Skip to content

Ruxolitinib vs Allogeneic SCT for Patients With Myelofibrosis According to Donor Availability

Ruxolitinib Versus Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients With Myelofibrosis According to Donor Availability: A Prospective Phase II Trial (MMM 02 Study)

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03333187
Enrollment
87
Registered
2017-11-06
Start date
2016-12-21
Completion date
2025-10-07
Last updated
2025-03-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bone Marrow Fibrosis

Keywords

Myelofibrosis, Myeloproliferative Disease

Brief summary

The present study will be a multicenter, prospective phase II-study comparing efficacy of allogeneic SCT for patients with myelofibrosis who have a suitable stem cell donor after a 3 months Ruxolitinib induction therapy with patients who lack a suitable stem cell donor and will continue to receive Ruxolitinib.

Detailed description

This study is a multicenter, prospective phase II-study compares efficacy of allogeneic SCT for patients with myelofibrosis who have a suitable stem cell donor after a 3 months Ruxolitinib induction therapy with patients who lack a suitable stem cell donor and will continue to receive Ruxolitinib. In this study will further assess and compare the safety and efficacy of study treatments/ induction therapy in both study arms on spleen reduction, improvement of constitutional symptoms, QOL, toxicity, fibrosis regression, development of GvHD as well as chimerism, engraftment, relapse incidence, disease related mortality, outcome and overall survival.

Interventions

PROCEDUREAllogeneic stem cell transplantation
DRUGRuxolitinib continuous therapy

Sponsors

Novartis
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Clinical Trial Center North (CTC North GmbH & Co. KG)
CollaboratorOTHER
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Treatment A (only with a suitable stem cell donor): Allogeneic SCT after 3 months of Ruxolitinib induction therapy Treatment B: Ruxolitinib continuous therapy

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Symptomatic primary myelofibrosis or myelofibrosis post polycythaemia vera or essential thrombocythemia stage intermediate 2- or high-risk according to IPSS or DIPSS \[46\] or intermediate 1-risk with high risk cytogenetics, other than normal karyotype, sole del 20q, del 13q, or sole+9, or transfusion-dependency 2. Patients age: 18 - 70 years at time of inclusion (female and male) 3. Patients understand and voluntarily sign an informed consent form 4. Platelet count ≥ 50 x 109/L 5. No prior Ruxolitinib treatment 6. ECOG ≤ 2

Exclusion criteria

1. Severe renal, hepatic, pulmonary or cardiac disease, such as: * Total bilirubin, SGPT or SGOT \> 3 times upper the normal level * Left ventricular ejection fraction \< 30 % * Creatinine clearance \< 30 ml/min * DLCO \< 35 % and/or receiving supplementary continuous oxygen 2. Positive serology for HIV 3. Pregnant or lactating women (positive serum pregnancy test) 4. Age \< 18 and ≥ 71 years. 5. Uncontrolled invasive fungal infection at time of screening (baseline) 6. Serious psychiatric or psychological disorders 7. Participation in another study with ongoing use of unlicensed investigational product from 28 days before study enrollment 8. Transformation to AML

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Event free survival3 yearsCompare to event free survival of patients at 3 years after allogeneic SCT and in Ruxolitinib continuous therapy in patients without a suitable donor

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Spleen reduction3 monthsUltrasound measurement Spleen size, reduction of Spleen size after 3 months Ruxolitinib induction therapy
Improvement of constitutional symptoms3 monthsImprovement of constitutional symptoms (Loose of weight and night sweat) after 3 months Ruxolitinib induction therapy, questionnaire, medical history
Improvement of bone marrow fibrosis3 monthsbone marrow histology, Improvement of bone marrow fibrosis after 3 months of Ruxolitinib induction therapy
Chronic graft-versus-host disease1, 2 and 3 years after allogeneic SCTIncidence of chronic graft-versus-host disease according to the NIH consensus criteria of Filipovich et al. at 1, 2 and 3 years after allogeneic SCT
Toxicity of Ruxolitinibtill 3 yearsToxicity of Ruxolitinib scored according to NCI CTCAE, Version 4.0
Toxicity of conditioning therapytill 3 yearsToxicity of conditioning therapy scored according to NCI CTCAE, Version 4.0
Relapse3 yearsCumulative incidence of relapse at 3 years after allogeneic SCT
Disease-related mortality3 yearsDisease-related mortality at 3 years after allogeneic SCT and Ruxolitinib continuous therapies
Acute graft-versus-host diseaseDay +100 after allogeneic SCTIncidence of acute graft-versus-host disease on Day +100 after allogeneic SCT according to the Glucksberg scale revised by Przepiorka
Discontinuation rate3 yearsDiscontinuation rate at 3 years after Ruxolitinib continuous therapy (End of study)
Evaluation of Sorror Risk Scoreat baselineEvaluation of Sorror Risk Score on outcome after allogeneic SCT
Chimerism on relapse30d, 100d, 180 d, 1 year, 2 years and 3 yearsChimerism Analyse, Impact of chimerism on relapse incidence after allogeneic SCT
Bone marrow fibrosis regression30d, 100d, 1 year, and 3 yearsbone marrow histology, Evaluation of bone marrow fibrosis regression after allogeneic SCT at 30d, 100d, 1 year, and 3 years
Evaluation of QOL (FACT-BMT)baseline, at transplantation, +180d, +1 year, +2 years and +3 yearsQuestionnaire, Evaluation of QOL (FACT-BMT) before Ruxolitinib induction therapy (= baseline), at transplantation, and after transplantation at 6m, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years
Evaluation of QOL (MPN-SAF-TSS)baseline, at transplantation, +180d, +1 year, +2 years and +3 yearsQuestionaire, Evaluation of QOL (MPN-SAF-TSS) before Ruxolitinib induction therapy (= baseline), at transplantation, and after transplantation at 6m, 1 year, 2 years and 3 years
Overall Survival3 yearsOverall survival at 3 years after allogeneic SCT compared to Ruxolitinib continuous therapy in patients without a suit-able donor
Non-relapsed mortality1 and 3 yearsNon-relapsed mortality at 1 and 3 years after allogeneic SCT and Ruxolitinib continuous therapy

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026