Skip to content

Electronic Health Record-leveraged, Patient-centered, Intensification of Chronic Care for HF

A Clinical Trial of an Electronic Health Record-leveraged, Patient-centered, Intensification of Chronic Care for Heart Failure (EPIC-HF)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03334188
Acronym
EPIC-HF
Enrollment
306
Registered
2017-11-07
Start date
2018-01-11
Completion date
2021-04-13
Last updated
2021-10-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction, Medication Optimization, Patient Activation, Patient Engagement

Brief summary

The EPIC-HF study will test the effectiveness of a patient empowerment and activation for optimization of Heart Failure with reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) medication plans. Three main regional centers in the University of Colorado Health (UCHealth) system will participate in a two-arm, randomized study design. In this design, each site participates in both control and intervention, with members of the sites eligible patient population randomly enrolled in either the intervention or the control arm. All eligible patients who agree to participate in the study will complete the Baseline Survey, the Follow-Up Survey, and will have information collected from their medical record at baseline, 1 month after the first clinic appointment post-enrollment, and 1 year after enrollment. Enrollment will take place at three UCHealth locations: UCHealth University of Colorado Hospital (Metro), UCHealth Medical Center of the Rockies and UCHealth Poudre Valley Hospital (North), and UCHealth Memorial Central and Memorial North (South). Study personnel at the North and South sites will carry out enrollment and Baseline Surveys with patients for those locations; all other study procedures will be conducted by study personnel at the University of Colorado (UC) School of Medicine (SOM) (UCSOM) at UCHealth University of Colorado School of Medicine. Patients enrolled in the intervention arm will receive, by email and/or text, a link to 1) a short patient engagement video around HFrEF medications, and 2) a link to an online portable document format (PDF) of a HFrEF medication checklist. Patients in the intervention arm will receive these materials after enrollment and one week prior to their next scheduled clinic appointment. The materials will be delivered in a second communication, three days after the first, via text, as well as a third communication on the day of the clinic appointment. Patients enrolled in the control arm will not receive any materials at any point of time and will receive their usual care. For both arms, medication changes in patient medical records will be assessed before and after clinic visits to measure the effectiveness of the intervention on aim 1; surveys will be compared before and after clinic visits to determine the effectiveness of the intervention on aim 2.

Detailed description

Multiple medications improve left ventricular remodeling, quality of life, and survival in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Unfortunately, the real-world use of HFrEF medications is suboptimal, particularly for more recently approved agents such as aldosterone antagonists. The introduction of sacubitril/valsartan and ivabradine add to already complex HFrEF treatment regimens. Without novel mechanisms to improve medication use, the benefits of advances in HF treatment will be largely unrealized. Efforts to optimize HFrEF medication delivery have focused primarily on 1) provider decision support around prescribing and 2) patient education around adherence. An important gap is the failure to empower patients to engage more directly in HFrEF prescribing efforts. Patients have a direct stake in making sure they are getting efficacious treatments, want to be involved in decisions about their treatments, and if engaged are more likely to adhere to them. Direct-to-consumer marketing and proliferation of shared decision making reflect a culture where patients are increasingly involved in medication prescribing. Within this context, the American Heart Association (AHA) has funded four centers across the United States to examine ways in which heart failure treatment and prevention may be optimized. The University of Colorado, Denver is one of these sites; The Development and Trial of an Electronic health record-leveraged, Patient-centered, Intensification of Chronic care for Heart Failure Tool (EPIC-HF) is the population-focused arm of study. Inspired by the gap in HFrEF medication optimization, this study aims to develop a patient-centered intervention in order to 1) activate and engage patients with HFrEF in their prescribing regimen, 2) empower them to initiate discussions with their provider about ways in which their medication plan could be improved, which will result in 3) a superior HFrEF medication plan. The investigators modeled this tool with the previous success of flipped classrooms and patient empowerment initiatives in mind. The intervention was iteratively developed with the input of both clinician and patient stakeholders, and is innovative in its emphasis on patient self-actualization and role as an equal with their healthcare provider in the discussion around medication prescribing. This study applies the intervention in a two-arm, randomized controlled trial across three sites (UCHealth metro, Memorial, and Medical Center of the Rockies) in the UCHealth medical system. Aim 1: Assess the effectiveness of the EPIC-HF intervention on HFrEF medication optimization Hypothesis 1: Compared to usual care, EPIC-HF will increase the number of HFrEF medication optimizations (i.e., dose changes for beta-blockers (βB), Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I)/Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB)/sacubitril, Aldosterone Receptor Antagonists (AldaA), Ivabradine, etc.) without compromising secondary outcomes including safety and healthcare provider satisfaction. Aim 2: Assess the effectiveness of the EPIC-HF intervention on patient empowerment and activation around their HFrEF medication plan Hypothesis 2: Compared to usual care, EPIC-HF will result in increased patient empowerment and activation around their HFrEF medication plan as measured through patient self-assessment

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPatient engagement materials

The intervention is a brief, animated video designed to engage and activate patients around their HFrEF medication prescribing, as well as a HFrEF medication checklist.

BEHAVIORALNo Intervention--Usual Care

Control for intervention--patient receives care as usual from provider to contrast against intervention arm.

Sponsors

American Heart Association
CollaboratorOTHER
University of Colorado, Denver
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Most recent cardiology imaging study showing left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \<=40% 2. A plan for ambulatory clinic appointments in the UCHealth system

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients who have clinic appointments more than 12 months apart 2. Under 18 years of age 3. Non-English speaking (decision tools and study assessments are in English only) 4. Unable to consent (this would include patients with conditions such as moderate-to- severe dementia) 5. Prisoners 6. Patients who are enrolled in hospice (increasing curative medications is often not appropriate in these patients) 7. Patients who are expected to live \< 6 months as documented in the patient's chart by treating clinician. 8. Continuous IV inotropic support (e.g. dobutamine or milrinone) 9. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) \< 15 mL/min or chronic renal disease 10. Patients who have neither an email address nor a phone to which text messages may be sent 11. Patients with an left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implant 12. Patients who have neither an email address nor a phone to which text messages may be sent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent of Participants Who Experienced an Initiation or Intensification of Their Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT)Enrollment, 1 month (30 days) after enrollmentThe investigators were interested in whether the patient engagement tool led to an increase in the optimization of HFrEF medications for patients. This was measured through medical record review of all medications and doses immediately preceding the cardiology clinic visit (enrollment) to 30 days after enrollment.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Self-Reported Patient Engagement Around HFrEF Medications1 month after delivery of intervention materials.The investigators were interested in whether the patient engagement tool (a 3-minute video and 1-page checklist-delivered electronically 1 week prior, 3 days prior and 24 hours prior to the enrollment cardiology clinic visit) led to an increase in patient sense of engagement around their HFrEF medication prescribing, prompting patients to begin a dialogue with their clinician about their medication plan. This was assessed among the Intervention group by comparing answers from a self-reported survey at 1 month after delivery of intervention materials. Participants were sent the survey and asked if they received and reviewed the intervention materials. Survey measures were included as well as a series of questions asking about how and when medications were discussed during clinical interactions.
Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsEnrollment, 1 month (30 days) after enrollmentInitiation or intensification of key heart failure medications was determined by medical chart review conducted at immediately following the cardiology clinic appointment (enrollment) and for the clinic visit closest to 1 month (30 days) after the enrollment visit. Raw numbers of participants were analyzed.
Guideline-directed Medical Therapy (GDMT) Intensifications Per PatientEnrollment, 1 month (30 days) after enrollmentGuideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) intensifications per patient from the pre-clinic visit (enrollment) to 1-month (30 days) after enrollment. This was measured by medical chart reviewing of the pre-clinic visit appointment and the closest clinic appointment preceding the 30 day mark after enrollment. Key: guideline directed medical therapy (GDMT); evidence-based beta blocker (EVBB); angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I); angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB); angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI); mineralocorticoid receptor agonists (MRA); hydralazine/isosorbide dinitrate (H/ISDN); Ivabradine (Iva)
Safety OutcomesEnrollment, 1-month (30 days) after EnrollmentUnplanned hospitalizations or emergency department visits without hospitalization from the cardiology clinic visit (enrollment) to 1-month (30 days) after enrollment. Hospitalization and emergency department visits were obtained via medical chart review and were analyzed as yes/no per patient.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Control
Patients will receive care-as-usual. The only study procedures patients will be exposed to will be a baseline survey at time of enrollment about their sense of engagement around their HFrEF medication prescribing, as well as a follow-up survey with the same general content one month after their next clinic appointment. Medical record review will occur at baseline (enrollment), 1 month after the next clinic appointment post-enrollment, and at 12 months from enrollment.This arm will include 'No Intervention--Usual Care'. No Intervention--Usual Care: Control for intervention--patient receives care as usual from provider to contrast against intervention arm.
145
Intervention
Patients will receive the patient engagement video and HFrEF medication checklist by email one week prior to their next clinic appointment after enrollment. Patients in the intervention arm will also receive a baseline survey at time of enrollment about their sense of engagement around their HFrEF medication prescribing, as well as a follow-up survey with the same general content one month after their next clinic appointment. Medical record review will occur at baseline (enrollment), 1 month after the next clinic appointment post-enrollment, and at 12 months from enrollment. This arm will include the 'Intervention :Behavioral: Patient engagement materials.' Patient engagement materials: The intervention is a brief, animated video designed to engage and activate patients around their HFrEF medication prescribing, as well as a HFrEF medication checklist.
145
Total290

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath10
Overall StudyNever had qualifying clinic visit77
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicControlInterventionTotal
Age, Customized
Age
64 years66 years65 years
brain natriuretic peptide (BNP)266 pg/mL161.5 pg/mL213.8 pg/mL
Can receive text messages86 Participants77 Participants163 Participants
Diastolic blood pressure70 mmHg70 mmHg70 mmHg
Employment
Employed
45 Participants46 Participants91 Participants
Employment
Missing
2 Participants4 Participants6 Participants
Employment
Retired
59 Participants72 Participants131 Participants
Employment
Unemployed
39 Participants23 Participants62 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
9 Participants11 Participants20 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
136 Participants134 Participants270 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Income
$20,001--$40,000
31 Participants17 Participants48 Participants
Income
$40,001--$60,000
15 Participants20 Participants35 Participants
Income
$60,001--$80,000
27 Participants29 Participants56 Participants
Income
Greater than $80,000
32 Participants44 Participants76 Participants
Income
Less than or equal to $20,000
31 Participants24 Participants55 Participants
Income
Missing
9 Participants11 Participants20 Participants
Insurance
Medicaid
23 Participants21 Participants44 Participants
Insurance
Medicare, Tricare
71 Participants73 Participants144 Participants
Insurance
None
3 Participants3 Participants6 Participants
Insurance
Private
48 Participants48 Participants96 Participants
left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)32.5 percent32.5 percent32.5 percent
Pulse74.5 bpm (beats per minute)72.5 bpm (beats per minute)73.5 bpm (beats per minute)
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
16 Participants14 Participants30 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
5 Participants7 Participants12 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants5 Participants9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
120 Participants119 Participants239 Participants
Serum creatinine1.1 mg/dL1.0 mg/dL1.05 mg/dL
Serum potassium4.3 mmol/L4.2 mmol/L4.25 mmol/L
Sex: Female, Male
Female
43 Participants41 Participants84 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
102 Participants104 Participants206 Participants
Single Relationship Status59 Participants56 Participants115 Participants
Systolic blood pressure110 mmHg112.5 mmHg111.3 mmHg

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 1450 / 145
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1450 / 145
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1450 / 145

Outcome results

Primary

Percent of Participants Who Experienced an Initiation or Intensification of Their Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT)

The investigators were interested in whether the patient engagement tool led to an increase in the optimization of HFrEF medications for patients. This was measured through medical record review of all medications and doses immediately preceding the cardiology clinic visit (enrollment) to 30 days after enrollment.

Time frame: Enrollment, 1 month (30 days) after enrollment

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
ControlPercent of Participants Who Experienced an Initiation or Intensification of Their Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT)29.7 percentage of participants
InterventionPercent of Participants Who Experienced an Initiation or Intensification of Their Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT)49.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Guideline-directed Medical Therapy (GDMT) Intensifications Per Patient

Guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) intensifications per patient from the pre-clinic visit (enrollment) to 1-month (30 days) after enrollment. This was measured by medical chart reviewing of the pre-clinic visit appointment and the closest clinic appointment preceding the 30 day mark after enrollment. Key: guideline directed medical therapy (GDMT); evidence-based beta blocker (EVBB); angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I); angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB); angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNI); mineralocorticoid receptor agonists (MRA); hydralazine/isosorbide dinitrate (H/ISDN); Ivabradine (Iva)

Time frame: Enrollment, 1 month (30 days) after enrollment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
ControlGuideline-directed Medical Therapy (GDMT) Intensifications Per Patient# of GDMT intensifications (initiation/dose increase EVBB, ACEI, ARB, ARNI, MRA, H/ISDN, or Iva)0.36 intensificationsStandard Deviation 0.61
ControlGuideline-directed Medical Therapy (GDMT) Intensifications Per Patient# of all intensifications (including GDMT plus initiation or uptitration of loop diuretic or digoxin0.38 intensificationsStandard Deviation 0.62
InterventionGuideline-directed Medical Therapy (GDMT) Intensifications Per Patient# of GDMT intensifications (initiation/dose increase EVBB, ACEI, ARB, ARNI, MRA, H/ISDN, or Iva)0.61 intensificationsStandard Deviation 0.73
InterventionGuideline-directed Medical Therapy (GDMT) Intensifications Per Patient# of all intensifications (including GDMT plus initiation or uptitration of loop diuretic or digoxin0.63 intensificationsStandard Deviation 0.73
Secondary

Number of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure Medications

Initiation or intensification of key heart failure medications was determined by medical chart review conducted at immediately following the cardiology clinic appointment (enrollment) and for the clinic visit closest to 1 month (30 days) after the enrollment visit. Raw numbers of participants were analyzed.

Time frame: Enrollment, 1 month (30 days) after enrollment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ControlNumber of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsAny intensification in HFrEF medication, including GDMT, loop diuretic, or digoxin45 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsACE-I or ARB replaced with ARNI3 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsARNI added0 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsKey heart failure medication up titrated33 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsBeta blocker added2 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsBeta blocker up titrated16 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsLoop diuretic added0 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsACE-I up titrated4 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsIntensification occurring during cardiology clinic visit (day 1)42 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsARB up titrated7 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsAldosterone antagonist added3 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsARNI up titrated5 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsACE-I added1 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsLoop diuretic up titrated1 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsIvabradine added0 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsAldosterone antagonist up titrated3 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsKey heart failure medication added10 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsIvabradine up titrated0 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsHydralazine added1 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsHydralazine up titrated0 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsARB added4 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsIsosorbide up titrated0 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsIsosorbide added1 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsDigoxin up titrated0 Participants
ControlNumber of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsDigoxin added0 Participants
InterventionNumber of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsDigoxin up titrated0 Participants
InterventionNumber of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsIntensification occurring during cardiology clinic visit (day 1)61 Participants
InterventionNumber of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsAny intensification in HFrEF medication, including GDMT, loop diuretic, or digoxin73 Participants
InterventionNumber of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsKey heart failure medication added17 Participants
InterventionNumber of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsBeta blocker added0 Participants
InterventionNumber of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsACE-I added4 Participants
InterventionNumber of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsARB added2 Participants
InterventionNumber of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsARNI added0 Participants
InterventionNumber of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsLoop diuretic added0 Participants
InterventionNumber of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsAldosterone antagonist added5 Participants
InterventionNumber of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsIvabradine added1 Participants
InterventionNumber of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsHydralazine added1 Participants
InterventionNumber of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsDigoxin added0 Participants
InterventionNumber of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsACE-I or ARB replaced with ARNI4 Participants
InterventionNumber of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsKey heart failure medication up titrated58 Participants
InterventionNumber of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsBeta blocker up titrated32 Participants
InterventionNumber of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsACE-I up titrated7 Participants
InterventionNumber of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsARB up titrated7 Participants
InterventionNumber of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsARNI up titrated6 Participants
InterventionNumber of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsLoop diuretic up titrated0 Participants
InterventionNumber of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsAldosterone antagonist up titrated8 Participants
InterventionNumber of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsIvabradine up titrated0 Participants
InterventionNumber of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsHydralazine up titrated2 Participants
InterventionNumber of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsIsosorbide up titrated1 Participants
InterventionNumber of Participants With Initiation/Intensification of Key Heart Failure MedicationsIsosorbide added2 Participants
Secondary

Safety Outcomes

Unplanned hospitalizations or emergency department visits without hospitalization from the cardiology clinic visit (enrollment) to 1-month (30 days) after enrollment. Hospitalization and emergency department visits were obtained via medical chart review and were analyzed as yes/no per patient.

Time frame: Enrollment, 1-month (30 days) after Enrollment

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
ControlSafety OutcomesUnplanned hospitalization at 30 days4 participants
ControlSafety OutcomesEmergency department visit without hospitalization at 30 days5 participants
InterventionSafety OutcomesUnplanned hospitalization at 30 days6 participants
InterventionSafety OutcomesEmergency department visit without hospitalization at 30 days9 participants
Secondary

Self-Reported Patient Engagement Around HFrEF Medications

The investigators were interested in whether the patient engagement tool (a 3-minute video and 1-page checklist-delivered electronically 1 week prior, 3 days prior and 24 hours prior to the enrollment cardiology clinic visit) led to an increase in patient sense of engagement around their HFrEF medication prescribing, prompting patients to begin a dialogue with their clinician about their medication plan. This was assessed among the Intervention group by comparing answers from a self-reported survey at 1 month after delivery of intervention materials. Participants were sent the survey and asked if they received and reviewed the intervention materials. Survey measures were included as well as a series of questions asking about how and when medications were discussed during clinical interactions.

Time frame: 1 month after delivery of intervention materials.

Population: Of the 145 intervention patients that were sent the survey, 126 responded to the survey. Only intervention participants were analyzed for this outcome, since Control participants received usual care.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
ControlSelf-Reported Patient Engagement Around HFrEF MedicationsReported receiving the video81 Participants
ControlSelf-Reported Patient Engagement Around HFrEF MedicationsReported reviewing the video73 Participants
ControlSelf-Reported Patient Engagement Around HFrEF MedicationsFound the video helpful in understanding their medical plan53 Participants
ControlSelf-Reported Patient Engagement Around HFrEF MedicationsFound the video helpful in discussing their medicines with their doctor51 Participants
ControlSelf-Reported Patient Engagement Around HFrEF MedicationsReported receiving the checklist83 Participants
ControlSelf-Reported Patient Engagement Around HFrEF MedicationsReported reviewing the checklist74 Participants
ControlSelf-Reported Patient Engagement Around HFrEF MedicationsFound the checklist helpful in understanding their medical plan56 Participants
ControlSelf-Reported Patient Engagement Around HFrEF MedicationsFound the checklist helpful in discussing their medicines with their doctor48 Participants
ControlSelf-Reported Patient Engagement Around HFrEF MedicationsBrought the checklist to their appointment61 Participants
ControlSelf-Reported Patient Engagement Around HFrEF MedicationsTalked about checklist with doctor at their appointment52 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 17, 2026