Skip to content

Continuous Versus Discontinuous Design of Encircling Lesions During Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

Acute Efficacy of Point-by-point Radiofrequency Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: a Randomized Comparison of Continuous Versus Discontinuous Design of Encircling Lesions

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03332862
Acronym
CDAF
Enrollment
30
Registered
2017-11-06
Start date
2017-09-15
Completion date
2018-01-31
Last updated
2017-11-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation

Keywords

Catheter Ablation, Atrial Fibrillation, Contact Force, Continuous Ablation

Brief summary

Acute efficacy of point-by-point radiofrequency ablation for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with atrial fibrillation are comparable independantly of the ablation strategy (continous versus discontinuous ablation) under the same condition of power delivery.

Detailed description

The number of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF) is increasing. Durable PVI is cornerstone for long-term freedom of AF. In one previous study continuous ablation was suggested to be more efficient in durable PVI. However, this hypothesis has not been proven in randomized fashion. The current study is to confirm whether continuous versus discontinuous design of encircling lesions are comparable under the same conditions of power delivery. The study design is a two-centre prospective randomized trial to compare the acute efficacy by using the above described approaches.

Interventions

PROCEDUREcatheter ablation

catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation treatment

Sponsors

Charles University, Czech Republic
CollaboratorOTHER
3rd Department of Internal Medicine - Cardiology
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation with radiofrequency catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation treatment.

Exclusion criteria

\-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Combined unsuccessful PVI or PV reconnection30 min after ablationCombined unsuccessfuk PVI after completeing the primary lesion set or PV reconnection during the waiting time

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Early pulmunary veins reconnection10 min.Early pulmunary veins reconnection within the first 10 min after PVI

Countries

Czechia

Contacts

Primary ContactBashar Aldhoon, MD, PhD
baaĺ@ikem.cz+420739528025

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 19, 2026