Patient Satisfaction After Root Coverage Using VISTA Technique Compared to MCAF Technique With PRF.

Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction After Root Coverage Procedure Using VISTA Technique Compared to Modified Coronally Advanced Flap Technique in Conjunction With Platelet Rich Fibrin-membrane.

Status

UNKNOWN

Phases

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT03328442

Enrollment

Registered

2017-11-01

Start date

2018-03-31

Completion date

2020-03-31

Last updated

2018-01-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gingival Recession

Brief summary

VISTA technique with PRF compared to MCAF technique with PRF to treat gingival recession

Detailed description

Comparison between two techniques for root coverage divided in two groups the first (test group) VISTA technique in conjunction with PRF-membrane and the second (control group)MCAF technique in conjunction with PRF-membrane for treating Miller's class I and II gingival recession defects. Clinical Periodontal Records will be taken at baseline, 3 months and 6 months respectively. Visual analogue scale for pain during one week after operation. Patient satisfaction record using questionnaire after 6 months.

Interventions

PROCEDUREVISTA Technique

VISTA with PRF membrane includes Treatment of recession class I and II using autologous PRF membrane

PROCEDUREmodified coronally advanced flap

modified coronally advanced flap with PRF membrane for Treatment of recession class I and II

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

PARALLEL

Primary purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

18 Years to 55 Years

Healthy volunteers

Yes

Inclusion criteria

\- Age (18-55) Miller's classI and II multiple GR width of KG\>2 mm

Exclusion criteria

* Systemic diseases Poor oral hygiene Smoking Patient allergy Miller's class III and IV

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame	Description
Patient satisfaction	after 6 months	Using a questionnaire which are designed in a dichotomous fashion (yes or no ) and calculated by percentage of answering yes. it not a scale, the following questions will be asked to the patients; 1. did you feel pain in spite of the medication prescribed? 2. did you perceive the course of healing unexpected restriction? 3. did you experience any remaining symptoms of parasethesia? 4. would you described the under taken effort as reasonable? 5. have your expectations been fulfilled?

Contacts

Primary ContactMohamed S Saleh, Master

mssaleh213@yahoo.com01001628350

Backup ContactHani M Elnahass, PhD

Nahass77@gmail.com01000252603

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026