Skip to content

Postoperative Periprosthetic Fractures in Hip Fracture Patients: Exeter vs Anatomic SP2 Lubinus Stem

Postoperative Periprosthetic Fractures in Hip Fracture Patients: Comparison of the Exeter Stem and the Anatomic SP2 Lubinus Stem

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03326271
Acronym
PPFEvL
Enrollment
2527
Registered
2017-10-31
Start date
2016-05-04
Completion date
2017-10-11
Last updated
2019-10-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Femoral Neck Fractures, Periprosthetic Fractures

Brief summary

Recent studies have indicated a high incidence of postoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture in elderly patients treated with two commonly used cemented polished, tapered femoral stems. The aim of this study was to compare the prevalence and incidence rate of PPF in a cohort of elderly with femoral neck fractures (FNF) treated with either a collarless, polished, tapered stem (Exeter) or an anatomic matte stem (Lubinus SP 2). Patients and Methods In a multicentre retrospective cohort study 2529 patients 60 years and above, with a FNF as indication for primary surgery with a cemented hip arthroplasty were included. Patients were treated either with a polished tapered Exeter stem or a matte anatomic Lubinus SP12 stem according to the surgeons preference or to the praxis of the present department. The incidence of perprosthetic femoral fractures Hip-related complications and repeat surgery were assessed at a minimum follow-up of 2 years postoperatively.

Interventions

PROCEDUREExeter stem

Patients treated with an total or hemiarthroplasty using a Exeter stem for a displaced femoral neck fracture

PROCEDURELubinus SP2 stem

Patients treated with an total or hemiarthroplasty using a SP2stem for a displaced femoral neck fracture

Sponsors

Sunderby Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Karolinska Institutet
CollaboratorOTHER
Sundsvall Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Femoral neck fracture * Treated with hip arthroplasty with Exeter or SP2 stem

Exclusion criteria

* Patological fracture * Other typ of stem

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Periprosthetic femoral fractures2006-2014The incidence of postoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures are compared between the two groups studied (patients treated with Exeter stem or Lubinus SP2 stem. The hypothesis that the type of stem affects the incidence of periprosthetic femoral fractures are studied. The comparison will be analysed using cox proportional hazards or poisson regression analysis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Riskfactors for periprosthetic fractures2006-2014Sex (male or female), age (years), ASA class (1-2 or 3-4), Exeter stem size (0-2, 3-4, 5-6) and surgical approach (direct lateral or posterolateral) type of stem used (Lubinus Sp2 or Exeter stem)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026