Skip to content

To Assess Safety and Efficacy of Agents Targeting DNA Damage Repair With Olaparib Versus Olaparib Monotherapy.

A Phase II, Open Label, Randomised, Multi-centre Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Agents Targeting DNA Damage Repair in Combination With Olaparib Versus Olaparib Monotherapy in the Treatment of Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer Patients Stratified by Alterations in Homologous Recombinant Repair (HRR)-Related Genes (Including BRCA1/2) (VIOLETTE).

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03330847
Enrollment
273
Registered
2017-11-06
Start date
2018-03-07
Completion date
2026-10-09
Last updated
2026-07-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Metastatic Triple Negative Breast Cancer

Keywords

Germline BRCA mutation, Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, Olaparib, Homologous Recombinant Repair (HRR)-related Genes

Brief summary

This study is to assess the efficacy and safety of olaparib monotherapy versus olaparib in combination with an inhibitor of ATR (Ataxia-Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM) and Rad3-related protein kinase (Ceralasertib \[AZD6738\]) and olaparib monotherapy versus olaparib in combination with an inhibitor of WEE1 (adavosertib \[AZD1775\]) in second or third line setting in patients with Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) prospectively stratified by presence/absence of qualifying tumour mutation in genes involved in the homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway. Treatment arms are olaparib monotherapy, olaparib+ Ceralasertib and olaparib+adavosertib. The study subject population will be divided into Stratum A, Stratum B, and Stratum C. Due to the different schedules of administration of each of the treatment options as well as their different toxicity profiles, the study is not blinded. Study has two stage consent process- stage 1 consent (molecular screening for HRR defects) and stage 2 consent (main study). Patients with TNBC and with known qualifying BRCAm, non BRCAm HRRm and non HRRm status will be offered the option of consenting to the main part of the study within the 28-day screening period. Following the ISRC meeting on 17 April 2019 a recommendation was made to close the adavosertib+olaparib treatment arm across all biomarker strata. Patients receiving treatment with adavosertib+olaparib treatment were offered the opportunity to continue treatment on olaparib monotherapy at the approved dose (300 mg bd). Following the closure of this arm the total number of patients randomised will be lower (approximately 350 patients). Approximately 300 patients will be randomised (using randomisation ratio 1:1) to 2 ongoing treatment arms plus an additional 47 patients to a 3rd arm (olaparib+adavosertib) prior to the arm being discontinued.

Detailed description

This is a prospective, open label, randomised, multi-centre Phase 2 study that will assess the efficacy and safety of olaparib monotherapy versus olaparib in combination with an inhibitor of ATR (Ceralasertib) and olaparib monotherapy versus olaparib in combination with an inhibitor of WEE1 (adavosertib) in second or third line setting in patients with TNBC prospectively stratified by presence/absence of qualifying tumour mutation in genes involved in the HRR pathway. Eligible patients will be randomised by a ratio 1:1:1 to treatment Arm 1: olaparib continuous in a 28-day cycle, Arm 2: Ceralasertib Days 1-7 with olaparib continuous in a 28-day cycle or Arm 3: adavosertib Days 1-3 and 8-10 with olaparib continuous in a 21-day cycle. Following the ISRC meeting on 17 April 2019 a recommendation was made to close the adavosertib+olaparib treatment arm across all biomarker strata. Following closure of this arm the randomisation ratio will be 1:1 to olaparib monotherapy or Ceralasertib+olaparib. Patients who were receiving treatment with adavosertib+olaparib treatment were offered the opportunity to continue treatment on olaparib monotherapy at the approved dose (300 mg bd). The study subject population will be divided into Stratum A (patients with mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 (Breast cancer susceptible gene mutation (BRCAm)), Stratum B (patients with mutations in any of the other genes involved in the HRR pathway and no mutation in BRCA1 and no mutation in BRCA2), and Stratum C (patients with no detected tumour mutations in any of the HRR genes). Within each stratum A, B and C, there will be further stratification by whether the patient received prior platinum-based therapy. In the olaparib monotherapy treatment arm as well as in the Ceralasertib+olaparib treatment arm, patients will be administered olaparib bd at 300 mg continuously. Two (2) 150 mg olaparib tablets will be taken at the same time each day, approximately 12 hours apart with one glass of water (approximately 250 mL). In the adavosertib+olaparib treatment arm, patients will be given olaparib 200 mg bd (2 x 100 mg tablets twice a day) and adavosertib 150 mg bd from Day 1 to Day 3 (inclusive) and Day 8 to Day 10 (inclusive) of every 21-day cycle. Ceralasertib will be supplied as 20 mg, 80 mg, or 100 mg film coated tablets. Patients will be administered Ceralasertib od at 160 mg from Day 1 to Day 7 (inclusive) of every 28-day cycle. A total of 160 mg of Ceralasertib tablets will be taken at the same time on each day of dosing with approximately 250 mL of water. Adavosertib will be supplied as capsules containing 25 mg, 50 mg, 75 mg, 100 mg, or 200 mg of drug substance. Adavosertib will be taken with approximately 250 mL of water approximately 2 hours before or 2 hours after food. Olaparib, Ceralasertib and adavosertib will be provided by AstraZeneca. Primary outcome measures (progression free survival \[PFS\]) will be analysed for the 3 patient populations BRCAm, Non BRCAm HRRm (Homologous Recombination Repair gene mutation) and Non HRRm. Secondary outcome measures will be analysed in 2 patient populations HRRm and All for PFS, Objective response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS) will be analysed in all 5 patient populations. DoR, and tumour change will be analysed in BRCAm, Non BRCAm HRRm, and Non HRRm patient populations. Tumour and germline mutation status will be analysed only in the all patient population. PK outcome measures will be analysed only in the all patient population. Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) of radiological imaging data will be carried out using RECIST version 1.1 and Investigator assessments will also be analysed for sensitivity purposes.

Interventions

DRUGOlaparib Continuous (28-Day cycle) 300 mg BD.

Two (2) 150 mg olaparib tablets should be taken at the same time each day, approximately 12 hours apart with one glass of water (approximately 250 mL).

DRUGCeralasertib 160 mg OD + olaparib continuous 300 mg BD (28-day cycle).

Patients will be administered Ceralasertib OD at 160 mg from Day 1 to Day 7 (inclusive) of every 28-day cycle.

DRUGAdavosertib 150 mg BD + olaparib 200 mg BD (21-day cycle).

Patients will be administered adavosertib BD at 150mg from Day 1 to Day 3 and Day 8 to Day 10.

Sponsors

AstraZeneca
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Masking description

Given the study treatment design (monotherapy and 2 different combination therapies will be employed) neither patients nor Investigators will be blinded to study treatment.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 130 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Pertinent Inclusion criteria: 1. Informed consent prior to any study specific procedures. 2. Male or female ≥18 years of age. 3. Progressive cancer at the time of study entry. 4. Histologically or cytologically confirmed TNBC at initial diagnosis with evidence of metastatic disease and HER2 negative as per ASCO-CAP HER2 guideline recommendations 2013. 5. Patients must have received at least 1 and no more than 2 prior lines of treatment for metastatic disease with an anthracycline (eg, doxorubicin, epirubicin) and/or a taxane (eg, paclitaxel, docetaxel) unless contraindicated, in either the neo-adjuvant, adjuvant or metastatic setting. 6. Confirmed presence of qualifying HRR mutation or absence of any HRR mutation in tumour tissue by the Lynparza HRR assay. 7. At least one measurable lesion that can be accurately assessed at baseline by computed tomography (CT) (magnetic resonance imaging \[MRI\] where CT is contraindicated) and is suitable for repeated assessment as per RECIST 1.1. 8. Patients must have normal organ and bone marrow function measured within 28 days prior to randomization (defined in the protocol). 9. ECOG PS 0-1 within 28 days of randomisation. 10. Postmenopausal or evidence of non-childbearing status for women of childbearing potential (contraception restrictions apply to participants and their partners). 13\. Patient is willing to comply with the protocol requirements. 14. Life expectancy of ≥16 weeks. Pertinent

Exclusion criteria

1. Cytotoxic chemotherapy, hormonal or non hormonal targeted therapy within 21 days of Cycle 1 Day 1 is not permitted. Palliative radiotherapy must have been completed 21 or more days before Cycle 1 Day 1. The patient can receive a stable dose of bisphosphonates or denosumab for bone metastases, before and during the study as long as these were started at least 5 days prior to study treatment. 2. More than 2 prior lines of cytotoxic chemotherapy for metastatic disease (prior treatments with hormonal, non-hormonal, biologics or the combination of an aromatase inhibitor and everolimus are not counted as a prior line of therapy). 3. Previous randomisation in the present study. 4. Previous treatment with a PARP inhibitor (including olaparib) or other DDR inhibitor (unless less than 3 weeks duration and at least 12 months has elapsed between the last dose and randomization). 5. Exposure to a small molecule IP within 30 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to randomisation. The minimum washout period for immunotherapy shall be 42 days. 6. Patients with second primary cancer (exceptions defined in the protocol). 7. Mean resting corrected QTc interval using the Fridericia formula (QTcF) \>470 msec/female patients and \>450 msec for male patients (as calculated per institutional standards) obtained from 3 ECGs performed 2-5 minutes apart at study entry, or congenital long QT syndrome. 8. Any of the following cardiac diseases currently or within the last 6 months: unstable angina pectoris, congestive heart failure ≥ Class 2 as defined by the New York Heart Association, acute myocardial infarction, conduction abnormality not controlled with pacemaker or medication (patients with a conduction abnormality controlled with pacemaker or medication at the time of screening are eligible), significant ventricular or supraventricular arrhythmias (patients with chronic rate-controlled atrial fibrillation in the absence of other cardiac abnormalities are eligible). 9. Concomitant use of known strong or moderate cytochrome P (CYP) 3A inhibitors, strong or moderate CYP3A inducers, or sensitive CYP3A4 substrates or CYp3A4 substrates with a narrow therapeutic index (No longer applicable from CSPv7.0). 10. Persistent toxicities (≥ CTCAE grade 2) caused by previous cancer therapy, excluding alopecia and CTCAE grade 2 peripheral neuropathy. 11. Major surgery within 2 weeks of starting study treatment: patients must have recovered from any effects of any major surgery. 12. Immunocompromised patients, eg, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). 13. Patients with known active hepatitis (ie, hepatitis B or C). 14. Patients considered a poor medical risk due to a serious, uncontrolled medical disorder, non malignant systemic disease or active, uncontrolled infection. 15. Patients with symptomatic uncontrolled brain metastases. 16. Patients unable to swallow orally administered medication and patients with gastrointestinal disorders likely to interfere with absorption of the study medication. 17. Patients with a known hypersensitivity to olaparib, adavosertib, Ceralasertib, or any of the excipients of the products. 18. Pregnant or breast feeding women.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-free Survival Per Stratum (BICR)Until date of first documented progression or censoring date or date of death from any cause, whichever came first (assessed up to 32 months)Progression-free survival was defined as time from randomization until the date of objective disease progression or death, regardless of whether the patient withdrew from randomized therapy or received another anti-cancer therapy prior to progression. Progression was determined by Blinded independent central review (BICR) using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours Version (RECIST 1.1). Patients who had not progressed or died at the time of analysis were censored at the time of the latest date of assessment from their last evaluable RECIST assessment. If patients had no evaluable visits or baseline data, the patient was censored at Study Day 1, unless death occurred within 17 weeks i.e., death within 17 weeks was relative to randomization. Here, the study patient population was stratified as follows: Breast cancer susceptible gene mutation (BRCAm) patients; non BRCAm homologous recombination repair gene mutation (HRRm) patients; non HRRm patients.
Progression-free Survival Per Stratum (Sensitivity Analysis)Until date of first documented progression or censoring date or date of death from any cause, whichever came first (assessed up to 32 months)Progression-free survival was defined as time from randomization until the date of objective disease progression or death, regardless of whether the patient withdrew from randomized therapy or received another anti-cancer therapy prior to progression. Progression was determined by the site Investigator. Patients who had not progressed or died at the time of analysis were censored at the time of the latest date of assessment from their last evaluable RECIST 1.1 assessment. If patients had no evaluable visits or baseline data, the patient was censored at Study Day 1, unless death occurred within 17 weeks i.e., death within 17 weeks was relative to randomization. Here, the study patient population was stratified as follows: BRCAm patients; non BRCAm HRRm patients; non HRRm patients.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients With Objective Response (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)From date of randomization until date of first documented progression or last evaluable assessment, or start of subsequent anti-cancer therapy (Whichever occurred first [assessed up to 32 months])The objective response was defined as patients with at least one BICR assessed visit response of CR or PR. For sensitivity analysis, objective response was defined as the patients with at least one visit response of CR or PR based on Investigator data. These are unadjusted percentages of responders (100 \* number of responders / number of patients in full analysis set). The objective response was assessed per RECIST 1.1 guidelines for: measurable lesions (measured at baseline as ≥ 10 mm in the longest diameter (except lymph nodes which must have short axis ≥ 15 mm) using CT or MRI, non-measurable lesions (all other lesions, including small lesions (longest diameter \<10 mm or pathological lymph nodes with ≥10 to \<15mm short axis at baseline), based on target lesions \[TL\] (maximum of 5 measurable lesions (with a maximum of 2 lesions per organ), non-target lesions \[NTL\] (lesions (or sites of disease) not recorded as TL should be identified as NTL at baseline) and any new lesions.
Objective Response Rate (ORR) (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)From date of randomization until date of first documented progression or last evaluable assessment, or start of subsequent anti-cancer therapy (Whichever occurred first [assessed up to 32 months])The ORR was defined using BICR data to define a visit response of CR or PR, with denominator defined as number of patients in FAS. For sensitivity analysis, ORR is defined as the percentage of patients with at least one investigator-assessed visit response of CR or PR, with denominator defined as number of patients in FAS. These are summarized using adjusted response rates, which are computed with a logistic regression including factors study treatment and prior platinum-based therapy (no, yes), i.e. these response rates are adjusted for prior platinum-based therapy, which is one of the randomisation stratification factors. The adjusted response rates have been presented as a percentage of patients.
Duration of Response (DoR) [Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis]From date of first documented response until date of first documented progression or last evaluable assessment (assessed up to 32 months)The DoR was defined as the time from the date of first documented response according to BICR data until date of documented progression according to BICR data or death in the absence of disease progression. For sensitivity analysis, DoR was defined as the time from the date of first documented response according to Investigator assessment until date of documented progression according to Investigator assessment or death in the absence of disease progression. Here, the median DoR and the 25th and 75th percentile of DoR are presented. The DoR from onset of response was calculated using Kaplan-Meier technique. Here, the study patient population was stratified as follows: BRCAm patients; non BRCAm HRRm patients; non HRRm patients.
Percentage Change From Baseline in Target Lesion Tumour Size [Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis]Baseline, at Week 16Tumour size was the sum of the longest diameters of the target lesions (TLs). The percentage change in TL tumour size at Week 16 was obtained for each patient as follows (considering a visit window around the scheduled day of the Week 16 assessment): (TL at Week 16 minus TL at baseline) divided by (TL at baseline) multiplied by 100. Here, the percentage change data have been reported as per BICR and as per sensitivity analysis per investigator assessments. Here, the study patient population was stratified as follows: BRCAm patients; non BRCAm HRRm patients; non HRRm patients.
Overall Survival (OS)From the date of randomisation until time of data cut-off date or death due to any cause (assessed up to 32 months)Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of randomisation until death due to any cause. Any patient not known to have died at the time of data cut-off was censored based on the last recorded date on which the patient was known to be alive. Here, the study patient population was stratified as follows: BRCAm patients; non BRCAm HRRm patients; non HRRm patients.
Plasma Drug Concentrations of OlaparibPre-dose at Cycle 1 Day 7 [olaparib monotherapy or ceralasertib+olaparib] or Cycle 1 Day 10 [adavosertib+olaparib] (each cycle is 21 days for olaparib+adavosertib, and 28 days for olaparib monotherapy and olaparib+ceralasertib)Plasma drug concentrations of olaparib are evaluated to assess exposure to olaparib in all patients.
Number of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)From screening until Follow-up 30 Days after last dose of study treatment (assessed up to 32 months)Treatment-emergent adverse events reported after treatment with olaparib monotherapy, the combination of ceralasertib and olaparib or the combination of adavosertib and olaparib. The data includes adverse events (AEs) with an onset or worsening date on or after the date of first dose and up to and including 30 days following the date of last dose of study medication.
Plasma Drug Concentrations of Ceralasertib and AdavosertibPre-dose at Cycle 1 Day 7 [ceralasertib+olaparib] or Cycle 1 Day 10 [adavosertib+olaparib] (each cycle is 21 days for olaparib+adavosertib, and 28 days for olaparib+ceralasertib)Plasma drug concentrations of ceralasertib and adavosertib are evaluated to assess exposure to ceralasertib and adavosertib in all patients.
Progression-free Survival (Per BICR)From randomization until date of first documented progression or censoring date or date of death from any cause, whichever came first (assessed up to 32 months)Progression-free survival was defined as time from randomization until the date of objective disease progression or death, regardless of whether the patient withdrew from randomized therapy or received another anti-cancer therapy prior to progression. Progression was determined by BICR using RECIST 1.1. Patients who had not progressed or died at the time of analysis were censored at the time of the latest date of assessment from their last evaluable RECIST assessment. If patients had no evaluable visits or baseline data, the patient was censored at Study Day 1, unless death occurred within 17 weeks i.e., death within 17 weeks was relative to randomization. Here, the study patient population was presented as follows: HRRm and all enrolled patients.

Countries

Belgium, Canada, Czechia, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, South Korea, Spain, Taiwan, United Kingdom, United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAndrew Tutt, MB ChB PhD

Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted between 21-Feb-2018 and 13-Nov-2020 in 15 countries in Asia, Europe, and North America.

Pre-assignment details

Participants who met the inclusion and none of the exclusion criteria were enrolled to the study. All study assessments were performed as per the schedule of assessment.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Olaparib Monotherapy
Randomized patients received olaparib monotherapy 300 mg twice daily (BD) \[28-day cycle\], until objective radiological disease progression as per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours Version (RECIST 1.1) as assessed by the Investigator or until any other discontinuation criteria were met.
114
Olaparib + Ceralasertib
Randomized patients received ceralasertib 160 mg once daily (OD) from Days 1 to 7 and olaparib 300 mg twice daily (28-day cycle), until objective radiological disease progression as per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by the Investigator or until any other discontinuation criteria were met.
112
Olaparib + Adavosertib
Randomized patients received adavosertib 150 mg BD from days 1 to 3 and days 8 to 10 and olaparib 200 mg BD (21-day cycle), until objective radiological disease progression as per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by the Investigator or until any other discontinuation criteria were met. The adavosertib dose was reduced from 175 mg to 150 mg BD through implementation of clinical study protocol (CSP) version 5.0.
47
Total273

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicOlaparib MonotherapyOlaparib + CeralasertibOlaparib + AdavosertibTotal
Age, Continuous53.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.55
54.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.85
52.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.29
53.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.21
Age, Customized
>=40 to <50 Years
30 Participants27 Participants18 Participants75 Participants
Age, Customized
<40 Years
15 Participants9 Participants4 Participants28 Participants
Age, Customized
>=50 to <65 Years
52 Participants57 Participants16 Participants125 Participants
Age, Customized
>=65 to <75 Years
14 Participants13 Participants8 Participants35 Participants
Age, Customized
>=75 Years
3 Participants6 Participants1 Participants10 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
6 Participants7 Participants5 Participants18 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
92 Participants97 Participants40 Participants229 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
16 Participants8 Participants2 Participants26 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
14 Participants23 Participants7 Participants44 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
5 Participants5 Participants2 Participants12 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
12 Participants7 Participants2 Participants21 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
81 Participants77 Participants34 Participants192 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
114 Participants112 Participants47 Participants273 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
42 / 11440 / 11226 / 47
other
Total, other adverse events
99 / 110106 / 10946 / 46
serious
Total, serious adverse events
21 / 11024 / 10917 / 46

Outcome results

Primary

Progression-free Survival Per Stratum (BICR)

Progression-free survival was defined as time from randomization until the date of objective disease progression or death, regardless of whether the patient withdrew from randomized therapy or received another anti-cancer therapy prior to progression. Progression was determined by Blinded independent central review (BICR) using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours Version (RECIST 1.1). Patients who had not progressed or died at the time of analysis were censored at the time of the latest date of assessment from their last evaluable RECIST assessment. If patients had no evaluable visits or baseline data, the patient was censored at Study Day 1, unless death occurred within 17 weeks i.e., death within 17 weeks was relative to randomization. Here, the study patient population was stratified as follows: Breast cancer susceptible gene mutation (BRCAm) patients; non BRCAm homologous recombination repair gene mutation (HRRm) patients; non HRRm patients.

Time frame: Until date of first documented progression or censoring date or date of death from any cause, whichever came first (assessed up to 32 months)

Population: All randomized patients were analyzed according to the randomisation scheme, regardless of the treatment they actually received. Here, number analyzed reflects number of patients enrolled in each stratum per treatment arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Olaparib MonotherapyProgression-free Survival Per Stratum (BICR)non BRCAm HRRm patients1.9 Months
Olaparib MonotherapyProgression-free Survival Per Stratum (BICR)BRCAm patients7.3 Months
Olaparib MonotherapyProgression-free Survival Per Stratum (BICR)non HRRm patients1.9 Months
Olaparib + CeralasertibProgression-free Survival Per Stratum (BICR)non BRCAm HRRm patients3.9 Months
Olaparib + CeralasertibProgression-free Survival Per Stratum (BICR)BRCAm patients7.4 Months
Olaparib + CeralasertibProgression-free Survival Per Stratum (BICR)non HRRm patients3.6 Months
Olaparib + AdavosertibProgression-free Survival Per Stratum (BICR)BRCAm patients3.8 Months
Olaparib + AdavosertibProgression-free Survival Per Stratum (BICR)non HRRm patients4.4 Months
Olaparib + AdavosertibProgression-free Survival Per Stratum (BICR)non BRCAm HRRm patients2.1 Months
Comparison: Patient Population BRCAmp-value: 0.940390% CI: [0.63, 1.66]Two-sided log-rank tests
Comparison: Patient Population BRCAmp-value: 0.928290% CI: [0.52, 1.88]Two-sided log-rank tests
Comparison: Patient Population Non BRCAm HRRmp-value: 0.127490% CI: [0.28, 1.03]Two-sided log-rank tests
Comparison: Patient Population Non BRCAm HRRmp-value: 0.295690% CI: [0.23, 1.26]Two-sided log-rank tests
Comparison: Patient Population Non HRRmp-value: 0.295990% CI: [0.5, 1.14]Two-sided log-rank tests
Comparison: Patient Population Non HRRmp-value: 0.019390% CI: [0.28, 0.8]Two-sided log-rank tests
Primary

Progression-free Survival Per Stratum (Sensitivity Analysis)

Progression-free survival was defined as time from randomization until the date of objective disease progression or death, regardless of whether the patient withdrew from randomized therapy or received another anti-cancer therapy prior to progression. Progression was determined by the site Investigator. Patients who had not progressed or died at the time of analysis were censored at the time of the latest date of assessment from their last evaluable RECIST 1.1 assessment. If patients had no evaluable visits or baseline data, the patient was censored at Study Day 1, unless death occurred within 17 weeks i.e., death within 17 weeks was relative to randomization. Here, the study patient population was stratified as follows: BRCAm patients; non BRCAm HRRm patients; non HRRm patients.

Time frame: Until date of first documented progression or censoring date or date of death from any cause, whichever came first (assessed up to 32 months)

Population: All randomized patients were analyzed according to the randomisation scheme, regardless of the treatment actually they received. Here, number analyzed reflects number of patients enrolled in each stratum per treatment arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Olaparib MonotherapyProgression-free Survival Per Stratum (Sensitivity Analysis)non BRCAm HRRm patients3.4 Months
Olaparib MonotherapyProgression-free Survival Per Stratum (Sensitivity Analysis)BRCAm patients7.4 Months
Olaparib MonotherapyProgression-free Survival Per Stratum (Sensitivity Analysis)non HRRm patients1.9 Months
Olaparib + CeralasertibProgression-free Survival Per Stratum (Sensitivity Analysis)non BRCAm HRRm patients3.7 Months
Olaparib + CeralasertibProgression-free Survival Per Stratum (Sensitivity Analysis)BRCAm patients7.5 Months
Olaparib + CeralasertibProgression-free Survival Per Stratum (Sensitivity Analysis)non HRRm patients3.5 Months
Olaparib + AdavosertibProgression-free Survival Per Stratum (Sensitivity Analysis)BRCAm patients5.4 Months
Olaparib + AdavosertibProgression-free Survival Per Stratum (Sensitivity Analysis)non HRRm patients2.9 Months
Olaparib + AdavosertibProgression-free Survival Per Stratum (Sensitivity Analysis)non BRCAm HRRm patients2.9 Months
Comparison: Patient Population BRCAmp-value: 0.614790% CI: [0.53, 1.39]Two-sided log-rank tests
Comparison: Patient Population BRCAmp-value: 0.787990% CI: [0.48, 1.68]Two-sided log-rank tests
Comparison: Patient Population Non BRCAm HRRmp-value: 0.369590% CI: [0.38, 1.31]Two-sided log-rank tests
Comparison: Patient Population Non BRCAm HRRmp-value: 0.458690% CI: [0.29, 1.58]Two-sided log-rank tests
Comparison: Patient Population Non HRRmp-value: 0.745290% CI: [0.61, 1.31]Two-sided log-rank tests
Comparison: Patient Population Non HRRmp-value: 0.118590% CI: [0.37, 1]Two-sided log-rank tests
Secondary

Duration of Response (DoR) [Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis]

The DoR was defined as the time from the date of first documented response according to BICR data until date of documented progression according to BICR data or death in the absence of disease progression. For sensitivity analysis, DoR was defined as the time from the date of first documented response according to Investigator assessment until date of documented progression according to Investigator assessment or death in the absence of disease progression. Here, the median DoR and the 25th and 75th percentile of DoR are presented. The DoR from onset of response was calculated using Kaplan-Meier technique. Here, the study patient population was stratified as follows: BRCAm patients; non BRCAm HRRm patients; non HRRm patients.

Time frame: From date of first documented response until date of first documented progression or last evaluable assessment (assessed up to 32 months)

Population: All randomized patients were analyzed according to the randomization scheme, regardless of the treatment they actually received. Here, number analyzed reflects number of patients with objective response.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Olaparib MonotherapyDuration of Response (DoR) [Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis]non HRRm patients per BICR11.4 Weeks
Olaparib MonotherapyDuration of Response (DoR) [Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis]non BRCAm HRRm per sensitivity analysis16.3 Weeks
Olaparib MonotherapyDuration of Response (DoR) [Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis]BRCAm patients per sensitivity analysis20.0 Weeks
Olaparib MonotherapyDuration of Response (DoR) [Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis]non HRRm per sensitivity analysis13.6 Weeks
Olaparib MonotherapyDuration of Response (DoR) [Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis]non BRCAm HRRm patients per BICR16.8 Weeks
Olaparib MonotherapyDuration of Response (DoR) [Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis]BRCAm patients per BICR20.0 Weeks
Olaparib + CeralasertibDuration of Response (DoR) [Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis]non HRRm patients per BICR24.1 Weeks
Olaparib + CeralasertibDuration of Response (DoR) [Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis]BRCAm patients per BICR32.0 Weeks
Olaparib + CeralasertibDuration of Response (DoR) [Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis]non BRCAm HRRm patients per BICR17.1 Weeks
Olaparib + CeralasertibDuration of Response (DoR) [Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis]BRCAm patients per sensitivity analysis32.6 Weeks
Olaparib + CeralasertibDuration of Response (DoR) [Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis]non BRCAm HRRm per sensitivity analysis16.5 Weeks
Olaparib + CeralasertibDuration of Response (DoR) [Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis]non HRRm per sensitivity analysis11.7 Weeks
Olaparib + AdavosertibDuration of Response (DoR) [Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis]non HRRm per sensitivity analysis31.6 Weeks
Olaparib + AdavosertibDuration of Response (DoR) [Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis]non BRCAm HRRm per sensitivity analysis48.1 Weeks
Olaparib + AdavosertibDuration of Response (DoR) [Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis]BRCAm patients per BICR33.4 Weeks
Olaparib + AdavosertibDuration of Response (DoR) [Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis]BRCAm patients per sensitivity analysis41.1 Weeks
Olaparib + AdavosertibDuration of Response (DoR) [Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis]non HRRm patients per BICR16.6 Weeks
Secondary

Number of Patients With Objective Response (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)

The objective response was defined as patients with at least one BICR assessed visit response of CR or PR. For sensitivity analysis, objective response was defined as the patients with at least one visit response of CR or PR based on Investigator data. These are unadjusted percentages of responders (100 \* number of responders / number of patients in full analysis set). The objective response was assessed per RECIST 1.1 guidelines for: measurable lesions (measured at baseline as ≥ 10 mm in the longest diameter (except lymph nodes which must have short axis ≥ 15 mm) using CT or MRI, non-measurable lesions (all other lesions, including small lesions (longest diameter \<10 mm or pathological lymph nodes with ≥10 to \<15mm short axis at baseline), based on target lesions \[TL\] (maximum of 5 measurable lesions (with a maximum of 2 lesions per organ), non-target lesions \[NTL\] (lesions (or sites of disease) not recorded as TL should be identified as NTL at baseline) and any new lesions.

Time frame: From date of randomization until date of first documented progression or last evaluable assessment, or start of subsequent anti-cancer therapy (Whichever occurred first [assessed up to 32 months])

Population: All randomized patients were analyzed according to the randomization scheme, regardless of the treatment they actually received. Here, number analyzed reflects number of patients enrolled in each stratum per treatment arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Olaparib MonotherapyNumber of Patients With Objective Response (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)BRCAm patients per BICR19 Participants
Olaparib MonotherapyNumber of Patients With Objective Response (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)non BRCAm HRRm patients per BICR3 Participants
Olaparib MonotherapyNumber of Patients With Objective Response (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)non HRRm patients per BICR2 Participants
Olaparib MonotherapyNumber of Patients With Objective Response (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)HRRm patients per BICR22 Participants
Olaparib MonotherapyNumber of Patients With Objective Response (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)All patients per BICR24 Participants
Olaparib MonotherapyNumber of Patients With Objective Response (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)BRCAm patients per sensitivity analysis18 Participants
Olaparib MonotherapyNumber of Patients With Objective Response (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)non BRCAm HRRm per sensitivity analysis3 Participants
Olaparib MonotherapyNumber of Patients With Objective Response (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)non HRRm per sensitivity analysis1 Participants
Olaparib + CeralasertibNumber of Patients With Objective Response (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)non HRRm patients per BICR8 Participants
Olaparib + CeralasertibNumber of Patients With Objective Response (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)non BRCAm HRRm per sensitivity analysis4 Participants
Olaparib + CeralasertibNumber of Patients With Objective Response (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)HRRm patients per BICR24 Participants
Olaparib + CeralasertibNumber of Patients With Objective Response (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)All patients per BICR32 Participants
Olaparib + CeralasertibNumber of Patients With Objective Response (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)BRCAm patients per sensitivity analysis20 Participants
Olaparib + CeralasertibNumber of Patients With Objective Response (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)BRCAm patients per BICR20 Participants
Olaparib + CeralasertibNumber of Patients With Objective Response (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)non BRCAm HRRm patients per BICR4 Participants
Olaparib + CeralasertibNumber of Patients With Objective Response (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)non HRRm per sensitivity analysis11 Participants
Olaparib + AdavosertibNumber of Patients With Objective Response (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)non HRRm patients per BICR3 Participants
Olaparib + AdavosertibNumber of Patients With Objective Response (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)non BRCAm HRRm patients per BICR0 Participants
Olaparib + AdavosertibNumber of Patients With Objective Response (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)BRCAm patients per BICR6 Participants
Olaparib + AdavosertibNumber of Patients With Objective Response (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)HRRm patients per BICR6 Participants
Olaparib + AdavosertibNumber of Patients With Objective Response (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)non BRCAm HRRm per sensitivity analysis1 Participants
Olaparib + AdavosertibNumber of Patients With Objective Response (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)BRCAm patients per sensitivity analysis7 Participants
Olaparib + AdavosertibNumber of Patients With Objective Response (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)All patients per BICR9 Participants
Olaparib + AdavosertibNumber of Patients With Objective Response (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)non HRRm per sensitivity analysis3 Participants
Secondary

Number of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

Treatment-emergent adverse events reported after treatment with olaparib monotherapy, the combination of ceralasertib and olaparib or the combination of adavosertib and olaparib. The data includes adverse events (AEs) with an onset or worsening date on or after the date of first dose and up to and including 30 days following the date of last dose of study medication.

Time frame: From screening until Follow-up 30 Days after last dose of study treatment (assessed up to 32 months)

Population: The safety analysis set included all patients who received at least one dose of randomized treatment according to the treatment they actually received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Olaparib MonotherapyNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)AEs leading to reduction of olaparib15 Participants
Olaparib MonotherapyNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any AE with outcome = death1 Participants
Olaparib MonotherapyNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any AE with outcome = death, causally related to non-olaparibNA Participants
Olaparib MonotherapyNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)AEs leading to reduction of study treatment15 Participants
Olaparib MonotherapyNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any AE causally related to non-olaparibNA Participants
Olaparib MonotherapyNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any AE with outcome = death, causally related to non-olaparib and olaparibNA Participants
Olaparib MonotherapyNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)AEs leading to reduction of non-olaparibNA Participants
Olaparib MonotherapyNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any AE leading to discontinuation of study treatment2 Participants
Olaparib MonotherapyNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any SAE21 Participants
Olaparib MonotherapyNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any AE with outcome = death, causally related to olaparib0 Participants
Olaparib MonotherapyNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any SAE causally related to olaparib4 Participants
Olaparib MonotherapyNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)AEs leading to reduction of non-olaparib and olaparibNA Participants
Olaparib MonotherapyNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any AE causally related to non-olaparib and olaparibNA Participants
Olaparib MonotherapyNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any SAE causally related to non-olaparibNA Participants
Olaparib MonotherapyNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any AE causally related to olaparib91 Participants
Olaparib MonotherapyNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any AE105 Participants
Olaparib MonotherapyNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any SAE causally related to non-olaparib and olaparibNA Participants
Olaparib + CeralasertibNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any AE with outcome = death, causally related to olaparib0 Participants
Olaparib + CeralasertibNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any AE leading to discontinuation of study treatment12 Participants
Olaparib + CeralasertibNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)AEs leading to reduction of study treatment32 Participants
Olaparib + CeralasertibNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any AE with outcome = death2 Participants
Olaparib + CeralasertibNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)AEs leading to reduction of olaparib30 Participants
Olaparib + CeralasertibNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any AE causally related to olaparib95 Participants
Olaparib + CeralasertibNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)AEs leading to reduction of non-olaparib16 Participants
Olaparib + CeralasertibNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)AEs leading to reduction of non-olaparib and olaparib11 Participants
Olaparib + CeralasertibNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any SAE causally related to non-olaparib and olaparib7 Participants
Olaparib + CeralasertibNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any AE107 Participants
Olaparib + CeralasertibNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any AE with outcome = death, causally related to non-olaparib0 Participants
Olaparib + CeralasertibNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any AE with outcome = death, causally related to non-olaparib and olaparib0 Participants
Olaparib + CeralasertibNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any AE causally related to non-olaparib92 Participants
Olaparib + CeralasertibNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any SAE24 Participants
Olaparib + CeralasertibNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any SAE causally related to olaparib9 Participants
Olaparib + CeralasertibNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any SAE causally related to non-olaparib7 Participants
Olaparib + CeralasertibNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any AE causally related to non-olaparib and olaparib91 Participants
Olaparib + AdavosertibNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)AEs leading to reduction of non-olaparib and olaparib3 Participants
Olaparib + AdavosertibNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any AE46 Participants
Olaparib + AdavosertibNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any AE causally related to olaparib43 Participants
Olaparib + AdavosertibNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any AE causally related to non-olaparib45 Participants
Olaparib + AdavosertibNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any AE causally related to non-olaparib and olaparib42 Participants
Olaparib + AdavosertibNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any AE with outcome = death1 Participants
Olaparib + AdavosertibNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any AE with outcome = death, causally related to olaparib0 Participants
Olaparib + AdavosertibNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any AE with outcome = death, causally related to non-olaparib0 Participants
Olaparib + AdavosertibNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any AE with outcome = death, causally related to non-olaparib and olaparib0 Participants
Olaparib + AdavosertibNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any SAE17 Participants
Olaparib + AdavosertibNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any SAE causally related to olaparib9 Participants
Olaparib + AdavosertibNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any SAE causally related to non-olaparib14 Participants
Olaparib + AdavosertibNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any SAE causally related to non-olaparib and olaparib9 Participants
Olaparib + AdavosertibNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)Any AE leading to discontinuation of study treatment9 Participants
Olaparib + AdavosertibNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)AEs leading to reduction of study treatment19 Participants
Olaparib + AdavosertibNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)AEs leading to reduction of olaparib11 Participants
Olaparib + AdavosertibNumber of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)AEs leading to reduction of non-olaparib12 Participants
Secondary

Objective Response Rate (ORR) (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)

The ORR was defined using BICR data to define a visit response of CR or PR, with denominator defined as number of patients in FAS. For sensitivity analysis, ORR is defined as the percentage of patients with at least one investigator-assessed visit response of CR or PR, with denominator defined as number of patients in FAS. These are summarized using adjusted response rates, which are computed with a logistic regression including factors study treatment and prior platinum-based therapy (no, yes), i.e. these response rates are adjusted for prior platinum-based therapy, which is one of the randomisation stratification factors. The adjusted response rates have been presented as a percentage of patients.

Time frame: From date of randomization until date of first documented progression or last evaluable assessment, or start of subsequent anti-cancer therapy (Whichever occurred first [assessed up to 32 months])

Population: All randomized patients were analyzed according to the randomization scheme, regardless of the treatment they actually received. Here, number analyzed reflects number of patients enrolled in each stratum per treatment arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Olaparib MonotherapyObjective Response Rate (ORR) (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)BRCAm patients per BICR42.7 Percentage of patients
Olaparib MonotherapyObjective Response Rate (ORR) (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)non BRCAm HRRm patients per BICR15.0 Percentage of patients
Olaparib MonotherapyObjective Response Rate (ORR) (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)non HRRm patients per BICR3.9 Percentage of patients
Olaparib MonotherapyObjective Response Rate (ORR) (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)HRRm patients per BICR33.2 Percentage of patients
Olaparib MonotherapyObjective Response Rate (ORR) (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)All patients per BICR20.1 Percentage of patients
Olaparib MonotherapyObjective Response Rate (ORR) (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)BRCAm patients per sensitivity analysis41.0 Percentage of patients
Olaparib MonotherapyObjective Response Rate (ORR) (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)non BRCAm HRRm per sensitivity analysis15.0 Percentage of patients
Olaparib MonotherapyObjective Response Rate (ORR) (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)non HRRm per sensitivity analysis2.0 Percentage of patients
Olaparib + CeralasertibObjective Response Rate (ORR) (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)non HRRm patients per BICR15.4 Percentage of patients
Olaparib + CeralasertibObjective Response Rate (ORR) (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)non BRCAm HRRm per sensitivity analysis20.0 Percentage of patients
Olaparib + CeralasertibObjective Response Rate (ORR) (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)HRRm patients per BICR38.0 Percentage of patients
Olaparib + CeralasertibObjective Response Rate (ORR) (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)All patients per BICR27.3 Percentage of patients
Olaparib + CeralasertibObjective Response Rate (ORR) (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)BRCAm patients per sensitivity analysis49.0 Percentage of patients
Olaparib + CeralasertibObjective Response Rate (ORR) (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)BRCAm patients per BICR48.4 Percentage of patients
Olaparib + CeralasertibObjective Response Rate (ORR) (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)non BRCAm HRRm patients per BICR20.0 Percentage of patients
Olaparib + CeralasertibObjective Response Rate (ORR) (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)non HRRm per sensitivity analysis21.2 Percentage of patients
Olaparib + AdavosertibObjective Response Rate (ORR) (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)non HRRm patients per BICR11.1 Percentage of patients
Olaparib + AdavosertibObjective Response Rate (ORR) (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)non BRCAm HRRm patients per BICR0.0 Percentage of patients
Olaparib + AdavosertibObjective Response Rate (ORR) (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)BRCAm patients per BICR44.9 Percentage of patients
Olaparib + AdavosertibObjective Response Rate (ORR) (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)HRRm patients per BICR28.5 Percentage of patients
Olaparib + AdavosertibObjective Response Rate (ORR) (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)non BRCAm HRRm per sensitivity analysis14.3 Percentage of patients
Olaparib + AdavosertibObjective Response Rate (ORR) (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)BRCAm patients per sensitivity analysis53.1 Percentage of patients
Olaparib + AdavosertibObjective Response Rate (ORR) (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)All patients per BICR18.3 Percentage of patients
Olaparib + AdavosertibObjective Response Rate (ORR) (Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis)non HRRm per sensitivity analysis11.1 Percentage of patients
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of randomisation until death due to any cause. Any patient not known to have died at the time of data cut-off was censored based on the last recorded date on which the patient was known to be alive. Here, the study patient population was stratified as follows: BRCAm patients; non BRCAm HRRm patients; non HRRm patients.

Time frame: From the date of randomisation until time of data cut-off date or death due to any cause (assessed up to 32 months)

Population: All randomized patients were analyzed according to the randomization scheme, regardless of the treatment they actually received. Here, number analyzed reflects number of patients enrolled in each stratum per treatment arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Olaparib MonotherapyOverall Survival (OS)non BRCAm HRRm patients8.4 Months
Olaparib MonotherapyOverall Survival (OS)BRCAm patients20.4 Months
Olaparib MonotherapyOverall Survival (OS)non HRRm patients9.2 Months
Olaparib + CeralasertibOverall Survival (OS)non BRCAm HRRm patients12.4 Months
Olaparib + CeralasertibOverall Survival (OS)BRCAm patients15.5 Months
Olaparib + CeralasertibOverall Survival (OS)non HRRm patients10.3 Months
Olaparib + AdavosertibOverall Survival (OS)BRCAm patients22.8 Months
Olaparib + AdavosertibOverall Survival (OS)non HRRm patients10.6 Months
Olaparib + AdavosertibOverall Survival (OS)non BRCAm HRRm patients8.0 Months
Secondary

Percentage Change From Baseline in Target Lesion Tumour Size [Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis]

Tumour size was the sum of the longest diameters of the target lesions (TLs). The percentage change in TL tumour size at Week 16 was obtained for each patient as follows (considering a visit window around the scheduled day of the Week 16 assessment): (TL at Week 16 minus TL at baseline) divided by (TL at baseline) multiplied by 100. Here, the percentage change data have been reported as per BICR and as per sensitivity analysis per investigator assessments. Here, the study patient population was stratified as follows: BRCAm patients; non BRCAm HRRm patients; non HRRm patients.

Time frame: Baseline, at Week 16

Population: All randomized patients were analyzed according to the randomization scheme, regardless of the treatment they actually received. Here, number analyzed reflects the number of patients with an observed or imputed value for the percentage change from baseline at week 16.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Olaparib MonotherapyPercentage Change From Baseline in Target Lesion Tumour Size [Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis]BRCAm patients per BICR-27.7 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 34.33
Olaparib MonotherapyPercentage Change From Baseline in Target Lesion Tumour Size [Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis]non BRCAm HRRm patients per BICR4.9 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 35.78
Olaparib MonotherapyPercentage Change From Baseline in Target Lesion Tumour Size [Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis]non HRRm patients per BICR40.3 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 76.18
Olaparib MonotherapyPercentage Change From Baseline in Target Lesion Tumour Size [Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis]BRCAm patients per sensitivity analysis-21.9 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 39.88
Olaparib MonotherapyPercentage Change From Baseline in Target Lesion Tumour Size [Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis]non BRCAm HRRm per sensitivity analysis6.2 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 34.77
Olaparib MonotherapyPercentage Change From Baseline in Target Lesion Tumour Size [Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis]non HRRm per sensitivity analysis20.1 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 34.71
Olaparib + CeralasertibPercentage Change From Baseline in Target Lesion Tumour Size [Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis]non HRRm per sensitivity analysis3.9 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 37.2
Olaparib + CeralasertibPercentage Change From Baseline in Target Lesion Tumour Size [Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis]BRCAm patients per BICR-33.8 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 37.77
Olaparib + CeralasertibPercentage Change From Baseline in Target Lesion Tumour Size [Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis]BRCAm patients per sensitivity analysis-29.5 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 35.36
Olaparib + CeralasertibPercentage Change From Baseline in Target Lesion Tumour Size [Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis]non BRCAm HRRm per sensitivity analysis-2.1 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 40.66
Olaparib + CeralasertibPercentage Change From Baseline in Target Lesion Tumour Size [Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis]non BRCAm HRRm patients per BICR4.9 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 35.72
Olaparib + CeralasertibPercentage Change From Baseline in Target Lesion Tumour Size [Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis]non HRRm patients per BICR5.7 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 40.46
Olaparib + AdavosertibPercentage Change From Baseline in Target Lesion Tumour Size [Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis]non BRCAm HRRm patients per BICR42.3 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 27.44
Olaparib + AdavosertibPercentage Change From Baseline in Target Lesion Tumour Size [Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis]non HRRm patients per BICR9.2 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 32.66
Olaparib + AdavosertibPercentage Change From Baseline in Target Lesion Tumour Size [Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis]non HRRm per sensitivity analysis9.3 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 27.46
Olaparib + AdavosertibPercentage Change From Baseline in Target Lesion Tumour Size [Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis]BRCAm patients per sensitivity analysis-23.7 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 41.85
Olaparib + AdavosertibPercentage Change From Baseline in Target Lesion Tumour Size [Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis]BRCAm patients per BICR-34.1 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 42.52
Olaparib + AdavosertibPercentage Change From Baseline in Target Lesion Tumour Size [Per BICR and Per Sensitivity Analysis]non BRCAm HRRm per sensitivity analysis73.9 Percentage changeStandard Deviation 107.94
Secondary

Plasma Drug Concentrations of Ceralasertib and Adavosertib

Plasma drug concentrations of ceralasertib and adavosertib are evaluated to assess exposure to ceralasertib and adavosertib in all patients.

Time frame: Pre-dose at Cycle 1 Day 7 [ceralasertib+olaparib] or Cycle 1 Day 10 [adavosertib+olaparib] (each cycle is 21 days for olaparib+adavosertib, and 28 days for olaparib+ceralasertib)

Population: PK analysis set included patients who have received at least one dose of study medication per the protocol and for whom there was at least one reportable PK concentration.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Olaparib MonotherapyPlasma Drug Concentrations of Ceralasertib and Adavosertib870.05 ng/mLStandard Deviation 772.05
Olaparib + CeralasertibPlasma Drug Concentrations of Ceralasertib and Adavosertib290.46 ng/mLStandard Deviation 169.07
Secondary

Plasma Drug Concentrations of Olaparib

Plasma drug concentrations of olaparib are evaluated to assess exposure to olaparib in all patients.

Time frame: Pre-dose at Cycle 1 Day 7 [olaparib monotherapy or ceralasertib+olaparib] or Cycle 1 Day 10 [adavosertib+olaparib] (each cycle is 21 days for olaparib+adavosertib, and 28 days for olaparib monotherapy and olaparib+ceralasertib)

Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis set included patients who have received at least one dose of study medication per the protocol and for whom there was at least one reportable PK concentration.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Olaparib MonotherapyPlasma Drug Concentrations of Olaparib2.97 ug/mLStandard Deviation 2.41
Olaparib + CeralasertibPlasma Drug Concentrations of Olaparib2.90 ug/mLStandard Deviation 2.68
Olaparib + AdavosertibPlasma Drug Concentrations of Olaparib3.22 ug/mLStandard Deviation 3.37
Secondary

Progression-free Survival (Per BICR)

Progression-free survival was defined as time from randomization until the date of objective disease progression or death, regardless of whether the patient withdrew from randomized therapy or received another anti-cancer therapy prior to progression. Progression was determined by BICR using RECIST 1.1. Patients who had not progressed or died at the time of analysis were censored at the time of the latest date of assessment from their last evaluable RECIST assessment. If patients had no evaluable visits or baseline data, the patient was censored at Study Day 1, unless death occurred within 17 weeks i.e., death within 17 weeks was relative to randomization. Here, the study patient population was presented as follows: HRRm and all enrolled patients.

Time frame: From randomization until date of first documented progression or censoring date or date of death from any cause, whichever came first (assessed up to 32 months)

Population: All randomized patients were analyzed according to the randomization scheme, regardless of the treatment they actually received. Here, number analyzed reflects number of patients enrolled in each stratum per treatment arm.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Olaparib MonotherapyProgression-free Survival (Per BICR)HRRm patients per BICR5.6 Months
Olaparib MonotherapyProgression-free Survival (Per BICR)All patients per BICR3.6 Months
Olaparib + CeralasertibProgression-free Survival (Per BICR)HRRm patients per BICR5.6 Months
Olaparib + CeralasertibProgression-free Survival (Per BICR)All patients per BICR5.3 Months
Olaparib + AdavosertibProgression-free Survival (Per BICR)HRRm patients per BICR3.7 Months
Olaparib + AdavosertibProgression-free Survival (Per BICR)All patients per BICR3.8 Months

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026