Skip to content

Comparison of Two Strategies for Endotracheal Tube Cuff Underinflation Prevention During Invasive Mechanical Ventilation

Comparison of Two Strategies for the Prevention of Endotracheal Tube Cuff Underinflation During Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: Intermittent Versus Continuous Cuff Pressure Control - A Randomised Controlled Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03330379
Acronym
CONTIPRESS
Enrollment
60
Registered
2017-11-06
Start date
2018-03-01
Completion date
2019-07-31
Last updated
2026-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Brain Injury, Brain Injuries

Keywords

Endotracheal tube, ventilator's associated pneumonia, intensive care unit, orotracheal intubation

Brief summary

During invasive mechanical ventilation, maintaining endotracheal tube cuff pressure (Pcuff) around 25 cmH2O is recommended for sealing the upper airways. The continuous control of Pcuff with a simple mechanical device, the Tracoe Smart CuffmanagerTM, has never been assessed. The investigators hypothesize that the Tracoe Smart CuffmanagerTM would allow a reduction of the incidence of underinflation episodes, as compared with the intermittent strategy of Pcuff control.

Detailed description

During invasive mechanical ventilation, maintaining a tracheal cuff pressure (Pcuff) around 25 cmH2O is recommended to prevent cuff over- (\> 30 cmH2O) and underinflation (\< 20 cmH2O), identified as risk factors for tracheal ischemic damage and for oropharyngeal microaspirations, respectively. Intermittent measurements with intermittent adjustments of Pcuff is the widely used strategy but, between measurements, over- and underinflation episodes could occur. Devices allowing a continuous control of Pcuff are therefore appealing. As microaspiration is the most relevant mechanism for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), the use of such devices may decrease the incidence of VAP for instance. To the knowledge of the investigators, the continuous control of Pcuff with a simple mechanical device, the Tracoe Smart CuffmanagerTM, has never been assessed. The investigators hypothesize that the Tracoe Smart CuffmanagerTM would allow a reduction of the incidence of underinflation episodes, as compared with the intermittent strategy of Pcuff control. As secondary objectives, the investigators aim to assess the impact of the use of the Tracoe Smart CuffmanagerTM on the incidence of overinflation episodes and on the incidence of early ventilator-associated pneumonia. A homogenous population will be studied for this purpose: patients admitted with severe acute brain damage.

Interventions

DEVICETracoe Smart CuffmanagerTM

In patients randomly assigned to the continuous adjustment strategy, in addition to standard care, the Tracoe Smart CuffmanagerTM will be connected to the tracheal cuff. Within the 2 days following the inclusion, all the intermittent Pcuff measurements will be collected as well as the incidence of Pcuff manual adjustments

Sponsors

Nantes University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* with severe acute brain damage * admitted in the ICU for less than 48 hours * and expected to receive invasive mechanical ventilation (through orotracheal tube with a low pressure-high volume cuff) for at least 48 hours after inclusion.

Exclusion criteria

* change in the upper airway management within the 48 hours following the inclusion (extubation or change in the tracheal tube or tracheostomy) * pregnancy, moribund status.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of underinflation episodesDay2The primary outcome is to test whether the Tracoe Smart CuffmanagerTM reduces the incidence of underinflation episodes, as compared with the intermittent strategy of Pcuff control. Therefore, a comparison, between the 2 groups, of the incidence of Pcuff \<20 cmH2O measurements will be performed. Time Frame: Within the 2 days following the inclusion, all the intermittent Pcuff measurements will be collected as well as the incidence of Pcuff manual adjustments

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
incidence of Pcuff >30 cmH2O measurements (overinflation episodes)Within the 2 days following the inclusionAs secondary objective, a comparison, between the 2 groups, of the incidence of Pcuff \>30 cmH2O measurements (overinflation episodes) will be performed. Furthermore, the incidence of early ventilator-associated pneumonia will be compared between the 2 groups.
Duration of mechanical ventilationWithin the 2 days following the inclusion
ICU length of stayWithin the 2 days following the inclusion
ICU mortalityWithin the 2 days following the inclusion
occurrence of early ventilator-associated pneumoniaDuring the first two weeks of hospital stay

Countries

France

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJérôme Dauvergne

Nantes University Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 15, 2026