Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, Medication Optimization, Patient Activation, Patient Engagement
Conditions
Brief summary
The EPIC-HF study will test the effectiveness of a patient empowerment and activation for optimization of Heart Failure with reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) medication plans. Three main regional centers in the University of Colorado Health (UCHealth) system will participate in a two-arm, randomized study design. In this design, each site participates in both control and intervention, with members of the sites eligible patient population randomly enrolled in either the intervention or the control arm. All eligible patients who agree to participate in the study will complete the Baseline Survey, the Follow-Up Survey, and will have information collected from their medical record at baseline, 1 month after the first clinic appointment post-enrollment, and 1 year after enrollment. Enrollment will take place at three UCHealth locations: UCHealth University of Colorado Hospital (Metro), UCHealth Medical Center of the Rockies and UCHealth Poudre Valley Hospital (North), and UCHealth Memorial Central and Memorial North (South). Study personnel at the North and South sites will carry out enrollment and Baseline Surveys with patients for those locations; all other study procedures will be conducted by study personnel at the University of Colorado (UC) School of Medicine (SOM) (UCSOM) at UCHealth University of Colorado School of Medicine. Patients enrolled in the intervention arm will receive, by email and/or text, a link to 1) a short patient engagement video around HFrEF medications, and 2) a link to an online portable document format (PDF) of a HFrEF medication checklist. Patients in the intervention arm will receive these materials after enrollment and one week prior to their next scheduled clinic appointment. The materials will be delivered in a second communication, three days after the first, via text, as well as a third communication on the day of the clinic appointment. Patients enrolled in the control arm will not receive any materials at any point of time and will receive their usual care. For both arms, medication changes in patient medical records will be assessed before and after clinic visits to measure the effectiveness of the intervention on aim 1; surveys will be compared before and after clinic visits to determine the effectiveness of the intervention on aim 2.
Detailed description
Multiple medications improve left ventricular remodeling, quality of life, and survival in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Unfortunately, the real-world use of HFrEF medications is suboptimal, particularly for more recently approved agents such as aldosterone antagonists. The introduction of sacubitril/valsartan and ivabradine add to already complex HFrEF treatment regimens. Without novel mechanisms to improve medication use, the benefits of advances in HF treatment will be largely unrealized. Efforts to optimize HFrEF medication delivery have focused primarily on 1) provider decision support around prescribing and 2) patient education around adherence. An important gap is the failure to empower patients to engage more directly in HFrEF prescribing efforts. Patients have a direct stake in making sure they are getting efficacious treatments, want to be involved in decisions about their treatments, and if engaged are more likely to adhere to them. Direct-to-consumer marketing and proliferation of shared decision making reflect a culture where patients are increasingly involved in medication prescribing. Within this context, the American Heart Association (AHA) has funded four centers across the United States to examine ways in which heart failure treatment and prevention may be optimized. The University of Colorado, Denver is one of these sites; The Development and Trial of an Electronic health record-leveraged, Patient-centered, Intensification of Chronic care for Heart Failure Tool (EPIC-HF) is the population-focused arm of study. Inspired by the gap in HFrEF medication optimization, this study aims to develop a patient-centered intervention in order to 1) activate and engage patients with HFrEF in their prescribing regimen, 2) empower them to initiate discussions with their provider about ways in which their medication plan could be improved, which will result in 3) a superior HFrEF medication plan. The investigators modeled this tool with the previous success of flipped classrooms and patient empowerment initiatives in mind. The intervention was iteratively developed with the input of both clinician and patient stakeholders, and is innovative in its emphasis on patient self-actualization and role as an equal with their healthcare provider in the discussion around medication prescribing. This study applies the intervention in a two-arm, randomized controlled trial across three sites (UCHealth metro, Memorial, and Medical Center of the Rockies) in the UCHealth medical system. Aim 1: Assess the effectiveness of the EPIC-HF intervention on HFrEF medication optimization Hypothesis 1: Compared to usual care, EPIC-HF will increase the number of HFrEF medication optimizations (i.e., dose changes for beta-blockers (βB), Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I)/Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB)/sacubitril, Aldosterone Receptor Antagonists (AldaA), Ivabradine, etc.) without compromising secondary outcomes including safety and healthcare provider satisfaction. Aim 2: Assess the effectiveness of the EPIC-HF intervention on patient empowerment and activation around their HFrEF medication plan Hypothesis 2: Compared to usual care, EPIC-HF will result in increased patient empowerment and activation around their HFrEF medication plan as measured through patient self-assessment
Interventions
The intervention is a brief, animated video designed to engage and activate patients around their HFrEF medication prescribing, as well as a HFrEF medication checklist.
Control for intervention--patient receives care as usual from provider to contrast against intervention arm.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
1. Most recent cardiology imaging study showing left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \<=40% 2. A plan for ambulatory clinic appointments in the UCHealth system
Exclusion criteria
1. Patients who have clinic appointments more than 12 months apart 2. Under 18 years of age 3. Non-English speaking (decision tools and study assessments are in English only) 4. Unable to consent (this would include patients with conditions such as moderate-to- severe dementia) 5. Prisoners 6. Patients who are enrolled in hospice (increasing curative medications is often not appropriate in these patients) 7. Patients who are expected to live \< 6 months as documented in the patient's chart by treating clinician. 8. Continuous IV inotropic support (e.g. dobutamine or milrinone) 9. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) \< 15 mL/min or chronic renal disease 10. Patients who have neither an email address nor a phone to which text messages may be sent 11. Patients with an left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implant 12. Patients who have neither an email address nor a phone to which text messages may be sent
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percent of Participants Who Experienced an Initiation or Intensification of Their Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT) | Enrollment, 1 month (30 days) after enrollment | The investigators were interested in whether the patient engagement tool led to an increase in the optimization of HFrEF medications for patients. This was measured through medical record review of all medications and doses immediately preceding the cardiology clinic visit (enrollment) to 30 days after enrollment. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Self-Reported Patient Engagement Around HFrEF Medications | 1 month after delivery of intervention materials. | The investigators were interested in whether the patient engagement tool (a 3-minute video and 1-page checklist-delivered electronically 1 week prior, 3 days prior and 24 hours prior to the enrollment cardiology clinic visit) led to an increase in patient sense of engagement around their HFrEF medication prescribing, prompting patients to begin a dialogue with their clinician about their medication plan. This was assessed among the Intervention group by comparing answers from a self-reported survey at 1 month after delivery of intervention materials. Participants were sent the survey and asked if they received and reviewed the intervention materials. Survey measures were included as well as a series of questions asking about how and when medications were discussed during clinical interactions. |
| Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | Enrollment, 1 month (30 days) after enrollment | Initiation or intensification of key heart failure medications was determined by medical chart review conducted at immediately following the cardiology clinic appointment (enrollment) and for the clinic visit closest to 1 month (30 days) after the enrollment visit. Raw numbers of participants were analyzed. |
| Guideline-directed Medical Therapy (GDMT) Intensifications Per Patient | Enrollment, 1 month (30 days) after enrollment | Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) intensifications per patient from the pre-clinic visit (enrollment) to 1-month (30 days) after enrollment. This was measured by medical chart reviewing of the pre-clinic visit appointment and the closest clinic appointment preceding the 30 day mark after enrollment. Key: guideline directed medical therapy (GDMT); evidence-based beta blocker (EVBB); angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I); angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB); angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI); mineralocorticoid receptor agonists (MRA); hydralazine/isosorbide dinitrate (H/ISDN); Ivabradine (Iva) |
| Safety Outcomes | Enrollment, 1-month (30 days) after Enrollment | Unplanned hospitalizations or emergency department visits without hospitalization from the cardiology clinic visit (enrollment) to 1-month (30 days) after enrollment. Hospitalization and emergency department visits were obtained via medical chart review and were analyzed as yes/no per patient. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Control Patients will receive care-as-usual. The only study procedures patients will be exposed to will be a baseline survey at time of enrollment about their sense of engagement around their HFrEF medication prescribing, as well as a follow-up survey with the same general content one month after their next clinic appointment. Medical record review will occur at baseline (enrollment), 1 month after the next clinic appointment post-enrollment, and at 12 months from enrollment.This arm will include 'No Intervention--Usual Care'.
No Intervention--Usual Care: Control for intervention--patient receives care as usual from provider to contrast against intervention arm. | 145 |
| Intervention Patients will receive the patient engagement video and HFrEF medication checklist by email one week prior to their next clinic appointment after enrollment. Patients in the intervention arm will also receive a baseline survey at time of enrollment about their sense of engagement around their HFrEF medication prescribing, as well as a follow-up survey with the same general content one month after their next clinic appointment. Medical record review will occur at baseline (enrollment), 1 month after the next clinic appointment post-enrollment, and at 12 months from enrollment. This arm will include the 'Intervention :Behavioral: Patient engagement materials.'
Patient engagement materials: The intervention is a brief, animated video designed to engage and activate patients around their HFrEF medication prescribing, as well as a HFrEF medication checklist. | 145 |
| Total | 290 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Death | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Never had qualifying clinic visit | 7 | 7 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Control | Intervention | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized Age | 64 years | 66 years | 65 years |
| brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) | 266 pg/mL | 161.5 pg/mL | 213.8 pg/mL |
| Can receive text messages | 86 Participants | 77 Participants | 163 Participants |
| Diastolic blood pressure | 70 mmHg | 70 mmHg | 70 mmHg |
| Employment Employed | 45 Participants | 46 Participants | 91 Participants |
| Employment Missing | 2 Participants | 4 Participants | 6 Participants |
| Employment Retired | 59 Participants | 72 Participants | 131 Participants |
| Employment Unemployed | 39 Participants | 23 Participants | 62 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 9 Participants | 11 Participants | 20 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 136 Participants | 134 Participants | 270 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Income $20,001--$40,000 | 31 Participants | 17 Participants | 48 Participants |
| Income $40,001--$60,000 | 15 Participants | 20 Participants | 35 Participants |
| Income $60,001--$80,000 | 27 Participants | 29 Participants | 56 Participants |
| Income Greater than $80,000 | 32 Participants | 44 Participants | 76 Participants |
| Income Less than or equal to $20,000 | 31 Participants | 24 Participants | 55 Participants |
| Income Missing | 9 Participants | 11 Participants | 20 Participants |
| Insurance Medicaid | 23 Participants | 21 Participants | 44 Participants |
| Insurance Medicare, Tricare | 71 Participants | 73 Participants | 144 Participants |
| Insurance None | 3 Participants | 3 Participants | 6 Participants |
| Insurance Private | 48 Participants | 48 Participants | 96 Participants |
| left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) | 32.5 percent | 32.5 percent | 32.5 percent |
| Pulse | 74.5 bpm (beats per minute) | 72.5 bpm (beats per minute) | 73.5 bpm (beats per minute) |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 16 Participants | 14 Participants | 30 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 5 Participants | 7 Participants | 12 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 4 Participants | 5 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 120 Participants | 119 Participants | 239 Participants |
| Serum creatinine | 1.1 mg/dL | 1.0 mg/dL | 1.05 mg/dL |
| Serum potassium | 4.3 mmol/L | 4.2 mmol/L | 4.25 mmol/L |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 43 Participants | 41 Participants | 84 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 102 Participants | 104 Participants | 206 Participants |
| Single Relationship Status | 59 Participants | 56 Participants | 115 Participants |
| Systolic blood pressure | 110 mmHg | 112.5 mmHg | 111.3 mmHg |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 1 / 145 | 0 / 145 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 145 | 0 / 145 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 145 | 0 / 145 |
Outcome results
Percent of Participants Who Experienced an Initiation or Intensification of Their Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT)
The investigators were interested in whether the patient engagement tool led to an increase in the optimization of HFrEF medications for patients. This was measured through medical record review of all medications and doses immediately preceding the cardiology clinic visit (enrollment) to 30 days after enrollment.
Time frame: Enrollment, 1 month (30 days) after enrollment
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Control | Percent of Participants Who Experienced an Initiation or Intensification of Their Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT) | 29.7 percentage of participants |
| Intervention | Percent of Participants Who Experienced an Initiation or Intensification of Their Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT) | 49.0 percentage of participants |
Guideline-directed Medical Therapy (GDMT) Intensifications Per Patient
Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) intensifications per patient from the pre-clinic visit (enrollment) to 1-month (30 days) after enrollment. This was measured by medical chart reviewing of the pre-clinic visit appointment and the closest clinic appointment preceding the 30 day mark after enrollment. Key: guideline directed medical therapy (GDMT); evidence-based beta blocker (EVBB); angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I); angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB); angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI); mineralocorticoid receptor agonists (MRA); hydralazine/isosorbide dinitrate (H/ISDN); Ivabradine (Iva)
Time frame: Enrollment, 1 month (30 days) after enrollment
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Guideline-directed Medical Therapy (GDMT) Intensifications Per Patient | # of GDMT intensifications (initiation/dose increase EVBB, ACEI, ARB, ARNI, MRA, H/ISDN, or Iva) | 0.36 intensifications | Standard Deviation 0.61 |
| Control | Guideline-directed Medical Therapy (GDMT) Intensifications Per Patient | # of all intensifications (including GDMT plus initiation or uptitration of loop diuretic or digoxin | 0.38 intensifications | Standard Deviation 0.62 |
| Intervention | Guideline-directed Medical Therapy (GDMT) Intensifications Per Patient | # of GDMT intensifications (initiation/dose increase EVBB, ACEI, ARB, ARNI, MRA, H/ISDN, or Iva) | 0.61 intensifications | Standard Deviation 0.73 |
| Intervention | Guideline-directed Medical Therapy (GDMT) Intensifications Per Patient | # of all intensifications (including GDMT plus initiation or uptitration of loop diuretic or digoxin | 0.63 intensifications | Standard Deviation 0.73 |
Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications
Initiation or intensification of key heart failure medications was determined by medical chart review conducted at immediately following the cardiology clinic appointment (enrollment) and for the clinic visit closest to 1 month (30 days) after the enrollment visit. Raw numbers of participants were analyzed.
Time frame: Enrollment, 1 month (30 days) after enrollment
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | Any intensification in HFrEF medication, including GDMT, loop diuretic, or digoxin | 45 Participants |
| Control | Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | ACE-I or ARB replaced with ARNI | 3 Participants |
| Control | Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | ARNI added | 0 Participants |
| Control | Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | Key heart failure medication up titrated | 33 Participants |
| Control | Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | Beta blocker added | 2 Participants |
| Control | Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | Beta blocker up titrated | 16 Participants |
| Control | Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | Loop diuretic added | 0 Participants |
| Control | Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | ACE-I up titrated | 4 Participants |
| Control | Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | Intensification occurring during cardiology clinic visit (day 1) | 42 Participants |
| Control | Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | ARB up titrated | 7 Participants |
| Control | Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | Aldosterone antagonist added | 3 Participants |
| Control | Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | ARNI up titrated | 5 Participants |
| Control | Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | ACE-I added | 1 Participants |
| Control | Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | Loop diuretic up titrated | 1 Participants |
| Control | Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | Ivabradine added | 0 Participants |
| Control | Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | Aldosterone antagonist up titrated | 3 Participants |
| Control | Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | Key heart failure medication added | 10 Participants |
| Control | Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | Ivabradine up titrated | 0 Participants |
| Control | Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | Hydralazine added | 1 Participants |
| Control | Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | Hydralazine up titrated | 0 Participants |
| Control | Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | ARB added | 4 Participants |
| Control | Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | Isosorbide up titrated | 0 Participants |
| Control | Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | Isosorbide added | 1 Participants |
| Control | Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | Digoxin up titrated | 0 Participants |
| Control | Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | Digoxin added | 0 Participants |
| Intervention | Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | Digoxin up titrated | 0 Participants |
| Intervention | Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | Intensification occurring during cardiology clinic visit (day 1) | 61 Participants |
| Intervention | Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | Any intensification in HFrEF medication, including GDMT, loop diuretic, or digoxin | 73 Participants |
| Intervention | Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | Key heart failure medication added | 17 Participants |
| Intervention | Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | Beta blocker added | 0 Participants |
| Intervention | Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | ACE-I added | 4 Participants |
| Intervention | Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | ARB added | 2 Participants |
| Intervention | Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | ARNI added | 0 Participants |
| Intervention | Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | Loop diuretic added | 0 Participants |
| Intervention | Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | Aldosterone antagonist added | 5 Participants |
| Intervention | Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | Ivabradine added | 1 Participants |
| Intervention | Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | Hydralazine added | 1 Participants |
| Intervention | Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | Digoxin added | 0 Participants |
| Intervention | Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | ACE-I or ARB replaced with ARNI | 4 Participants |
| Intervention | Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | Key heart failure medication up titrated | 58 Participants |
| Intervention | Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | Beta blocker up titrated | 32 Participants |
| Intervention | Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | ACE-I up titrated | 7 Participants |
| Intervention | Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | ARB up titrated | 7 Participants |
| Intervention | Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | ARNI up titrated | 6 Participants |
| Intervention | Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | Loop diuretic up titrated | 0 Participants |
| Intervention | Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | Aldosterone antagonist up titrated | 8 Participants |
| Intervention | Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | Ivabradine up titrated | 0 Participants |
| Intervention | Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | Hydralazine up titrated | 2 Participants |
| Intervention | Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | Isosorbide up titrated | 1 Participants |
| Intervention | Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications | Isosorbide added | 2 Participants |
Safety Outcomes
Unplanned hospitalizations or emergency department visits without hospitalization from the cardiology clinic visit (enrollment) to 1-month (30 days) after enrollment. Hospitalization and emergency department visits were obtained via medical chart review and were analyzed as yes/no per patient.
Time frame: Enrollment, 1-month (30 days) after Enrollment
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Safety Outcomes | Unplanned hospitalization at 30 days | 4 participants |
| Control | Safety Outcomes | Emergency department visit without hospitalization at 30 days | 5 participants |
| Intervention | Safety Outcomes | Unplanned hospitalization at 30 days | 6 participants |
| Intervention | Safety Outcomes | Emergency department visit without hospitalization at 30 days | 9 participants |
Self-Reported Patient Engagement Around HFrEF Medications
The investigators were interested in whether the patient engagement tool (a 3-minute video and 1-page checklist-delivered electronically 1 week prior, 3 days prior and 24 hours prior to the enrollment cardiology clinic visit) led to an increase in patient sense of engagement around their HFrEF medication prescribing, prompting patients to begin a dialogue with their clinician about their medication plan. This was assessed among the Intervention group by comparing answers from a self-reported survey at 1 month after delivery of intervention materials. Participants were sent the survey and asked if they received and reviewed the intervention materials. Survey measures were included as well as a series of questions asking about how and when medications were discussed during clinical interactions.
Time frame: 1 month after delivery of intervention materials.
Population: Of the 145 intervention patients that were sent the survey, 126 responded to the survey. Only intervention participants were analyzed for this outcome, since Control participants received usual care.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Self-Reported Patient Engagement Around HFrEF Medications | Reported receiving the video | 81 Participants |
| Control | Self-Reported Patient Engagement Around HFrEF Medications | Reported reviewing the video | 73 Participants |
| Control | Self-Reported Patient Engagement Around HFrEF Medications | Found the video helpful in understanding their medical plan | 53 Participants |
| Control | Self-Reported Patient Engagement Around HFrEF Medications | Found the video helpful in discussing their medicines with their doctor | 51 Participants |
| Control | Self-Reported Patient Engagement Around HFrEF Medications | Reported receiving the checklist | 83 Participants |
| Control | Self-Reported Patient Engagement Around HFrEF Medications | Reported reviewing the checklist | 74 Participants |
| Control | Self-Reported Patient Engagement Around HFrEF Medications | Found the checklist helpful in understanding their medical plan | 56 Participants |
| Control | Self-Reported Patient Engagement Around HFrEF Medications | Found the checklist helpful in discussing their medicines with their doctor | 48 Participants |
| Control | Self-Reported Patient Engagement Around HFrEF Medications | Brought the checklist to their appointment | 61 Participants |
| Control | Self-Reported Patient Engagement Around HFrEF Medications | Talked about checklist with doctor at their appointment | 52 Participants |