Skip to content

Improvement of Perioperative Care of Elderly Patients

Improvement of Perioperative Care of Elderly Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT03325413
Acronym
PeriAge
Enrollment
310
Registered
2017-10-30
Start date
2017-11-01
Completion date
2020-05-14
Last updated
2021-05-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Perioperative Care

Keywords

Perioperative geriatric care, Geriatric assessment, Postoperative cognitive dysfunction, POCD, Frailty, Depression, Physical fitness, Geriatric anesthesia, IADL, Postoperative functional status, Quality of life

Brief summary

The focus of this study is the development of a perioperative treatment concept for elderly patients, based on individual necessities and risk factors, aiming to improve patient outcome. The planned interventions include preoperative screening for malnutrition, frailty and uncalled-for long-term medication, if required followed by early prophylaxis and treatment of these risk factors, prior to or during surgery.

Detailed description

In Germany every second inpatient surgical intervention is performed on patients aged 60 years and above. These patients often offer an extensive set of risk factors such as frailty, malnutrition, poor physical fitness and multi-morbidity that may in turn lead to longer hospitalizations and decline of health and functional status after surgery. An age-related increase in postoperative complications, such as postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) and delirium is associated with a higher rate of postoperative morbidity, mortality and longer hospitalization. Early detection of risk factors and implementation of prophylactic measures is important to reduce postoperative complications and improve clinical outcomes in elderly patients. The aim of our study is to develop and verify a protocol - which allows for a systematic evaluation of risk factors and the implementation of prophylactic or therapeutic measures in order to optimize the postoperative outcome. The feasibility of our protocol will be verified in clinical practice by systematic process evaluations.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALSystematic inclusion of family members

Systematic inclusion of family members/ reference person in the perioperative process

BEHAVIORALPreoperative information

Detailed preoperative information about delirium prevention and procedures

BEHAVIORALPhysical and breathing exercises

Preoperative execution of physical and breathing exercises if necessary

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTDietary supplements

Dietary supplements if necessary

OTHEREvaluation of long-term medication

Avoidance of unsuitable drugs for elderly if possible

PROCEDURERegional anesthesia

Regional anesthesia whenever possible

OTHERPersonal aids

Personal orientation aids until anesthesia induction

DEVICETemperature management

Perioperative warming

DEVICENeurmonitoring

Using Bispectral index (BIS) to measure the depth of anesthesia

PROCEDUREPain catheter

A pain catheter will be used as postoperative pain therapy if possible

Sponsors

Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

The study has 3 arms with patients allocated to them in a fixed chronological order. For six months, patients will be recruited for the control arm. In this arm, participants receive usual care without any additional intervention initiated by the study. After finishing recruitment for the control arm, patients will be recruited for the implementation arm for six months. In this arm, stepwise implementation of the study interventions begins with the possibility of flexibly adapting them to the specific conditions. After finishing recruitment for the implementation arm, patients will be recruited for the full-scale intervention arm for six months. In this arm, all study interventions will be utilized.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
65 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age \>64 years * Written informed patients consent * forthcoming elective surgery * Time interval from inclusion to appointed surgery at least 5 days

Exclusion criteria

* Refusal of consent * Illiteracy * Poor knowledge ofGerman language * Mental disability * Vision handicap (not corrected) * Hearing handicap (not corrected) * Benzodiazepine abuse * Drug/ substance abuse * Psychosis * Parkinson disease * Emergency surgery * Planned postoperative ICU treatment * Planned inpatient stay 1 night * Cerebral surgery * Ophthalmological surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Functional abilitiesEvaluation preoperatively, 1 month, 6 months after surgeryChange in functional abilities from baseline, evaluated by Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) score

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cognitive impairmentEvaluation preoperatively, at 2-5 days, 1 month, 6 months after surgeryDemTect: cognitive screening instrument, sensitive to the early symptoms of dementia
Attention and task switchingEvaluation preoperatively, at 2-5 days, 1 month, 6 months after surgeryThe Trail Making Test A&B (TMT A&B): a neuropsychological test of visual attention and task alternation
Attentional capabilitiesEvaluation preoperatively, at 2-5 days, 1 month, 6 months after surgeryTAP Alertness: a computerized, standardized neuropsychological test for attentional performance.
Health related quality of lifeEvaluation preoperatively, 1 month, 6 months after surgeryMeasured by a 12-item short-form (SF-12) Health Survey
Hospital length of stay1 monthDay of admission until day of discharge
Postoperative complicationsEvaluation evaluation of complications at 2-5 days, 1 month, 6 months after surgeryIncidence of postoperative complications

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of delivery of the intervention components6 monthsContinuous documentation of which intervention components were delivered by the clincal staff with a standardized checklist
Experience of staff with intervention components6 monthsQualitative interviews with the clinical staff on acceptability, feasibility, barriers, and facilitators of the intervention
MobilityEvaluation preoperatively, 1 month, 6 months after surgeryTimed Up&Go-Test
Physical fitnessEvaluation preoperatively, 1 month, 6 months after surgerySit-to-stand- Test
Grip strengthEvaluation preoperatively, at 2-5 days, 1 month, 6 months after surgeryMeasurement by Vigorimeter
FrailtyEvaluation preoperatively and 6 months after surgeryLUCAS (Longitudinale Urbane Cohorten Alters - Studie) functional Index
Mental HealthEvaluation preoperatively, 1 month, 6 months after surgeryGeriatric Depression Scale (GDS) by Yesavage: a 15-item self-report assessment used to detect depression in the elderly

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 20, 2026