Family Health
Conditions
Keywords
Family Relations, Family Health, Intervention study, Social support, Intensive care unit
Brief summary
Objective: We investigated the outcomes of a nurse-led family intervention, Health Promoting Conversations, which focused on family functioning and wellbeing in families with a critically ill member. Study design: This randomized controlled pilot study used a pre-test, post-test design with intervention and control groups to investigate the outcomes of the nurse-led intervention in 17 families. Outcome measures: The Health Promoting Conversations intervention was evaluated using validated instruments that measure family functioning and family wellbeing: the General Functioning sub-scale from the McMaster Family Assessment Device; the Family Sense of Coherence, the Herth Hope Index, and the Medical Outcome Short-Form Health Survey. Descriptive and analytical statistical methods were used to analyse the data.
Detailed description
This randomized control trial (RCT) used a pre-test, post-test design with intervention and control groups. In the intervention group, there were 3 health-promoting conversations with each family after the discharge. The health-promoting conversations were held within an approximately 4- to 8-week period with an interval of 2 weeks between conversations. A closing letter was sent 2 to 3 weeks after the final conversation that summarized all of the conversations and that provided further opportunities for reflection. Baseline data were collected to assess family functioning and wellbeing in the intervention group and the control group 1-2 months after the critical illness and before the start of the intervention. Follow-up assessments were conducted 3 and 12 months after the intervention for both groups. Additionally, background data, including health history, were collected using a self-administered questionnaire that asked about age; sex; education level; habits like smoking, alcohol consumption, and physical activity; psychosocial support; co-morbidity; and risk of mortality. The latter was calculated using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (Charlson et al., 1987). The main outcome variables in this study were family functioning and family wellbeing. The following instruments were used in this study: 1) General Functioning (GF) sub-scale from the McMaster Family Assessment Device (FAD); 2) Family Sense of Coherence (F-SOC/F-KASAM); 3) Herth Hope Index (HHI); and 4) Medical Outcome Short-Form health survey (SF-36).
Interventions
BEHAVIORALThe health-promoting conversations
The health-promoting conversations
OTHERUsual Care
Usual Care
Sponsors
Linkoeping University
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE
Intervention model description
This randomized controlled pilot study used a pre-test, post-test design with intervention and control groups
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* patient age \>18 years * patient treated in the ICU for at least 96 hours * at least one family member (age \>15 years) interested in participating
Exclusion criteria
* dementia * or other severe psychiatric illnesses * drug abuse * difficulties in understanding or reading the Swedish language
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| family functioning | up to 12 months | e GF is a 12-item scale designed to measure self-reported perceived overall 15 family functioning (Wright and Leahey, 2009, 2013). Each item is rated on a four-point 16 Likert scale: 'strongly agree' = 1, 'agree' = 2, 'disagree' = 3 and 'strongly disagree' = 4. The 17 scale scores ranges from 12 to 48, with lower scores indicating better family functioning. The 18 GF was translated into Swedish and has been pilot tested in Swedish samples, and the scale 19 has shown satisfactory reliability and acceptable validity of 0.90 (Bylund et al., 2015). The 20 reliability coefficient alpha was 0.45 in this study. |
Countries
Sweden
Outcome results
None listed