occurrence of protocol deviations. Here 'n' (number analyzed) included all evaluable participants who were analyzed at specified categories.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Unsolicited Adverse Events (AEs)Post-vaccination35.5 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Unsolicited Adverse Events (AEs)Post-challenge74.1 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Unsolicited Adverse Events (AEs)Post-vaccination46.9 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Unsolicited Adverse Events (AEs)Post-challenge69.2 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities

Percentage of participants with vital signs abnormalities were reported. Vital signs measurements included body temperature (measured in degree celsius from less than \[\<\] 37.5 to \<39.5), respiratory rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and pulse rate, which were graded by FDA Toxicity Grading Scale Grade 0 (=no grade), Grade 1 (=mild), Grade 2 (=moderate), Grade 3 (=severe) and Grade 4 (=potentially life-threatening).

Time frame: Up to Day 28 post-challenge

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study vaccine, regardless of the occurrence of protocol deviations. Here 'n' (number analyzed) included all evaluable participants who were analyzed at specified categories.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesPost-dose: Bradycardia (pulse): Grade 26.5 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesPost-dose: Respiratory rate: Grade 125.8 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesPost-dose: Temperature (38.5-<39.0)6.5 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesPost-dose: Tachycardia (pulse): Grade 13.2 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesPost-dose: Bradycardia (pulse): Grade 3/43.2 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesPost-challenge: Bradycardia (pulse): Grade 118.5 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesPost-dose: Temperature (38.0-<38.5)6.5 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesPost-challenge: Bradycardia (pulse): Grade 23.7 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesPost-dose: Hypertension (diastolic): Grade 10 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesPost-challenge: Bradycardia (pulse): Grade 3/43.7 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesPost-dose: Bradycardia (pulse): Grade 112.9 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesPost-challenge: Hypertension (diastolic): Grade 13.7 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesPost-dose: Hypertension (diastolic): Grade 26.5 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesPost-challenge: Hypertension (systolic): Grade 10 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesPost-dose: Temperature (37.5-<38.0)22.6 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesPost-challenge: Respiratory rate: Grade 125.9 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesPost-dose: Hypertension (systolic): Grade 13.2 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesPost-challenge: Tachycardia (pulse): Grade 13.7 Percentage of participants
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Percentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesPost-dose: Temperature (<37.5)64.5 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesPost-challenge: Tachycardia (pulse): Grade 10 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesPost-dose: Temperature (<37.5)93.8 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesPost-dose: Temperature (37.5-<38.0)3.1 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesPost-dose: Temperature (38.0-<38.5)0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesPost-dose: Temperature (38.5-<39.0)3.1 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesPost-dose: Bradycardia (pulse): Grade 13.1 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesPost-dose: Bradycardia (pulse): Grade 26.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesPost-dose: Bradycardia (pulse): Grade 3/40 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesPost-dose: Hypertension (diastolic): Grade 13.1 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesPost-dose: Hypertension (diastolic): Grade 20 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesPost-dose: Hypertension (systolic): Grade 13.1 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesPost-dose: Respiratory rate: Grade 118.8 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesPost-dose: Tachycardia (pulse): Grade 10 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesPost-challenge: Bradycardia (pulse): Grade 111.5 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesPost-challenge: Bradycardia (pulse): Grade 23.8 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesPost-challenge: Bradycardia (pulse): Grade 3/40 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesPost-challenge: Hypertension (diastolic): Grade 10 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesPost-challenge: Hypertension (systolic): Grade 17.7 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Vital Signs AbnormalitiesPost-challenge: Respiratory rate: Grade 126.9 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Total Clinical Symptoms Score at Day 6 and 7

The total clinical symptom score was determined as the sum of the scores (grades) ranges from 0 (no symptom) to 52 (severe symptoms) of the 13 self-reportable symptoms on the SSC. Clinical symptoms includes runny nose, stuffy nose, sneezing, sore throat, ear ache, malaise, headache, muscle and/or joint ache, chilliness/ feverishness, cough, chest tightness, shortness of breath and wheeze. For every separate symptom, the score ranges from 0 (I have no symptom) to 4 (its quite bothersome most of the times and stop from participating in activities).

Time frame: Day 6 and 7: morning, afternoon and evening

Population: The Intent-to-treat-Challenge (ITTc) population is a subset of the Full Analysis Set (FAS) (all participants who were randomized and received study vaccine, regardless of the occurrence of protocol deviations) included all randomized, vaccinated and challenged participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Total Clinical Symptoms Score at Day 6 and 7Day 6: Morning0.6 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Total Clinical Symptoms Score at Day 6 and 7Day 6: Afternoon0.4 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Total Clinical Symptoms Score at Day 6 and 7Day 6: Evening0.5 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.28
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Total Clinical Symptoms Score at Day 6 and 7Day 7: Morning0.6 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.23
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Total Clinical Symptoms Score at Day 6 and 7Day 7: Afternoon0.6 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.32
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Total Clinical Symptoms Score at Day 6 and 7Day 7: Evening0.6 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.32
PlaceboTotal Clinical Symptoms Score at Day 6 and 7Day 7: Afternoon2.5 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
PlaceboTotal Clinical Symptoms Score at Day 6 and 7Day 6: Morning2.6 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.64
PlaceboTotal Clinical Symptoms Score at Day 6 and 7Day 7: Morning2.5 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.7
PlaceboTotal Clinical Symptoms Score at Day 6 and 7Day 6: Afternoon2.8 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.74
PlaceboTotal Clinical Symptoms Score at Day 6 and 7Day 7: Evening2.5 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.63
PlaceboTotal Clinical Symptoms Score at Day 6 and 7Day 6: Evening2.5 Units on a scaleStandard Error 0.65
Secondary

Viral Load by Quantitative RT-PCR Assay on Day 6 and 7

Viral load determined by quantitative RT-PCR assay of nasal wash samples on Day 6 and Day 7 were reported. Here, values below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) were imputed with zero.

Time frame: Day 6 (0 hour and 12 hours) and Day 7 (0 hour and 12 hours)

Population: The Intent-to-treat-Challenge (ITTc) population is a subset of the Full Analysis Set (FAS) (all participants who were randomized and received study vaccine, regardless of the occurrence of protocol deviations) included all randomized, vaccinated and challenged participants. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants analyzed for this outcome measure (OM) at specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Viral Load by Quantitative RT-PCR Assay on Day 6 and 7Day 6: 0 hour0.821 log10 copies per mLStandard Error 0.349
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Viral Load by Quantitative RT-PCR Assay on Day 6 and 7Day 6: 12 hour1.261 log10 copies per mLStandard Error 0.433
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Viral Load by Quantitative RT-PCR Assay on Day 6 and 7Day 7: 0 hour1.761 log10 copies per mLStandard Error 0.436
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Viral Load by Quantitative RT-PCR Assay on Day 6 and 7Day 7: 12 hour1.552 log10 copies per mLStandard Error 0.443
PlaceboViral Load by Quantitative RT-PCR Assay on Day 6 and 7Day 7: 12 hour3.025 log10 copies per mLStandard Error 0.53
PlaceboViral Load by Quantitative RT-PCR Assay on Day 6 and 7Day 6: 0 hour2.898 log10 copies per mLStandard Error 0.63
PlaceboViral Load by Quantitative RT-PCR Assay on Day 6 and 7Day 7: 0 hour3.072 log10 copies per mLStandard Error 0.586
PlaceboViral Load by Quantitative RT-PCR Assay on Day 6 and 7Day 6: 12 hour2.939 log10 copies per mLStandard Error 0.604
Secondary

VL-AUC of RSV by Quantitative Culture of RSV (Plaque Assay) on Day 6 and 7

VL-AUC of RSV by the quantitative culture of nasal wash samples on Day 6 and Day 7 were determined. pfu\*h/mL stands for plaque-forming units hour per millilitre.

Time frame: Day 6 (0 hour and 12 hours) and Day 7 (0 hour and 12 hours)

Population: The Intent-to-treat-Challenge (ITTc) population is a subset of the Full Analysis Set (FAS) (all participants who were randomized and received study vaccine, regardless of the occurrence of protocol deviations) included all randomized, vaccinated and challenged participants. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants analyzed for this OM at specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)VL-AUC of RSV by Quantitative Culture of RSV (Plaque Assay) on Day 6 and 7Day 6: 0 hour0.278 log10 pfu*h/mLStandard Error 0.1936
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)VL-AUC of RSV by Quantitative Culture of RSV (Plaque Assay) on Day 6 and 7Day 6: 12 hour0.304 log10 pfu*h/mLStandard Error 0.2198
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)VL-AUC of RSV by Quantitative Culture of RSV (Plaque Assay) on Day 6 and 7Day 7: 0 hour0.101 log10 pfu*h/mLStandard Error 0.1015
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)VL-AUC of RSV by Quantitative Culture of RSV (Plaque Assay) on Day 6 and 7Day 7: 12 hour0.276 log10 pfu*h/mLStandard Error 0.1931
PlaceboVL-AUC of RSV by Quantitative Culture of RSV (Plaque Assay) on Day 6 and 7Day 7: 12 hour1.237 log10 pfu*h/mLStandard Error 0.3891
PlaceboVL-AUC of RSV by Quantitative Culture of RSV (Plaque Assay) on Day 6 and 7Day 6: 0 hour1.587 log10 pfu*h/mLStandard Error 0.4159
PlaceboVL-AUC of RSV by Quantitative Culture of RSV (Plaque Assay) on Day 6 and 7Day 7: 0 hour1.226 log10 pfu*h/mLStandard Error 0.3505
PlaceboVL-AUC of RSV by Quantitative Culture of RSV (Plaque Assay) on Day 6 and 7Day 6: 12 hour1.737 log10 pfu*h/mLStandard Error 0.432
Secondary

Weight of Mucus Secretions Over Time

The weight mucous over time was determined in grams using eCRF forms. Participants were given pre-weighed packets of paper tissues. After each tissue was used for nose blowing or sneezing, the participants should store them in an airtight plastic bag to calculate the weight of mucus from Day 0 to Day 12. All paper tissues used by each participant were collected for each 24-hour period up to Day 12, to determine daily mucus weight.

Time frame: Day 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 and 12

Population: The Intent-to-treat-Challenge (ITTc) population is a subset of the Full Analysis Set (FAS) (all participants who were randomized and received study vaccine, regardless of the occurrence of protocol deviations) included all randomized, vaccinated and challenged participants. Here 'n' (number analyzed) signifies the number of participants analyzed for this OM at specified timepoints.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Weight of Mucus Secretions Over TimeDay 20.997 GramsStandard Error 0.235
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Weight of Mucus Secretions Over TimeDay 71.715 GramsStandard Error 0.7201
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Weight of Mucus Secretions Over TimeDay 41.164 GramsStandard Error 0.3535
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Weight of Mucus Secretions Over TimeDay 80.799 GramsStandard Error 0.296
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Weight of Mucus Secretions Over TimeDay 10.228 GramsStandard Error 0.0621
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Weight of Mucus Secretions Over TimeDay 91.004 GramsStandard Error 0.4147
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Weight of Mucus Secretions Over TimeDay 51.440 GramsStandard Error 0.8609
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Weight of Mucus Secretions Over TimeDay 100.907 GramsStandard Error 0.3457
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Weight of Mucus Secretions Over TimeDay 30.970 GramsStandard Error 0.2176
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Weight of Mucus Secretions Over TimeDay 110.749 GramsStandard Error 0.243
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Weight of Mucus Secretions Over TimeDay 61.226 GramsStandard Error 0.4925
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Weight of Mucus Secretions Over TimeDay 120.622 GramsStandard Error 0.2647
Ad26.RSV.preF (1*10^11 vp)Weight of Mucus Secretions Over TimeDay 00.586 GramsStandard Error 0.1883
PlaceboWeight of Mucus Secretions Over TimeDay 120.990 GramsStandard Error 0.3005
PlaceboWeight of Mucus Secretions Over TimeDay 00.175 GramsStandard Error 0.0913
PlaceboWeight of Mucus Secretions Over TimeDay 10.086 GramsStandard Error 0.0333
PlaceboWeight of Mucus Secretions Over TimeDay 20.428 GramsStandard Error 0.1459
PlaceboWeight of Mucus Secretions Over TimeDay 30.543 GramsStandard Error 0.1333
PlaceboWeight of Mucus Secretions Over TimeDay 40.714 GramsStandard Error 0.2123
PlaceboWeight of Mucus Secretions Over TimeDay 51.068 GramsStandard Error 0.3539
PlaceboWeight of Mucus Secretions Over TimeDay 63.132 GramsStandard Error 1.0991
PlaceboWeight of Mucus Secretions Over TimeDay 75.124 GramsStandard Error 1.3257
PlaceboWeight of Mucus Secretions Over TimeDay 83.230 GramsStandard Error 1.1022
PlaceboWeight of Mucus Secretions Over TimeDay 91.798 GramsStandard Error 0.4406
PlaceboWeight of Mucus Secretions Over TimeDay 101.785 GramsStandard Error 0.4838
PlaceboWeight of Mucus Secretions Over TimeDay 111.172 GramsStandard Error 0.3442

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026