Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of RBCs Derived From Mirasol-treated Whole Blood in Patients Requiring Chronic Transfusion (PRAISE)

Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of RBCs Derived From Mirasol-treated Whole Blood Compared With Conventional RBCs in Patients Requiring Chronic Transfusion Support

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03329404
Acronym
PRAISE
Enrollment
9
Registered
2017-11-06
Start date
2018-04-12
Completion date
2018-12-19
Last updated
2024-02-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Transfusion Dependent Thalassemia

Keywords

Thalassemia, pathogen reduction therapy

Brief summary

This is a prospective, multi-center, randomized, crossover trial to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of red blood cells (RBCs) derived from Mirasol-treated whole blood (WB) versus conventional RBCs in transfusion dependent thalassemia patients. Throughout the clinical study, RBC transfusion volume and frequency will be determined by each subject's treating physician.

Detailed description

Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive either Mirasol-treated RBCs followed by conventional RBCs, or to receive conventional RBCs followed by Mirasol-treated RBCs. The blood centers will collect the donor RBCs and supply the Mirasol-treated RBCs to the hospital sites for transfusion into patients. Hospital sites will order conventional RBCs as per their normal process, from their standard vendor. Blood transfusion is the mainstay of care for individuals with thalassemia major. The purpose of transfusion is twofold: to improve the anemia and to suppress the ineffective erythropoiesis. A transfusion episode for these thalassemia patients are the routine transfusions administered on a regular schedule for the life of the patient. The crossover trial design will consist of 2 treatment periods: Period 1 = Mirasol-treated RBCs followed by conventional (reference) RBCs; Period 2 = Reference RBCs followed by Mirasol-treated RBCs. Each period will include a 50 day wash-in phase (Day 0 of the wash-in = Day 0 of the treatment period) followed by 2 transfusion episodes. An end of study treatment follow-up visit will occur 2-4 weeks after the last per protocol transfusion, prior to the next standard of care transfusion. A final study visit will occur at least 60 days after the last per protocol transfusion. The primary objective of the PRAISE study is to determine if percent survival of RBCs derived from Mirasol-treated WB is non-inferior to conventional RBCs when transfused into patients requiring chronic RBC transfusion support. The secondary objectives include comparing other efficacy and safety endpoints between treatment groups.

Interventions

DEVICEMirasol Red Blood Cells (MIR RBCs)

Mirasol Red Blood Cells (MIR RBCs) derived from Mirasol-treated WB; WB will be Mirasol treated, centfifuged and leukoreduced and the derived RBCs will be stored before transfusion for up to 21 days and transfused according to the patient's transfusion schedule.

DEVICEReference Red Blood Cells (REF RBCs)

Reference Red Blood Cells (REF RBCs) will be acquired from routine use inventory and transfused according to the patient's transfusion schedule.

Sponsors

United States Department of Defense
CollaboratorFED
Joint Warfighter Medical Research Program
CollaboratorOTHER
U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command
CollaboratorFED
Terumo BCTbio
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 1\. Transfusion dependent thalassemia patient with mean 2-4 week transfusion intervals for the prior 6 months. 2\. Age ≥ 12 years. 3\. Negative pregnancy test for women of childbearing potential and agreement to practice a medically acceptable contraception regimen throughout the participation in the clinical trial. Not required if female subjects are not of child-bearing potential (ie, prior to menses onset, surgically sterilized, 1-year postmenopausal). 4\. Signed informed consent from the patient, or if the patient is \< 18 years of age, signed assent from patient and consent from parent/guardian, according to local Institutional Review Board/Ethics Committee (IRB/EC) requirements.

Exclusion criteria

1. Historical RBC transfusion requirement of more than 250 mL/kg/year. 2. Presence of RBC antibodies that make procurement of compatible RBC units not feasible per the treating physician's clinical judgment for reasonable execution of the study. 3. Prior treatment with pathogen-reduced RBCs with subsequent development of known antibodies to the associated RBCs. 4. Planned treatment requirement of frozen RBC products. 5. Treatment requirements for any medication that is known to cause hemolysis. 6. Receiving cardiac medications for heart failure. 7. Patients anticipated to receive massive transfusion, per the treating physician's clinical judgment. 8. Known HIV infection (defined as HIV RNA positive) with changes to antiviral regimen within the 12 months prior to screening. 9. Acute or chronic medical disorder that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would impair the ability of the patient to receive study treatment. 10. Participation in another clinical study, either concurrently or within the previous 28 days, in which the study drug or device may influence study endpoints or patient safety, according to Investigator discretion. 11. Participation in another clinical study within the past 3 months if investigational RBCs or treatment or drugs were received that are likely to have long term effect on RBCs function. 12. Pregnant or breastfeeding. 13. Planned concurrent treatment with other pathogen reduction treated blood products during participation in this study. 14. Patients who received prior treatment with pathogen-reduced RBCs within the past 120 days. 15. Inability to comply with study procedures and/or follow-up.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Normalized Hemoglobin (Hb AUC) Calculated From Normalized Hb Between Successive Transfusions as a Measure of Percent Surviving RBCsCrossover design with 2 treatment periods. Each period included a 50-day wash-in followed by 2 transfusion episodes for primary endpoint assessment. Expected participation was approximately 7-10 months, depending on the subject's transfusion schedule.The Hb AUC is calculated using the trapezoidal method on normalized Hb. The normalization is accomplished by dividing all posttransfusion Hb values by the 15-minute posttransfusion Hb level. The ratio is expressed as a percentage. A natural log-transform of the observed normalized Hb AUC will be utilized.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Hb IncrementEndpoint assessments was evaluated at 15 min Post Transfusion, 1 Day Post Transfusion, 7 Day Post Transfusion, and End of Transfusion Episode.(post-transfusion Hb - pre-transfusion Hb)/Hb transfused\]/RBC volume in subject at pre-transfusion
Actual Hb Level Post-transfusion (15 Min)An average of 30 weeks consisting of 2 crossover treatment periods with each period including a 50 day wash-in phase followed by 2 transfusion episodes for endpoint assessmentActual Hb level post-transfusion (15 min)

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage Decline in Post-transfusion Hb LevelAn average of 30 weeks consisting of 2 crossover treatment periods with each period including a 50 day wash-in phase followed by 2 transfusion episodes for endpoint assessment.Percentage decline in post-transfusion Hb level
Number of Participants With Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) Alloimmunization Post TransfusionUp to 40 weeks consisting of 2 crossover treatment periods with each period including a 50 day wash-in phase followed by 2 transfusion episodes for endpoint assessment and a final study visit 60 days after last study.The highest of three different normalized background ratio (NBG) cut-offs was used to quantify positivity for Class I HLA antibodies prior to transfusion as it was used to identify conversion from HLA antibody negative prior to transfusion to positivity after transfusion(s) within the applicable treatment group.
RBC Mass InfusedAn average of 30 weeks consisting of 2 crossover treatment periods with each period including a 50 day wash-in phase followed by 2 transfusion episodes for endpoint assessmentvolume x Hb/unit
Number of Antibody Screening Test With Confirmed Specificity to RBCs Derived From Mirasol-treated WBUp to 40 weeks consisting of 2 crossover treatment periods with each period including a 50 day wash-in phase followed by 2 transfusion episodes for endpoint assessment and a final study visit 60 days after last study transfusionAntibody screening was performed in a total of 8 (100%) subjects in the SS at a total of 97 intervals (Pre-Transfusion, 7 Days Post-Transfusion or End of Study Treatment Follow-up Visit).

Countries

Israel, Italy, Turkey (Türkiye), United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Nine subjects were enrolled and assigned into treatment arms. The first subject signed consent on 12 April 2018 and the last subject signed consent on 03 October 2018.

Pre-assignment details

This was a crossover study, all 9 randomized subjects were to receive both Mirasol and Reference RBCs in either period 1 or 2. 4 subjects were randomized to the MIR/REF RBC treatment sequence and 5 subjects were randomized to the REF/MIR RBC sequence. 4 subjects completed period 1, no subjects completed period 2 due to study suspension. Because no subjects completed the study, the primary endpoint was not evaluated and results are summarized by treatment type rather than treatment sequence.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Mirasol Red Blood Cells (MIR RBCs)/Reference Red Blood Cells (REF RBCs) Treatment Sequence
MIR RBCs: RBCs were derived from whole blood (WB) collected in citrate phosphate dextrose (CPD) solution, treated with the Mirasol System for WB, Leukoreduced (LR), and stored in Additive Solution Formula 3 (AS-3) for ≤ 21 days at 1 - 6°C. REF RBCs: LR apheresis RBCs or WB-derived RBCs were per site standard inventory.
4
Reference Red Blood Cells (REF RBCs)/Mirasol Red Blood Cells (MIR RBCs) Treatment Sequence
REF RBCs: Leukoreduced (LR) apheresis RBCs or whole blood (WB)-derived RBCs were per site standard inventory. MIR RBCs: RBCs were derived from WB collected in citrate phosphate dextrose (CPD) solution, treated with the Mirasol System for WB, LR, and stored in Additive Solution Formula 3 (AS-3) for ≤ 21 days at 1 - 6°C.
5
Total9

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyThe study was suspended.14

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMirasol Red Blood Cells (MIR RBCs)/Reference Red Blood Cells (REF RBCs) Treatment SequenceReference Red Blood Cells (REF RBCs)/Mirasol Red Blood Cells (MIR RBCs) Treatment SequenceTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
3 Participants4 Participants7 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants5 Participants8 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
4 participants5 participants9 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants4 Participants6 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 40 / 8
other
Total, other adverse events
1 / 44 / 8
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 40 / 8

Outcome results

Primary

Normalized Hemoglobin (Hb AUC) Calculated From Normalized Hb Between Successive Transfusions as a Measure of Percent Surviving RBCs

The Hb AUC is calculated using the trapezoidal method on normalized Hb. The normalization is accomplished by dividing all posttransfusion Hb values by the 15-minute posttransfusion Hb level. The ratio is expressed as a percentage. A natural log-transform of the observed normalized Hb AUC will be utilized.

Time frame: Crossover design with 2 treatment periods. Each period included a 50-day wash-in followed by 2 transfusion episodes for primary endpoint assessment. Expected participation was approximately 7-10 months, depending on the subject's transfusion schedule.

Population: The Statistical Analysis Plan was not executed for this study because the study was stopped prematurely. Ninety-seven subjects were planned to be enrolled however 9 were randomized. None of the 9 randomized subjects completed the sequence arms and met the per protocol criteria and as such the primary endpoint was not collected.

Secondary

Actual Hb Level Post-transfusion (15 Min)

Actual Hb level post-transfusion (15 min)

Time frame: An average of 30 weeks consisting of 2 crossover treatment periods with each period including a 50 day wash-in phase followed by 2 transfusion episodes for endpoint assessment

Population: The SAP was not executed for this study as the study was stopped prematurely. None of the 9 randomized subjects completed the sequence arms and met the per protocol criteria. Post-hoc analysis was performed by intervention, not by the randomized sequence arm. Of the 9 randomized subjects, 1 subject did not enter either treatment period.There were 4 MIR treatment periods and 8 REF treatment periods.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mirasol Red Blood Cells (MIR RBCs)Actual Hb Level Post-transfusion (15 Min)11.19 grams/dLStandard Deviation 1.44
Reference Red Blood Cells (REF RBCs)Actual Hb Level Post-transfusion (15 Min)11.49 grams/dLStandard Deviation 0.65
Secondary

Hb Increment

(post-transfusion Hb - pre-transfusion Hb)/Hb transfused\]/RBC volume in subject at pre-transfusion

Time frame: Endpoint assessments was evaluated at 15 min Post Transfusion, 1 Day Post Transfusion, 7 Day Post Transfusion, and End of Transfusion Episode.

Population: The Statistical Analysis Plan was not executed for this study because the study was stopped prematurely. Ninety-seven subjects were planned to be enrolled however 9 were randomized. None of the 9 randomized subjects completed the sequence arms and met the per protocol criteria and as such the secondary endpoint was not analyzed as planned in the Statistical Analysis Plan.~The limited data collected was analyzed per intervention, not by sequence.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mirasol Red Blood Cells (MIR RBCs)Hb Increment15 minute Post-Transfusion0.000299 delta g/dl per mL RBC transfusedStandard Deviation 0.000422
Mirasol Red Blood Cells (MIR RBCs)Hb Increment1 Day Post-Transfusion0.000297 delta g/dl per mL RBC transfusedStandard Deviation 0.000486
Mirasol Red Blood Cells (MIR RBCs)Hb Increment7 Day Post-Transfusion0.000173 delta g/dl per mL RBC transfusedStandard Deviation 0.000287
Mirasol Red Blood Cells (MIR RBCs)Hb IncrementEnd of Transfusion Interval0.000014 delta g/dl per mL RBC transfusedStandard Deviation 0.000159
Reference Red Blood Cells (REF RBCs)Hb IncrementEnd of Transfusion Interval-0.000041 delta g/dl per mL RBC transfusedStandard Deviation 0.0000999
Reference Red Blood Cells (REF RBCs)Hb Increment15 minute Post-Transfusion0.000288 delta g/dl per mL RBC transfusedStandard Deviation 0.0004
Reference Red Blood Cells (REF RBCs)Hb Increment7 Day Post-Transfusion0.000149 delta g/dl per mL RBC transfusedStandard Deviation 0.000181
Reference Red Blood Cells (REF RBCs)Hb Increment1 Day Post-Transfusion0.000362 delta g/dl per mL RBC transfusedStandard Deviation 0.00033
Other Pre-specified

Number of Antibody Screening Test With Confirmed Specificity to RBCs Derived From Mirasol-treated WB

Antibody screening was performed in a total of 8 (100%) subjects in the SS at a total of 97 intervals (Pre-Transfusion, 7 Days Post-Transfusion or End of Study Treatment Follow-up Visit).

Time frame: Up to 40 weeks consisting of 2 crossover treatment periods with each period including a 50 day wash-in phase followed by 2 transfusion episodes for endpoint assessment and a final study visit 60 days after last study transfusion

Population: Safety Set. The Statistical Analysis Plan was not executed for this study because the study was stopped prematurely. Of the 97 subjects planned to be enrolled, only 9 subjects were randomized and none completed the sequence arms. Of the 9 subjects, one did not enter either treatment period. The limited data collected was analyzed per intervention, not by sequence.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_UNITS)
Mirasol Red Blood Cells (MIR RBCs)Number of Antibody Screening Test With Confirmed Specificity to RBCs Derived From Mirasol-treated WB0 antibody screen test
Reference Red Blood Cells (REF RBCs)Number of Antibody Screening Test With Confirmed Specificity to RBCs Derived From Mirasol-treated WB3 antibody screen test
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) Alloimmunization Post Transfusion

The highest of three different normalized background ratio (NBG) cut-offs was used to quantify positivity for Class I HLA antibodies prior to transfusion as it was used to identify conversion from HLA antibody negative prior to transfusion to positivity after transfusion(s) within the applicable treatment group.

Time frame: Up to 40 weeks consisting of 2 crossover treatment periods with each period including a 50 day wash-in phase followed by 2 transfusion episodes for endpoint assessment and a final study visit 60 days after last study.

Population: Safety Set. The Statistical Analysis Plan was not executed for this study because the study was stopped prematurely. Of the 97 subjects planned to be enrolled, only 9 subjects were randomized and none completed the sequence arms. Of the 9 subjects, one did not enter either treatment period. The limited data collected was analyzed by sequence.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Mirasol Red Blood Cells (MIR RBCs)Number of Participants With Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) Alloimmunization Post Transfusion1 Participants
Reference Red Blood Cells (REF RBCs)Number of Participants With Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) Alloimmunization Post Transfusion0 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Percentage Decline in Post-transfusion Hb Level

Percentage decline in post-transfusion Hb level

Time frame: An average of 30 weeks consisting of 2 crossover treatment periods with each period including a 50 day wash-in phase followed by 2 transfusion episodes for endpoint assessment.

Population: The Statistical Analysis Plan was not executed for this study because the study was stopped prematurely. Ninety-seven subjects were planned to be enrolled however 9 were randomized. None of the 9 randomized subjects completed the sequence arms and met the per protocol criteria and as such the secondary endpoint was not analyzed according to the Statistical Analysis Plan. The limited data collected was analyzed per intervention, not by sequence.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mirasol Red Blood Cells (MIR RBCs)Percentage Decline in Post-transfusion Hb Level-4.256 percent changeStandard Deviation 5.367
Reference Red Blood Cells (REF RBCs)Percentage Decline in Post-transfusion Hb Level-3.249 percent changeStandard Deviation 5.568
Other Pre-specified

RBC Mass Infused

volume x Hb/unit

Time frame: An average of 30 weeks consisting of 2 crossover treatment periods with each period including a 50 day wash-in phase followed by 2 transfusion episodes for endpoint assessment

Population: The Statistical Analysis Plan was not executed for this study because the study was stopped prematurely. Ninety-seven subjects were planned to be enrolled however 9 were randomized. None of the 9 randomized subjects completed the sequence arms and met the per protocol criteria and as such the secondary endpoint was not analyzed as planned in the Statistical Analysis Plan. The limited data collected was analyzed per intervention, not by sequence.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Mirasol Red Blood Cells (MIR RBCs)RBC Mass Infused1445.796 gramsStandard Deviation 33.622
Reference Red Blood Cells (REF RBCs)RBC Mass Infused107.039 gramsStandard Deviation 29.583

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026